Toxic, Metallic Compounds Found in All COVID Vaccine Samples Analyzed by German Scientists - https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/toxic-metallic-compounds-covid-vaccines-german-scientists/?eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=f7cf9f90-f6de-447f-8b4c-3b94cd5f6219
Japanese study proves Pfizer and Moderna shots contain entities that assemble themselves in complex structures - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/19957kg1BP/nanobots-in-covid-shots-that-ass/c
German scientists reveal what's in the shots with Raman spectroscopy - https://odysee.com/@ildrzaius:6/German_Scientists_Show_Magnified_Images_Of_Massive_Vaccine_Damage_and_Unnatural_Contaminants_In_Vaccines:5
Spanish scientists exposed the Graphene Oxide in covid shots using Raman spectroscopy. La Quinta Columna has over 1000 scientists, who have collaborated for this information with over 1000 hours of research combined. - https://odysee.com/@ekab:2/VID_20220326_082809_583:f
Spanish scientists discover that the vaccinated and the tested for covid emit unknown bluetooth signals - BlueTruth documentary full - https://odysee.com/@ARGONAUT:d/CC_2022_06_11_DocBluetruth_English:10?src=embed
Graphene oxide discovered in covid shots using optical microscopy - Greg Reese report - https://odysee.com/@InfoNews:f/What-Graphene-does-in-your-body:5
Surveillance Under The Skin - Dr. Yuval Noah Harari - A tiny gae joo, who's WEF's right hand man. "The thing that people would remember from the covid crisis is that this was the moment when everything became monitored" - https://odysee.com/Surveillance-Under-The-Skin---Dr.-Yuval-Noah-Harari:1?src=embed
This guy didn't die from sugar - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/1995H03Swm/covid-strikes-again-at-a-person-/c
This guy also didn't die from sugar - https://communities.win/c/TrueChristianity/p/1995CQBlf3/those-of-you-who-think-the-vacci/c
These athletes didn't have heart complications and didn't die from sugar. Jwilderness - https://www.youtube.com/@JWilderness/search?query=what%27s%20going%20on
"In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established." - 2 Corinthians 13:1
Not by a comment from a redditor, who can't distinguish SUGAR from Graphene oxide, and his whole theory (which is promoted on Reddit, and here) is - "Look the other way, people. Nothing to see here... Ignore all these reports from scientists all over the world..."
Mass spectrometry requires accelerators which are only going to be available at large institutions. For example, a national lab in the USA. I am not familiar with the European institutions but I'm guessing it is a similar situation there. This means that these researchers would have to send their sample off to the equivalent of a national lab in order to get the type of analysis you are speaking of done. Of course all the major institutions that would be available for this type of work are government funded and controlled, so none of them would touch an illegally obtained sample. However, the researchers can certainly perform their own analysis of the sample with the tools they have available to them, thus the different microscopy analyses (and other smaller scale analyses) we see.
It does-not. Typical quadrupole mass-spectrometer is a tabletop device with a size of a good office printer. It is not even very expensive in comparison with other lab equipment.
You could even find used ones for the price affordable to a small private business or a middle-class enthusiast.
Yes, they work from regular wall outlet and consume around 1kW.
Mass-spectrometer does have particle accelerator, just like CRT monitor or home air ionizer. "Particle accelerator" does not mandatory mean some giant cyclotrone or LHC. Any device that accelerate particles is particle accelerator, be it electron gun in CRT tube or very similar assembly of few electrodes in mass-spectrometer.
You are correct, there are table top devices. I was doing some more digging and it looks like a combination of time of flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy is used to study graphene. Although its not clear to me how one would use that to study graphene suspended in a liquid. In principal though, I think you are correct that one could devise a means to do so in a medium sized lab.
The table top devices for typical quadrupole mass spec wouldn't be useful here since they would just tell you the relative amounts of carbon, oxygen, etc. How could you tell if graphene is present with that information?
Exactly. This gives the first and basic clue about composition of substance on atomic and submolecular level. It allow you to get preliminary information for chromatography and chemical tests for specific substances. If you have carbon, oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, lead and iron, you don't need to look for arsenic compounds or cesium. But force you to look for cyanides and lead compounds.
You will have high relative amount of carbon, much higher than for hydrocarbons or carbonates.
Also, just think why they so stick to that graphene stuff. Graphene is one of greatest nothingburger of science. It is known for around century, but still we don't have any more or less useful use of that substanse other than fill MSM articles and empty scientific papers.
Of course, talking about some polyhexamethylene guanidine in vaccines or sodium ethylmercurithiosalicylate will not create attention from regular public, but overhyped graphene will.
Also, graphene narrative as microblades in vaccine that cut everything in bloodstream directly contradicts blood clots facts. You can't create a clot with something that cut objects in pieces. But some uninterestin calcium hydrocarboaluminate (widely used coagulant) or other complex calcium compounds or, say, synthesized thrombines, easily could be the reason.
And, suddenly, you need mass-spectrometer to detect calcium in specimen to get a clue where to look for if you want to find a reason of blood clots.
Don't you understand that whole anti-vaccinehoax publications just does not fit together and with known facts about not-a-vaccine. It is just insane - "who cares why blood clots is a main consequence of not-a-vaccine, look, GRAPHENE!!!!".
Unscientific, non-systematic, self-contradictory "studies" floating around on non-official side with all that overhyped "nano", "graphene", "aluminium" and other keywords just make things worse.
Yeah that makes sense. It does seem like the graphene that was detected was probably from contamination from their preparatory steps that got into some batches, and was likely unrelated to the issues people were seeing. Which, to your point, could be part of a disinfo campaign. I think what got alot of people looking at the graphene angle was the guy talking about graphene razor blades (which seemed like some science fiction to me) who suddenly died after his discovery. Pretty suspicious timing. I'm forgetting the guy's name...