Some years ago I picked up a factoid in mainstream reporting. The subject was the number of people who died from the flu every year. We all got used to hearing figures in the tens of thousands, maybe 40 or 50 or even 75,000. So they asked, "Of those, how many were documented by laboratory testing to have died of the flu?"
They said the answer was about 25. Not thousand. Twenty-five. If some old person felt poorly, went to the hospital and croaked, well, flu, amirite? Just check that box and we all move on.
Everything is just a much deeper and longer-running scam than any of us ever suspected.
Even what is referred to as Ukraine's war effort I think has got to end soon, weeks or a couple of months at a guess, and I base that on just two data points.
First, the professional army has been annihilated. None of the reinforcements going to the contact line are professional contract soldiers.
Second, in the last wave of mobilization, the casualty rate was 80% before even reaching the front. They were killed, injured, or deserted.
I think this is going to be a case of "slowly, then all at once", but there's no way short of active duty NATO soldiers just up and deploying into Ukraine (in larger numbers than they are already) to extend what has long been a foregone conclusion.
I think the whole ghey op was for this purpose: to frighten people away from talking about all the ghey ops. However, I also think they will never go after real people unless it is under extremely controlled circumstances.
Why would I say this? I keep thinking more and more that the "trial" was not an actual legal proceeding. Note that no one even questions that. In any real proceeding, the defendant has a right to discovery, and the easiest thing to do would be to claim that the child or children were not real people and demand all the records that would exist if they were (birth, school, health, death, etc.). Either none would be provided or there's a very good chance they could be shown to be phony.
Since Jones did none of this, nor even talked about why he didn't, IDK what further proof we need he's controlled op and this was just another sham.
I agree that this is pretty much the model, but I have found that there is a deeper underlying problem. That is, when you show people the gateway into an inner level, very few of them have any recognition of it, or of the wall, or of why they would want to get past it. I suppose that's because everyone thinks they live in the citadel.
Here's an example: I've posted replies on Reddit conspiracy many dozens of times directly in response to someone's OP linking them to a paper by Miles Mathis. His work is loaded with stunning revelations. Not one single time have I got back a reply saying something like, "Wow, some surprising stuff in there!" or "Hey, this really goes deeper than I thought!" Nor do they say, "That guy is full of beans!" Nope, just no response at all.
As an aside, Mathis is a disinfo agent himself, and the highest-level gatekeeper I have ever encountered. So he has to guide you in himself past several gateways in the image above to bring you to the door he's guarding.
Anyway, I surmise that because the information is so disturbing to their worldview, even though they are presumably "conspiracy theorists", that it just bounces off them like ping-pong balls off a brick wall and they move on undisturbed. It pains me to say it, but they're just a more refined strain of normie.
I bring this all up to point out that even the "awake" are severely limited, and that's the world we're dealing with.
I believe it's more correct to say that feminism was invented by "Them". Here's one of the originals, good old illumined Adam Weishaupt, on the very subject:
There is no way of influencing men so powerfully as by means of the women. These should therefore be our chief study; we should insinuate ourselves into their good opinion, give them hints of emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion, and of standing up for themselves; it will be an immense relief to their enslaved minds to be freed from any one bond of restraint, and it will fire them the more, and cause them to work for us with zeal, without knowing that they do so, for they will only be indulging their own desire of personal admiration.
It's a long analysis, but I believe he's really dead this time and won't be coming back.
One aspect of it is that I presume Zawahiri had returned to Afghanistan to direct Al Qaeda's destabilization effort against the Taliban. I suppose we can conclude that control of Afghanistan remains a key component of Cabal plans.
I suspect he returned to Afghanistan in the fall of 2021 somewhat visibly yet still out of the reach of the Taliban. Then in November, he dropped off the radar in Ghazni by spreading news of his own death by natural causes, then quietly takes up residence in Kabul.
Although I do not agree with the thesis of the article, you can read some of the details of his supposed demise in: The Biden Regime Did Not Kill Ayman al-Zawahiri. It's pretty fishy just on the surface that a sick and aging physician goes to a country where he's a wanted criminal and drops dead because he can't get treatment.
I should note that the Taliban and Al Qaeda are deadly enemies, although the Establishment wants you to believe that they're all terrorists and therefore all work together. This is utter nonsense.
So elements of the Taliban are working with White Hat elements of the US military, and they locate Zawahiri at his new digs in Kabul and put the zap on him. This explains two other puzzling elements.
One is that the Taliban was very confused at first about what happened, or even if Zawahiri was targeted. Well, it had to stay compartmentalized even within the Taliban because they have got to be worried about infiltration.
The other is the the Biden Administration was clearly catching up to news that was already spreading. Now they're publishing articles trying to backfill how they knew all about it, of course. Pathetic, but everyone buys it so maybe I shouldn't say that.
What a joke this all is.
I've actually been wondering if the trial is even real, as in an authentic legal proceeding. I mean, movies are shot in courtrooms all the time and the way we know it isn't real is that we see it in a movie. But what if they just showed it to us with low production values and without an opening theme and credits at the end?
And even if there was something illegal about a fake trial, can your wildest imagination include anyone being prosecuted for it? They told us they went to the Moon too, and no one has got in trouble yet.
The more you read, the more you can tell that they're just making it all up. Also, I think it's entirely pointless even trying to talk to anyone that believes any of it. But then again, everyone is also free to slam their head against a wall.
Does anyone think the US will defend against this accusation by claiming that Russia must be making all this up because viruses don't exist?
Nah, guess they'll just do the usual and act like this accusation doesn't exist.
I think the really disturbing thought is that we live in a world where virtually everyone believes viruses exist, are contagious, and cause illness. Further, unless the deep psychological warfare under which they exist ceases, we stand almost no chance of persuading them otherwise. For proof, look what it took for this intelligent, educated, and experienced guy to change his mind.
On another note, I would say there definitely was something new making people ill from about October 2019, before the announcement of COVID. People reported being sicker than they'd ever been with a very bad "flu" or pneumonia. So I would argue that a bioweapon of some sort was disseminated, although there's such a tornado of nonsense surrounding COVID I've never even attempted to figure out the nature, perpetrator, or deployment of the weapon.
I didn't see his name mentioned in the infographic, but this information on the Kursk originally comes from Dimitri Khalezov, the gray-haired man pictured in the upper left.
I consider his very long and detailed interview on nuclear 9/11 required viewing for any researcher of that topic (one of the pictures is a screencap from that interview). And it's quite little known, but he has also written a long analysis explaining in detail how Chernobyl was not an accident, but sabotage by a tactical nuke placed under the reactor (by the CIA, obvs).
Very unexpectedly, Khalezov is two degrees of separation from a current affair: Brittney Griner. In the proposed prisoner swap with the Russians, the Americans are supposed to trade the arms dealer, Viktor Bout, who happens to be a personal friend of Khalezov. In fact, Khalezov was in Thailand when Bout was picked up on orders of the Americans and tried to get him released without success.
Very small world, sometimes.
I was surprised to find out that no one in Taiwan cares about this Pelosi matter at all. And I was shocked that a long story on it was published in the mainstream. All the war-mongering was just a media creation and everyone bit on it hard.
Possible Pelosi visit elicits shrugs in Taiwan, long the focal point of geopolitical standoff
I agree with your analysis, especially as concerns Shareblue. There are many other examples of such, like the J6 hearings. Is there one single person in the US who had no opinion on the events that day, then tuned in for a few hours and thought, "OMG, it really was worse than Pearl Harbor!" No way. And it turned out even the early rating were half what they were for the regular evening newscasts they preempted. That is, half of normie newswatchers literally turned it off.
I would go the next step and say that this all indicates we're in the endgame. Who pursues an agenda without worrying about losing adherents to it? One that knows control is slipping away and if they don't score a "war decisive" victory soon, they never will.
There is a baffling verse in the Bible suggesting some function for gold in human physiology:
And he took the calf the people had made and burned it in the fire; then he ground it to powder, scattered it on the water and made the Israelites drink it.
Three entirely enigmatic statements all in a row. Burned gold? It would simply melt, then evaporate. Ground to powder? Gold is notable in that it can be pounded to molecular thinness, so it can't be ground in the conventional sense of cracking it apart. Mixed with water? As a gold panner could tell you, normal flecks of gold would simply sink to the bottom.
No one is said to have gotten ill or died from this, so it doesn't seem to be a punishment. Rather, it seems only a method for destroying their stock of gold to prevent creation of another idol.
We also know that just previous to this, Aaron collected gold jewelry and melted it in a fire to make the calf, so we know it began as gold with which we are all familiar. So what could this verse possibly mean?
The fact that conventional Biblical exegesis is entirely silent on it indicates to me that we are not supposed to think about it. Thus, it's something very important for us to think about.
Definitely loosh farming, and an authentic story.
Many will think, "Well, we can't trust that this story isn't just make up nonsense!" Okay, try imagining this story coming into being some way other than truthful reporting.
Maybe someone in the Cabal makes it up and plants it where just a few tens of thousands will ever read it. And of those, maybe a few thousand are familiar enough with loosh and sharp enough to make the connection (because it isn't mentioned in the story).
So They go to that much trouble to mislead--what, a few thousand? Why would They care at all what those few thousand think? The vast majority of conspiracy theorists are either ignorant of loosh or dismiss it out of hand. So in my view, the scenario that it's disinfo seems quite ridiculous.
I don't think there's any way of knowing the answer, but I wonder is there's even a single human being in the world who likes her as a person and enjoys spending time with her.
Not that I have any sympathy if the answer is zero, because as far as I can tell, she chose her path every step of the way.
You have to wonder what goes through the minds of that large fraction of the populace that already lives according to this principle. Are they at all surprised at hearing it being said aloud? I suspect they are not, because they were not instructed to be surprised.
The most startling of these I've ever heard is that the speed of light is encoded in the latitude at which the pyramid is located. It's within tens of meters, so close that I've wondered whether Google deliberately shifted the location slightly so it's not dead on.
If you're interested in checking it out further, I'll pose one rhetorical question and give one cryptic clue in the form of a question.
-
If someone just made up the character of Lucifer somewhere along the line as the "personification of evil" or some such thing, why would he bother saying who his father was?
-
Yahweh's city is Jerusalem, control of which was fought over from ancient times to this very day. If it's Yahweh's city, is it named after him?
Not trying to be a jerk or a tease with these question, but I can 100% guarantee that the information will mean absolutely nothing to you unless you find it yourself.
Just came across this very bad sign for Ukraine relative to the Western powers. The banner carrier for the Leftist Establishment Narrative, NPR, has been given the green light to mention less-than-complimentary things about Ukraine:
NPR Turns Against Ukraine!
Do not ask for whom the bell tolls, Elensky & Co., it tolls for thee.