back up the claim
Up implies potential; claim implies possession...it's procession which allows given potential to take possession. Doing so lowers the potential to grow up with possessions burdening down.
How can I trust the Bible?
Only by free will of choice which by trusting binds oneself to another.
is grounded in four key areas
a) There can be only one foundation for each one within...God.
b) Area/arere (arid; dry)...as solid (life) within fluid (inception towards death) each being was planted into fertile ground.
manuscript consistency
It's not the manual scripture suggested but ones consent to it which makes it con (together) sistere (to stand). Before consent and suggestion join...one stands apart from one another.
archaeological and historical evidence
Notice archaeologic-AL + historic-AL aka the archaeology and history shaped within ALL by anyone within. God doesn't shape archaeology or history to make all evident to each one within.
Evident aka ex (out) weid (to see) implies God giving each one within sight to look out...others shape archeology and history to obfuscate ones sight with what few show to many.
fulfilled prophecies
God gives the instrument (tongue) to voice pro (forward) bha (to speak)...doing so tempts one to ignore the given by taking from one another, which permits few to make prophet/profit from many.
As for fulfilled...that implies God filling up (life) while flushing down (inception towards death).
internal cohesion
All internally divides each one within from one another...few invert internal division into external cohesion by tempting many together and thereby against one another.
Ones consent to any suggestion of another establishes co (together) hesion (to adhere, stick) representing ones hesitation to adapt to all.
Christ Jesus
That's btw the seldom used correct line of progress...first God; then Christ (each anointed one being moved across); then Jesus (I AM aka taking possession over oneself).
divine inspiration
Aka inspiration by division (perceivable inspiration)...not by cohesion (suggested information). God gives each form within by inspiration.
Finally, the internal cohesion
It's cohesion (ones consent to any suggestion of another) which tempts one to ignore origin (finAL) for outcome (FINal).
Notice furthermore that internal implies a division from external...not a cohesion.
being written over approximately 1,500 years
How can a being (life) which cannot measure beginning (inception) and end (death) while being moved in-between...approximate writings of each other?
How can anything be approximated OVER from the perspective of UNDER?
by some 40 authors
There can be only one author (God) who doesn't summarize together but divides apart aka authorizing the free will of choice to each.
It's few who summon many together by tricking each (consent) to join with each other (consensus).
record of God’s revelation
a) Recording the revealed (possession) tempts one (potential) to ignore adapting to revelation (procession). God doesn't stop revelation...suggested records tempt ones perception to ignore all perceivable.
The artificial record tempts one to hold onto; the natural record forces one to let go aka re (to respond) cord/cor (heart). A heart holding onto implies infarcation...
let’s not
Everything lets each thing be...nothing is shaped by each other to distract from that.
there being a Creator
There and here implies the internal division of everywhere aka a transformative process of everything (cause) into each thing (effect) allowing measurements to be taken over distance from one another.
Creation tempts one to deny the transformation of everything into each thing by adding "nothing" as a source to create from.
the evidence is all around us
a) Only within a line (inception towards death) can one (life) shape a circle around self (logic) and each other (reason), which obfuscates evidence (to see out).
b) All divides each one apart from one another...only after which ones can be united together into an "us". That's why US (united states) is called the great satan.
the invisible attributes of God...
...are blind to being made visible within God. Blindness represents a stigma each attribute can only dissolve by self discernment.
God makes all (perceivable) visible through each one (perception)...it's any suggestion of one another which blinds ones perception if consented to aka adhered to aka STICK-matized to.
We will
Only each one can wield free will of choice. We aka the majestic plural tempts one to sacrifice self willingly to another which permits few the will over many.
- You've got mud on your face, you big disgrace
- Kicking your can all over the place, singin'
- We will, we will rock you
There is no speech nor language where their voice is not heard
Only within sound/sanus (entire; whole; all; el; God) can each instrument (mind structured within) shape speech by forking language/lingo (tongue).
As for not hearing it...
- People talking without speaking
- People hearing without listening
- People writing songs that voices never share
- And no one dared
- Disturb the sound of silence
reality of getting banned
a) Real aka ones response within all implies permission only aka per (by) mittere (to send)...one cannot get banned from being send.
b) Ban/bha - "to speak; tell; say"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ban
It's speech shaped while being send which fakes reality while representing a self imposed ban taken on the permission given.
DMT and hyperspace
Hyper (over) space/spatior (to wander)...taking DMT ignores given while shaping a circular conflict (placid vs hyper) which tempts ones free will of choice to wander from center into circumference.
Another example is the word "hyperactive". Action implies a straight line delineating each ones reaction in-between over (hyper) and under (placid). Action cannot be over or under...only reaction can go above and below its position.
being locked out
Being implies "freed within"...consenting to any suggestion of another locks ones perception out of discerning this. Consent (singular) represents the key few utilize to lock up many into a consensus (plural).
Suggestion tempts consent into a contract and contraction locks out expansion. Meanwhile...ones perception within all perceivable allows free expansion.
Last words in the book: "I am certain we shall conquer. Because Reason must prevail."
Prevail aka pre (before) valere (have power)...abusing ones free will of choice to I AM (taking possession over self) + WE (joining one another) + REASON (turning against one another) sacrifices free will of choice aka the power one had before.
Designer > Benefactor > Happiness
The benefactor represents the suggestion of another tempting ones consent to design a state of happiness within self...happy implies "chance"; being implies "choice"...chance tempts choice to feel lucky.
Sleight of hand: https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/kylieminogue/ishouldbesolucky.html
- You (chance) always keep me (choice) waiting
- Because it's only make believe
enemy of happiness
En-e-my (in-a-me aka within me) hence enemy (choice) of happiness (chance).
- Enemy: "One needs to be alone" (perceivable nature)
- Happiness: "We can be together" (suggested artifice)
As for sadness: sad/sæd - "sated, full, having had one's fill"...what does D-503 do after having his fill of I-330? The designer comes to his senses and chooses to go right back to his benefactor...
he (yoda) is magical mr mephistopheles
Mephistopheles aka mephitz (to destroy) tophel (to lie)...Yoda implies "to know" which destroys any lie (and truth) held together because knowledge implies that which flows through any form shaped within.
was not made by Lucas, but copied
Lucas implies "light" aka the light onto this world allowing each one within to copy aka imitate (image). The deception is about holding onto the image while ignoring that light moves.
oxfam
Lady Lynn Forester de Rothschild, Chief Executive Officer of E.L. Rothschild and chairman of the Coalition for Inclusive Capitalism, who is speaking at a joint Oxfam-University of Oxford event on inequality today, called on business leaders meeting in Davos to play their part in tackling extreme inequality... https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/richest-1-will-own-more-all-rest-2016
Flow (inception towards death) generating form (life) implies equality generating diversity by using extremes to set free... tackle/taken - "to grasp; seize" implies an apparatus to seize that which was set free.
33%
Aka as above/so below...two extremes (charity and cruelty) aimed to tackle ones free will of choice from both sides.
charity
Charity/carus/ka - "to like: desire". Being implies diverse within equal tempted to desire likeness among one another. Charity destroys diversity within equality...what a cruel fate.
prime, or driving evil.
Prime (first) from per (forward) implies God aka all (motion) steering (momentum) each driver (matter) within...it's ignoring all for one another which tempts the driver off course. Since the course (inception towards death) forwarding each driver (life) implies linear progress...off course represents turning like turning LIVE into EVIL.
Notice that you learned "evil" from suggested moralism (good or evil). Notice also that "good" represents more than GOD (one letter more)...it's wanting more than all needed offered from one another which turns one off course while jeopardizing ones life.
Greed isn't the great
The (theos) implies God aka all value (cause) delineating each ones evaluation (effect)...greed vs charity; is vs isn't and small vs great represent circular conflicts among one another about measurements taken from one another within all God given.
The issue isn't that "greed isn't the great", but that oneself ignores THE (God) when holding onto "greed isn't great"...that's three layers of distracting measurements held within self tempting one to ignore all God given.
capitalism
Capit (head) al (all)...implies each ones head within all as the capital offense. Few suggest -isms to tempt the heads of many into a consensus with each other.
Joining any plural consensus (-ism) requires ones singular consent (-ist) which is why a capital-ist implies ones consent to suggested capital-ism.
I refuse to use language wrong
a) The only right/reg (to move in a straight line) language/lingo (tongue) implies the God given tongue enabling one to articulate words within natural sound. Doing so represents falling for spell-craft which splits/forks ones tongue in two.
b) Only God uses...each one within re-uses all God given or lets one another abuse one.
c) Refuse implies ones singular response (re) melting together (fuse) with others within for example right vs wrong conflict. One doesn't need to choose a side within a conflict against one another...one needs to adapt to all God given as choice.
they mean
They (pluralism) represents a meaning (measurement) suggested by another and consented to by you...the singular being. If you use "they mean" aka a spell crafted by others articulated through your tongue or spelled out as grammar (grimoire; incantation); then you show to those with eyes to see that you a) ignore natural singularity for artificial pluralism, and b) that you burden your mind with artificial measurements.
making money
Suggesting make-believe "money" turns ones consent into m-one-y (my one). Artificial money is used to convert consent into ownership by minting a mind. Suggestion represents the wedge (coin) of another within ones perception if consented to.
primary driven by the greed of men
Greed implies want tempting towards outcome; primary driven implies the need for anyone within to adapt to origin. Greed isn't a driving force, but a pulling force others exploit by tempting ones greed to desire possession.
Reality implies procession (inception towards death) generating potential (life)...that's the driving force. Life tempting other life with fake possessions...that's a pulling force.
didn't care what was sold, just that it sells.
Flow (inception towards death) carries form (life)...that's the natural current giving each form FREE will of choice. Artificial currency tempts ones free will of choice to sell self out to another, when buying from another.
Selling oneself (potential) out by buying from another becomes ones burden (possession) to carry.
Produce implies "bring forth" aka nature bringing forth native...it's the market (buying vs selling) which is artificial and therefore dominated by the happy merchant of temptation.
things are driven by people
Everything (cause) drives each thing (effect) apart from one another...few tempting many things together as "people" represents a pulling force.
You are not a people (plural) but a person (singular)...joining others doesn't change your nature; it only distracts you with artifice.
the message
The (theos) implies God + mess-age aka messianic age from mashiah (anointed) implies each anointed one within God....that's the transmitted message. Any other communication represents a distortion thereof.
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see... https://genius.com/Grandmaster-flash-and-the-furious-five-the-message-lyrics
- Don't push me 'cause I'm close to the edge
- I'm trying not to lose my head
- It's like a jungle sometimes
- It makes me wonder how I keep from going under
they don't care how many businesses or how much of the economy that destroys.
One can only raise (life) during destruction (inception towards death)...business (occupation) + economy (household management) represent self imposed burdens which makes raising harder.
Look into the conflict between the cephalic index (mediterranean) vs craniometry (nordic); your example being found as Dolichocephaly (long head) among the former, and then check out the anthropology field within the eugenic movement from Giuseppe Sergi (sephardic jew) to Franz Uri Boas (ashkenazi jew); the latter becoming the "Father of American Anthropology"...
magic slide pictures
Sliding implies gliding over a surface...any suggested picture represents a captured moment sliding over the surface of perceivable momentum.
Example: a physical picture and a mental memory of ones child tempt one to ignore ones child. The child moves within nature; the artificial picture and memory one holds onto...slides over the surface of ones perception.
Using suggestion to tempt ones perception to hold onto mentally or physically...that's magic.
holy communion
Holy (whole) sets each union (unit within action) apart from one another...com (together) union (unit within action) artificially tempts units together.
Suggesting com + union represents magic; consenting to hold "communion" together establishes the slide.
Enticed by them, the boys forgot everything else.
Any suggestion by another entices ones perception to forget all perceivable.
Do you understand what this means?
By holding onto suggested meaning one stands under another.
the devil does his utmost
a) The (theos) implies God...de (to divide) vil (will) implies each one within.
b) Utmost implies outermost aka being at the farthest extremity...being implies innermost aka being (life) in-between extremes (inception/death).
in order to keep you away
A WAY (inception towards death) implies the natural order for each native living within...a moving order which prevents anyone within from keeping anything.
this devilish lantern must be smashed to pieces.
God puts to piece/peace by dividing each piece within from one another...the lantern tempts divided pieces together into war against each other.
Supporting Open Borders
The borderline (inception towards death) was always open for each supported vessel (life) within...pluralism (borders; nations; societies; communities etc.) closes ones growth outwards.
Game Rewards
A game tempts ones given choice to take a chance which is followed by punishment...the reward was the choice given.
Notice that he wrote "can it BE made"...it's the being who uses AI which got made by make believe.
Nature implies the line natives ignore for mental ideals and physical idols...both of which are tempting one to hold onto while seeking goals with added burdens.
As for only goals...only implies natural singularity; goals implies artificial plurality. There can be only one goal (death) for each one living within.
GO (to advance; depart; go away) AL (all) aka all advancing each departed one (life) within the same way (inception towards death).
uncertain legal terrain
Terrain (life) within natural law (inception towards death) can never be certain (affixed)...since it's being moved.
will be public, but a legal expert says the "unprecedented decision"
The will of a being implies each ones private decision preceded by nature...not any unprecedented public decision.
Btw etymology is slowly entering the mainstream... https://theworldwatch.com/videos/1620837/words-are-actually-spells/
you must accept
Acceptance to whom?
be thus be
a) If God gives being, then what is the conflict of acceptance vs denial about?
b) Thus/þus - "in this way"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/thus What's the way of being?
Mormons, who say they are Christians but are polytheists.
What about you using pluralism (Mormons; Christians) to describe one another as more than each God given being? How is ignoring singularity for plurality not polytheism?
call AI sentient
Calling implies forcing out sound artificially...nature implies sound forcing into each native. Using AI implies answering a call; thereby ignoring natural for artificial and corrupting ones sentience.
AI artificially regurgitates the sentience of nature ignoring users.
religious leaders...
...are representing religious followers aka those who answer calls of others.
Christian denominations
Nature doesn't denominate (give name to)...nature anoints (christens) each native from one another with the free will of choice to artificially denominate. Doing the latter tempts ignorance of former and represents idolatry.
Whoever believes...has been born of God
So does whoever disbelieves or whoever else aka one cause for each effect within.
Whoever loves the Father also loves the child
Whoever loves or hates the Father (cause) also loves or hates the child (effect). The issue...love vs hate tempt effects to turn against each other while ignoring the father > child delineation apart from one another.
sin
Father (motion) delineates seed through soil of mother (momentum) to bring forth each anointed child (matter)...sin/syn tempts one to ignore this while rubbing one another out as lovers vs haters.
instruction to return
Being within (in) the structure (struct) of action (ion) implies delineation; only within which a circle (re-turn) can be shaped by ones response to one another; like for example lover turning against hater and vice versa.
timeline
A line moves...timing it tempts one to ignore being (life) moved within a line (inception towards death). The trick is based upon taking measurement while ignoring given delineation.
missing timeline
Timing (possession) tempts being (potential) to miss linear motion (procession).
a past that never existed
Delineation implies the bending (life) of a line (inception towards death)...the suggestion of past > present > future tempts ones mind to ignore the line of progression and ones existence at the center thereof.
Life (present) cannot perceive its inception (past) or death (future)....only the in-between presence. There can be only now...not any before or after.
everything moves
Each thing within can be tempted to ignore being moved by holding onto measurements...which represents nothing other in reality than ones ignorance of everything.
who would rewrite
Anyone who RE-sponds to what another WRITE-s while ignoring the natural RITE of passage. Writing represents the distortion of delineation.
transhuman evolution with brain hacking tech
The transfer of human life from inception towards death implies delineation within a line of progress...techno (artifice) logy (logic) implies a circular evolution shaped within the linear transfer of each human.
The word hack stems from keg - "to hook" aka hooking the human brain during the natural transfer to artifice to establish a mental evolution (circular logic) and a physical revolution (reason).
neuralink
Neura (nerve; sinew; bowstring) implies the natural transfer of each human life from inception towards death forming a bow aka nature's tendon/ten (to stretch)...stretching from the nerve-center.
A link implies "a series of rings or loops which form a chain" aka the linked consensus among gentiles chained to any jewish suggestion.
A jew shaping a contracting link to prevent gentiles from stretching...that's a neuralink.
cranial computers
Aka each cran-i-al (head within all) tempted to com-pute (count together) what nature divides from one another.
layers of AI inside the brain
Consenting to any suggested artifice shapes ones mind into intelligence (understanding)...so if one willingly stands-under; then another can bury one under layers of suggested information.
neural lace
A lace represents a snare aka suggested information ensnaring the mind of anyone who willingly puts his head into a noose (circular logic).
brain surgery
Surge/surrigere aka sub (from below) + regere (to move in a straight line) aka coming up from below while being (life) moved within a straight line (inception towards death) representing the brain/bhragno - "to break".
components wouldn't necessary require brain surgery
As described above...brain surgery necessitates the requirements for each broken life coming up from below. It's com (together) ponent (to place) which tempts one with optional togetherness to ignore necessary apartheid.
a list of 33° Freemasons
33 (as above/so below) represents each native position (matter) at the center (momentum) of nature (motion)...a list/leizd - "border; band" tempts one off-center.
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/list... a band binds ones free will of choice which a mason of free has to learn.
The list is not sorted in any particular order.
The natural order (inception towards death) particularizes each native (life) by division from one another...a list artificially unifies particulars into bondage with one another.
Sort/ser - "to line up"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/sort aka natural delineation; not artificial grouping together.
Feel free
Motion > momentum > matter...that's how motion sets matter free. Emotion aka feeling tempts matter together. To remain free one needs to resist the wanted temptation of feelings.
Example...tits. One doesn't need to fondle them, but they do feel nice though.
might have missed, or suggest any changes
Suggestion tempts ones perception to ignore that all perceivable moves...therefore holding onto any suggestion tempts ones perception to miss change.
elliott brand
Elliot/elias from El-i-jah (my God is yahweh) + Brandt (to burn)
our friends at the democratic side of the AISLE...
Aisle; noun - "lateral division of a church" from root aks as in axis (to turn). God delineates which establishes the central division of each church (body of christ), which a jew inverts into the axis of satan; axis mundi; axis vs allies warfare; the masonic level from axis to equality, and of course axioms (self evident truths) etc.
electronics + circuit board
Aka elect (choice) oni (one)...few shape an artificial circle (circuit) within the natural line (board) of progress to invert ones (oni) choice (elect) into selecting a chosen one.
Mental logic (circular thinking) represents an open circuit; physical reason (turning against one another) represents a short circuit...both establish electronic impedance for gentiles, while permitting each chosen jew control over both nodes aka both sides of any conflict of reason gentiles choose a side within.
Example...politics. Voting for a representative implies ones choice (oni elect) selecting a chosen one (elect oni) within an election. That's how election admittance turns into impedance aka "resistance due to induction in an electrical circuit".
What one votes for represents the nodes (left wing OR right wing) turning into a circuit (left wing VS right wing) by voting. Node/ned - "to bind; tie"
Runestone
Aka to RUN ESTimation on ONE...nature implies the value (all perceivable) running through each ones evaluation (ones perception). A jew runs artificial estimation on each gentile by tempting gentiles collectively to consent to suggested values like currency.
where could someone come up with the idea of
SOME (plural sum) contradicts ONE (singular unit)...a jew suggests the word "someone" to tempt gentiles to consent to a suggested contradiction. A gentiles mental consent represents idealism (ideal); the physical consent represent idolatry (idol).
So you (a native) came up in nature, which you choose to ignore for the jewish idea of "someone" aka being one part within a larger sum of gentiles. So the "where" implies nature for each native, and a natives mind for each artificial idea by one another.
in the first place
First implies all of nature (cause); second implies division of nature into each native (effect)...only effect within cause can have place (body) ment (mind).
A jew utilizes suggestion to tempt a gentiles secondary perception to ignore the first cause of all perceivable by for example tempting gentiles to race against each other to reach the "first place" at the end, which once again represents a contradiction.
technologically advanced
Nature advances (inception towards death) native (life) within a straight line...a jew suggests techno (artifice) logi (logic) to shape a circle inside (logic) and outside (reason) of gentiles to distract from delineation.
Advancing technologically implies running in an artificial circle while ignoring natural advancement.
the world ended and we restarted
Only in-between beginning (inception) and end (death) can a world (life) be shaped, and only within an ongoing line can a temporary shape experience beginning and end.
reset theory
Aka ones REsponse to being SET by THEO (God)...which a jew inverts with the-ORY aka orating in the name of God for gentiles.
Orating in the name of God aka "In nomine Patris" shapes trinitarianism aka logos (word of God) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (turning against one another)...running gentiles within a circle of re-cycling.
God doesn't speak....God implies sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) generating each in-stru-ment (mind structured within).
Theory (orating theos) represents blasphemy aka "to speak impiously or irreverently of God". A jew inverting practical (sound) into theoretical (word) represents spell-craft and most gentiles are spellbound.
several factors that I believe make me immune to mind control
Immune aka im (within) mune (change), hence immunity implying each being (life) within change (inception towards death) given free will of choice....both factor (one who buys or sells for another) and believing (to hold onto the suggestion of another) bind ones free will of choice aka making ones immunity susceptible to another.
Notice furthermore that con (together) trol (to roll) contradicts several; adjective - "existing apart, independent, not together"
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see:
- My loneliness is killin' me (and I)
- I must confess, I still believe (still believe)
- When I'm not with you, I lose my mind, give me a sign
- Hit me, baby, one more time
The showrunner of Supernatural; Eric Kripke the son of Larry and Joan Kripke (a jewish couple). His paternal cousin was Saul Kripke, an influential philosopher and logician....
"(Saul) Kripke was also partly responsible for the revival of metaphysics and essentialism after the decline of logical positivism, claiming necessity is a metaphysical notion distinct from the epistemic notion of a priori, and that there are necessary truths that are known a posteriori, such as that water is H2O. A 1970 Princeton lecture series, published in book form in 1980 as Naming and Necessity, is considered one of the most important philosophical works of the 20th century."
That being said...watch out for others naming something super (beyond) natural to gain control over the mind of a being within nature.
Roller coaster
a) Only within a line can a circle be shaped. The track is always linear (beginning towards end)...no matter how many loops one rolls through.
b) Coast; verb - "to skirt, to go around the sides, to go along the border"...few suggest rollercoasters to sideline the minds of many while tempting each off-center.
If one mentally (logic) and physically (reason) rolls; then one coasts the implicating line (if > then).
a device which is permanently fixed to a site
Aka a device (suggestion by another) which is permanently fixed (ones consent) to a site (ones perception)...imagine a suggestion so AMUSE-ing that within ones perceiving MENT it can be PARK-ed by consent?
loophole
Only within (w)hole can a loop be shaped by tempting a partial to hold beginning and end together, like for example mentally thinking in a circle (logic) or physically turning against one another (reason). The use of logic within reason represents a "loop the loop" establishing a "hole in one".
Selling weapons for defense from others, while offering self up to AI by others...at what price?
Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies a state of dissolution aka "to break up, disunite, separate into parts". Living implies disunity; dying implies unity.
The issue in the above question...a body cannot be plural (bodies) or whole (all); only a partial unit (form) within whole singularity (flow).
Bur-i-al (to bury within all) tempts one to ignore that all (flow) disinters each one (form). Few suggest land; air or water burials to distract many from natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) aka the ongoing division of each from one another within the same motion.
It's the process of dying which consumes each living potential within, hence each ones struggle with hunger and thirst. To distract from the natural process...few artificially feed potential to potential to tempt possession aka appetite.
In short...few are composting many.
Being implies slow (life) within fast (inception towards death) food...struggling in-between hunger (need) and appetite (want). Fast food tempts one to ignore that slow being requires one to resist temptation, which fertilizes resistance.