2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Financial elites are figures too. Important ones, but they are not real players.

There is some markers in game that is too specific and too unattached to any figure. F.e. that exact 400ppm CO2 in Earth atmosphere threshold. In no way financial elites could set such marker - it just absolutely does not fit in their (or any other figure) role. So, they are not players and it's not them who set the rules.

Also, one of the rule that everybody obey, including financial elites - one figure is not allowed to just exterminate another figure. There is no any problem today to kill figure - Rotshild, Windsor, Putin, Biden, whatever. But figures never do that. So there is some strict rule, external for the figures and set by somebody out there.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think there is several different NWO approaches:

  1. Kissinger-like - link all countries with trade relations so all countries become mutually dependent, so NWO will appear naturally.
  2. Soros-like - force everybody to globalist jail under the control of single non-electable entity through all that green agenda, forced tolerance, global surveillance and so on.
  3. Corporation-state-like - establish NWO through technology
  4. may be China-like - create something like hive from humanity. I'm not shure about that, really, historically China do not need any expansion and is fine with their own hive-like life in their borders, if nobody disturb them, so China more likely is at 1 approach.

and so on. All that approaches have something common in goals and at the same time different enough to be incompatible.

What we see now is a fight between different NWO "parties" for the leadership in future NWO. West play for Soros, corporations play for their own approach, Putin play for Kissinger, together with "Global South", and so on.

May be on higher level it is a game between different entities/kinds/races of "reptiloids" operating their Earth puppets. Winner get control over planet or who knows what.

Only way to stop that insane game is to find real masters of all that public puppets. There probably could be other ways too, but its hard to imagine some independent force (or idea, or some trick) powerful enough to severely disrupt the game.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Putin's Russia was balls deep in the plandemic hoax.

Yes, but there are nuances.

First, due to Russian specific, many don't give a fuck to coronahoax. All that lockdowns and mask mandates was not strict or heavily forced. Those who didn't want to obey, could do that without serious problems. Putin didn't sign any order or law on it, throwed all that shit to local authorities.

Second, western vaccines was not approved in Russia, but was not banned - you could buy them and get a jab, but that was on your own, and so we have no such devastating side-effect from domestic one. So only some of those who for whatever reason took western vaccines get serious injuries with all that miocarditis, blood clots and so on. Probably, Pfizer shot he got in Germany hospital was real cause of Navalny death from blood clot f.e. Domestic vaccine side effect was mostly kind of arthritis in joints. I have two examples from around hundred of people who took vaccine around me. And I never heard about anything more serious.

Interesting that western backed "opposition" at the time insisted on much stricter lockdowns and later on vaccine mandates and approvement of western vaccines. It was up to insane rallies with demands to immidiately ban any gatherings. "Oppositon" blamed evil Putin for negligence before the face of "deadly virus" and so on. Navalny & Co even contrived to lost significant part of their supporters when harshly condemned Canadian truckers as right-wing extremists and all that stuff. Their already not very large audience immidiately declined in ten times or even more.

Also, take in account that Belarus completely ignored coronahoax on all levels and even denied IMF bribe for introducing lockdowns and mask mandates, did literally nothing in accordance with globalist's coronahox guidelines - I'd visited Belarus multiple times during coronahoax and could confirm that there was no any sign of coronahoax at all in Belarus. People talk about it, but that's all. And Belarus is closest Russia ally, so if Putin really want to push coronahoax he would had been ask Lukashenko and Lukashenko would had been aligned with Putin on coronahoax (in the same relaxed manner, but anyway). But that didn't happen, and Belarus stayed coronahoax free all way long.

IDK, what was that thing with coronahoax with kind of implementation in Russia and full ignorance in Bealrus, was it kind of some game with his NWO rivals, or kind of control group or whatever, or some signal to somebody, or whatever.

In any case, course and outcome of coronahoax in Russia was noticeably different from the West. Only more or less common thing was that criminal WHO insanity with ventilators and treatment of anything that look like severe covid (mostly regular pneumonia) in the beginning.

Putin is in no way antiNWO, really. He for a long time sided with Kissinger way to NWO through making all states highly dependent on each other, so NWO will eventually appear like something natural. Putin know Klaus Schwab since early 1990 when they organized so called "Food in Exchange for Oil" machination. Of course, Russia sent a lot of oil to the Schwab connected businesses, and never got any food in exchange. All money settled on shady western accounts. Later, when Putin gain some political weight, he was noticed by Kissinger. F.e. Kissinger was the first who immidiately rushed to Putin after accindent with Kursk submarine, which, with high probability collided with US submarine (or was accidentally hit by it), to convince Putin not to reveal whole story for public.

But on the other side he have to obey some Russian specific and could not cross some lines like LGBTXYZ crap normalisation, all that DEI and ESG and so on.

So he is a representative of Kissinger type of NWO who walk on the rasor's edge between his masters and Russia as civilizational entity.

This is what convinced me Putin can't truly be in opposition to the international jewish cabal.

Putin is hardcore, USSR communist party internationalist, so he can't be in oppositon to any etnicity. This create a lot of problems, really, but that's what we have.

However, walking on his rasor's edge Putin have to do some antiglobalist and anticabal things from time to time. He had to ban many cabal NGOs, now there is a process of closing Jewish Sokhnut organization in courts, f.e. and so on. He do that things unintentionally, as side effect of more important things he do to keep walking on razor's edge. May be Russian thing will eventually outweight his Kissinger NWO adherence and internationalism, may be not, IDK.

Putin is in no way a saviour or great leader or supersmart or whatever. He just in situation where he have to do some reasonable things and slowly develop Russia. As I said earlier, it is not leaders changing Russia, it is Russia inevitably changing its leaders.

Something like that.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wouldn't you consider the barbaric killing of the royal family and the subsequent installation of a jewish ran (85% of the party) degenerate atheistic state by Lenin a fall of the monarchy?

It was end of monarchy, but not the end of Russia. Eventually, Stalin, being Georgian, exterminated all that insane jewish trotskist in power, and began to build his own Empire (that is why he is so hated on the West, and have some respect in Russia). And he succeded, despite WWII that was unleashed as soon as most of trotskist jews in Russia was exterminated around 1938 and Western elites found out that their attempt to hijack Russia failed again.

The USSR was financed by western jewish bankers and exploited for its resources and for geopolitical reasons (muh Cold War fearmongering).

USSR creation eventually turned out as western nightmare, when Russia not only defeated West (again), but ressurected from devastaing war much faster than any Western country. Russian Empire under the guise of USSR was back.

Next attempt to subvert Russia was attempted in 60s with Khruschev and subsequent so called Cold War, when the West convinced USSR leadership to start oil trade with the west and accept dollar as payment. Along with many other shit like curtailing Russian computer tech on behalf of IBM, DEC and other Western corporations, switching to some sources of crucial components to the West instead of creating own and so on. But that was eventually to some extent mitigated by Brezhnev with a wave of anti-colonial uprising in Africa and Latin/South America that undermined those external, colonial sources of wealth and power of the West.

Then Brezhnev died, and next round was with traitor Gorbachev, who organized all that mess and deficit to reason USSR destruction. Then West installed their puppets in all ex-USSR republics, but again that failed, and only by the West fault, really. Instead of accepting new ex-USSR elite as equal to Western aristocracy, which could have guarantee slow but unhindered sucking all juice from Russia, West suddenly clearly showed that it will never account any Russians as equal. And that simple and very easy to do thing ruined all West plans on Russia again. West begun to use Jewish oligarchs (Khodorkovsky, Berezovsky, and many others, less known) to destroy Russia further.

Final West fuckup happened in two stages - at 2014 sanctions, and finally with coronahoax. That was combined point of noreturn for the Western influence in Russia. If before that population have in mind that there exists oppotrunity to "make some money" and move to the "blessed, elven, free and democratic West" to live wealthy life, then after that events, last foothold of the Western elites vanished completely. No any desire for "Western life" left, an that illusory image of the "blessed West" disappeared completely. Today, there is absolutely nothing left in the West that could attract any noticeable amount of Russian citizens to the side of the West.

Today, again, Western elites have absolutely nothing to offer for Russians and Russia. Russians (as citizens) view Western elites as perverted clowns who fucked themselves up, and those who praised the West earlier do not need anything from the West anymore and turned to developing Russia as only reasonable option. And will do it at any cost, not giving any fuck to all that Western sanctions and laws. That does not mean that Russians began hate regular Western people, or deny Western commodities that are still worth something. They will get all they want from the West regardless of West desire. West become nothing and nobody.

Putin, supposedly, still have some intentions to somehow communicate with West and to adhere to some proprieties regarding the West, but internal opposition to such policies grow in the country, so he will have to correct his behaviour with time. For now, Putin is the best person Western elites could dream about. They should pray for Putin health and wellbeing to have a chance for anything regarding Russia. Population is already completely lost for the West.

Something like that, speaking as simple as possible.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ekatherine westernized Russia.

As Peter I. But eventually it turned in completely different way.

She had revolutionary enlightenment ideology influenced by the Illuminati and the French Revolution degenerates.

At the same time it was Ekaterine II who eventually prohibit Jews from settling in core Russia and created strict Pale of Settlement around 1790 IIRC, after 30 years being Empress.

Even only this single act of Ekaterine fully covered all shit she brought from the West. Also you could be aware about establishing Novorossia/Crimea and dividing Poland (again).

It was such western-oriented monarchs

She was German by etnicity. And still eventually made Russian Empire stronger. It took time, of course, but eventually Russia changed her and she began to work in Russian interests.

that led to the downfall of the Russian Empire.

Russian Empire never felt. You just pay to much attention to the naming. It have an ability to ressurect even after severe fuckups, unlike Western empires. While now dead Western empires always had external source of wealth and power, Russia always had internal one.

There is interesting question about USA on that matter. USA, among very few countries in the world could have internal source of wealth and power too, just like Russia, it is objective fact. But for some insane reason, USA leadership through the last century did everything to set USA wealth and power based on external sources. May be USA Founding Fathers should have took an example from Ekaterine II about Pale of Settlement for Jews? Especially taking in account that it was Ekaterine who noticeably supported young US independent state with intense Russian-American trade and diplomacy, despite officially declared neutrality.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why on Earth would I need an argument?

Just because only arguments is the basis of any sane conversation. :)

It's well known that any serious opposition to Putin gets murdered or imprisoned.

Do you understand that most serious opposition to Putin is not some West paid liberals, but Communist Party of Russian Federation (conservative-right) and Liberal-Democratic Party of Russia (far-right)? With real support among population, not some Western MSM fairy tales. That is serious Russian opposition, not some Western elites dick suckers.

The question is rather why you go to so much lengths pretending that this election wasn't rigged from the start.

This time there was no any need to rig elections at all. As I already said it was protest voting - people willingly voted for the dude most hated on the West.

You have to be fucking retarded to assume that average Russian sheeple will beg for installing some Western shill because West denied to sell him Mercedes. It is exactly opposite. "We will not sell you Mercedes, orc, until you will bent before us!" - Russian sheeple answer will be - "So fuck you, fuck all your relatives and ass partners, fuck your inbreed pedo elites and fuck all your wishes". And he will willingly and consciously vote for Putin if he will see that this inbreed Western dumbfucks hate him. Along with ordering Mercedes through Kazakhstan or Georgia, not giving a single fuck to some stupid Western dreams about "isolation". It will become his point of honour - to do what Western elites didn't want him to do - vote for Putin and fuck Western "laws" and bans.

You do not understand anything about Russia at all.

Meanwhile, you told me nothing about King Charles f.e. Who voted for this Britain ruler in your "freedom and democracy" world? Where is his opponents in the fight for taking King position in Britain?

Somehow it is OK for "free and democratic West" to have rulers who wasn't elected at all and rule till death unquestionaby, but for some unimaginable reason for the same time you are very worried about elections in Russia.

Well, I could tell you only one thing about that all - elections in Russia is not your fucking business. Go fuck youself, or cry in a corner about some western dicksucker fate in Russia, or try to elect another King of Britain, whatever. Nobody cares.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

hilarious to see the resident Russkie shills immediately explain why this is the real outcome of the election and how it's the fault of The West.

:)

Do you have a single argument why it can't be a real outcome and why it is not purely fault of the West?

PS: Especially funny to listen opinion about outcome of Russian elections from a person who lives in Western "democracy" with different Bidens, Macrons, Sholtzes and especially King Charles nobody ever voted for.. :)

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Putin is western-oriented liberal, internationalist and hardcore bureaucrat, paper worm with little imagination. He obviously don't care about those who do not directly want to destroy his kingdom, so he does not care about those who didn't vote at all or voted for, say, "non-destructive" opposition.

Putin is dangerous only for open traitors who used to suck western dick and for hardcore Russian nationalists. If you are not one or another, there is nothing to fear.

As for all that idiocy about "freedom of speech" or "democracy", we don't have tradition to acount freedom of shouting "Putin is motherfucker" in public places as freedom of anything at all. We account it as mental illness. It is alien concept for us, so only paid shills will do that, so this way they reveal themselves.

Western audience is absolutely unaware about Russian political opposition for one simple reason - they are all much more "right" than Putin. It is Communist Party (conservative-right, don't even ask :) ), Liberal-Democratic Party (far-right slightly nationalistic, don't ask too :) ) and Fair Russia (antiglobalist-right). This is real Putin and United Russia ruling party opposition with noticeable support, presence in Parliament and local authorities and so on. This parties more or less natural, i.e. there exist real people who share their ideology and programs and have socially useful jobs in business and state. Everything more left and/or liberar than Putin and United Russia is unnatural, artificial constructs, existing mostly on western support without any noticeable support in public.

What you see in Western media as "Russian" "opposition" have nothing to do with Russian politic life at all. They are purely western shills without any chance for anything in Russia. Western media is frightened to death to talk about real Russian opposition, so they push stupid narrative about "all opposition is supressed". No, it is not. Just this real Russian opposition is much worse for the Western elites than Putin. And they are not supressed here.

IDK, try to imagine that Trump is the most liberal and left candidate in US elections, all other candidates are much worse for US elite/MSM then Trump. They insist on instant cut of Israel support, prohibition of LGBTXYZ+ propaganda, expelling not only illegal immigrants, but also heavy checking of IQ and education level of any new legal immigrants who get US citizenship, dismantling CIA, MIC audit, laws prohibiting dual citizens from getting any state position or job, and so on.

In such situation, there will be no other option for MSM except completely ignore any Trump opposition existence, because they will have to at least disclose something from their programs which is unacceptable and think out some artificail candidates that was supressed by evil Trump.

Something like that.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you concerned that not voting might put you on an FSB list?

No, I'm not. Why should I?

Russians love their "Strongmen"

Putin is accounted as liberal here, if you are not aware. And I think he is too old to have a chance to become a "strongman". Hardly in his next 6 years he will suddenly drop his liberalism and give orders to began operation on extermination of globalist elite all over the world f.e.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

They don't even get the really important thing - that the voting turnover significantly rised from around 60% to 75%. That means that even politically neutral people decided to participate in elections and vote for Putin, making his victory undeniable, since more than 50% of all voters voted for him for the first time ever.

And it is purely achievement of Western elites and their MSM including that Politico with idiots writing nothing except pure bullshit. :)

It was protest voting really, not for Putin, but against Western liberal insanity and Western inbreed elites - to elect guy they hate most.

PS: No, I didn't vote at all, I do not account elections as something scientific and sensible. This shit with permanent elections doesn't fit Russia as civilization phenomenon at all. It is not politicians who change Russia, it is Russia who change politicians. If you take a look at Russian history, Russia always developed under long-term ruler, and had serious problems each time when ruler was short-term. And every time long-term ruler was eventually changed by Russia to her benefits. Took anyone - Ivan Grozny, Peter I, Ekaterine II, Alexander II, even Stalin or Brezhnev. All of them was eventually changed by Russia to her benefits. Even German Ekaterine or Georgian Stalin. Elections in Russia could be necessary only when ruler dies or dynasty cut in case of monarchy.

by -pkvi-
2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

We defeated whole soviet propaganda machine by not giving a fuck to it. That works. Tested. But we made another mistake - looking for source of information we fall into Western propaganda machine trap with all that "freedom of speech" and other bullshit. So we had to run another round.

You have much better situation - you could learn on our victories and mistakes. All you need to do is to began openly don't give a fuck to Western propaganda machine. And don't fall into any other centralized propaganda and controlled media.

And you don't need to convince whole population. More or less noticeable amount of people who don't give a fuck to any MSM, regardless of its partisanship if enough to destroy them.

Really, Western MSM did the most part of work, already. They heavily discredited itself multiple times, so even some sheeple tired of their crap. But they are separated and have no idea that some other people don't give a fuck to MSM too. If they will see others also don't give a fuck, and it is perfectly normal, then bridge will burn.

This "fuck you" toward media should become loud, and that's all.

It's like tirning off TV. "Did you see latest NNN show?" - "What NNN? Who the fuck is this? Do you think I'm so dumb to watch such shit?". Or "CNN told..." - "Who told? ZNN? What is this? Some web-page in internet?"

Also there could be other approaches. Do you know how once popular fashion styles die? It's not only marketing of new style. It is also a very noticeable push from very small group of "fashionable" people who began to mock and humiliate those who still wear old style clothes/hair/shoes. So you need to become that "fashionable" man who mock and humiliate those who still stick to MSM. "Nobody need all that MSM anymore, with their over makeuped plastic dolls and stupid experts".

I agree that there is too much information noise around, but it is better when sheeple consume noise instead of MSM propaganda. At least they have a chance to get something real in that noise. So, for now, noise is much better than MSM.

by -pkvi-
2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Using Aesop language is not a solution at all. It doesn't work against propaganda. And it doesn't make enemy job harder.

In information war, probably the best solution is don't give any fuck about enemy and its attempts to to its job.

Enemy goal in information war is to bend you under its rules. As soon as you bent - you lost the battle.

I think most decent way to deal with enemy is to clearly state that we don't give any fuck about how they call us or what they think about us. If they don't like that - they could go fuck themselves. Clear and open declaration that they are absolutely nobody for us is what they really afraid of. They have to be somebody, have some influence on everybody, that is their goal and that is their Achilles' heel. Total influence, regardless of its sign is what they want. Why give them that? Why not hit them hard in their most wulnerable spot?

Whatever, "ADL? Who the fuck is that? Some kike nobodies? GTFO". That works. That not only kick them out of their comfort zone, but also show others that they could be ignored.

It was your slogan - "burn the bridge". Bridge want to be listened in the first place. It exist only because everybody listen. And not giving a fuck is the best and most effective way to burn it, isn't it?

Mocking them, laughing on them, accounting as empty place - that is what firing their asses the most. And that fire inevitably will burn that bridge.

3
CrazyRussian 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's nothing new, From early days of internet. (((|))) is menorah smile. I mean old-time hardcore smiles, made from ASCII characters by real men, not that modern hipster woke Unicode emoji idiocy.

PS: I don't recall that anybody used menorah smile to mark jews. People just wrote "jew" or "kike" in plain text in the past, if necessary. Both, "jew" or "kike" just shorter than six brackets. Menorah smile used mostly in Jews' signatures or among Jews to congratulate each other with Jewish holidays.

by -pkvi-
2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the point? For kikes, any participant of such forum is antisemite by default, excluding their shills, of course. Regardless of brackets usage or whatever.

I'm more concerned about brackets on another reason. People are so afraid, that unable to name things by their names. What's the problem to write "jew" or "kike" instead of that silly brackets? Some implanted taboo or what? Poor dudes.

6
CrazyRussian 6 points ago +6 / -0

JFYI - bearable pain level is different for different races and etnicities. Shortly, colder the climate where etnicity lives - higher the pain threshold.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If some obviously Jewish person says something should be stopped "for safety", then I'm sure it is not about safety, it is about control.

As for technology - every possible technology should be absolutely open and accessible for anybody. It's not that inbreed arrogant and ignorant elites technologies created for. Elites have no any rights on any technology, nether they have any right to supress and prohibit them. Technologies belong to whole humanity, not to elites.

Access to technologies is like an ultimate gun that equalize people. But elites are afraid of that. They, being completely insane, psychotic and ignorant want to be the only one who can use and control all modern technologies, while telling others fairy tales about "what if some insne neighbour create Godzilla". Elites are most insane and human hating beings here, not people. It is not for elites to talk anything about "safety" or "what is some crazy..." at all. Elites are the only ones who really should be deprived of any technology to ensure people safety.

And that startup, hardly would have been able to do anything more than glowing plant, really, if succeed at all. The danger for elites was promise of that startup about public access to technology currently available only to elites and their BigPharma/BigAgriculture pocket monsters. They could not allow that. So killed the dude.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're anonymous they have no reason not to kill you as a punishment and a warning to future whistleblowers (same as mafia rules).

If you are anonymous, how they would know that it was you? Also, they will have much more important task of damage control, when punishment of somebody will be only a proof and additional attention to the information.

Mafia killed snitches, who informed police or agreed to testify in court, not made some information public. Here you have same situation, really. BigBusiness, just like mafia, account such wistleblower hiding data from public as a snitch, who is ready to witness to police or testify in court or something like.

There is difference between "People should know that it is Big Boss who racketing our town, here is proofs" and "I will give police/judge proofs about who is racketeering our town". Especially in the case of corrupt law system, when there is zero probablility that BigBoss/BigBusiness will be really punished. In the best case BigBoss/BigBusiness will be fined, nothing more, but people around will not be warned about source of danger, because "private person protection" and all that stuff.

It's always a David against Goliath scenario and I applaud their bravery and self-sacrifice

I will applaud their bravery only if that bravery have real results, specifically in releasing meaningful information about participants. With exact names, locations, documents, bank accounts, sums and all that stuff. Released to public without any redactions, not to some fucking court or lawyers who will sweep this stuff under the carpet and that's all.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Remember they most likely signed non-disclosure contracts.

Nobody force you to share your critical and important information under your real name.

Or there is something about acquiring some piece of fame and glory for themselves? Then, we are doomed in the long run.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again and again I observe exactly same stupidity of wistleblowers.

"Soon, I'll reveal information very harmful for NNN" - something happens - "They killed wistleblower!!!!1111"

It is unbeliveable insanity.

Today, there is no any problem to instantly share important information you have with whole world.

I could not imagine any real reason for wistleblower to keep information from release except may be some desire to get some ransom from corporation or whatever.

Wistleblower is a target only if he withhold some information. If information is already published, there is no any sense anymore to kill a wistleblower, his death will be only additional proof that information he released is truthful.

So if a wistleblower doesn't publish full information he have, without any omission, regardless of all that crap about "protecting persons from whatever", with exact names, facts, locations, dates, unredacted documents and so on, then there is something else , filthy and disguisting.

Same applicable to all that "great inventors of great inventions" and other similar persons.

When you suspend or withhold some information you know, this information is a mortal danger for you.

PS: When Twitter Files was published with redacted email From/To fields without IP addresses from mail path, it became absolutely clear that Musk is nowere near about getting rid of government and elites control over Twitter. Following events show that absolutely clear. But the first proof of that was withholding information about malicious actors participated in Twitter censorship.

As positive example of correct wistleblowing I could point to Hunter Biden e-mails dump where nothing is redacted and all email information is published including mail headers. But still there should be doubts about fullness of that dump. May be some emails was deleted before publishing f.e.

2
CrazyRussian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Continious laser weapons look pretty cool, but they have no future in the battle with real enemy, since they are fundamentally self-laser-tagged targets.

Pulsed chemical laser weapons, where laser medium pumped with powerful chemical reaction (basically blast) could have some use, but still, they are also easily targeted.

Any part of laser beam spotted from two different points instantly reveal precise target position. Very simple math and very precise coordinates for instant strike with least possible effort.

So, it is unuseable on the battlefield. Probably, could be used for defence from some low-tech enemy with few drones without any serious strike capability.

Continous laser need some significant time to heat the target to destruction temperature. System should track target all way during "shot". While doing that, other targets could do the job. Either you need multiple laser systems, either system should be able to fire multiple beams with independent target tracking.

Also, laser is easy to deflect. White, mirror or light-return paint will significantly increase already significant time needed for beam to heat target surface to destruction temperatures. And even could damage laser weapon targeting/observation optics/cameras.

From the "sci-fi weaponry", railgun f.e. looks much better. No need to track target with beam for some significant time. Shoot and forget, switch to next target. And even railgun lose to regular missile based AD, that could fire missiles simultaneously to all detected targets and missiles able to track targets by themselves.

As for defence in general - some force shields would be real breakthrough. Meanwhile, Alcubierre drive warp bubble should have that feature, regardless of if it stationary or moving with any speed including FTL. Warp bubble surface is space-time distortion with high curvature that will completely destroy any possible matter trying to cross it. And it will destroy matter on atomic level, so no material will sustain that. Only possible workaround is a projectile with its own warp-drive. Possibly, if metric inside target and aroung projectile are equal, projectile will be able to soak inside target warp bubble. But that's just an assumption, not even mathematically checked AFAIK.

7
CrazyRussian 7 points ago +7 / -0

Interesting, when all that social platforms lovers finally get a very simple fact - there are can't be any "safe" platform if it is centralized and ask personal data that in no way needed for the platform functioning?

IDK, how any sane human being could step on rake again and again and don't even think that he is doing something idiotic.

If any social platform asks for your email, phone, birthdate, credit card or anything except login and password on registration or during use - it is not the platform you should use for anything.

There can't be any technical reason for any social platfom to ask you anything except login and password. If they do - they inherently want to use you as a commodity. There can't be any other options at all.

1
CrazyRussian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shrimps main allergen is tropomyosin. Of course shrimps have chitin too, but usually humans don't eat shrimps chitin shell. :)

You are right that chitin do not allow fats to be absorbed in stomach, but obesity is rarely connected with fat consumption. Obesity fats created by body, speaking oversimplified from glucose that was not used for providing energy to the brain and other body parts.

So, chitin could lower risk of different liver issues connected with fat consumption, but hardly could do anything about obesity.

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

basic differential equations describing our world could give nearly infinite number of soulutions in form of formulas. They all correct mathematically, if you put formula in that basic differential equation it will be true, but that does not mean that they correctly describe our world. Soulutions could include new particles, all that dark matter/enercgy, strings, strapels, whatever shit you want. The only way to check solution is practical experiment (observation for astrophysics).

Math is not a science, it is a language to describe our universe. And as with any other language, you could easily make grammatically correct sentence that will have no any sense.

What astro/partical physics theorists do - is constructing that grammatically correct sentences and then throwing them to practics to find any sense in them. While practics check that "phrase", possibly in very hard, expensive and long way, theorists create 10 more such grammatically correct phrases.

It is practics who have to find that values for formulas you are talking about. And it is much harder in all senses than to pop yet another "sentence".

10
CrazyRussian 10 points ago +14 / -4

FE crowd is not about explaining anything. It is a 130-year old (Zetetic society and all that stuff in late 1800s) British elites operation to litter with grabage any uncensored platform where people dare to question official narratives.

5
CrazyRussian 5 points ago +5 / -0

Strictly speaking astrophysics/cosmology, just like particle physics divided into two separate things - theorists and practics. And problem is that theorists produce too many theories, mathematically correct, but unfounded in reality. Practics do a great job disproving all that stuff (showing that 10^120 errors), but they can't handle all that constant flow of garbage from theorists.

It is like overloading experimenters wtih random theories. Theorists today does not need their theories being proven practically to get grant money, so they just publish mathematically correct garbage and switch to creating new theory to get new grant. Something tells me that this done intentionally, to disrupt science process in very important areas of science that could produce brearthrough discoveries and inventions.

Ideally, theorist should not get grant money in full until his current theory checked in practice. And only when his theory proven or disproven by experiment(observation of things predicted by theory in case of astrophysics), he should be able to apply for the new grant and switch to another problem.

Today, theorist just publish his article, and that accounted like his job is done. This ruins scientific method. Divide and conquer principle applied to science by elites.

view more: Next ›