A thought occurred to me the other day: spend tons of taxpayer money to import and house and feed tons of immigrants during one term. The next term spend tons of money rooting out, detaining, and deporting immigrants. Once the political pendulum swings back to the left rinse and repeat!
Yeah that makes sense. It does seem like the graphene that was detected was probably from contamination from their preparatory steps that got into some batches, and was likely unrelated to the issues people were seeing. Which, to your point, could be part of a disinfo campaign. I think what got alot of people looking at the graphene angle was the guy talking about graphene razor blades (which seemed like some science fiction to me) who suddenly died after his discovery. Pretty suspicious timing. I'm forgetting the guy's name...
Campra himself admits that he has no idea where the sample comes from. It was sent to him anonymously. Which means, nobody knows if was a real vial of covid vaccine.
I would expect this given that its illegal to obtain the specimens.
He also admits that the results are inconclusive.
Here I'll quote the article for anyone reading this shill's comments:
The identification of graphene oxide structures can be regarded as conclusive in 8 of them, due to the high spectral correlation with the standard. In the remaining 20 objects, images coupled with Raman signals show a very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphene structures, however different than the standard used here
retard
:)
") shows the measured Raman spectrum of benzene, where the peaks at 3,063, 2,950, 1,586, 1,177, 992 and 606 cm −1 represent its characteristic features. " https://www.researchgate.net/figure/b-shows-the-measured-Raman-spectrum-of-benzene-where-the-peaks-at-3-063-2-950-1-586_fig4_221749919
Compare that to the spectrum obtained in figs 4 and 6 here, which shows peaks at different locations: https://www.graphene.cam.ac.uk/files/518.pdf
In general it looks like you wouldn't be able to distinguish graphene from graphite with just raman spec but you should be able to distinguish it from other hydrocarbons.
You are correct, there are table top devices. I was doing some more digging and it looks like a combination of time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy is used to study graphene. Although its not clear to me how one would use that to study graphene suspended in a liquid. In principal though, I think you are correct that one could devise a means to do so in a medium sized lab.
The table top devices for typical quadrupole mass spec wouldn't be useful here since they would just tell you the relative amounts of carbon, oxygen, etc. How could you tell if graphene is present with that information?
Also in this paper they mention generic spectroscopy wouldn't be able to differentiate graphene (since you'd just see carbon and whatever else) so they used micro raman spectroscopy https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355979001_DETECTION_OF_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES
Mass spectrometry requires accelerators which are only going to be available at large institutions. For example, a national lab in the USA. I am not familiar with the European institutions but I'm guessing it is a similar situation there. This means that these researchers would have to send their sample off to the equivalent of a national lab in order to get the type of analysis you are speaking of done. Of course all the major institutions that would be available for this type of work are government funded and controlled, so none of them would touch an illegally obtained sample. However, the researchers can certainly perform their own analysis of the sample with the tools they have available to them, thus the different microscopy analyses (and other smaller scale analyses) we see.
7 catholics in cabinet - Tom Vilsack ; Marty Walsh; Jennifer Granholm; Lloyd Austin Denis McDonough; Gina Raimondo; Xavier Becerra
Media corporation CEOs that are catholic: John Wren (Omnicom Group Inc)
compared to jewish - Brian L. Roberts (comcast), Robert Iger (disney), David Zaslav (warner bros), Arthur Sadoun (Publicis Groupe SA)
investment bank ceos - Brian Moynihan (BofASecurities), Jamie Dimon? (irish descent, jewish spouse), James P. Gorman (morgan stanley),
I dont feel like going through all the board members, but you get the idea. Lots of catholics. Lots of jews as well. Only 1 of the investment bank CEOs was jewish from looking at the major ones (solomon for jp morgan) but most of the major media corporations CEOs are jews.
Real censorship is where they outright remove the video or they shadow ban you by never having you come up in the search results and they throttle the view counts. None of those have happened with this video which is a video they want people to see since it is part of the bread and circus festivities that they want everyone to put their mental energy into.
This guy seems like he knows what he is talking about. His monologue at the end regarding how his viewership never increases makes sense; he speaks the truth plainly and in simple to understand terms without sugarcoating it. People like that are shadowbanned everywhere. Another great example of such a content creator is mark passio; whenever I post mark's work on reddit conspiracy it is downvoted to 0 every single time. If I make a post stating something I've heard from his podcast it will often be received favorably meaning that people are open to his ideas and appreciate the truth contained within, but the content moderation clearly is designed to marginalize people like him and this "legalman" person.
Also he mentiones the movie Jones plantation, I'll have to check it out. It was produced by larken rose, apparently a good redpill for people to understand the illusion of authority.
Common sense immediately showed the lockdowns were complete nonsense, tons of virologists who had the bravery to speak out against the establishment narrative laid out very simple arguments for this truth many times and yet almost no one listened or took them seriously. That is how thoroughly brainwashed the average person is, and most suffer from too much stockholm syndrome to even admit that they were duped or that the lockdowns weren't the proper response. "We were doing the best with what we knew at the time!" is a common response if you do try to get them to think about the contradictions, but this is of course nonsense given early attempts like the great barrington declaration to counter the lockdowns.
People in general have almost zero understanding of how power is structured in our society. Almost none of the people carrying out these orders have to have bad intentions or even understand that what they are doing is wrong, they simply carry out the order in their compartmentalized department at whatever minor level they are involved, not understanding that they are carrying out plans laid down years in advance by people whose name they will never hear about who work in globalist think tanks.
Yeah ultimately its the governments ability to project force that coerces people into compliance hence the gun metaphor. And that ability literally comes from the mind control of the populace, specifically the useful idiots in the police and military. These people either believe in government authority or they are willing to accept a paycheck to do something they know is immoral.
This does feel like a poisoning the well psyop. Someone pointed out some weird stuff about the research group: https://nitter.poast.org/Jikkyleaks/status/1832390193246024147#m
I remember when the vaccines first came out there was a spanish group and a german group and a few others claiming to see graphene like structures in it. Perhaps there is some tech in there and this is designed to discredit that idea. Or just discredit the idea that the vaccine has anything nefarious in it at all.
Classic hegelian dialectic. For example, porn is extremely destructive to society and terrible for your brain and sex life. However - A) government has no right to exist and B) no one has a right to stop you from viewing porn or people from freely creating porn if they want to do so. Getting people to cheer on these authoritarian measures is playing off of people's sense that things are degenerating due to the decaying moral compass of the population at large and their desire for a "savior" but at the end of the day as long as the "savior" is big daddy government the control system continues unabated. We have to quit using porn because we are evolved humans, not because we are threatened at the barrel of a gun.
How is an admission of guilt a "huge step forward" when there is no indication of any consequences or changes in behavior? Maybe I'm being too cynical but this all seems to be this coordinated change in tactics by the higher level technocrats to seem like they are on the side of freedom (ie the musk jones trump kennedy and now zuckerberg? alliance) when really they are just playing the roles of the "antiestablishment" party still within the typical hegelian dialectic for the two party control system. Because there is so much widespread dissatisfaction and disillusionment they have to change tactics and give up small amounts of ground in the war for control but ultimately its designed to continue to keep people invested in the system mentally. Its all to distract from the truth which is that authority is an illusion. It is necessary to maintain that illusion so that we as a population continue to tacitly give our power to the system of control.
The most important method of truth discovery is understanding the trivium and how to use it.