One (perception) needs all (perceivable), while being tempted (suggestion) to want from other ones.
added/change
Addition within change implies ones inception; subtraction within change implies ones death. Only change (inception towards death) adds and subtracts (life).
left out a whole
Whole implies out for each partial within. A whole cannot be left out...out of what? More than whole?
added/changed...I said to fix that
a) How could one fix change without contradicting the implied motion thereof?
b) Could affixed (suggested words) tempt one to ignore ongoing (perceivable sound)?
i said to fix...they just made it look stupid
STUPID; adjective - "stop; cessation of motion"...isn't that what affixing change implies?
untrustworthy
a) Does nature suggest one to add an affixed worth to trust? Does nature require trust from those within?
b) What if nature implies whole (all perceivable value) generating partials (ones evaluation by perception)...would that require trust?
c) What if others suggest values, while tempting ones free will of choice to consent aka to trust them?
One (perception) needs all (perceivable), while being tempted (suggestion) to want from other ones.
Addition within change implies ones inception; subtraction within change implies ones death. Only change (inception towards death) adds and subtracts (life).
Whole implies out for each partial within. A whole cannot be left out...out of what? More than whole?
a) How could one fix change without contradicting the implied motion thereof?
b) Could affixed (suggested words) tempt one to ignore ongoing (perceivable sound)?
STUPID; adjective - "stop; cessation of motion"...isn't that what affixing change implies?
a) Does nature suggest one to add an affixed worth to trust? Does nature require trust from those within?
b) What if nature implies whole (all perceivable value) generating partials (ones evaluation by perception)...would that require trust?
c) What if others suggest values, while tempting ones free will of choice to consent aka to trust them?