Forbidden implies forwards (for) offer (bid) towards responding choice. Consenting to the suggested word "forbidden" permits others the power to forbid and permit, which in return tempts oneself to ignore being the responding choice (life) within that which nature offers (inception towards death).
Problem...is with elites that push eating
If one chooses to be part of jews; Christians; Muslims; then does one select (French élite) others to shape suggested choices in the name of oneself?
In other words...if elites are the problem; then what about those selecting them to be elite?
without any..."experts" and "interpreters" of any kind.
So without rabbis; priests and imams...
Change (inception towards death) is that which sets bodies (life) apart...others suggest internal nets to entangle bodies together.
getting the human system controlled from the outside
Ones inside consent gives control to outside suggestions by others. Take for example ones name...it was suggested by others (parents) and gives others (governments) control over one. Meanwhile; oneself holds onto the name inside, while waiting for suggested cues to respond to from outside.
no man is an island
a) "Islands in the stream...that is what we are...no one in between"... https://genius.com/Kenny-rogers-and-dolly-parton-islands-in-the-stream-lyrics
b) Being implies one apart from one another, hence intercourse generating off-spring.
c) Island aka land (life) within water (inception towards death)...
MS wants
Microsoft doesn't want or not want your father to install anything...Microsoft knows your father ignores perceivable need for suggested want.
father asked me...Shd ayh say yes?
Ignoring perceivable for suggested implies shirking ones response-ability (free will of choice) onto others. Microsoft simply exploits the shirking by offering a suggestion to shirk onto.
it's pointless
Father shirks response-ability over life-sentence onto others; son seeks end of sentence (point) yet only finds death of others.
its personal
Aka viewing a "person" as cause, while ignore that per sonos (by sound) implies effect. Once again...shirking of effects response-ability within cause onto others.
... is not about what, but who is in charge.
There WAS a perceivable charge, before anyone within can suggest who IS in charge.
To bring this back to personal...sound implies what; per sonos implies who.
Civilization is...AYH FUCKING HATE...
Aka domesticating (civilizing) a majority into conflicts of reason (love vs hate) among each other, which in return protects the foreign state of a few.
to homogenize information
Ones consent to any suggested information homogenizes ones choice with a chosen ones suggestion. Natural order (inception towards death) separates itself to generate being (life).
Our only weapon is unplugging.
a) "our" implies the plug, since nature isn't ours.
b) Free will of choice implies the only weapon each one wields...anything else has to be chosen.
According to the bible
Accord implies "coming into agreement"; which implies ones consent to the suggestion (bible) by another. Doing so tempts one to ignore coming (inception towards death) into being (life).
Both agreement and disagreement with another tempts one to ignore being self.
Quoting testament (will of mind), while judging the will of another as injury or molestation from continued acts or inconvenience (to annoy); tempts one to ignore that only nature continuously acts (inception towards death) upon each periodic reaction (life) within.
Anyway...no nation can be whole; for NATIVE, adjective - "produced by nature; original; born with the being" implies as partial within whole.
whole nations
Hebrew goy - "people, nation"...people implies aggregation of persons; while person implies separation by (per) sound (sonos, son).
In short...all aggregation is being destroyed by nature setting itself apart.
Why is Ben Shapiro seen as...
Because watching what others are showing ignores ones sight, while permitting others to define; redefine and contradict was is being shown.
Why are midwits continuously fooled by "Tech Porn"?
Being implies temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death)...ignoring this for suggested progressivism tempts a midwit to continuously follow artificial (tech) lust (porn).
It requires wit/wise/to know/to perceive...to realize that temporary needs to resist ongoing as to prolong continuance of being.
In short...all tech porn tempts one to ignore that which is for that which might be. Falling for this reduces the might of being.
discrimination laws
To discriminate implies "differentiation; distinction; separation", hence natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater).
bad
That implies ones consent to suggested moralism; shaping a conflict of reason (good vs bad).
Nature discriminates; those within tempt each other together within conflicts of reason
Great post. A little tidbit from the 1700s...look into the original depiction of "Hanswurst".
"Father, why hast thou forsaken me?"
Forsake aka "forwards seeking" implies the opposite direction of offspring (son) aiming at origin (father).
was hoping...
...hoping for a suggested outcome; while ignoring perceivable origin.
dying on the cross
Cross implies line drawn through another...being implies within (life) line (inception towards death); while set apart from one another.
Ones consent to the suggestion of another permits others to draw line through self, while nailing one to the cross.The suggested information by others becomes the nail binding ones hands to the cross, when holding onto it.
Perceivable inspiration (father inspiring son) goes through oneself and cannot be held onto. One needs to bear the cross; while being moved ACROSS...
the kikes
Ones consent to suggested the-ism tempts one into a conflict of reason against others aka circular reasoning aka kikel; kike; circle.
who's actually funding
Current (inception towards death) is the foundation of being (life)...if one chooses to ignores this; then a chosen one becomes the foundation for suggested currency.
Actual (perceivable current) or fictitious (suggested currency)...a choice tempting one to ignore foundation for fundamentalism.
need a warrior leader
War misleads one side against the other...others suggest war disguised as "reason/logic" to tempt one to choose a side.
insurance
Aka being within (life) assurance (inception towards death)...hence it being called "life insurance".
A living one paying insurance fees to get a promise from another about dying...it's a confidence scheme.
Why did Instagram replace tumblr and Pinterest?
If one pins interest (pinterest) one others until they tumble (tumblr); then others become prone to change (insta) towards anger (gram).
how the jews managed to make it popular
POP'ULAR, adjective (Latin popularis) - "suitable to common people" aka dumbing suggested information down for amassed goyim.
One perceives birth as "now". One cannot perceive birth as "when"...only others can suggest it, hence natal charts being based on hearsay. How could one map self out, while leaving origin to others?
what you sound like
Sound differentiates. It's oneself choosing to ignore this for things "sounding" alike.
You are being tricked to compare things alike; which distracts you from being different matter inside same motion. Moving differences implies perceivable inspiration, which is what ones senses perceive as input...unless ignored.
SOUND, adjective (Latin sanus) - "entire; unbroken"....oneself implies the broken partial within, which enables self discernment; which one cannot get from others.
a) If one exists at a side, then one couldn't wield choice from within a balance (need/want). Notice that perceivable need (hunger; thirst) requires constant adaptation; and that suggested want (appetite) tempts one to want more, and more...
b) Others suggest BUT - "besides" as the inversion of "being center".
a) IDE'A, noun - "that which is seen"...whatever others suggest about seen (perceivable) implies idealism.
b) How could one see "no; not; nothing"?
c) HAVE, verb - "to possess"...possession tempts one to ignore being (life) within procession (inception towards death).
Sleight of hand: demonic possession implies holding onto, while ignoring DAI (divider) MON (provider) aka that motion divides into momentum; which provides matter.
d) Notice that one suggesting "you" towards self establishes a division; a conflict...
a) BA'AL of consciousness...
b) If ones souROUNDing is round like a ball; then what about the corners of consciousness?
c) Does "degree" exist outside ones consciousness?
d) Does WE (plural) are all ONE (singular) contradict itself?
e) What if separated implies from oneness (whole) into ones (partials), and what if divided (Latin dvis; duo; two) implies one taking on/burdening self with another one?