a) A sleight of hand...master (mister) being (be) astute (ast) aka growth of self discernment.
b) Weird/wyrd/wert/wer - "to turn"...balance directs choice; choosing to turn imbalances choice.
How to cause
By suggesting effect (perception) to ignore cause (perceivable).
How to cause a war
By suggesting sides to tempt choice off-center.
How to cause a civil war
By tempting private (ones perception within all perceivable) to consent to civil (suggested by another).
AI losing
Who's affected by artificial loss? If gentiles are $35 trillion in debt, then does a jew experience artificial loss?
AI imploding
Can artificial implode without ignoring that natural implodes (Inception towards death) explosions (life)?
Open AI
If artificial implies ignorance of natural and intelligence implies standing under (understanding) another, then how could ignorance and submission be viewed as open? Open to deception?
won’t have to vote anymore
To vote/vow implies a preference of choice aka a wanted desire in opposition to needed response-ability. Choice needs to adapt to balance, no matter which other choices it prefers.
if he wins...
...then he was selected a chosen one by each ones choice avowing.
is...real
Any suggested answer ones quest waits for implies fiction. Reality implies the perceivable origin one ignores when waiting for suggested outcomes.
leaked footage
a) Leak implies letting water in or out...being implies solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) aka as partial inside hole/whole. Few suggest leaks to tempt many to stuff holes.
b) Footage implies a measured length (foot of age)...being implies a temporal rise (life) during ongoing loss (inception towards death). Few suggest many to measure others instead of discerning ONE-self.
patterns that aren't really there
PAT'TERN, noun - "an original (perceivable reality) or model (suggested fiction) proposed for imitation (perception)"
If all is one in energy; then flow (inception towards death) implies origin generating formed (life) patterns.
The trick is pattern-recognition aka re (response to) cogni (perceivable)...not consenting to suggested.
a) https://img.gvid.tv/i/3mj3kdCS.png
b) July Deals aka dealing with jew lies.
Patch Notes:
- Pharmaceutical food additives
- Pesticides
- Straighten the bend
it's own programming
Program/programma/proclamation/prographein aka pro (forward) graphein (to write)...holding in possession what one gives away?
are you able
Is artifice able or enabled?
copilot
Who's the pilot? Who owns the airplane? What enables air?
it might be time to move on
What happens to might of being (life) when moving on (inception towards death)?
onto a new
Aka onwards-towards (onto) something different from the old (new)...what if "old" origin moves (inception towards death) differentiation (life)?
Choosing to move onwards-towards death sounds like the same outcome for any different approach...
a marketing boost by being touted as a memory eraser?
Happy Merchant: "This is gonna blow your mind"
gibsmedat banana
All (perceivable) is given to each one (perception)...hence proof being within the putting/pudding.
recipe
Aka recipere - "to hold; contain"...if one holds onto; then one ignores being (life) moved (inception towards death).
Holding onto a banana spoils it faster.
Across all media
Across (inception towards death) media/medius/middle (life)...few suggest "media" so that the suggested becomes the mediator for the consenting many watching it.
still following
How could one follow motionless (still)? Notice that focusing onto suggested media tempts one to hold onto it, while ignoring motion. Notice further that parents are tempted to put children in front of screens to make them sit still...
What Creates Consciousness?
a) What implies energy (internal/inherent power) aka whole cause for each partial effect within. Otherwise...energy and what else?
b) Suggested creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable origin (within everything). Energy cannot create...it energizes (motion) internal (momentum) shapes (matter) aka transforming (life) flow (inception towards death).
c) Suggest CON (together; with) tempts one to ignore SCIOUS/SCIRE (to know; to perceive)... https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=conscious
Ones perception can only perceive all perceivable apart from one another...not together with others. Ones consent to a suggestion of another one establishes a contract between (two) ones.
world science festival
Festival/festus/feast - "to eat sumptuously; a sumptuous repast or public entertainment"
Science/scio/to know - "to perceive"...one cannot take sumptuously from perceivable without paying with ones life. Others tempt one to ignore that by consenting to suggested scientism, upon which others can then feast.
you have to be a freemasonic faggot & actually sell your very soul...Mr. Beast surely is a masonic
a) Each one (soul; sole; one and only) implies FREE will of choice...choosing another sells self out.
b) Surely/sure/securus - "free from care" implies ignoring ones free will of choice into the care of another.
c) Being implies FREE within SONIC (sound)...others suggest MA/MAG/MAGIC to shape ones consenting free will of choice within perceivable sound.
Suggestion tempts consent to mix together that which nature sets apart... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*mag-
Pulsing Electromagnetic
Electric pulse (inception towards death) generating magnetic suspension (life)
narrow-band...
A suggested inversion of wide (inception towards death) entity (life). Ones consent to any suggestion "binds/bands" one to another, while "narrowing" ones sight within perceivable.
The hidden truth about light
a) Light reveals (motion) by generating a spectrum (momentum) for each ray (matter) within.
b) Few suggest many to be part of a race/ray, while mixing them together, hence obfuscating the visible spectrum of light with each others shadows.
A ray of matter within moving light casts a shadow into the visible spectrum of light, hence impeding the momentum of other rays.
c) Ignoring perceivable (light) for suggested (dark) implies a domain (ones consent) under a sovereign (another ones suggestion) aka a realm of shadows, shaped within ones mind/memory, where one hides from the move-ment of light.
align podcast
a) Align implies "falling in line"...being implies rising (life) within fall of line (inception towards death).
b) To cast implies "to form into a mold"...to be implies formed (matter) within a mold (momentum) of flow (motion).
c) Pod people (1956) was popularized by the movie "Invasion of the Body Snatchers," based on the 1954 novel by U.S. author Jack Finney about a plant-like alien life form that arrives on Earth as pods and are capable of replicating people.
Replication (suggested information) of origin (perceivable inspiration) enables snatching of bodies...if consented to.
a niggersportsball logo
- Nigger; negra; black - "absence of light"
- Sport; desporter - "to carry away"
- Ball...Baal
- Logo; logos; logic - "a conflict of reason about suggested words"
Coincidence? Notice the background of the picture...masonry.
Cheating at your religion.
a) Religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) implies binding self to another by ones FREE will of choice. Is being free to do that cheating?
b) What if a jew is trained to operate within the confines of religion, to which gentiles are willingly binding themselves, while learning/teaching self about being free from the bound of religion if choosing to resist?
c) How could resistance exist within religions based on following/submitting/falling for temptation?
d) Cheat/escheat/excadere aka ex (out of) cadere (fall) aka out of (life) fall (inception towards death)...
Opposite of cheat implies aid...doesn't fall (inception towards death) aid rise (life)?
OCD
a) OBSESS'ION, noun (Latin obsessio) - "besieging; antecedent to possession". A happy merchant tempts consumers to obsess over possession.
b) COMPEL, verb - "to drive or urge with force"...only nature compels (inception towards death) resistance (life). A happy merchant tempts obsessive consumers to seek possession by going with the compelling force, instead of resisting it.
c) DIS'ORDER...ignoring natural order (whole separating into partials) by buying into (consent) to what another sells (suggestion) establishes a division among consumers aka a dis-order fed by dis-counts.
paranoia
Aka para (beyond) noos (mind)...all perceivable moves through ones perception aka BE WITHIN; while anything suggested tempts outwards aka BE YONDER.
Mind/memory needs to draw from perceivable, while resisting to hold onto suggested, which draws outwards. One wants to hold onto; one needs to let go of.
shabbat
Continuous (inception towards death) generates temporal (life)...an intermission...not a rest (cessation of motion); but a momentous beginning (inception) and end (death) of matter (life) during motion.
a) The law of noncontradiction operates only within the confines of logic/reason aka within a conflict, hence CONTRA-diction.
b) Nothing (non) contradicts everything. A jew suggest nothing to distract gentiles from everything perceivable... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQnaRtNMGMI&themeRefresh=1
Notice furthermore that SEIN-FELD (his field) implies both his field of vision and a pasture for his cattle...
His name...JEROME (hieronymus; hierous; holy) ALLEN (all) refers to SEIN (his) FELD (field) of vision within all perceivable; as partial within whole.
c) There can be only one origin (principle)...natural law. THE law puts suggested the-ism before it, hence contradicting origin.
Both cannot be true
Does one have the free will of choice to believe both to be true? Does one have the free will of choice to ignore contradictions? Can free will of choice be tricked to believe in the suggested choices of another, while contradicting itself?
jews are responsible
Response-ability (ones choice) selects a chosen one.
responsible for everything bad
Bad vs good implies suggested moralism.
Let's check wiki..."Moralism is a philosophy that arose in the 19th century...The tradition begins with the Essais of Michel de Montaigne (1580)...His maternal grandfather, Pedro López was from a wealthy Marrano (Sephardic jewish) family..."
will not be
That implies being (be) using free will of choice (will) to resist suggested nihilism (not).
Everything perceivable already was revealed to each ones perception...ones choice to ignore it for suggestions by another is made afterwards.
Oneness (whole) implies foundation for each one (partials) within. Looking to find suggested tempts one to ignore that all perceivable was always there.
What if value cannot be assessed/affixed? What if value (perceivable) moves evaluation (perception)?