Wait a second. Why does it matter what is approved or not by FDA bribe-takers? FDA (as any other "food safety" state agency) should not have any authority over you in the first place. It does not matter what they approve or not approve. If you delegate the power to decide what is safe for you and what is not to some third party, than you are a slave of that third party.
Enjoy your cup of fresh raw milk right from the cow, honey from neighbour hive and vegetables from your garden and don't give a fuck to that shitty agencies. And if you are not shure what is really in some corporate food - just don't buy it. You don't need any state agency to make the right decision at all.
I think it is relevant to understanding what is going on.
How exactly? Please be more specific.
Your logic tells you that you are correct, because you think it "didnt work"
So, what's your point? It did work? How?
You assume you know their objective.
Who told you that? Did you read my TLDR or just saw the word "virus" and triggered? Words "for whatever reason" repeated many times somehow means that I know their objective, or what?
You behave like someone who is cog dis and heard something
Looks like it is you who read something, somehow triggered and trying to switch the topic to some irrelevant issue.
I'm not interested in discussing your topic- which theory, germ or terrain is correct, since it is absolutely irrelevant to the question of my topic. If you are interested in your topic, you are free to create your own post and discuss the question you are interested in.
Food corporations like to roll out a relatively normal product at first, with normal ingredients, and when people began to buy it silently replace normal ingredients with chemistry.
Also such things happens when manufacturer tries to keep the same price in times of inflation. Replacing pork and beef in sausages to chicken, shugar with sweeteners, natural juice with artificial flavorings and so on.
If manufacturer is old and had stable quality for years, it is a second case - hiding inflation. There still stocks of normal product in your grocery, but already new batch in town you visited.
If you like that candies, fill your stocks with candies from your town, because very soon they will be replaced with new batches with aspartam.
Could it be that based states just reported more about injuries and woke states hide numbers of injured?
You are absolutely right, I just didn't get into much details for simplicity. Of course it will be sane to throw out sequences that express nothing on assays to cut down the number of sequences to test.
From the other side, shortest known RNA that encodes protein is 7 codons long (don't remember does it include start/stop or not). So it is combination of 22 aminoacids in group of 7 when order is improtant and with allowed repetitions. It is 22 power 7 or nearly 2.5 billion. So technically even raw human bruteforce is possible.
With optimisations you describe, much larger sequences, so more complex proteins or even proteins groups could be bruteforced.
Thank you.
where do you get the idea Zuckerberg worked on lifelog pre-facebook?
Where did you get that I get an idea that Zuckerberg worked on lifelog pre-facebook?
DARPA launched tender on the surveillance project with internal name LifeLog. Zuckerberg applied, obviously before June 23, 2003, with his proposal. DARPA choose Zuckerberg proposal. Zuckerberg get financing from DARPA and began to implement his proposal. Zuckerberg launch Facebook on February 4, 2004. No any contradictions at all. Everything is sequential and pretty logical.
There was no any CIA predecessor. There was DARPA tender for development of what they proposed as Project LifeLog that was won by Zukerberg.
https://web.archive.org/web/20030603173339/http://www.darpa.mil/ipto/Solicitations/PIP_03-30.html
Do you understand that your question is completely out of scope of that theory? It is absolutely irrelvant here, since their virus approach didn't work. So it does not matter what theory of real ilnesses is correct. There was no real ilness, there was no any real pandemic, so question "what cause illness" just does not matter.
You behave like a person who run into discussion about algorithms of breaking passwords with something about bigfoot.
Viruses are not alive. They are basically chemicals, not living beings. But that does not matter at all in case of above theory.
From the Orthodox view repentance is important part of self-improvement. Repentance is just an acknowlegement of your own mistakes. It sometimes very hard to do for people. F.e. vaxxers nearly physically can't acknowledge that they was fooled by BigPharma and did the wrong thing. And if they eventually don't repent for believing BigPharma and don't stop doing it in future, they will have no chance to improve their physical lives. Same with spiritual part of human being. Simple as that.
Last paragraph in that TLDR. :)
If all they wanted was to test out batches they could have done it without all of this fuss
As I see it, from the point of view of that theory, globalists prepared everything for their pandemic, but scientists failed them, so they didn't want to throw out all their huge preparations and roll out fake pandemic with all that shit obtaining nearly unlimited control over population. Then, they just use that nearly unlimited control over population to force scientists eventually finish their job.
I see it much worse than just implementation of some evil plan of killing/subdueing people or whatever. They just used humanity not even like lab rats, but like laboratory equipment in attempt to achieve their goals.
What if we are wrong in assuming that they in the war with population or account people as their cattle, what if humanity is just a tool for them like mill or printer? It could be interesting to examine their other things like climate change or wokeism from that point of view.
Sure, but what do you believe?
Being Orthodox Christian I believe only in God. All pther things I know.
Show how there were Russians 4500 years ago. Your claim. You show the evidence.
Read all tons of anthropologists and archaeologists studies, along with historical chronicles, including Western ones like "Letter of Alexander III of Macedon on the Slavic people". Somebody banned you from that info? Or it is all banned by BigBrother on the West to not disturb peasants minds? Or may be it is only Jews allowed to have long history of existence on the West now?
Why you are so incurious? Why do you think all other people have to believe in some info like you do, instead of knowing facts? Fascinating, how screwed and servile your way of getting info about world around. You used to believe in what you was told, and can't explore the world by yourself. I'm sorry for what your government did with once great nation of explorers and inventors.
Redacted is fake. Ex Fox, trained in Virginia, shady businessman. Came out of nowhere. Guy glows. Anyone still on YT you should be really careful of.
I know and I don't really care while they have interesting info and guests. I also like his English, pretty clean and understandable. Meanwhile they present most interesting info on Rumble, because YT banned them few times. Clayton also a friend of Tucker Carlson, who also not a saint. I care about information, not about who bring it.
They could easily do a actual super potent pathogen
No, they obviously can't. Having all the money on the earth does not make you omnipotent.
AI/Neuralink how to interact seamlessly with the biological self
AI does not exist, thing they name "AI" is a very dumb and very simple ANN which is just a system of equations. There is no any intelligence in that dumb thing and never will be.
Neuralink have same problem - they do not know how to encode or decode information in brain encoding.
That's not them.
Here they are:
https://whois.ipip.net/AS46997
Click on "whois" tab,
OrgName: Black Mesa Corporation OrgId: NRL-25 Address: 720 University Ave Address: PO Box 35765 City: Syracuse StateProv: NY PostalCode: 13235 Country: US RegDate: 2017-04-24 Updated: 2021-09-21 Comment: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Comment: + Black Mesa Corporation Comment: + Comment: + Black Mesa Corporation, a.k.a. Nato Internet Service is a Comment: + non-profit project for learning, education and research. Comment: + Comment: + Our goal is to support the ever-growing internet community Comment: + that wants to experiment and gain hands-on experience with Comment: + the real world BGP. Comment: + Comment: + Network Information: Comment: + https://internet.nat.moe Comment: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
https://internet.nat.moe redirects to https://apernet.io/ with description of some BGP research group for some reason having "Nato Internet Service" as a second name.
However, it is not clear why Starlink have an upstrem connection to them.
May be they just have one of Starlink ground stations on their property connected through their network, or may be they are something else, or may be Musk like to have an upstream connections of Starlink to the students campus clubs.
Michael and Jesus are part of Islam too. As archangel and great prophet.
In a practical sense, it makes no sense
I don't know answer too. May be some clue could be found in one of that upstreams in the list?
Per sat connectivity, you are thinking in terms of internet usage while ayh am speaking in terms of small packets of eID permissions and CBDC data.
Then it looks overengineered. You could transmit that tiny bits of control info even inside GPS signal or through something like ORBCOMM. Applying permissions is one-way thing, and there is always will be some ground cellular network nearby and within at most few hours of time, if phone commanded to send some data to BigBrother.
Hardly there is exist a task where they need two-way realtime communication in the regions without cellular network. Not many people live in such places today and hardly they use latest phones.
They definitely had something they were spreading that was actually killing people. I propose it could have been yeast and thus the importance of masking. They need this to justify the experiments.
I suspect PHMG in sanitizers or something like phosgen in public places.. At least they have symptoms of poisoning very similar to sympthoms we was told was observed in severe cases - lack of oxygenation, liquid in lungs, destroyed lungs tissue.
Ayh see IPv6 listed as well tho. 2B+
IPv6 is a bird without wings. It failed, and hardly will become something more than supplement to IPv4.
Not a good business model if that was all it was for. :/
IDK. 20M users worldwide by $100 is $2B per month or $24B per year. 4 year to cover that $100B spent. If satellites could last at least 5 years, than it is even profitable. Not that bad. Of course if it could sustain 20M users.
What's with the weird domains?
Domains that registered within that AS.
phones this year and next, with sat standard
I'm afraid you will need to carry a car battery to have any decent working time for the phone constantly using sat network. Square of distance, remember?
Model 3 is the best off grid sedan as solar can power it
Do you understand that 50 sunny days a year is a death sentence for any solar crap?
Did you ever tried to turn on a Tesla when it spent a week at -20°C? It is completely dead. And with high probability it lost half of capacity forever, if battery survived at all.
Remind me, what is the price for new Tesla "fuel tank"?
Holy shit, you are completely not aware about real world. Teslas are expensive and useless toys, nothing more.
Starlink enables remote work in off grid locations where internet isn't available.
May be only on ships in open sea or somewhere in really distant places like mountains or tundra. In any other case few kilometers of fiber is much cheaper and much more reliable.
So, do not read it, what's the problem? :)
So, do you believe that it's an accurate count and creation happened at that point in the past?
It does not matter what point in time some choose as a zero. It does not matter is that point real or mythical. The only thing that is important is that everybody who use that calendar agree to use the same point as a base.
You are the one claiming that Russians existed 4500 years ago. It's up to you to provide evidence and definition, not me.
Again and again. Are you retarded or what? "Russians" in English could mean ethnicity or citizenship. If you are not aware, it is absolutely different things. You continuously deny to clarify what exactly you mean saying "Russians". Why? What could be the problem with that for you?
I mean etnicity when I talk about Russians, because citizenship means nothing.
So from the ethnic point of view, yes, Russians perfectly existed thousands years ago with their own settlements, language, culture and genetic.
From the citizenship point of view, no there was no definite country named "Russia" in 2409BC, since Russians lived far from others and there was no need to define any distinct borders at the time.
As a kind of state Russia(Rus) was formed around 1500-1800 years ago with centers in Novgorod, Kiev, Rostov, Suzdal and others. There still was no any real equipped borders at the time, but all the land that contained all that Russian towns already accounted as belonging to Russians. Russian towns ruled by dukes who often have tensions with each other, but easily united against external threat.
Wasn't USA at the top of its prosperity at least in the last few decades of USSR existence? Then what is the problem?
And if it wasn't, then what's the difference?
I use it for all kinds of stuff if it's applicable.
I use it heavily too. It is faster and more versatile. But most internet trafic today is TCP and even VPNs do not make things better for UDP, most use TCP for VPN too.
Adverse reaction databases could show that some batches are deadlier than others, but that does not prove that other batches are safer.
There is additional factor that heavily influence the data in such databases - was it allowed to create a records for adverse effects or not.
If different batches had different ingredients and so different outcomes, it is certainly a factor too.
So you have at least two unknown factors that could interfere with results to produce results you observe.
If we suppose that they know which batches are more harmful beforehand, then why they need multiple different batches at all?
And if they need different batches to find out most harmful, they obviously couldn't know beforehand what batch will be more harmful and couldn't administer them accordingly.
I think they didn't know outcomes, all experiment was about finding them, so average distribution of harmful and not so harmful results among the batches are constant, but in some places it was prohibited to even admit officially a possibility of adverse effects while other places post them into database. Obviously different batches was distibuted to different places.