Homosexuals explained.
(media.scored.co)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Needing to resist wanted temptation. Sodomy implies want vs not want; while ignoring need.
Pretend (Latin proetendo; to stretch forward) tempts one to ignore being (life) within straight (inception towards death); hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to stretch forward.
Sex (Latin seco; to divide) implies setting apart, while marriage (Latin maritatu; to wed; entering into a wedlock) implies putting together...latter contradicts former.
Needing to set apart implies ones choice to resist; while wanting to put together implies ones choice falling for the temptation to ignore resisting.
Example...intercourse for off-spring implies a setting apart, for which one needs to resist wanted temptation. The less one resists; the more one tempts self to try something else....entrance sodomy; prostitution; abortion; sex-changes etc.
LET, verb - "to suffer; to permit"....only nature (inception towards death) permits suffering (life). Resistance diminishes suffering; temptation diminishes resistance. Life needs to resist wanted temptation, while suffering within the process of dying.
Full implies "containing all that can be received"; which implies ones possessiveness (to receive; to take into possession) over suggested information, contained within ones consenting mind/memory; hence "contain-ment".
Meanwhile in reality...perceivable inspiration flows (inception towards death) through each form (life) and cannot be held onto aka taken possession of aka contained within memory.
Ones denial of perceivable for suggested implies "emptiness", and ones possessiveness of suggested implies "fulfillment".
CELIBATE, noun - "a single life" aka being (bate) sole (celi) implies as one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Celibacy implies each ones status quo of being, which few corrupt by tempting many to "marry" aka to willingly consent to be united in wedlock aka binding together as the inversion of being set apart from one another.
a) "Christ's Second Appearing" implies anointed ones (christ) coming into light (appear) by division (Latin seco; to divide) of whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
The trick...suggesting one that "christ" is another, hence tempting one to count/enumerate/reckon together other ones as second; third; fourth etc.
b) "known as Shaking Quakers" implies shaking (inception towards death) + quaking (life) aka motion generating emotions.
Shaking implies setting apart; quacking implies convulsing together....hence one needing to "shake your booty" aka letting go of what one holds onto.
Another sleight of hand: "Shake, shake, shake, Señora, shake your body line...work, work, work, Señora, work your body line" aka senor (motion) + senora (momentum) for body (life) within line (inception towards death).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn3tUOJ9yv4
I quoted from that very wiki article (known as Shaking Quakers). The issue...shaking and quaking implies perceivable nature before it can be suggested artificially to describe anything within nature.
Few utilize suggestion to distract many from perception. Groups don't choose names; many follow suggested orders by few leaders; such as consenting to a brand. Nature doesn't group together; it sets units apart from one another.
PRECI'SE, adjective - "exact; definite; having determinate limitations; not loose"...few suggest definitions to trick many to ignore being set free ( will of choice) and spell-craft (linguistic) is how suggestions are being shaped and transferred to one another.
Definition implies "deaf phonetician" aka being deaf to phonics (perceivable sound); when consenting to suggested words.
Language implies "articulating sound" aka utilizing artificial (words) to distract from natural (sound). Nature doesn't shape words; it moves sound.
Aka suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested. Nothing isn't a natural state; but the artificial suggestion to ignore everything natural.
Artificial intelligence cannot adapt to natural knowledge (perceivable inspiration) without contradicting itself. This is all written by ones free will of choice...
a) Only nature gives straightforward (inception towards death) to each one (life) within.
b) Suggested questions tempt one to seek an outcome (suggested answers); while ignoring perceivable origin. If one's alive and being moved from inception towards death; then one needs to resist origin as to sustain self before outcome...others suggest outcomes as the inversion of perceivable origin.
Any question aims towards death; while any answer tempts life to wait for death. Nature doesn't question; nor give answers...it implies solution (inception towards death) generating problems (life); hence each ones struggle to sustain self.
c) Nature gives; those within tempt each other to take. Nature moves matter; matter cannot take motion...but it can be tricked to hold onto other matter, while burdening itself within motion.
d) What does nothing give? What gives nothing?
a) Yes vs no implies a conflict of reason, shaped by ones consent to suggested determinism, hence your "precise linguistic". This conflict continues for as long as one holds onto any side. An answer cannot dissolve a conflict of reason; it simply tempts both sides to seek more answers by questioning each other....a self perpetuating conflict.
b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family (the last name was originally spelled Fucker)...this implies freemasonry. If one puts bricks on mortar, then the weight squeezes the mortar outwards, which one has to smooth over at the joint...this is called a FUGE.
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others...fuge/fuck is used to smooth the joints over, hence the many being tempted to use "fuck" within their endless conflicts of reason to maintain ignorance smooth aka "fuck this; fuck that; go fuck yourself; get the fuck out of here; holy fuck etc."
Free will of choice sets apart bricks and mortar, hence choice being uneven and rough, instead of a "smooth criminal"
For those with eyes to see...fuck/fuge/fugue aka "a fugue is a composition founded upon one subject, announced at first in one part alone, and subsequently imitated by all the other parts in turn".