This should be obvious to anybody, or Americans at least, who have at least a 6th grade understanding of the Constitution.
This isn't a conspiracy as much as a critique of a certain conspiracy theory mindset.
Comments (6)
sorted by:
You can, but it's harder.
Takes longer and bigger coalitions, but yea.
I'm not sure which conspiracy theory mindset you're referencing, but in general, all large systems are guided as they grow and are largely controlled/contained. There's no way around that.
However, from the patterns I've seen in my time, there is usually a lot of leeway to do what you want outside of the system, so long as you are not directly interfering with any active goals of the system. You don't get any of the conveniences or niceties of the system that way, though, which is what keeps people in it.
When I look around, I observe that the vast majority of conspiracy theorists are crusaders engaged in fights with clouds of smoke. They condemn all who are not fighting the same smoke clouds. And they are exceedingly proud of themselves, as it is clear that they're giving that smoke a helluva beating.
The real powers need only stand outside the smoke, outside the range of the wild swinging.
Yep. I agree. They usually have a series of purity tests, and may be on board with most of what they believe, but it takes just one thing that someone else they know, who may have sort of a conventional mindset about a topic, and they get dismissed by the other theorist.
This mindset is nurtured by those who distrust organizing to great effect.
System implies the arrangement of things together...nature implies the division of each native within from one another.
Look at this... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/arrangement.html and notice that BEING is listed as the opposite of arrangement.
Nature implies everything doing each thing apart. Doing implies action...being done implies reaction.
A thing cannot do...only re-do all being done. As gentiles are being deceived to do, each jew redoes everything aka revisionism.
SYS implies "together"; DIFF implies "apart" aka differentiated from one another. It's ones consent to any suggested system which cultivates differences (difficult) together.
That's called suggested progressivism aka JUST DO IT...which gives few the upper hand (goddess of victory aka NIKE) if many consent to it.