You'd have to take my word for it, but you've definitely got father to go down basically the same rabbit holes. There's more evidence to collate. One sign that you've arrived is that all conspiracies begin to coalesce into one conspiracy.
As for myself, after many years I still don't feel like I'm at the bottom, but I do feel like I'm running out of evidence that can be sensibly processed. Like, if I start reading up on channelers, I'll know I've gone too far.
Finland should be considered a state used as a tool of "Fifth-generation warfare", if for no other evidence than that the PM, Sanna Marin, is a body double and no one is allowed to talk about it.
Although both the post and the user are now deleted, you can still see a side-by-side picture along with a bit of discussion here:
Why did they replace her? What’s going on in Finland? (11/14/2022)
So when we say "Finland", we should always be careful to understand that to be "TPTB that control Finland", and that it has nothing to do with the people and nation of Finland.
Off-topic note about these Satanists: Planned Parenthood's building in Houston is a Sumerian ziggurat. It's got that weird blue color because the Sumerians were also obsessed with lapis lazuli for some reason.
PP did this because it turns out that who we think of as "Satan" was one of the Sumerian "gods", but that's a story for another day.
I noticed this same picture from almost three years ago. Look how ill-fitting their clothes are, especially the woman second from the left and the pants of the man second from the right. It's like an "old timey" novelty picture at the beach boardwalk.
Haha, they're literally on a boardwalk!
I think most of us here know "the Nazis" were little like they are portrayed in popular media and thus how they are conceptualized in popular thought. But one of the worst characterizations of these certain Ukrainians is that they are Nazis.
It's turning out that these modern day Nazis are far worse than even the monsters of the popular imagination.
There's this subtext permeating all of modern Western thought, completely unremarked and even unnoticed: no one in the world is allowed to do anything without permission of the American government.
This is one of the deeper levels on which "They" operate. Somehow, everyone knows who runs Bartertown.
Technically speaking, Biglino didn't work for the Vatican but for the publishing house Edizione San Paulo, which handles almost all the Pope and cardinals' work. He steers wide of the Church and it's doctrine, since he's aware of how people get so easily wrapped around the axle with all that. Watch any of his videos and you'll see he's is just all about linguistics and deep etymology. It'd be boring a hell if it wasn't for the actual subject matter. Oh, and when he started talking about this stuff, they flushed him right quick.
You know, you touch on the whole concept of morality, Jesus' teachings, other Biblical teachings, Church doctrine, etc, etc. As you know, the debate is endless. But in the course of this area of research, I stumbled onto a conclusion about the nature of morality and human consciousness that would necessitate a fundamental reconsideration of that entire debate.
Bold claim, to be sure, and I wouldn't make it unless I was sure. There is, as you might guess, an extremely long story that can and should be told to back it up. Guess I'll have to write a book one of these days.
Just as the tip of the iceberg, I'll mention that the penny finally dropped when I closely read the Garden of Eden narrative. Not to explain everything I found, but what I realized was that everyone else had been misreading it. And I mean everyone.
Another tall claim, but do the experiment if you don't believe me. Write down ten (or however many you like) facts about the story that you "know". Then go back and find them in the text (and technically, remember the real text is in Hebrew, not English). Waving your hands around about "what it means" is not allowed.
You'll be shocked how far off you are. If you think you got it all right, send me a copy and I'll put metaphorical red ink all over it just like in school, but no one likes that. Remember, it's not a test for a grade, it's an exercise for learning.
Strangely enough, I saw a confirmation of what I thought were my most esoteric ideas on this in the first season of "WestWorld". That was both startling and reassuring. And if you're wondering how I could possibly wrap this all back to WW, well, I told you it was a long story.
As for the 1152 dating of the Nativity, you'll find it here in Chapter 1 of TSAR OF THE SLAVS by А.Т.Fomenko, G.V.Nosovskiy. These guys are academics, so you may find it rough going when reading it. But that's just the point: it is, as we used to say in mathematics, "closely reasoned". You also find out the Shroud of Turin is real, unless you can convince yourself it's all one big coincidence!
The mere fact that it's coming out of the DOE and the FBI is enough to convince me it's the opposite of true. How could it possibly even make sense to normies that it's coming from those agencies?
We have to conclude that "They" can't get the NIH or CDC to promote their lies any more. Maybe Elon was right when he said, "It's coming."
Actually, in one of his presentations Biglino tells the "origin story" of this part of his work (couldn't tell you exactly where, though). He's a professional translator and was working for the official publishing house for the Vatican. Starting with the Leningrad Codex, the oldest complete Hebrew copy of the OT, he said, "I'd like to do a translation in the most straightforward way possible. No interpretations, just the plain meanings of the words."
As he moved along in the work, it dawned on him that the story being told was much different that everyone seemed to think. It was actually the story of the interaction of humans with a group of powerful extraterrestrial beings. Sometime later he realized that this group of beings were the same ones the Sumerians wrote about and that Sitchin studied. In short, all his work is original.
As far as Jesus, his whole message boils down to, "act morally". Interestingly, the same simple message comes out of the OT as well, but it's like no one bothers actually reading it. Take a look at Isaiah 1, for example. Yahweh flatly rejects what we would call "organized religion" and tells the people basically just to "act morally". In more modern and developed terminology, we would simply say that everyone should act in accordance with "natural law" (the moral law of the Universe, see Mark Passio). Well, none of this has anything specifically to do with God or the Anunnaki, unless you want to say that the Creator established natural law in the Universe along with it's physical laws.
Jesus (and the other Anunnaki) are definitely coming back. (Note that Satan and his faction of 200 Anunnaki never left.) Jesus says that he'll return "at the end of the age". The Anunnaki alternated rulership of the Earth by zodiacal ages, each being 2160 years.
There are giant problems figuring out when that is, though. Our chronology has been so screwed up with fake history and lies we can't tell what year it really is. Strong evidence tells us that Jesus, for example, was born in what we would call the year 1152 AD. Then we have to establish what year the last turnover was.
You can see the problem. With reasonable guesses, the end of the age is still several centuries out, but on the other hand the Elites sure seem to act like they're running out of time. So who knows? Could be tomorrow or could be a thousand years. In my book, nothing about any of that should affect our adherence to natural law.
Finally, as to where to start, I suggest it should all be guided by the questions you pose to yourself. What do you really want to know about? You'll end up branching off anyway. Like with me, I set out years ago to learn about the "Baltic Dry Index" so I could improve my investing activities. I still do not know what it is.
There's the surface story, then at one level it has a bunch of Biblical references, then below that it's the correct interpretation of the Bible, which is that it's about the Anunnaki. The humans in WW are the Anunnaki and the robots are us humans.
I had just figured out the "Bible and Anunnaki" thesis when I finally got around to watching the show. I started picking up the very subtle clues they show you, and I thought, "Well, I guess that thesis is correct or it would be a hell of a coincidence to see all this."
LIFE AFTER WACO (20-page PDF)
This is from high-level disinfo agent Miles Mathis. Tread carefully with interpretations and conclusions, but evidence may be independently validated.
Fun note for those out there studying the occultists: The Waco compound was precisely 33 miles from the front door of GWB's pad in Crawford. We can't really measure how many feet that's accurate to landmark-wise because they wiped the Mt. Carmel site completely clean.
The giveaway is that when Bush Jr. bought the place, which was already odd because it was a hog farm not a ranch retreat, they tore down the existing perfectly good ranch house and built just another regular ranch house right next to where the hog pens had been.
You've made a crucial observation. WaPo is certainly not beyond twisting the truth beyond all recognition, but they did not do so. Why?
People seem to think "They" have some giant payroll and everyone on it must do exactly what "They" say. I would suggest that it's not like that at all, but rather a network of subtle influence. The vast majority of those involved just have to be "smart" and "play ball" and compromise themselves just a little bit.
But that also makes it fragile, and when it starts to break down (or be broken down), it loses effective very quickly. The mere publication of story is a sign of it. If you were an Illuminatus, would you have ever let this get out the door? No way!
So take heart, everyone. "They" are losing and "They" hate it when we notice that.
I got the "Atlantis in Antarctica" theory from the work of Rand and Rose Flem-Ath. It works into the Richat Structure thesis in that Atlantis was a worldwide empire based in Antarctica with one of the outposts being in Mali. I've often wondered if Corsetti is a sort of limited hangout specifically to divert from Antarctica. I've never once heard him mention it, and here he is popping up on Rogan, a controlled outlet.
Part of this whole theory concerns the sudden shift of the Antarctic that hardly anyone talks about. Take a look at the Piri Reis map. Everyone talks about how the coast is shown ice-free, which indicates a warmer climate there, but even more startling is that it is shown connected to South America!
Now look at that same area on a globe. Notice that the Andes is all bent to the east, and there's another corresponding mountain range in Antarctica also bent to the east. Now look more carefully and you'll see a chain of islands wrapping around and connecting them. I suggest this was a single mountain range, bent all out shape during the shift. Who knows what other havoc took place during this time.
As for long lives, it seems as if it has something to do with Anunnaki genetics in humans. They live, I believe, for perhaps 500k years. If you look at the Sumerian King List, you'll see three distinct lengths of reign: first tens of thousands of years, then thousands, then hundreds. I would suggest these correspond to full Anunnaki, part-Anunnaki, then mostly human genetics.
So thinking about Noah, there's that very anomalous incident where his sons saw him naked. No one wants to see their Dad's dingle, sure, but what's the big deal? I'm guessing here that there was something about his physical appearance that made him obviously not a normal human. What that was would be pure guesswork.
Very, very, very long story short, it turns out the Bible is basically about some of the dealings of the Anunnaki with humans. Actually, it's only a small part of a much larger picture. You can approach it as Mauro Biglino does by just reading what's in the text and realizing it's been terribly mistranslated, and a very different story emerges with a correct translation.
IDK how much Biglino really knows about the whole story, although I can see he treads very carefully when brushing up against people's religious convictions. As for myself, I just want the truth.
So it turns out, in brief, that in the Old Testament, these are the fundamental mistranslations (English = original Hebrew = actual identity):
- "God" = "Elohim" = Anunnaki (or Nibiruans)
- "Lord" = YHVH (or Yahweh) = the Anunnaki named Enlil
Plus, it turns out that Satan is the Anunnaki named Marduk, nephew of Enlil.
The Creator of the Universe is named only once, in Genesis 1:1, which was of course mistranslated. The proper translation is, "The Father of the Beginnings created the Elohim, the heavens and the Earth".
Finally, it's much harder to discern working in the New Testament, but clearly Jesus (and probably other messiahs in history) was sent to aid humanity by one of the Anunnaki, either Enlil of Enki.
It's all a story that the word "fascinating" does not begin to do justice to, and it makes me sad that people are missing out on it. But let's be honest: very few really want to hear it.
There's just a ton of speculation out there about what the whole Noah story was about. I came across some writing that I feel is crucial to sorting out some of the issues which seems to almost be unknown:
Short as it is, it's full of what I think of as "anomalous evidence". That is, very strange statements are made that don't lend themselves to what most people like, which is a "storybook narrative" that can made to support their existing worldview. So when I find an interpretation of these very strange things that fits the very strange theories I have, I find it very convincing.
So as concerns Noah, he was said to be "perfect in his generations". Every researcher thinks that means he was of purely human genetics. But that fragment says his appearance was so odd his father believes he was sired by an angel! When the issue eventually makes it to Enoch, he says, "Don't worry about it, he's Lamech's son. A big flood is coming and Noah and his sons are going to survive it." Noah also lived almost a thousand years, so I would say there's no way he was a human like you and me.
Making it more odd is that the Flood doesn't come for 600 more years! Pretty delayed for a punishment. Other sources and even certain interpretations of Bible passages seem to indicate the Flood was caused by the close passage of Nibiru.
What makes sense to me is that the return of Nibiru could be predicted as far ahead as one would like, and perhaps it was known that this next one would be a close passage causing great destruction. As I put it together, Yahweh decided that--given the Nephilim genetics floating around causing a lot of evil and a lot of suffering--he'd just go ahead and let the whole place get reset. (Longer story, but Enoch had apparently been talking to Yahweh's half-brother, the scientist that engineered humans and who wanted to save some people.)
As to the issue of how certain I am about this, well, there's a limit to how certain you can be with fragmentary evidence. But I see over and over and over how the wildest aspects of the story I've put together lock into place with one another.
There's one such example in that fragment of the Book of Noah. Long story, but I had put together that Atlantis was an empire based in Antarctica before it shifted to it's current position, and further that it had been founded by Poseidon, who was actually Enki who I mentioned above.
When Methuselah seeks out Enoch, he finds him at "the ends of the earth". If you had to pick out where the ends of the Earth were, would you come up with anything other than the Arctic and Antarctic?
I mean, I'm decently creative, but I couldn't begin to come up with these interlocking associations if I tried. And I've found so many I refuse to think it's all coincidence.
There's another fascinating yet totally unsurprising connection here.
The Vandenberg Coalition is named for the late Senator Arthus H. Vandenberg of Michigan. His nephew was four-star General Hoyt S. Vandenberg. He was Chief of Staff of the Air Force and Vandenberg AFB is named in honor of him.
Less well-known is that he was the 2nd Director of the CIA, taking the job only six months after it was created. He left in May 1947, just before the Roswell Incident.
Roswell AAFB was commanded at that time by Colonel William H. Blanchard. Rather than being punished, Blanchard went on to a stellar career. He was eventually promoted to four-star general and served as Vice Chief of Staff of the Air Force under (guess who?) Vandenberg.
Coincidence? I think not.
I was always of the opinion it was leaked by Alito himself. I would content the op (part of the larger Quiet War) was to gauge public opinion, defuse it as an election issue, and was a sort of predictive programming. They got like two days of outrage, 90% of which was driven by non-stop media, so they proceeded with the ruling.
In actuality, the Supreme Court is like the kind of small office many of us had worked in. Nine justice have seven of so clerks each, plus a small administrative staff. Maybe a hundred people, only a small fraction of which would have had access to prepublished opinions.
Just a guess, but I'd say if such an opinion really leaked, it would be instantly narrowed down to no more than three people, if they didn't know who it was right away. Not much of an investigation would ever be needed.
I think Ardis may be of a certain class of disinfo agents.
That is, if "They" can't convince you of their lies, then they'll take keeping you away from the truth. To that end, they find someone who is honest but incorrect and promote him in various (probably clandestine) ways. Some people will then buy into the error, but in any case the waters are further muddied and that's never a bad thing.
Someone who honest but in error will ultimately fall to someone with the correct information. (We also see that once attached to an idea, people have an extremely hard time letting go, and that's a lesson for all of us.) Pure disinfo agents either dodge around, devolve into sophistry, or go with the old standby: unhinged personal attacks.
They were definitely the creator race, huge pile of evidence for that along many lines. One item I learned about recently was that the phrase "in our image" in the Bible was translated from a Hebrew word with the deep etymology "cut out from". In modern English we would say "cut from the same cloth". That's pretty damn close to "genetic engineering", keeping in mind that the people writing these things down were fresh out of the Bronze Age.
As a quick aside on terminology, we would specify that the Anunnaki were those natives of Nibiru that traveled to Earth, and the Nibiruans were the race itself. In almost all cases, though, you'll find that "Anunnaki" is used both for the members of the expedition and for the race.
The Anunnaki of the expedition are one and the same as the "Watchers" of Enoch, but that word results from a mistranslation and people mistakenly think it has something to do with their function. The original Sumerian word was I.GI.GI, which can be and was translated as "watchers". But it can also be translated as the number 600, and I firmly believe this is what the Sumerians meant: that there were 600 members of the expedition.Many confirming pieces of evidence for that.
The Nephilim, meaning something like "The Fallen", were Anunnaki/human hybrids. It long puzzled me that the Bible included breeding between "angels" and humans. Bible scholars either ignore it or just wave their hands around and claim angels can do anything. But with the correct interpretation we see the possibility: we're already genetically part Anunnaki. It also explains the giantism, which you find for specific genetic reasons in another hybrid, the liger.
The first question is what I think we know least about, and we have to piece it together from tiny clues. I think "They" told us something about the situation in the book "Childhood's End" by Arthur C. Clarke. Spoiler: an alien master race comes to Earth but carefully conceals their appearance from humans because humans will find it too disturbing. Turns out they resemble the Devil.
So if I had to bet money, I think they resemble the Devil, although maybe more reptilian. And in a boomerang, my research has indicated without doubt that the Devil was one of the Anunnaki. You have to shovel away a huge pile of incorrect interpretation of the "authorities" to get to that, though, but I think you can see how it starts to fall into place.
The giveaway here is that it comes out of the Department of Energy. So they're in charge of nuclear accelerators, viruses and petroleum? Does this make sense to anyone?
My guess is that "They" have lost control of even the incredibly corrupt HHS.
Here's something sure to be the opposite of shocking for most people here:
Christian Zionism: Cyrus Scofield was Rothschild’s puppet (Veterans Today 10/17/2020)
Cyrus Scofield, a forger, felon and trained lawyer, had been hired by the Rothschilds to write this dispensational reinterpretation of biblical events and Christian doctrine.
The basic analysis of the article seems to be way off. I stopped at paragraph 2 with the sentence:
For anyone interested in validating just this foundation, you;ll find that "Lord" in the Bible is almost always translated from the Hebrew "YHWH", and vowelized as Yahweh or Jehovah.
"Baal" is typically left untranslated. It is, in other works and usages, translated as "Lord", but it also has the connotation of "master". In the context of the Bible, Baal is most certainly a different entity than Yahweh. In fact, the two are clearly at odds.