1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

mass media lies are actually directives

Fictitious directives towards outcome tempting those who consent to ignore being (life) directed (inception towards death) within actual origin.

Truth vs lie (fictional) distracts reaction (life) from action (inception towards death).

which lies to regurgitate

Ones consent regurgitates any suggested truth or lies until withdrawn from aka letting go of, hence holding onto information establishing circular logic aka internal regurgitation of external "food for thought".

Suggested information (fictional) tempts one to ignore that perceivable inspiration (actual) cannot be held onto or regurgitated.

In my personal view

Person aka per sonos (by sound)...claiming mine distracts one from being insane aka in sanus (within sound).

Others suggest THE VIEW to distract ones sight from being within moving sound by tempting one to focus aka narrow ones sight to what another shows.

These authors view culture war not as an unavoidable result of widespread cultural differences

Taking a side within a war implies ones ignorance of being set apart from one another. TAKING truth or false from one another establishes the artificial war against each other, while ignoring that only nature is GIVING.

Nature differentiates being...few within tempt many together, which establishes a) like-minded behavior and b) conflicts of reason against each other aka war.

technique to exploit differences

Technique/tekhnē - "art, skill, craft" implies suggested artifice distracting different beings (ones perception) from same nature (all perceivable).

It's ones consent given to any suggestion by another which opens the exploit by closing ones awareness of perceivable.

Example...If I craft a house, then I can tempt those who consent to live in it to ignore the natural need to shelter for the artificial want to seek shelter from me.

Seeking becomes the very addiction one needs to shelter from... https://genius.com/The-rolling-stones-gimme-shelter-lyrics

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

The very main goal is controllable and obedient crowd.

What if a suggested outcome (goal) tempts those who consent to be obedient to and controllable by those who shaped the suggestion?

What if each ones perception within all perceivable implies a response to origin...not a consent to outcome?

Just look at any woke person

Does looking/locking onto a suggestion make one awake to per-sonos (by sound) aka to being (perception) by sound (perceivable)?

the way it was meant to be.

The way (perceivable) was before one came into being (perception)...others suggest meaning to distract one from that.

3
free-will-of-choice 3 points ago +3 / -0

a) Asking for liberty permits answers to be held within captivity...

b) Only during DOM-inance (inception towards death) can one be FREE (life)...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nature doesn't reflect...each one within responses (re) to being bend (flectere). Few suggests mirrors to invert that by tempting many to hold onto the reflection thereof.

Mirror/mirare - "to look at" implies ones sight (perception) within all (perceivable) looking/locking onto what another shows (suggested).

  • Cause what you see you might not get
  • And we can bet, so don't you get souped yet
  • You're scheming on a thing that's a mirage
  • I'm trying to tell you now, it's sabotage
1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've gone from being...to having to

A being cannot have/own/possess inwards...only express potential outwards.

You'll eventually notice that changing sides within a conflict of reason (for vs against) doesn't impact the outcome of a suggestion (Connor McGregor).

A jew suggests Connor McGregor fighting within a ring, to tempt consenting gentiles to reason from outside whose gonna win or lose. Simultaneously a jew suggests narratives including Connor McGregor to establish a ring (circular logic) within each consenting gentiles mind/memory, as to manipulate both sides within the resulting conflict of reason (for vs against) among gentiles.

A gentile is being tricked to believe that consent given (to buy) implies possession gained over suggested (to sell)...while ignoring that perception (life) within perceivable (inception towards death) cannot hold onto anything.

we are to believe

WE implies ones (singular) belief in suggested pluralism. Holding onto such an -ism tempts one to ignore the implication of TO aka being (life) moved from inception TOWARDS death.

Be-lieve implies BEING LEAVING...the state of being.

who lied...in order to

A lie can only be shaped within the natural order moving life from inception TOWARDS death. A shaped lie or truth tempts one to believe aka to hold onto the suggested shape, while fighting (reason) within a ring (circular logic) about the meaning thereof.

The ongoing natural order doesn't stop for the temporary chaos within choosing to fight each other over fiction, while ignoring reality.

seen all over CCTV

a) If it's a CLOSED CIRCUIT telling a vision, then how did ones sight get in it?

b) How could such a closed circuit represent ALL if each ONEs sight operates outside of it?

c) Is it ones sight when looking at visions told (TV) in shapes within a closed circuit by another?

to have sex

How could one have/own/possess...sex/seco/divide...if it implies a separation from one another?

Yes I agree

Implies tethering self to the following conflicts of reason...YES vs NO; I vs YOU, and AGREE vs DISAGREE.

What a commitment for one to fight in three different conflicts simultaneously...would Connor McGregor commit to such odds?

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

antichrist

Consenting to a suggestion by another tempts one to ignore self, hence turning one against (anti) the anointed (christ) self.

Anti (ignorance) Christ (self discernment)...it's each ones free will of choice.

the prophecy surrounding

The suggestions by another become prophecy by ones consent, which establishes circular logic within self, hence surrounding ones thoughts with prophecy by another.

debated

Consenting to suggested establishes circular logic within self and conflict of reason against others, hence the perpetuation of debates over suggested information.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

fictional callouts of hopes without true basis. Movies.

Mo-TION implies the base for fic-TION. Call outs are made by few to tempt many to watch moving pictures (movies), while ignoring to be (life) within motion (inception towards death).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

synagogue

Syn (together) agein (put in motion) ag (to drive, draw out or forth, move)...an inversion of nature putting in (life) motion (inception towards death) by driving apart each one within from one another.

The SYN in synagogue implies gentiles being brought together (tikkun olam) by each jew tempting each gentile to ignore that motion sets matter apart...which implies the AGOGUE.

In short...casting out SYN/SIN.

Sin to Gog

Sin out of Gog aka togetherness (indigestion) out of apartheid (procession).

Nature sets apart; few within tempt many together so that the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) forces temporary indigestion (life) out of the way of few.

GOG = Gynecologic Oncology Group

a) Onco - "tumor" + Gyneco/gynē - "female/woman"...

b) Logic/logy - "conflict of reason" aka the grouping of gentiles together.

c) The MA in magog implies MAMA...

Uterus gives inception to life

ALL gives...uterus receives given and carries (gestation) each ONE apart (off-spring).

Sins Of The GOG

SYN/SIN (singular)...hence tempting consenting ones together.

While being moved from inception towards death...life can only hold onto each other, hence putting together (syn) what nature sets apart aka sinning.

is Inception towards Death

Motion WAS before matter (life) can suggest each other what momentum (inception towards death) IS.

Rabbi

Rabbi/robh - "multitude"...hence consenting (slave) to a rabbis (master) suggestion establishing jew (minority) and gentiles (multitude).

That's also the foundation for "robbing"...a rabbi robs ones potential by tempting one to join others.

Owner of the Eye

If one claims self as "me; myself or I (eye)" then one demands a right from a YOU (jew)...because a moving nature cannot be claimed.

The claim of "I" shapes each other one into a "YOU"...and demanding a right from a YOU by making the claim of I implies that YOU owns I.

printed currency

A print implies "impression upon surface"...being implies expression (life) within current (inception towards death), hence sur-face; sur-charge; sur-pass; sur-vival etc.

A jew utilizes print to impress WORD (suggestion) upon the current of SOUND (perception)...within the consenting minds/memories of gentiles.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

conflating wordplay

a) I took "flag-pole" apart after others conflated it together.

b) Playing implies gambling for suggested outcome...which tempts one to ignore perceivable origin.

conflating...with reality

Real implies a setting apart of ones RE-action (life) within ALL action (inception towards death)...reacting to each others suggestions conflates consent together.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Information war is by itself is an attempt to break the pattern recoginition abilities of public.

a) Public (plural) implies a suggested aggregate tempting each perceiving person (singular) to ignore self for others.

b) The break implies from all perceivable into each ones perception, while the suggestions by few tempt consenting many together.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is all about patterns...

Pattern/pater - "father" + about/abutan - "on the outside"...hence pattern re-cogni-tion aka internal reaction (re) perceiving (cogni) external action (tion).

for that moment

aka FORward MOMENTum...others suggest a this vs that conflict of reason to distract one from being matter (life) within forward momentum (inception towards death) of motion.

still could see

How could ones perception see all perceivable without motion aka from within stillness? Meanwhile...believing implies holding onto suggested, while ignoring perceivable.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

They could be running it up the flagpole to see how much resistance it gets.

If one puts flag/flacceo/flaccid - "to bend; to recede; to limp; to hang loose" before pole, then how much resistance should others expect?

What if few are phallus worshipers who erect basilisks and skyscrapers, while tricking many with flagpoles to show their impotence?

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

people will believe anything without doing an ounce of research

Look at the religions of this world...which one offers something to believe in exchange for research made? Which religion is based upon ones effort made before entering? Why does a so called jew makes it hard for gentiles to join the jewish faith?

This is shit we expect to see from leftists, but many on the so-called "right" are just as guilty of believing anything so long as it confirms their bias.

Being able to stand implies choosing to balance IN-BETWEEN left and right...holding onto either side would imbalance ones choice.

8
free-will-of-choice 8 points ago +8 / -0

"There are too many temples; we have too many churches; we have too many mosques"

What about the synagogues?

"We have to get rid of all the monks; get rid of all the preachers; all the imams."

What about the rabbis?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you're saying X or Y or Z are bad...

...then you established a conflict of reason (good vs bad); which your further comparisons are distracting from.

If you say "life is hard," just what are you going to compare it too?

Living implies within process of dying...a conflict of reason (easy vs hard) distracts from ones struggle to sustain self nonetheless.

Drawing comparisons about life being as hard as...tempts one to ignore that living isn't equal (par) together (com), but oddly apart from one another. Few tempt many to draw comparisons among each other to lure them together into conflicts of reason against each other.

I'm no genius

Reacting (life) to generation (inception towards death)...that's what genius/gene - "generative power" implies. Debating each other over genius vs dunce tempts one to ignore that.

Humans are weird" --- Compared to what?

Weird/wer - "to turn; bend"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/weird#etymonline_v_4898

Direction (inception towards death) bends (life), hence each being representing a temporary growth (sinus curve) within an ongoing loss (base line).

Turning against each other within conflicts of reason tempts one to ignore that.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wasn't the nazis, but the one's who funded them.

a) Ashke-nazi

b) All implies ones foundation...ashke-nazi tempt one to ignore all (perceivable) for nothing (suggested), hence establishing a fictitious foundation within reality, held together by the consenting masses.

Example...if one evaluates a gold bar as a door stopper, then few can suggest a value for gold to tempt consenting many to kill one for the door stopper.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

a) Only nature uses..each being within re-uses what nature offers.

b) Nature implies first...each being implies second aka seco - "to divide" aka an ongoing division of nature into each temporary being.

c) Ones perception (secondary effect) implies a tool implemented by all perceivable (first cause)...suggested tools and implements tempting ones consent to use them imply a third party offer.

Suggested (third) tempts perception (second) to ignore perceivable (first)...

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

why do we put up with this shit?

Because WE (plural) implies the accumulation; the indigestion; the amassing; the shit.

Cause (inception towards death) sets being (life) apart from ONE (singular) another.

inflammatory comments about white people

a) White implies "pure light"...it cannot be commented upon, since mending (ment) together (com) implies impurity.

b) White (motion) inflames rays (matter) within spectrum (momentum). Rays (life) within spectrum (inception towards death) are burning out.

c) Few suggest pluralism (people) to tempt each one of many to ignore being a perceiving singular (person).

union cancel an event

Event (inception towards death) generates union (life) by setting each unit apart from one another. Ones consent to a suggested union like "united states" tempts many together under a chosen ONE, which establishes an event horizon (a boundary beyond which events cannot affect an observer) because the observer holds onto the suggested union.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +3 / -1

yellow vest in the background...

45 (9) 47 (11)...

will fix it

Nature sets WILL free...

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) There are no missing parts within nature.

b) Putting parts together cannot make whole, hence a puzzle coming within a box, and each connecting part is surrounded by an outline...representing the moving differentiation of whole (motion) into partials (matter) within a box (momentum).

c) Whole implies one...as does each one partial within. Without whole setting partials apart from one another, other ones couldn't tempt one to puzzle together.

d) Puzzling together tempts one to miss that nature sets each thing within apart from one another. The missing part implies ones lack of self discernment.

e) Here's a little background about the Maier family behind the Ravensburger jigsaw puzzles...

  • 1885: Maier published a collection of patterns for stonemasons.
  • 1945: Otto Maier Verlag survives World War II undamaged and receives a publishing license.
  • 1959: The game MEMORY is launched.
  • 1960: The game MALEFIZ ("Barricade") is introduced.
  • 1964: Ravensburger puzzles are launched
-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

If God gave man our Free Will

God implies mono; our implies poly...two contradicting sides tempting ones (yours) free will of choice to imbalance itself by holding onto either.

why would God interfere with said "Free-Will"?

Being implies inter (choice) fere (balance) of God. In other words...Energy internally establishes action and reaction in balance with each other aka DOM-inating action (balance) and FREE reactions (choice).

Few suggest "free will" without OF CHOICE as a liberty to tempt ones consent by "free will of choice" to ignore self as FREE within DOM.

we contribute to the reality that is perceived

All perceivable generates each ones perception by setting apart aka by internal separation aka by differentiation aka by alternation...few suggest pluralism (we) for many to tribute consent together aka con-tribute, which is what one (singular) does when speaking in the name of others (plural) by simply using the word WE.

WE THE PEOPLE implies a suggested fiction...not a perceivable reality.

shared with the species

Species implies specification by separation of whole into partials. Few suggest speciesism to tempt many to consent to classification of each into many, which few then direct back from many into one aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one).

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +2 / -2

one thing true about all Christians

All implies God; each one within implies a Christian.

gullible

Each one is gullible when ignoring perception (reality) for suggestion (fiction).

faith is belief in lieu of evidence.

a) Giving faith/having belief implies ones consent to the suggestion of another...which makes the suggested evident to the one consenting to hold onto it.

b) There's only ones position within all...consenting to a suggestion of another tempts one to ignore ones position for a "lieu" of another, hence a shirking of response-ability.

The book you love was written by man

a) A book binds those who read in-between covers, hence in-between a conflict of reason like love vs hate.

b) Nature does not write/outline...it implies the line (inception towards death) for those within (life).

The stories in it were made up by man.

Nature doesn't store...it processes (inception towards death) products (life). Few tempt many to abuse mind/memory as storage for suggested information, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto; saved; stored...without destroying self.

The money you donate goes to fund

All perceivable (value) generates each ones perception (evaluation)...few suggest money to tempt many to devalue themselves, which in return permits few to set a price for that which nature offers towards each ones FREE will of choice.

Current implies a moving foundation; currency tempts those within (life) a moving foundation (inception towards death) to accumulate debt aka a self inflicted burden...

Living within the process of dying implies ones need to stay out of DEBT/DEAD by resisting wanted temptations luring one into it.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

One of the Tesla deceptions about using AC to generate electricity is a) current (inception towards death) generates alternation (life) and b) generated electricity implies a dis-charge aka a further division of charge, which tempts the alternating being within current to ignore to re-charge self.

The deception of charging...building a vessel to hold charges tempts one to ignore being a vessel; processed within charge, hence unable to contain within self without needing to let go.

Resistance during velocity can sustain temporal neutrality without participating in + vs - discharges...and that resistance builds up.

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

God is patient

a) WAS (perceivable) before IS (suggested)

b) All (god) was before one (being) can come into being a patient.

does not abide forever

Abide denotes "onward motion"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/abide#etymonline_v_38 aka ever forward (for-ever).

Few suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt many to ignore temporarily being (life) done (inception towards death) within forever, for the inversion "does nothing".

repentance

One cannot repent (grieving what came before, while seeking forgiveness from what comes) without ignoring oneself as choice within balance.

In other words...holding onto one side (grieve), while inclining towards another (forgiveness) ignores being (life) in-between sides (inception/death).

The Lord is not slow to fulfil His promise

A promise implies a pledge/vow of one to another...before such can be made ALL sets each ONE apart from one another.

Lord/laverd/loverd/wer - "perceive, watch out for"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/lord#etymonline_v_12435 implies ONE (perception) within ALL (perceivable), while the lord implies suggested THE-ism tempting ones consent to submit ones free will of choice to another lord above self.

salvation

There can be no salvation for emergency (life) during solution (inception towards death)...yet that which emerges can temporary grow during ongoing loss by resisting temptations like others suggesting one to seek salvation aka a way out of being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) “Every Masonic Lodge is a temple of religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion.” ~ Albert Pike

Talmud; noun - "instruction" from lamadh "he learned"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Talmud#etymonline_v_4343 hence senate/sen - "old, eld" aka learned elders.

b) Denomination; noun - "a calling by anything other than the proper name"

Denoumenon (suggestion) tempts phenomenon (perception) to ignore noumenoun (perceivable).

Noumenoun differentiates phenomenon. Denoumenon is "something like a phenomenon"... https://genius.com/Ll-cool-j-phenomenon-lyrics

DENOUM/demon-enoun...

  • Behind every playa (life) is a true playette (inception towards death)
  • Bounce you up (inception) outta there (death), push eject
  • Taster's Choice, have her nice and moist
  • But you're worth it playgirl, it's real in the field
  • Say what you want, but keep your lips sealed
view more: ‹ Prev Next ›