You can tell by an examination of the photos

Photo/phōs - "light". Ones sight within perceivable light implies "affirmative"...few suggest photos from a "negative" to invert the perception of many.

Tricking many to reason against each other over photographic evidence...based on the inversion of light and the ignorance of videre (to see)...implies photology (light discourse), which keeps those participating in the dark.

it's all too easy to accept or reject the evidence of your own eyes when someone else has told you what you're seeing

Indeed, hence few tricking many to focus on photos (negated light); pictures (captured moments) and film (moving pictures).