The whole interview is up on twitter https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1699543001473900670
Why is this coming back around now?
Larry Sinclair (the guy in the interview) wrote a tell-all book back in 2009 called "Barak Obama & Larry Sinclair Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder" which detailed the whole story. He attempted to get media attention, and got a little while also being snubbed by major news sources.
As far as I know he hasn't revealed any new information or proof of what happened. In fact, don't think Larry ever produced any proof that it happened other than a thorough account if his encounters with Barak Obama.
Is it possible? Are there alternatives?
One option would be to pass the voting to the 401k holders and not the firms themselves. That would mean you would have the option of logging into your 401k account and proxy voting on a regular basis.
Most people wouldn't do this of course, but it would strip the power from the 401k brokerages if they weren't allowed to vote with your shares.
Blackrock = people's 401ks.
Thanks for pointing this out since no one ever does when they mention Blackrock. However, Blackrock does do most of the voting based on the shares they hold that you own. That does give them immense influence.
I watched the live stream footage of the landing and this video has a point. The live footage was mostly a CGI depiction of the landing status and some shitty low-quality low-frame-rate video footage from the lander.
There was a comment made during the broadcast that there would be higher quality video that would be downlinked at a later time. But that has yet to happen.
It all seems very fishy, I am trying to rationalize such shitty footage in my mind. Higher quality color cameras are neither expensive nor do they weigh a lot. I understand that perhaps live footage has to be limited for bandwidth reasons but you can always transfer higher quality video after the fact.
It does make you wonder what's going on.
This is the correct answer.
Here are some things to think about:
Why is that some of the population of homeless include the adult-children of relatively affluent families?
Why is it that many immigrant families with very little resources aren't homeless?
Homelessness has nothing to do with homes.
Don't feel like watching Crowder, but as understand it, the Bush camp pulled serious shenanigans to win Florida. Gore should have won Florida. But then again, he should have won his home state of Tennessee too.
Some things come to mind that leaned in the favor of Bush to win Florida and ultimately the electoral college in 2000: Recounts, hanging chads, Florida Supreme Court ruling, Florida Governor Jeb Bush, Florida Secretary of State Katherine Harris.
I linked to a twitter post you midwit.
The first person to piss himself on the moon.
I can't figure that part out. Like you said, they could easily just remove the option completely and force people to save their watch history.
The subscriptions page works fine, most other things do. Just not the homepage. You'd think if they didn't want people to not save watch history they would just change the setting for each user. It's odd that they're making users enable the saving of watch history manually.
There is no way to cancel or turn off this alert. Youtube really wants you to enable your watch history so you can properly view the site.
This was entertaining to listen to. Shiva was in rare form. Summary: Shiva is running for president, even though he was born from India. He claims it doesn't matter. He calls RFK JR controlled opposition and Vivek a faker and a Brahma.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1QvyVWdyYQ4
Most people seem to agree that Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy had one of the best outcomes in a serious of otherwise disastrous candidate interviews at the Republican Turning Point convention this past weekend.
Is it possible to that Vivek found a cheat code to conservative/anti-establishment ideology and told everyone what they wanted to hear? His answers and positions were some of the best of the candidate crowd, but his tweets from not too long ago seem to be in conflict with his current positions.
There was no nuclear fallout in nagasaki or hiroshima. Put that in your crack pipe and smoke it.
Someone has been watching a few too many Owen Benjamin clips.
Here is video of a cluster bomb lands in a neighborhood street.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYDUN_e9Xis
Here is another video (different incident) of the aftermath of a Ukrainian cluster bomb missile detonating in the Donetsk, Ukraine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANNhDKGjNK8
Another problem is many of the bombs are duds and don't go off. Extensive sweeping has to be done after the conflict to reduce risk of civilians getting killed or injured from unexploded clusters.
He is definitely an environmentalist but I think I am the only one who actually watched his interviews based on the stupid comments in the thread.
I'd like to see a high res still image of that painting. I'm pretty sure that's Marina Abramović in the center.
Shiva copyrighted an interoffice messaging program called EMAIL in 1982. There was no mechanism to patent software at that time. It was limited to use for communication with University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) in Newark, New Jersey. But not externally.
At the release of his software he writes: "I, per- sonally, feel EMAIL is as sophisticated as any electronic mail system on the market today." and goes on to write "I hope all of EMAIL's users have as much fun using it as I had designing and developing it"
So in short, he wrote and copyrighted a program called EMAIL, but didn't invent electronic mail itself. It had been around for a few years before.
https://www.techdirt.com/2019/05/22/laying-out-all-evidence-shiva-ayyadurai-did-not-invent-email/
Are the claims true or false?
Fair question.
The claims which I think you are referring to are is RFK's views on climate change, vaccines, and the war in Ukraine.
First of all, most of my perspective on RFK's views are from RFK himself. I have seen a lot of what he has had to say and recently watched his conversation with Jordan Peterson which incidentally has been removed by YouTube. I've also followed Shiva for years.
https://rumble.com/v2t1gla-jordan-peterson-interviews-robert-f.-kennedy-jr..html
I'd recommend you take a look but it's long. So I'll share my takeaways:
At one point RFK was staunchly pro climate change (in the establishment sense) and aligned with the apocalyptic climate narrative. In fact here was one of his more ridiculous views which I believe is no longer accurate:
"Democratic presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., an environmental and anti-vaccine activist, once called for corporations and conservative groups that dispute climate change to be handed the "death penalty.""
Now he has a more nuanced view of climate change which I think its more reasonable. He believes the climate crisis is real but the the carbon orthodoxy that gets it wrong. He aligns with the likes of Bjorn Lomberg who takes a more measured view on climate change.
He has become more skeptical on vaccines in that he wrote books about it and was one of the loudest voices questioning the covid-19 vaccination. Lastly he changed his mind on Nato/Ukraine as he learned more about why we're there as well.
Look, I'm skeptical on some of RFK's positions. He is far from perfect. He continues to blindly and unequivocally support Israel and the billions of dollars of US aid. There aren't many presidential candidates that don't.
That being said, for an MIT multi-grad, Shiva can exceptionally short sighted. Not to mention to me he reeks of self-interest and disingenuousness.
Happy for you to change my mind, but I won't hold my breath.
Shiva might be nuts.
He maintains he invented email when he was like 14 years old.
He married Fran Drescher
He shits on RFK even though they're on the same side when it comes to vaccine and the Ukraine war.
Also Shiva is running for president even though I am pretty sure he isn't eligible since he was born in India. He probably should return any campaign donations before he gets in trouble for fraud.
I didn't know what ACA was so I looked it up:
Acala (ACA) is an Ethereum compatible, smart contract platform that consists of a decentralized finance (DeFi) network and liquidity hub for Polkadot (DOT). Acala’s infrastructure includes a stablecoin network and liquidity staking platform.
The pronoun convention is weird.
Why is the pronoun convention a pair? He/Him? Why both? And why would someone have mixed pronouns like She/They? Makes no sense.
Also, why are regular people forced to share their pronouns? It becomes a banner of compliance.
Who exactly came up with this standard and when?
The CDC just made it up. Seriously.
https://twitter.com/bambkb/status/1653147094629113856?s=20