They need the computing power because they’re going to force us into a digital currency and a digital ID that has to be able to track our every movement, every transaction, and every word we speak in order to calculate our social credit and carbon credit score, that’s what it’s all about.
There’s not much more to it than that other than they plan to get rid of cops altogether so they can be replaced by humanoid robots, robot dogs and flying drones by the tens of thousands that’ll be deployed at a moments notice to brutally put down any sort of rioting or crime the spy grid spots happening in real time. Obviously that system is going to require an insane amount of computing power to be functional when used to control a nation of 400+ million people if you include the illegals.
Oh and they’ll need the computing power for their tele-health and tele-education services as well. They’re going to get rid of human doctors and schools/teachers in the future. They don’t want kids to be socialized properly, they want kids stuck at home for most of their lives so they don’t develop the social skills needed to find a future husband/wife that’ll lead to more children being born, population control….and when citizens get sick from all of the artificial health destroying technologies are bodies are being inundated with, like lab grown foods and 6G radio waves, they’ll use their AI controlled hospitals to deal with the patients, robot doctors that will dictate whether you get a necessary medication or a necessary surgery based on your age and how much value you provide to the system.
digital ID that has to be able to track our every movement, every transaction
You're not wrong. But, this is only part of it. However, if that's all it was they only needed just a few AI data centers in all the major countries.
It's much more. And THEY need way more computing power, and these needs were grossly underestimated. They need to introduce "programmable money" and a third lock. Let me explain. Programmable money introduces a third lock. Between you and the seller, there is now an algorithm, a set of encoded rules that can approve, deny, modify, delay, or conditionally permit every single transaction. That is the literal technical definition of programmable money. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) describes the architecture this way. In their own words, tokenization integrates messaging, reconciliation, and settlement into a single seamless operation. What they do not say but what the architecture necessarily implies is that the entity controlling the program controls the transaction that it's not a financial system that is a control system. The tokenized securities can support collateral repo and equity transactions while preserving the same legal ownership rights as traditional assets. The full service launch is set for October 2026. So, right around the corner.
They are introducing the new monetary operating system. And the defining feature of that operating system, the feature that separates it from everything that came before is programmability. Tokenization reduces settlement times and cuts costs. It increases transparency. Crossbank payments currently take days and cost billions in intermediary fees. The existing system is slow, expensive, and opaque. Programmable settlement using smart contracts eliminates manual reconciliation, reduces counter-party risk, and opens markets to broader participation. The IMF itself published a paper describing tokenization as a structural improvement in financial architecture. On April 2, 2026, the IMF published a specific staff paper authored by Tobias Adrian entitled Tokenized Finance, which argues that tokenization represents a structural shift in the global financial system rather than merely a technological enhancement.
October is operational readiness. Pay attention to which blockchain networks are authorized and which financial institutions opt in during the first 30 days. The adoption curve in those first 30 days will tell you how fast the rest of the system follows.
The question you should be asking is not how to make money from what's coming? but how do you survive what's coming. What if the real threat is not that your money loses value, but that your money stops being yours?
What if while you have been watching the markets go up and down, the architecture of your entire financial life has been quietly redesigned and the new architecture has a feature the old one never had. A third lock on every transaction you will ever make. The question I'm asking: who holds the key to the third lock? The most dangerous financial system is not the one that crashes. It is the one that works perfectly for whoever controls it.
Yes, but that window is closing quick. IMO, anything that can be used in a bartering economy, which is virtually any good or service of value that can be exchanged if both parties agree on the terms. Key here is "come to quick agreement".
In crisis or economic collapse scenarios, which is exactly what's coming, high-value barter items shift toward survival essentials such as fuel, medicinal herbs, water filters, long-life foods, tools and security equipment. And of course precious metals like gold and silver.
I'm not an expert in BitCoin, I understand there are advantages but doesn't solve the 3rd lock issue. For instance the FBI and Interpol have successfully traced and seized billions in illicit crypto by linking wallet addresses to real-world identities through exchange KYC data and IP surveillance.
Based on the amount of AI Data Centers they're building I came to the conclusion they are not primarily used for citizen surveillance. Although, that's one of the uses... the main reason THEY need so much compute power is because of the New Financial system that is to come. We're talking about huge computing capacity if it's to judge only by the amount of electricity consumption needed.
Global data center electricity consumption is projected to reach 565 terawatt hours by the end of 2026, up 26% from the year before. Goldman Sachs projects US data center power demand will climb from 31 gigawatt in 2025 to 66 gigawatt by 2027. That is more than doubling in 2 years. The US Department of Energy found that data centers consume 4.4% of all US electricity in 2023 and projects that figure would hit 12% by 2028. Over 5,000 active data center facilities are operating in the United States today with more than 700 under construction across 38 states. In Virginia alone, data centers consume more than a quarter of the state's electricity.
You do not build that much compute capacity for faster stock settlement. You build that much compute capacity when you intend to process, monitor and enforce rules on every transaction in a programmable financial system. My question: is the US data center buildout designed for domestic programmable finance or for global programmable finance? I don't know. As I understand a similar AI data center buildout is planned for Australia. Maybe that would be used to supplement the load required for US or Global demand. Because if you are pushing stable coins and digital tokens out to the entire world through the dollar system, and THEY're just starting to do, the compute requirements are orders of magnitude larger.
You're correct in saying AI training is one of the most computationally intensive tasks in commercial technology. Because it relies on distributed GPU clusters optimized for high throughput and memory bandwidth. The compute required to train the major AI systems has doubled approximately every 6 months. Training AI is computationally intensive because it involves performing numerous floating-point operations (FLOPs) to adjust billions of parameters across massive datasets. I suspect that's one area where they grossly missed estimating the compute requirements. But, that still doesn't explain the data center buildout, IMO.
However, consider this - the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) is the institution provider that automates, centralizes, and standardizes the clearing and settlement of securities transactions for the global financial system. DTCC manages assets valued at approximately $114 trillion in its central securities depository subsidiary, DTC, as of June 2026. In terms of transaction volume, the DTCC processes over $2.5 quadrillion in securities transactions annually. Managing that transaction volume calls for a lot of computing power. DTCC has already begun live production trades using tokenized stocks, bonds, and treasuries, and most people do not even know it is happening. The data center buildout required to run this system is so enormous that it tells you something about the intended scale that no official will say out loud.
You build that much compute capacity when you intend to process, monitor and enforce rules on every transaction in a programmable financial system
A simple back-of-the-envelope calculation of number of cpu cycles in those datacenters divided by number of transactions in the world rules that out. Completely.
My criticism of these data centers - anyone in HVAC want to chime in? The official explanation of this water use is that they're using a glorified swamp cooler with in an open system (water is dumped out rather than recycled). It's seemingly the most inefficient cooling method. Why not use refrigerant, which has the added benefit of taking water out of the air? Are servers not sensitive to moisture? Seems like a front and why isn't anyone questioning this?
Because ignoring where one came from for what another suggests is coming worsens ones position.
recession
Only during recession (inception towards death) can expansion (life) come into being.
they need massive amounts of computing power
Few realize that nature offers all needed to each native within, hence redirecting the massive amount of computing power among many towards artifice instead.
AI Data Centers
Artificial data decentralizes each native of nature who chooses to hold onto it. Nature demands adaption; artifice tempts stagnation. Few utilize AI to regurgitate data to many, which distracts from natural adaption with artificial stagnation.
They hope that many will use the new financial system, programmable money and digital currency. Every time you use a digital payment, you are generating data that feeds the system being built around you. Cash is not a relic. Cash is the only payment technology that does not require permission from a third party to function.
Cash is the only payment technology that does not require permission from a third party to function.
a) Before one consents to cash or digital one consents to money representing value...which permits few to set artificial values for many.
b) 1st (all perceivable) > 2nd (ones perception) > 3rd (suggestion by another)...any suggestion tempts ones consent to a parasitic 3rd party.
will use the new
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun" ~Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
Few suggest "new" to distort the will of many into ignoring perceivable "now".
the system being built around you
Nature delineates (inception towards death) each native (life)...few tempt many mentally (logic) and physically (reason) into a binding ring aka circular logic and turning against one another reasoning.
Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
payment
Paying another implies selling out ones FREE will of choice...a mental deception.
they hope
Both hope (want) and fear (not want) represent suggested outcomes few shape to distract many from perceivable origin (need).
They need the computing power because they’re going to force us into a digital currency and a digital ID that has to be able to track our every movement, every transaction, and every word we speak in order to calculate our social credit and carbon credit score, that’s what it’s all about.
There’s not much more to it than that other than they plan to get rid of cops altogether so they can be replaced by humanoid robots, robot dogs and flying drones by the tens of thousands that’ll be deployed at a moments notice to brutally put down any sort of rioting or crime the spy grid spots happening in real time. Obviously that system is going to require an insane amount of computing power to be functional when used to control a nation of 400+ million people if you include the illegals.
Oh and they’ll need the computing power for their tele-health and tele-education services as well. They’re going to get rid of human doctors and schools/teachers in the future. They don’t want kids to be socialized properly, they want kids stuck at home for most of their lives so they don’t develop the social skills needed to find a future husband/wife that’ll lead to more children being born, population control….and when citizens get sick from all of the artificial health destroying technologies are bodies are being inundated with, like lab grown foods and 6G radio waves, they’ll use their AI controlled hospitals to deal with the patients, robot doctors that will dictate whether you get a necessary medication or a necessary surgery based on your age and how much value you provide to the system.
You're not wrong. But, this is only part of it. However, if that's all it was they only needed just a few AI data centers in all the major countries.
It's much more. And THEY need way more computing power, and these needs were grossly underestimated. They need to introduce "programmable money" and a third lock. Let me explain. Programmable money introduces a third lock. Between you and the seller, there is now an algorithm, a set of encoded rules that can approve, deny, modify, delay, or conditionally permit every single transaction. That is the literal technical definition of programmable money. The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) describes the architecture this way. In their own words, tokenization integrates messaging, reconciliation, and settlement into a single seamless operation. What they do not say but what the architecture necessarily implies is that the entity controlling the program controls the transaction that it's not a financial system that is a control system. The tokenized securities can support collateral repo and equity transactions while preserving the same legal ownership rights as traditional assets. The full service launch is set for October 2026. So, right around the corner.
They are introducing the new monetary operating system. And the defining feature of that operating system, the feature that separates it from everything that came before is programmability. Tokenization reduces settlement times and cuts costs. It increases transparency. Crossbank payments currently take days and cost billions in intermediary fees. The existing system is slow, expensive, and opaque. Programmable settlement using smart contracts eliminates manual reconciliation, reduces counter-party risk, and opens markets to broader participation. The IMF itself published a paper describing tokenization as a structural improvement in financial architecture. On April 2, 2026, the IMF published a specific staff paper authored by Tobias Adrian entitled Tokenized Finance, which argues that tokenization represents a structural shift in the global financial system rather than merely a technological enhancement.
October is operational readiness. Pay attention to which blockchain networks are authorized and which financial institutions opt in during the first 30 days. The adoption curve in those first 30 days will tell you how fast the rest of the system follows.
how do we make money from that? what are uou buying?
The question you should be asking is not how to make money from what's coming? but how do you survive what's coming. What if the real threat is not that your money loses value, but that your money stops being yours?
What if while you have been watching the markets go up and down, the architecture of your entire financial life has been quietly redesigned and the new architecture has a feature the old one never had. A third lock on every transaction you will ever make. The question I'm asking: who holds the key to the third lock? The most dangerous financial system is not the one that crashes. It is the one that works perfectly for whoever controls it.
i agree. but there is still a window to convert fake money into real world assets before we reach elysium levels of rich and poor
Yes, but that window is closing quick. IMO, anything that can be used in a bartering economy, which is virtually any good or service of value that can be exchanged if both parties agree on the terms. Key here is "come to quick agreement".
In crisis or economic collapse scenarios, which is exactly what's coming, high-value barter items shift toward survival essentials such as fuel, medicinal herbs, water filters, long-life foods, tools and security equipment. And of course precious metals like gold and silver.
I'm not an expert in BitCoin, I understand there are advantages but doesn't solve the 3rd lock issue. For instance the FBI and Interpol have successfully traced and seized billions in illicit crypto by linking wallet addresses to real-world identities through exchange KYC data and IP surveillance.
Based on the amount of AI Data Centers they're building I came to the conclusion they are not primarily used for citizen surveillance. Although, that's one of the uses... the main reason THEY need so much compute power is because of the New Financial system that is to come. We're talking about huge computing capacity if it's to judge only by the amount of electricity consumption needed.
Global data center electricity consumption is projected to reach 565 terawatt hours by the end of 2026, up 26% from the year before. Goldman Sachs projects US data center power demand will climb from 31 gigawatt in 2025 to 66 gigawatt by 2027. That is more than doubling in 2 years. The US Department of Energy found that data centers consume 4.4% of all US electricity in 2023 and projects that figure would hit 12% by 2028. Over 5,000 active data center facilities are operating in the United States today with more than 700 under construction across 38 states. In Virginia alone, data centers consume more than a quarter of the state's electricity.
You do not build that much compute capacity for faster stock settlement. You build that much compute capacity when you intend to process, monitor and enforce rules on every transaction in a programmable financial system. My question: is the US data center buildout designed for domestic programmable finance or for global programmable finance? I don't know. As I understand a similar AI data center buildout is planned for Australia. Maybe that would be used to supplement the load required for US or Global demand. Because if you are pushing stable coins and digital tokens out to the entire world through the dollar system, and THEY're just starting to do, the compute requirements are orders of magnitude larger.
Perhaps they are preparing for the huge amount of data to be aggregated to 'evolve' and upgrade AI rather than sheer surveillance.
That wouldnt be as per raw data storage per se, but more about computing all of it over and over through ML for AI
You're correct in saying AI training is one of the most computationally intensive tasks in commercial technology. Because it relies on distributed GPU clusters optimized for high throughput and memory bandwidth. The compute required to train the major AI systems has doubled approximately every 6 months. Training AI is computationally intensive because it involves performing numerous floating-point operations (FLOPs) to adjust billions of parameters across massive datasets. I suspect that's one area where they grossly missed estimating the compute requirements. But, that still doesn't explain the data center buildout, IMO.
However, consider this - the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) is the institution provider that automates, centralizes, and standardizes the clearing and settlement of securities transactions for the global financial system. DTCC manages assets valued at approximately $114 trillion in its central securities depository subsidiary, DTC, as of June 2026. In terms of transaction volume, the DTCC processes over $2.5 quadrillion in securities transactions annually. Managing that transaction volume calls for a lot of computing power. DTCC has already begun live production trades using tokenized stocks, bonds, and treasuries, and most people do not even know it is happening. The data center buildout required to run this system is so enormous that it tells you something about the intended scale that no official will say out loud.
A simple back-of-the-envelope calculation of number of cpu cycles in those datacenters divided by number of transactions in the world rules that out. Completely.
regional. see 1984. abt 3 or 4 regions.
My criticism of these data centers - anyone in HVAC want to chime in? The official explanation of this water use is that they're using a glorified swamp cooler with in an open system (water is dumped out rather than recycled). It's seemingly the most inefficient cooling method. Why not use refrigerant, which has the added benefit of taking water out of the air? Are servers not sensitive to moisture? Seems like a front and why isn't anyone questioning this?
are there 1,000 MEN with wire cuutters?
Because ignoring where one came from for what another suggests is coming worsens ones position.
Only during recession (inception towards death) can expansion (life) come into being.
Few realize that nature offers all needed to each native within, hence redirecting the massive amount of computing power among many towards artifice instead.
Artificial data decentralizes each native of nature who chooses to hold onto it. Nature demands adaption; artifice tempts stagnation. Few utilize AI to regurgitate data to many, which distracts from natural adaption with artificial stagnation.
They hope that many will use the new financial system, programmable money and digital currency. Every time you use a digital payment, you are generating data that feeds the system being built around you. Cash is not a relic. Cash is the only payment technology that does not require permission from a third party to function.
a) Before one consents to cash or digital one consents to money representing value...which permits few to set artificial values for many.
b) 1st (all perceivable) > 2nd (ones perception) > 3rd (suggestion by another)...any suggestion tempts ones consent to a parasitic 3rd party.
"The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun" ~Ecclesiastes 1:9-10
Few suggest "new" to distort the will of many into ignoring perceivable "now".
Nature delineates (inception towards death) each native (life)...few tempt many mentally (logic) and physically (reason) into a binding ring aka circular logic and turning against one another reasoning.
Only within a line can a circle be shaped.
Paying another implies selling out ones FREE will of choice...a mental deception.
Both hope (want) and fear (not want) represent suggested outcomes few shape to distract many from perceivable origin (need).
This is the single sentence that everyone should understand.