Just as an indication of how bad it all really is: I was listening yesterday to Russell "Texas" Bentley interview from a few weeks back where he was complaining that RT was so cucked and subverted by liberals he couldn't stand to read it any more.
I mean, wow. He didn't elaborate but it put RT in a new light for me. I had been thinking, "Well, I suppose this content could be a little Russia-leaning without me being able to know any better." Now I've changed that bias to, "It's at least this bad, maybe a lot worse."
I certainly agree with what you said, but I think no one has quite put their finger on the deeper dynamics at work. I suspect, in the end, we'll be describing a type of consciousness we come to call base-level or "beast" consciousness. There are a few other strongly demonstrated phenomena we can observe:
During the pandemic, these people simply could not do enough to save their own lives. What I derived is that rather than living--as you describe it--they were avoiding dying. Big difference, right?
Also, for all their bleating about overpopulation, can you think of even one of them that jumped off a bridge as a political statement or just to help the rest of us out? Me either.
We might observe that they procreate at a lower rate, and encourage birth control and abortion and all that, but that seems to be driven again by selfishness: everyone else is ruining it for "them". It seems to me like they're too self-absorbed and self-centered to wish to care for children. And in an odd twist, they don't even act like they would have had children and then "take credit" for not having them to save us from whatever. A strange omission for people obsessed with virtue-signalling.
Finally, I've noticed that the lives of others don't really seem "real" to them. I haven't heard a single one of them mention the human cost of the conflict in Ukraine--let alone grieve it--apart from as a talking point that "Russia bad". Human life seems to them to have no inherent worth, let alone transcendence.
The thesis that is forming for me is that this all reflects a consciousness similar to that of animals. How many animals conceptualize that the world existed before them, and that it will continue to exist after they pass away? Or that anyone need bother themselves with considerations of either?
(BTW: I think that's why Greta had to ratchet "the End of the World" down to 12 years. Leftists simply could not be made to care about anything further out.)
I have a something of an elaboration on the origin and function of disinformation agents like Desmet.
I've listened to so many paid liars over the years I feel that just from the tone I can pick up on them in the first few minutes, if not the few few sentences. When I listened to a two hour interview with Desmet back when "mass psychosis formation" was making the rounds, I didn't pick up that he was a liar, and didn't see the "poison pill" in his thesis until near the end of the interview. And he wasn't pushing it, either, it was in response to a question.
So what's the category? Well, as there are useful idiots, there are useful intellectuals. That is, their research and presentations are authentic and close to the truth, but off far enough in critical ways to be harmless. Just like a stage punch is more convincing the closer it is to being a real punch without doing any actual damage.
Judy Woods and Judy Mikovits fall into the same category, although I think now Woods realizes she was incorrect, but also realizes on which side her bread is buttered. Pretty much the same goes for Robert Schoch.
The old rule, of course, is that there's no one better to spread a lie than someone who actually believes it.
If you're looking for some knowledge of the depth of the game being played here, you may be interested in the etymology of the household word "flu" itself.
It comes the study of epidemics in Italy way back in the 1500s. Long story short, they found out that the only thing they could correlate these outbreaks to was solar activity. So the term "flu" comes from the Italian phrase "influenza della stella", or "the influence of the star".
Okay so, entertaining story and maybe there's even something to it, but why would you attach any real importance to it? Well, "They" most certainly do.
I searched on that phrase in two engines and only one single reference is left to it in English. You cannot locate even the small bit I just told you. Bizarrely, that one hit is to a clemaneuverers post on this very forum:
"They" consider it important enough to annihilate knowledge of it. How many people do you think know the game is played at this level and are aware of examples? Whatever your answer is, it's now +1. Welcome.
Personally, I would discount the occurrence of a nova event--or any other such catastrophe--at any time in the foreseeable future. That would be based on two primary lines of evidence.
First, you can't really find what I would consider reliable evidence that They are making any preparations for the survival of any large number of people, even a few hundred thousand. You can any number of narratives about underground civilizations and bunker cities for the elites under mountains, etc, etc, but none of these ever seem to interlock with one another as you would expect to see with fragmentary revelations of an underlying truth.
Second, why would they bother with depopulation programs a century old if all us poor surface dwellers are just going to get boiled and suntanned to death? I suppose one could say it's just misdirection to throw us off the huge secret, but then again there's no independent evidence of there being a huge secret like that.
None of this means catastrophes haven't taken place before. It's pretty clear to me that a comet struck 13,000 years ago, kicking off the Younger Dryas and creating the Great Flood, among other things. The mainstream derides this as "conspiracy theory", yet promotes all other manner of disasters to frighten us. Puzzling.
I believe this should be read an yet another act of desperation, a last-ditch ploy to get people to believe that viruses are contagious little animalcules floating everywhere and on every surface making people sick.
Even saying that they are bioweapons has little cost. Is anyone going to get hauled into court over these "bioweapons", let alone hang by the neck until dead? No? No one?
Final note: There certainly has been something "novel" in the world the last few years, and it has killed some people and sickened a great many. There has been almost no investigation or discussion of this. Was it some wort of bioweapon, possibly one mimicking the action of a "weaponized virus"?
Final final note: The more I look at Stew Peters, the more disturbed I am by him. Obviously controlled op, but is he also some sort of evil android?
There is a passage (Revelation 21:7-8) that comes to mind when I have similar thoughts:
He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son. But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.
Now, do I think the Bible is the inspired Word of God, and that we are living in the End Times, and do I fear Eternal Damnation, and am I trying to convert people to the Body of Christ? No, none of these things are true.
But when I read those words, I think, "There is just no way I want to be one of those people in the second sentence. Sound like a bunch of lame-ass bitches. I would definitely rather overcometh. That there is the baller move."
So keep on truckin'. Or overcometh. However you want to say it it's the same thing.
It's funny (in a horrifying way) that just a handful of years ago one of the big signs that the Ukrainian puppet state was turning into the Fourth Reich Junior and tool of the Neo-Imperialists was that they caused a schism between the Ukrainian Orthodox and the Russian Orthodox churches.
And now here we are and they have turned on the Ukrainian Orthodox church itself. It makes you wonder whether the Ukrainian Orthodox church realizes the mistake it made, and that despite whatever differences they may have had with them, the Russians were never their real enemy.
In a larger sense, it makes you wonder how many people really understand that when it comes to the Dark Forces which are at work in the world, there is no allying with them, there is no appeasement, there is no separate peace. There is only complete subjugation, or annihilation.
Very few, would be my answer. Even at this late date, very few.
It's a long story, but she was there on some sort mission. Very "secret squirrel" stuff and it's still not clear what it was, but it may have involved Nancy Pelosi's laptop.
We can tell, however, it was worth very publicly murdering her to stop her. We can further tell that, two years later, it's top of the agenda for the herd of shills and their dupes you see here to convince you it was all fake.
Whoever lost the operator they sent in that day has surely not forgotten nor forgiven. That being said, the waters are beyond murky and dragging matters out into the light at the current time may not be the optimum strategic choice.
"At least that's not what we're going to call it. And new rule: you're not allowed to call it that either. We're going to begin the perpetration after all the heat blows out of the headlines."
UPDATE 20 MINUTES LATER: Breaking: FDIC to Make Good All Deposits at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank
The statement says a special assessment will be made on FDIC member banks to cover any losses and that taxpayers will not bear the cost of any losses.... The move to backstop the banks is being made to stave off runs....
See everyone? This is a "special assessment" on "FDIC member banks" in order to "backstop" them. It's not like you and me keep our money in "FDIC member banks" where such "special assessments" will in this veiled way be passed on to us.
This is a "backstop" and not a "bailout", and is a totally separate and legally distinct methodology for thievery.
Yeah, I don't think the "lab leak" can be anything other than a limited hangout. The interesting question will be trying to distinguish those who are part of the "production" from those too dumb to see through it.
It looks like they're going to hang Saint Sickle out to dry. He's an easy guy to hate. Importantly, I'm of the view he was executed at GTMO some time ago so a dead man can hardly object to being thrown to the wolves.
So the far more interesting point to me is whether they can put a Simulated Person(tm) on trial and "throw him in jail". I'd say yes, no problem, but seeing it play out adds to the surreality I already feel I'm living in.
I'm of the view that she was actually murdered, and there was something very serious going on there. Some photo evidence turned up that the guy that shot her had a real gun, while other "security agents" had fakes. She was in some crazy Air Force special ops unit and I believe was there on a specific mission.
What that mission was is as yet uncertain, but that's why I suspected everyone that should be talking more about just let it lie. Too hot to touch even now.
Does Brand speak a lot of truth and bring attention to many issues that need it? Most certainly. But also given that he's controlled opposition, what should be noted is how far out They now have to send their agents to stay ahead of the wave of awakening.
The message is getting out there, and for those able to properly interpret the evidence, this is proof of that.
This "name change" business is a very common feature of what I have come to call "Simulants". They aren't just the ordinary people we all know, nor are they completely fabricated Intelligence legends. Rather, they are combinations of authentic, partially authentic, and completely false elements.
Bill Clinton is a prime example. You may not have heard, but that's not his name. They'll admit he was born William Jefferson Blythe III. They first tell us:
Clinton has described his stepfather as a gambler and an alcoholic who regularly abused his mother and half-brother, Roger Clinton Jr. He threatened his stepfather with violence multiple times to protect them.
Then they say he took his stepfather's name at the age of 16.:Sound plausible? Not in the least. The person they tell us is Bill's biological father is completely fake, of course.
Who is his real father? There's a possibility it was this military intelligence officer:
COLONEL WILLIAM JACKSON BLYTHE, SR. OBIT
Who knows. though? They may have just poured Bill out of a vat and handed him to Col. Blythe.
I would suggest there is a subtle phenomenon at play. Roughly speaking, a portion of the population is "wired" quite differently than the rest, and they function in the world very differently than anyone realizes. Put bluntly, they are more robotic and absorb directives from those they consider "authorities".
"They" are well aware of this and implement their programs based on it. They carefully disguised it by giving these people relatively reasonable "orders". Over time, as "They" have started to lose control, they needed to issue increasingly less reasonable orders, and this is manifested as "mental illness".
So suppose you come across Lt. Cmdr. Data beating some human to death. Is the relevant question, "Why is he so mad?" Not at all. Data is as he always ways, a robot. You would ask, "Who programmed this behavior into him?"
They beat you to the punch!
Newsom Under Fire From Bipartisan Critics Over Trillions of Gallons of Lost Water
Don't miss Chapter 1 of his book "Tsar of the Slavs", where he sets out a compelling case that Jesus was born in what we call the year 1152 AD.
Prediction: Everyone disagreeing with this conclusion is in reality simply made too uncomfortable by it, and will find a personalized way to avoid exposure to the evidence. Well, this is not actually a prediction, it's just how human minds really work.