I've always wondered if there is something to these "beyond top secret" black budget programs with advanced technology development and whatnot that you hear about from the UFO disclosure community, or if they are just stealing the money. The thing is, if they are able to funnel this money into black ops programs in secret, then the people who are ultimately gaining the money (assuming it is being stolen and not actually used for meaningful R&D) would be getting it in a clandestine way, so those people wouldn't necessarily be on public billionaire lists because they wouldn't officially have all that money.
I do tend to be partial to the theory that they do have advanced technology at their disposal, though. That would imply the money is being used for their advantage and they are actively using the technology in ways we don't directly see to maintain their stranglehold over the reigns of power. For example, I wouldn't be surprised if they had better versions of the "AI" we see today 20+ years ago. I always felt like the Covid psyop was guided by an advanced AI, since the propaganda worked so well and it simultaneously achieved so many different goals of theirs. Perhaps the "UFO" sightings and these types of phenomenon are their advanced propulsion technology which explains why congress / the president can't just send the military to these DUMBs to figure out wtf they are doing; they are technologically outmatched.
It is one among many. No one forces them to join the military. Really its the parent's fault for not instilling moral values in the child who goes and joins the military. I get your point though, how could they know? The education system brainwashes them into thinking the military is righteous, the financial system robs them of their time and energy, the government robs them of their savings and the church teaches them not to worry about it all because they just need to be good so they can get into heaven.
That being said we are in an age where ignorance is a choice given how much information is available. So at some level they are culpable. Especially so if they realize that they were sold a lie and still stay in it for the paycheck.
The fiat money system is one of the most complex and effective technologies for controlling the masses. It relies on people not understanding it for it to work. Manipulation of the CPI is a big part of that. If you were to tell someone, get paid and trade in this unit of currency that is going to lose 10% of its value in a year, and that 10% would be distributed amongst the people who control the supply and distribution of said currency (and their business partners), no one would willingly accept it. By controlling how much interest you charge people in a debt based economy, you are effectively choosing who gets the share of that value stolen from people's cash holdings. And of course, poor people disproportionately hold their savings (if they have any) in cash, so it affects the least affluent most. In essence, it is a system designed to siphon in an almost imperceptible manner over time people's time and energy.
Of course if the system isn't well tuned, the inflation gets out of hand and you get market crashes when too many people try to settle up at once. So in those scenarios historically the money printers have used their accrued power over the government to bail them out with taxpayer money, which ironically increases their share of the wealth even more than if their system was just humming along flawlessly. So even when they should lose, they win because people are too dumb to realize that government is a scam as well.
He says its neutral in his frame but not in the cats frame because the cat is moving with the electrons. But by that same logic the electrons should be contracted in his frame, which he conveniently ignores.
LOL then you have this comment which receives 200+ likes to "explain" this apparent contradiction:
For those who ask themselves, why the electrons dont come closer together in the lab frame: I think its because only the electrons become contracted not the space in between. Hence, the density of charge doesn't change. When the cat moves, everything it sees is contracted, since everything (also the space between the postitiv charges) moves and the density of positive charges increases. Just my approach though
Apparently space is being contracted in the cat's frame but not in the lab frame. Just complete idiocy
A thought occurred to me the other day: spend tons of taxpayer money to import and house and feed tons of immigrants during one term. The next term spend tons of money rooting out, detaining, and deporting immigrants. Once the political pendulum swings back to the left rinse and repeat!
Yeah that makes sense. It does seem like the graphene that was detected was probably from contamination from their preparatory steps that got into some batches, and was likely unrelated to the issues people were seeing. Which, to your point, could be part of a disinfo campaign. I think what got alot of people looking at the graphene angle was the guy talking about graphene razor blades (which seemed like some science fiction to me) who suddenly died after his discovery. Pretty suspicious timing. I'm forgetting the guy's name...
Campra himself admits that he has no idea where the sample comes from. It was sent to him anonymously. Which means, nobody knows if was a real vial of covid vaccine.
I would expect this given that its illegal to obtain the specimens.
He also admits that the results are inconclusive.
Here I'll quote the article for anyone reading this shill's comments:
The identification of graphene oxide structures can be regarded as conclusive in 8 of them, due to the high spectral correlation with the standard. In the remaining 20 objects, images coupled with Raman signals show a very high level of compatibility with undetermined graphene structures, however different than the standard used here
retard
:)
") shows the measured Raman spectrum of benzene, where the peaks at 3,063, 2,950, 1,586, 1,177, 992 and 606 cm −1 represent its characteristic features. " https://www.researchgate.net/figure/b-shows-the-measured-Raman-spectrum-of-benzene-where-the-peaks-at-3-063-2-950-1-586_fig4_221749919
Compare that to the spectrum obtained in figs 4 and 6 here, which shows peaks at different locations: https://www.graphene.cam.ac.uk/files/518.pdf
In general it looks like you wouldn't be able to distinguish graphene from graphite with just raman spec but you should be able to distinguish it from other hydrocarbons.
You are correct, there are table top devices. I was doing some more digging and it looks like a combination of time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy is used to study graphene. Although its not clear to me how one would use that to study graphene suspended in a liquid. In principal though, I think you are correct that one could devise a means to do so in a medium sized lab.
The table top devices for typical quadrupole mass spec wouldn't be useful here since they would just tell you the relative amounts of carbon, oxygen, etc. How could you tell if graphene is present with that information?
Also in this paper they mention generic spectroscopy wouldn't be able to differentiate graphene (since you'd just see carbon and whatever else) so they used micro raman spectroscopy https://www.researchgate.net/publication/355979001_DETECTION_OF_GRAPHENE_IN_COVID19_VACCINES
Mass spectrometry requires accelerators which are only going to be available at large institutions. For example, a national lab in the USA. I am not familiar with the European institutions but I'm guessing it is a similar situation there. This means that these researchers would have to send their sample off to the equivalent of a national lab in order to get the type of analysis you are speaking of done. Of course all the major institutions that would be available for this type of work are government funded and controlled, so none of them would touch an illegally obtained sample. However, the researchers can certainly perform their own analysis of the sample with the tools they have available to them, thus the different microscopy analyses (and other smaller scale analyses) we see.
7 catholics in cabinet - Tom Vilsack ; Marty Walsh; Jennifer Granholm; Lloyd Austin Denis McDonough; Gina Raimondo; Xavier Becerra
Media corporation CEOs that are catholic: John Wren (Omnicom Group Inc)
compared to jewish - Brian L. Roberts (comcast), Robert Iger (disney), David Zaslav (warner bros), Arthur Sadoun (Publicis Groupe SA)
investment bank ceos - Brian Moynihan (BofASecurities), Jamie Dimon? (irish descent, jewish spouse), James P. Gorman (morgan stanley),
I dont feel like going through all the board members, but you get the idea. Lots of catholics. Lots of jews as well. Only 1 of the investment bank CEOs was jewish from looking at the major ones (solomon for jp morgan) but most of the major media corporations CEOs are jews.
Real censorship is where they outright remove the video or they shadow ban you by never having you come up in the search results and they throttle the view counts. None of those have happened with this video which is a video they want people to see since it is part of the bread and circus festivities that they want everyone to put their mental energy into.
This guy seems like he knows what he is talking about. His monologue at the end regarding how his viewership never increases makes sense; he speaks the truth plainly and in simple to understand terms without sugarcoating it. People like that are shadowbanned everywhere. Another great example of such a content creator is mark passio; whenever I post mark's work on reddit conspiracy it is downvoted to 0 every single time. If I make a post stating something I've heard from his podcast it will often be received favorably meaning that people are open to his ideas and appreciate the truth contained within, but the content moderation clearly is designed to marginalize people like him and this "legalman" person.
Also he mentiones the movie Jones plantation, I'll have to check it out. It was produced by larken rose, apparently a good redpill for people to understand the illusion of authority.
Common sense immediately showed the lockdowns were complete nonsense, tons of virologists who had the bravery to speak out against the establishment narrative laid out very simple arguments for this truth many times and yet almost no one listened or took them seriously. That is how thoroughly brainwashed the average person is, and most suffer from too much stockholm syndrome to even admit that they were duped or that the lockdowns weren't the proper response. "We were doing the best with what we knew at the time!" is a common response if you do try to get them to think about the contradictions, but this is of course nonsense given early attempts like the great barrington declaration to counter the lockdowns.
People in general have almost zero understanding of how power is structured in our society. Almost none of the people carrying out these orders have to have bad intentions or even understand that what they are doing is wrong, they simply carry out the order in their compartmentalized department at whatever minor level they are involved, not understanding that they are carrying out plans laid down years in advance by people whose name they will never hear about who work in globalist think tanks.
How could deflation occur when the federal reserve is constantly adding money to the supply? There will always be inflation with the current system, its just a question of how much.