The mere fact that they had to pay the foreign drunkard to fabricate the dossier tells us something. I mean, why not just write it themselves and say it was written by a "former career intelligence officer"? For that matter, why even write it at all? Just claim that it exists and then just "summarize" what it says when and as needed.
It tells me that all along the chain, the people involved are not totally controlled assets. "They" have to create and maintain all this pretense because "They" work through influence and corruption. Everyone just has to compromise themselves that 5% or 2% or 0.5%, but are otherwise okay.
And not to defend them but just to highlight the situation, that even goes for the normies. If this nonsense wasn't shoved down their throats 24-7, they wouldn't spew it back out. After all, they clearly aren't thinking it up for themselves.
The mere fact that they had to pay the foreign drunkard to fabricate the dossier tells us something. I mean, why not just write it themselves and say it was written by a "former career intelligence officer"? For that matter, why even write it at all? Just claim that it exists and then just "summarize" what it says when and as needed.
It tells me that all along the chain, the people involved are not totally controlled assets. "They" have to create and maintain all this pretense because "They" work through influence and corruption. Everyone just has to compromise themselves that 5% or 2% or 0.5%, but are otherwise okay.
And not to defend them but just to highlight the situation, that even goes for the normies. If this nonsense wasn't shoved down their throats 24-7, they wouldn't spew it back out. After all, they clearly aren't thinking it up for themselves.