Needing to resist wanted temptation. Sodomy implies want vs not want; while ignoring need.
Pretend to be straight
Pretend (Latin proetendo; to stretch forward) tempts one to ignore being (life) within straight (inception towards death); hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to stretch forward.
sexless marriage
Sex (Latin seco; to divide) implies setting apart, while marriage (Latin maritatu; to wed; entering into a wedlock) implies putting together...latter contradicts former.
Needing to set apart implies ones choice to resist; while wanting to put together implies ones choice falling for the temptation to ignore resisting.
Example...intercourse for off-spring implies a setting apart, for which one needs to resist wanted temptation. The less one resists; the more one tempts self to try something else....entrance sodomy; prostitution; abortion; sex-changes etc.
Let...
LET, verb - "to suffer; to permit"....only nature (inception towards death) permits suffering (life). Resistance diminishes suffering; temptation diminishes resistance. Life needs to resist wanted temptation, while suffering within the process of dying.
Full implies "containing all that can be received"; which implies ones possessiveness (to receive; to take into possession) over suggested information, contained within ones consenting mind/memory; hence "contain-ment".
Meanwhile in reality...perceivable inspiration flows (inception towards death) through each form (life) and cannot be held onto aka taken possession of aka contained within memory.
Ones denial of perceivable for suggested implies "emptiness", and ones possessiveness of suggested implies "fulfillment".
celibate
CELIBATE, noun - "a single life" aka being (bate) sole (celi) implies as one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Celibacy implies each ones status quo of being, which few corrupt by tempting many to "marry" aka to willingly consent to be united in wedlock aka binding together as the inversion of being set apart from one another.
like a shaker
a) "Christ's Second Appearing" implies anointed ones (christ) coming into light (appear) by division (Latin seco; to divide) of whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
The trick...suggesting one that "christ" is another, hence tempting one to count/enumerate/reckon together other ones as second; third; fourth etc.
b) "known as Shaking Quakers" implies shaking (inception towards death) + quaking (life) aka motion generating emotions.
Shaking implies setting apart; quacking implies convulsing together....hence one needing to "shake your booty" aka letting go of what one holds onto.
Another sleight of hand: "Shake, shake, shake, Señora, shake your body line...work, work, work, Señora, work your body line" aka senor (motion) + senora (momentum) for body (life) within line (inception towards death).
So what do you want gay dudes to do? Pretend to be straight and date your sister who then gets stuck in a loveless, sexless marriage?
Let gay people go off to Fire Island.
Needing to resist wanted temptation. Sodomy implies want vs not want; while ignoring need.
Pretend (Latin proetendo; to stretch forward) tempts one to ignore being (life) within straight (inception towards death); hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to stretch forward.
Sex (Latin seco; to divide) implies setting apart, while marriage (Latin maritatu; to wed; entering into a wedlock) implies putting together...latter contradicts former.
Needing to set apart implies ones choice to resist; while wanting to put together implies ones choice falling for the temptation to ignore resisting.
Example...intercourse for off-spring implies a setting apart, for which one needs to resist wanted temptation. The less one resists; the more one tempts self to try something else....entrance sodomy; prostitution; abortion; sex-changes etc.
LET, verb - "to suffer; to permit"....only nature (inception towards death) permits suffering (life). Resistance diminishes suffering; temptation diminishes resistance. Life needs to resist wanted temptation, while suffering within the process of dying.
Are you fully celibate like a Shaker?
Full implies "containing all that can be received"; which implies ones possessiveness (to receive; to take into possession) over suggested information, contained within ones consenting mind/memory; hence "contain-ment".
Meanwhile in reality...perceivable inspiration flows (inception towards death) through each form (life) and cannot be held onto aka taken possession of aka contained within memory.
Ones denial of perceivable for suggested implies "emptiness", and ones possessiveness of suggested implies "fulfillment".
CELIBATE, noun - "a single life" aka being (bate) sole (celi) implies as one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Celibacy implies each ones status quo of being, which few corrupt by tempting many to "marry" aka to willingly consent to be united in wedlock aka binding together as the inversion of being set apart from one another.
a) "Christ's Second Appearing" implies anointed ones (christ) coming into light (appear) by division (Latin seco; to divide) of whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
The trick...suggesting one that "christ" is another, hence tempting one to count/enumerate/reckon together other ones as second; third; fourth etc.
b) "known as Shaking Quakers" implies shaking (inception towards death) + quaking (life) aka motion generating emotions.
Shaking implies setting apart; quacking implies convulsing together....hence one needing to "shake your booty" aka letting go of what one holds onto.
Another sleight of hand: "Shake, shake, shake, Señora, shake your body line...work, work, work, Señora, work your body line" aka senor (motion) + senora (momentum) for body (life) within line (inception towards death).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn3tUOJ9yv4
No, I literally meant the Shakers. The celibate Quaker-like group. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakers
I’m linguistically precise, I don’t need you exhaustively parsing my single sentence through ChatGPT and not giving a straightforward answer.
Do you fuck, yes or no?