usual bullying
- USUAL; adjective - "current"... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=usual
- BULL; verb - "push through roughly"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/bull#etymonline_v_46834
USUAL (inception towards death) BULL (life)...a TRANS-formation.
prevention is the best medicine
a) Can being (life) prevent origin (inception towards death)?
b) Can action (tion) be prevented by reactions within?
c) PRE (before) VENIRE (to come)...does origin (inception towards death) exist before being (life) comes to be?
i needed a few
One (perception) needs all (perceivable), while being tempted (suggestion) to want from other ones.
added/change
Addition within change implies ones inception; subtraction within change implies ones death. Only change (inception towards death) adds and subtracts (life).
left out a whole
Whole implies out for each partial within. A whole cannot be left out...out of what? More than whole?
added/changed...I said to fix that
a) How could one fix change without contradicting the implied motion thereof?
b) Could affixed (suggested words) tempt one to ignore ongoing (perceivable sound)?
i said to fix...they just made it look stupid
STUPID; adjective - "stop; cessation of motion"...isn't that what affixing change implies?
untrustworthy
a) Does nature suggest one to add an affixed worth to trust? Does nature require trust from those within?
b) What if nature implies whole (all perceivable value) generating partials (ones evaluation by perception)...would that require trust?
c) What if others suggest values, while tempting ones free will of choice to consent aka to trust them?
"gibberish"?
GIBBERISH; noun - "language of rogues and gypsies" aka rogare (to ask) + gyp (to cheat)
Perceivable sound implies natural; suggested words imply artificial...the latter asks for ones consent, which when given, cheats one within former.
Nature doesn't ask any questions, nor does it require any answers...it simply implies solution (inception towards death) to each problem (life), hence cheating aka escheat - "that which falls to one".
site is the op
a) Suggested site or perceivable sight...ones free will of choice.
b) Sight unravels ones perception within all perceivable, while a site tempts many to focus on suggestion by few aka manifold. Ones consent permits few to fold; bind; twist many into a world wide web.
c) Operation aka OP (work) RATION/RE (reason) TION (action)...action (work) generates reactions (workers)...reason tempts workers against each other, while striking.
Furthermore...action (work) sets reactions (worker) apart from one another, while few suggest many "workers unite".
they are currently
Current (inception towards death) sets vessels (life) apart from one another...suggested pluralism (they) tempts consent together.
the west
a) WEST, noun - "a decline or fall, departure. In elements, it coincides with waste"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/west
b) Being implies in-between N (orth) E (east) W (est) S (outh) aka center (perception) within circumference (perceivable) aka wind (inception towards death) rose (life), which has been inverted into compass rose (rising by passing together).
Now get those locals to dig up the fields for planting of potatoes and the next orchestrated "great hunger" doesn't come as a surprise...then again...getting the locals out of the pubs aka away from the "greater thirst" hasn't been an Irish tradition so far.
False knowledge
a) Reason (true vs false) can only be applied within edge (life) of known (inception towards death). In other words...only within perceivable can one reason about suggested.
b) Know implies need; true vs false implies want vs not want, while ignoring need.
Nature doesn't offer true or false; only change. Those within wield the free will of choice to ignore change (perceivable) while reasoning (true vs false) over definitions (suggested), hence definite/affixed.
false light that is identified with
a) Light implies motion; being within spectrum of visible light implies being matter within momentum of motion.
b) "identified" implies identical/same; which tempts one to ignore being different from one another.
Spectrum implies differentiation within same light aka into rays/race of light.
c) "with" implies within and being within implies differentiated from outside...not identical.
Sophia, Isis, Ishtar, Venus and Lucifer
Aka words; names; nouns; definitions...tempting one to hold onto aka affix words, while ignoring to be within motion of sound.
Consenting to a definition implies "deaf phonetician" aka one who ignores sound aka one who ignore to be within sound (in sanus) and by sound (per sonos).
See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy
PHI (to love) LO (logic/reason) SOPHIA (knowledge)...reasoning (love vs hate) tempts one to ignore implication (if/then) of moving knowledge. Reason keeps ones mind captive in conflict against another, and it's ones free will of choice to ignore implication (perceivable) for reason (suggested).
empty deceit
a) De (divide) capere (to take) implies ones consent to take suggested; which divides one against another within a conflict of reason.
b) All perceivable implies full; while ones consent to suggested implies empty, hence ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable.
according to human
hue-man (color of man) implies a setting apart of light into spectrum, while accord (coming into agreement) implies a binding together of that which nature set apart.
Ones accord permits another to pull ones strings.
according to the elemental
Again...ment/mind within el/all implies a setting apart; which accord/agree-ment contradicts.
spirits of the world, and not according to Christ
a) Anointed one (christ) implies each one set apart from one another, while breathing (Latin spiro; spirit) within whole aka breath of all through each one.
b) World/vault implies matrix/mother/momentum for each being set apart within, hence father (motion) mother (momentum) off-spring (matter).
c) Suggested nihil-ism (not) tempts one to ignore/de-nial perceivable for suggested.
Can you describe the spirit of "nothing"? Or how about this...how does one christen/baptize "nothing"?
one and the same
a) Only within sameness (whole) can ones (partials) be different from one another.
b) Few suggest progressivism (and; thereupon, next) + theism (the) to tempt many to consent alike, hence domesticating others to behave the same, while ignoring to be different from one another.
a) If one googles at another, one puts the goggle onto self.
b) "They Live" suggests the struggle against another to wear the glasses/spectacles/goggles...this tempts one to ignore that suggested implies the goggle one willingly wears within perceivable.
Ones real struggle is within self to take off what others suggest one to wear.
a) Gnostic/gnostos/gno - "to know" implies ones perception, which suggested gnostic-ism tempts one to ignore.
b) Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies religion (Latin religio; to bind anew), which in return tempts one to ignore being free will of choice.
c) Deceit aka de (divide) capere (to take) implies ones free will of choice taking suggested by consent, which divides one within a conflict of reason against others.
d) Doctrine/doctor aka docere (to show) + dek (to take) implies others showing suggestions and ones consent taking it.
Furthermore; phonetically a doct-or aka docked oar implies a vessel restricted from steering aka ones free will of choice binding self to another.
deleting connection to god
a) Delete implies letting (let) divide (de) aka by ones free will of choice.
b) DE-lete + CO-nect aka divided against + together with...that implies each conflict of reason.
c) "to god" implies suggested progressivism (to) and theism (god) tempting one to ignore perceivable...being (life) within (inception towards death) aka being moved towards, while within origin.
d) CON (together; with) NECTERE (to bind) TION (action)...actions sets reactions free (will of choice) from one another. It's ones consent to the suggestion of another which binds anew aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew).
e) Calling TION (action) "god" binds ones re-action to suggested theism, hence making one a follower, while ignoring that action (inception towards death) inspires reactions (life) to resist.
Action doesn't require a name...it implies a putting (life) into motion (inception towards death), hence implying both cause (ongoing loss) and effects (temporary growth) aka both all (whole) and each one (partial) within.
Bonus...action/accioun - "cause or grounds for a lawsuit" hence legal action. Natural law implies action; crime/charge/infraction implies those within natural law aka each frag-ment (partial mind).
That lawsuit implies "armor of god" aka "cast off the works of darkness (suggested information) and put on the armor of light (perceivable inspiration).
Steiner prophesied
a) Pro (forwards) phanai (to speak) tempts one to ignore being forwarded within sound...consenting to the suggestion of former tempts one to follow (dissonance); while adapting to latter inspires one to resist (resonance).
b) Rudolf aka hruod-wolf (fame wolf)...attributing to another tempts one to ignore self aka Steiner/st-ein/ ST-ONE (ones strength).
Watch out for the wolf (rudolf) within sheep's clothing (steiner)...
c) Who's using STEIN to clothe self for fame/infamy among others?
d) For those with eyes to see...Hans Fallada - "Wolf Among Wolves"
claiming its a scientific...
Notice the "aim" in claim...suggestion aims at consent. If one calls a suggestion a claim; then one consented to the suggested, hence directing aim by becoming target.
Meanwhile; science/scio - "to know" implies ones perception, which doesn't have to be aimed; since it exists within all perceivable.
truth is a mixture of the two
What if all is one? How could whole be more than one? To mix ones together implies within/during/in response to/transmuted out of all...
math proves other dimensions
a) How does one DI-vide minds/MENS within act-ION? By tempting ones consent to react to another ones suggestion, which establishes a division called "reason".
b) Math/meth/mad/me - "mowing" aka cutting down... https://www.etymonline.com/word/math#etymonline_v_43762
What's the aftermath of claiming oneself as ME? Branding everyone else as YOU (phonetic jew).
c) ma-the-matic aka matter-theism-magic
c) If all implies one, then addition (inception); subtraction (death); multiplication (intercourse for off-spring) and division (whole into partials).
Problems (life) within solution (inception towards death)...many are being tricked by few to "solve problems" instead.
How do we know
a) Knowledge implies each ones perception within all perceivable...suggested pluralism (we) tempts perceiving singular (one) to ignore self for others.
b) Try to describe a "we" in nature without ignoring each "one" thereof..
c) You and me implies each one of us...suggested "you" + "me" + "us" tempts ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
for all intent and purposes it indeed looks flat
a) Intended purpose implies aiming at end...can life perceive its beginning (inception) or end (death)? What does ones (not other ones) inception and death look like?
Meanwhile, life being processed from inception towards death implies a flat-line...which one perceives as moment-um. Now what does momentum look like?
b) Indeed implies in-deed aka life within a transaction from inception towards death...ignoring this for the suggestions by another tempts one in-debt.
Income does not match consumer costs
a) All perceivable comes into each ones perception...what others suggest was already coming in, while tempting ones consent to ignore origin.
b) The cost of whole (holo-caust) implies each partial within burning (life) out (inception towards death).
c) Match (one of a pair, an equal) implies suggested dualism tempting one to be different from one another within the same whole.
Match (stick for striking fire) implies those suggesting dualism hiding dual meaning within their suggestions; while tempting burned offerings.
economy is patterned for failure
a) ECO (environment and man's relation to it) LOGY (reasoning about suggested) NOUN (name)
Ones consent relates to a suggested name mentally, which in return establishes conflicts of reason.
b) Notice that eco-nomy conceals logy, from those who ignore implication...if eco; then ecology. Also; consenting to suggested puts another at ones center, hence eco-centric.
That's why if ones choice selects chosen ones suggestions; then ones center (choice) becomes off-balance.
c) Consenting to a suggestion implies "recording" it, hence being tempted into pattern (suggested information) recognition (consent). From the perspective of those suggesting this implies domestication of those consenting.
there's no reporting the true state of things
Because; if one reports aka responds to port; then one ignores vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death) aka evaluation (matter) steering within value (motion).
antisemitism
SEM (one) implies apart from one another. If one seeks togetherness (we) over apartheid (one); then one becomes anti-sem aka against one and for another.
Goebbels was about "Lügenmaul stopfen" (stuffing lying mouth)...that doesn't work. A lie implies ones contradiction of a truth others are stuffing themselves with. Only letting go of truth prevents lies to be used as contradictions.
Nature implies perceivable change (need)...those within suggest concord (truth) and contradict (lies) to distract from that.
Holding onto (words) during motion (sound) contradicts itself. Few exploit this by tempting many to hold onto (truth); while using contradiction (lies) against them.
in no way could be named "eternity"
a) Eternal way (inception towards death); temporal wanderers (life).
b) Eternal sound (perceivable); temporal words (suggested)
It's ones consent to any suggested name, which tricks one to ignore eternal (perceivable) for temporal (suggested), while permitting others to speak "in the name of (in nomine)"...
is a lie
If one ignores perceivable sound (moving) for suggested words (affixed); then ones choice establishes truth (want) vs lie (not want) reasoning.
carthage
a) "cARThAGE" aka artificial age.
b) Latin Carthago from Phoenician quart khadash - "new town"...town/tun - "enclosure".
Suggested "new town" inverts perceivable "now opening" aka momentum/moment/now (inception towards death) opening matter (life).
jews following god
Hebrew yisra'el "he that striveth with God"...the opposite of following implies resisting (life) velocity (inception towards death) aka struggling to sustain self aka striving (ones growth) within god (all loss).
What if only gentiles follow jewish suggestions by consent, while ignoring to resist perceivable?
leaders
Nature leads from inception towards death...living within does not imply following along.
pushing back
If ones consent binds one to the suggestion by another; then how could one push back without tethering?
unreliability of AI
RE-sponse makes one LIABLE to suggested artifice...UN (not; nothing) implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing).
Liable implies being able to lier, liier "to bind" aka to bind self by consent to suggestions by another.
Presenting perspective proves problematic
Hence sight being SPEC; special; particular to each one.
people perpetuate preferred propaganda
Propaganda implies suggested information; preference implies consenting choice.
persuading peers passively
Active (inception towards death) generates passive (life)...persuasion (temptation) and deterrence (resistance) simultaneously, hence those within having a free will of choice.
Pondering prevents partiality
Pondering upon suggestions of another tempts ONE to ignore self...one remains partial within whole; yet within the collectivism by another...by a chosen one.
Pondering prevents partiality, promoting perceptive patience
Pondering over outcome increases PATIENCE, noun ([Latin patientia, from patior, to suffer) within origin.
Persistently processing plausible premises
a) If velocity (inception towards death) generates resistance (life); then persistent frequency can be mimicked to distract resistance from frequenting free will of choice to resist.
b) A suggested premise sends on a mission towards, which in return tempts one to ignore being (life) send (inception towards death)...which isn't plausible/agreeable/acceptable unless one wants to destroy self.
practicing principled perseverance
Principle (inception) generates perseverance (life)...during that one is being tempted to follow suggested theory; while resisting perceivable praxis.
possibly pioneering profound progress
a) The way (inception towards death) doesn't need to be prepared (pioneered) for others...it processes each potential within naturally.
b) Suggested "profound" tempts one to ignore that foundation (all) exists before being (one) comes to be within.
That's how easy revisionism is...just shaping suggested information by free will of choice. The issue...tempting others to consent to it.
What I do is way harder for others...resisting suggested information, while adapting to perceivable inspiration.
a) Being implies in-between (life) sides (inception/death)...not either (one of two); but odd (ones) within even (oneness).
b) Tax implies a burden (suggested information) taken on (consent) by oneself from another...meanwhile; nature (inception towards death) sets one free (life) aka relieves all burdens.
c) Suggested "our" (plural) tempts perceiving "one" (singular) to ignore self for holding onto others, hence burdening self with a tax.
d) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) relief (life)...taking on artificial suggestions permits others to tax one with burdens to carry.
e) "don't" implies doing nothing aka the suggested inversion of being done within everything perceivable. Furthermore...nothing aka suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempts one to de-nial perceivable.
f) "to" aka towards implies motion generating momentum (balance) for matter (choice) within aka ones free sight in-between dominating sides.
Endless discussion over the origins.. never a single discussion about the tests.
a) Test/teks (to weave) + discuss aka dis (apart) quatere (to shake)...nature shakes apart; those within weave together.
All perceivable shakes apart each ones perception, which establishes the opportunity for each to find ones footing aka ones self discernment within all.
Ones consent to the suggestions of another, while ignoring perceivable; permits others to weave within ones mind/memory, hence test-a-ment (weaving a mind).
b) Endless cause (inception towards death) generates limited effects (life).
c) Origin/oriri (arise)...only during fall (inception towards death) can one arise (life).
Sleight of hand: "second coming" aka coming by second/seco (to divide) or "resurrect/reanimate" aka responding to being erected/animated.
a) Aka suggested social-ism tempting ones consent (creed/credit) to form (stem) together (sys).
b) CREDIT; noun (French crédit; Italian credito; Latin creditum) - "belief, faith, trust, loan, thing entrusted to another".
c) Nature sets each ones free will of choice apart from one another...trusting others isn't needed; it's wanted...want (temptation) ignores need (resistance).