Ok... Well you're lying. And either way you've started a pointless argument just to end up agreeing with everything I said.
Moron.
Have you ever taken antibiotics?
have you ever had an infection?
it can only skew the average if most people are kept alive longer than they would have otherwise been.
So yeah, The fact that you made it out of childhood is not trivial to this conversation.
So then genius, If most of us have not been saved from things that would've otherwise killed us in the past, then explain how the average life expectancy is drastically higher now.
You've never had an infection? Or a fever? Or any kind of surgery whatsoever?
Yes, childhood mortality heavily skewed past life expectancies.
However, that being said I'm in my 30s and I've already had several conditions that would've killed me if medical science hadn't developed treatments. I'm sure most of us have.
Stuff like infections, broken bones, and requiring surgery on my wisdom teeth.
Hearsay. Was the accusation even made?!
Cite the primary source. Let's hear it from Jennifer Guskin instead of Stew Peters.
Copy and paste some "simple data" from a spreadsheet into this same AI bot and ask it to sort it. Then go down the list manually counting all the numbers it left out and changed.
Youre trying to do research using a bot trained from Tumblr and reddit. Its not Mr Data from Star Trek. Not even close.
BTW... as others have pointed out, WW2 was not contained to just Germany. So even if these numbers were 100% accurate, You're still looking at the wrong data.
Lastly these numbers you present show a 92% decrease in the Jewish population from 1933 to 1950.
So where did 92% of the Jews go if there was no genocide?
"AI generated answer" = garbage answer.
Yes.... That was already covered. Whats your point?
That answer tells me exactly how safe you think it would be.
lol.
HIV blood injection does not always cause disease. There is no scientific proof that HIV cause AIDS.
Do it then. Inject yourself with HIV.
show me a tofu dreg construction project in America then
Why would anybody go to China knowing that the food they're going to eat while they're there will be fished out of the sewer?
Hmmm... I wonder if they used Chinese building materials on that leaning tower in San Francisco.
Just the gutter oil alone is reason enough to never step foot in that country, let alone the fact you're taking a chance with your life just crossing a bridge or being near a building.
Xi? Is that you?
Reading your comment is like someone who believes that if you can't accurately count the number of dead in a continental wide genocide, then obviously the real death toll must be zero and the genocide never happened.
Even if they stole all the best designs in the world, they would just pillage their own production process to the point where everything is broken right off the factory line, or worse functions just long enough to blow up in their soldiers faces.
In these construction project videos they are building skyscrapers, and the workers can just grab inch thick rebar and break it in half with their bare hands.
Cause I guess someone somewhere down the line is watering down the metal to skim the difference in cost. Then they do it with the concrete where it crumbles like dry mud. Everywhere..
By the end of the project it looks nice for a month, collapses and kills a thousand people, and then the same company gets the contract to rebuild it and start the skim all over again.
Serpentaz calls it "destructive construction" and that's exactly what it is. Everyone but maybe 1 guy at the top would be better off just leaving the lot empty and building nothing at all.
That is not trivial at all. That is life and death. lol.
They are not isolated. They never have been and never will because they don it exist.
When you say they haven't been isolated, do you actually mean they haven't removed from their natural environment, killed on a petri dish, brought back to life, and re-establish in living cells once more?
Gee.... I wonder why that hasn't happened.
They see that the cells start to die and these tiny little things start coming out of them. News flash sweetheart: all of that stuff was already in the cell, and the cell died
Then explain why they see DIFFERENT tiny little things coming out of those cells depending on which disease the person is manifesting?
Why do cells from people with HIV produce different tiny little things than cells from people with the flu?
Bro.... If i thought you were a stupid retarded idiot, I wouldn't hesitate to tell you. I know I've told many others that before.
I'm not here saying everything modern science thinks about viruses is true. I'm not even gonna pretend that I sit around reading books and doing studies on viruses. I'm sure a lot of new discoveries will get made that change a lot about what we think we know. I hope so at least.
But with this virus denial argument, I'm just going off some common sense that everyone knows contagious diseases are real.
In order for this argument to have merit, they shouldn't be real.... But they are.....
And until someone explains to me how a disease can still be contagious without a self replicating pathogen causing it, common sense is gonna tell me to just trust medical science on this one, because your explanations are severely lacking.
I'm starting to understand what people mean when they call it a "paper tiger".....
Their whole society is just like their skyscrapers. Big, imposing, and modern looking, but cannibalized from corruption to the point where it will crumble under your feet at the slightest push.
When world war 3 finally pops off, China's gonna nuke themselves because someone skimmed all the missile fuel for a little bit of extra profit, and they only have a range of 20 miles. Just enough to fly over the horizon and fool the inspector who certifies them.
Since you're a 'logic' guy you should recognize that at best the virus hypothesis is not disproven.
Okay bro... Again not wanting to sound like a broken record, but please study epistemology.
Go to youtube and just watch some videos on "street epistemology" and "the Socratic method"... That's a good place to start. Pretty entertaining too most of the time.
One of the first topics you'll come across is how to accurately assign the burden of proof and what it really means when it's not met.
Your statement here is an inversion of the burden of proof.
Who cares? The issue is -- has the viral model been replicated via experiment... no... only 'epidemiologically'.
Yes... The viral model gets replicated every time you go to costco healthy, and get sick 3 days later because one of the 2,000 people you were around sneezed near you.
Yes.... It's totally trivial and easy to prove that a viral infection can pass from person to person. You can deny it's a virus causing the illness, but you can not deny that the illness is contagious.
You can do one better. You can give us full blood transfusions! Go ahead -- look into the evidence of your 'experiment'.
I have.... Turns out it's bad for your health to receive HIV blood...
Who would've thought?!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contaminated_haemophilia_blood_products
Thanks.