The propositions are boolean

a) Booleanism tempts ONE to consent to another ONEs suggestion, hence establishing a DUAL conflict of reason...that's where the "only two possible values" originate from.

b) In nature there can be only one value...motion, hence motion proposing momentum (inception towards death) for evaluation by matter (life).

From a christian perspective...only God proposes. George Boole proposed a suggestion (Satan), which tempts one to ignore perceivable (God)...one deceives self by consenting to ignore "you shall have no other gods before me".

which in logic means

a) Logic/logos - "word" implies suggested word tempting one to ignore perceivable sound. That's the foundation for idolatry...if one consents to hold onto the suggested meaning of words.

b) Shaping words within sound implies "spell-craft", which tempts those who consent into conflicts of reason aka logomachy (word magic) - "war of words"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/Logomachy

either be true or false, but nothing else

a) True (wanting suggested) or false (not wanting suggested) ignores change (perceivable need).

b) If being alive is "true", then does changing into death makes being "false"?

What if being (life) can only exist within constant change (inception towards death)? Only within process of dying can life come to be aka springing off (offspring)...true vs false reasoning tempts one to ignore CHANGE, verb - "to cause to turn or pass from one state to another; to alter, or make different; to vary in external form, or in essence"

Holding onto a side (true of false) tempts one to ignore alternation. Reason/logic tempts alternating beings into static behavior, hence many becoming statistics for few.

c) How could nothing be? Is nothing true or false? Else/alius/alias/alien - "another"...how could another be nothing?

Creating a dialectic

a) Creationism (out of nothing) tempts one to ignore transformation (within everything)...only within everything perceivable can ones perception be transformed.

Consenting to suggested creationism tempts one to de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) everything perceivable.

Right now...try to create anything suggestible without shaping it out of; within and in response to everything already perceivable. One cannot perceive creation, because everything perceivable had to be there for one to be able to perceive.

b) Dialect aka dia (two) legere (to speak)...who's the ONE speaking?

Can you show me TWO in nature without each ONE of whatever you're showing being apart from ONE another? Where does nature suggest one to count?

Notice that nature doesn't speak aka it doesn't articulate (word) natural (sound)...it moves sound within which artifice can be shaped.

there even is a center

Even (balance) generates odd centers (choice)...one can only wield choice within balance, and only within motion can there be balance (momentum) for choice (matter).

a jewish mind trick

The suggested label "jew" tempts one to mentally hold onto it, which in return tricks one to brand perceivable (sound) with suggested (word).

Trick/trigger/trekken - "to pull"...consent pulls suggestion into self deception, hence the happy merchant of temptation pushing suggestions.