As an indication of how bad the situation is, the controversy over O'Keefe came up on the last couple of episodes of the No Agenda show (1529 and 1530, I think). One of the listeners wrote in with specific first-hand information, which was relayed during the show.
He's the executive director of either one or both of the PV legal entities. He said the board was completely happy with O'Keefe and that the whole story was BS, made up out of a very minor technical legal matter.
So how to interpret this latest event? (1) The board was always compromised and they just now pulled the plug. (2) This executive director was taking pains to spread disinfo first-hand. (3) Shadowy forces leaned on the board hard enough and quickly enough to make them fold like a cheap suit.
We can also observe that "they" let O'Keefe run out a lot of line before they jerked him out of the water. Such evidence always brings to my mind the picture of someone sitting in a room monitoring events and making decisions at a couple of levels of abstraction above where virtually everyone else is paying attention (well, those that are paying attention at all).
I suppose that's 4D chess, and we just saw a move.
As an indication of how bad the situation is, the controversy over O'Keefe came up on the last couple of episodes of the No Agenda show (1529 and 1530, I think). One of the listeners wrote in with specific first-hand information, which was relayed during the show.
He's the executive director of either one or both of the PV legal entities. He said the board was completely happy with O'Keefe and that the whole story was BS, made up out of a very minor technical legal matter.
So how to interpret this latest event? (1) The board was always compromised and they just now pulled the plug. (2) This executive director was taking pains to spread disinfo first-hand. (3) Shadowy forces leaned on the board hard enough and quickly enough to make them fold like a cheap suit.
We can also observe that "they" let O'Keefe run out a lot of line before they jerked him out of the water. Such evidence always brings to my mind the picture of someone sitting in a room monitoring events and making decisions at a couple of levels of abstraction above where virtually everyone else is paying attention (well, those that are paying attention at all).
I suppose that's 4D chess, and we just saw a move.