If you're interested in checking it out further, I'll pose one rhetorical question and give one cryptic clue in the form of a question.
If someone just made up the character of Lucifer somewhere along the line as the "personification of evil" or some such thing, why would he bother saying who his father was?
Yahweh's city is Jerusalem, control of which was fought over from ancient times to this very day. If it's Yahweh's city, is it named after him?
Not trying to be a jerk or a tease with these question, but I can 100% guarantee that the information will mean absolutely nothing to you unless you find it yourself.
Lucifer does indeed have parents, although only his father is named. This is stated explicitly in the Bible in the original Hebrew: "helel ben shahar"
It is from the word "helel" that we ultimately derive the name "Lucifer". "Ben" in Hebrew means "son of". Thus, Lucifer is the son of Shahar.
Now you just have to figure out who Shahar is. Don't feel bad if you've lost interest at this point because everybody else in the world has also.
If you're interested in checking it out further, I'll pose one rhetorical question and give one cryptic clue in the form of a question.
If someone just made up the character of Lucifer somewhere along the line as the "personification of evil" or some such thing, why would he bother saying who his father was?
Yahweh's city is Jerusalem, control of which was fought over from ancient times to this very day. If it's Yahweh's city, is it named after him?
Not trying to be a jerk or a tease with these question, but I can 100% guarantee that the information will mean absolutely nothing to you unless you find it yourself.