to destroy the stage
- The stage....suggestion
- The elevation...consent
Edit: "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players"..."Last scene of all, that ends this strange eventful history, is second childishness and mere oblivion"
~William Shakespeare
"leaders" would sacrifice
The only sacrifice a leader makes is a suggested outcome for others to follow towards, and that sacrifice was made before followers select leaders by following.
phantom currency
Apparition (suggested information) within animation (perceivable inspiration)...
deceptive mirage
Mirroring (suggestion) reality (perception) misleads ones mind...
where life and death intertwine
Being implies intestine (life) of animation (inception towards death)...ignoring this by consenting to suggested intertwines life with other life aka an intestine indigestion.
a journey where life is but a fleeting illusion...
...a journey fueled by suggestions from others: "Don't stop believin... Hold on to that feelin".
It's a game of chess
Only for those being played...there's no black vs white within the visible spectrum of light...unless one ignores (black) discernment (white).
shaping markets
- The market: consent (buying) + suggestion (selling).
- The shaping: defining; redefining and contradicting suggested information (currency) within perceivable inspiration (current).
manipulate currencies
Manual currency (suggested information) within automatic current (perceivable inspiration).
dictate fate
a) Opposite of fate implies choice... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/fate.html
b) FATE, noun (Latin fatum, fari, to speak) + DICTATE, verb (Latin , to speak)
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/fate
- https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/dictate
There's the spell-craft of suggestion (word) within perception (sound) tempting ones free will of choice to consent to FI'AT. (Latin fio) - "let it be done; a decree; a command to do something".
plotting their next move with precision and cunning
Few don't need to delineate (plot) motion (move)...only tempt many to ignore that ones life-line (inception towards death) moves aka a precise direction of life towards death.
Cunning implies "knowing" aka perceivable; which is what many ignore when consenting to suggestions by few.
a darker truth
Holding onto truth tempts one to ignore that light moves, and ignorance implies darkness for ones discernment within the visible spectrum of light.
greed and corruption
It's the many who want more and more from the few, while corruption themselves by ignoring to resist (need) temptation (want).
financial destiny
Destiny aka "invincible necessity" implies origin (inception towards death) for being (life)...and finance aka revenue (respond to venue) or income (coming to be within) implies oneself as "free" will of choice aka ones evaluation (perception) of all value (perceivable).
tl; dr...nice effort post.
Money implies a suggested currency/current; which runs through the fingers of those trying to hold onto it by consent. Truth implies the same trick...suggested information by few tempting many to consensual hold onto it.
As for "before"...a suggested inversion of forwards (inception towards death) being (life). Before implies "life for death"...a rhetorical self sacrificial ritual.
a) One cannot consent in accordance with another's will or desire without ignoring self.
b) Way of all (inception towards death) implies deadly; each one resisting the temptation of complying with another implies lively.
"You'll own nothing" means they'll keep....
Ones consent to the suggestion of another implies ones de-nial (Latin nihilo; nothing) of everything perceivable. Whatever suggested one attempts to keep by consent implies owning nothing...this includes "meaning".
poor
Rich vs poor implies wanting vs not wanting the suggested values by another...while ignoring to be perception aka evaluation.
One cannot be poor in reality; since nature offers everything perceivable to each ones perception at any moment of being. Furthermore...poor (destitute of property) implies that perception cannot hold onto perceivable without ignoring that it moves, while rich (Latin rego; reach) implies everything perceivable in reach of each ones perception.
Consenting to suggested information implies taking in; while adapting to perceivable inspiration implies reaching out. Gentiles took in suggested values by a jew and are now holding onto "muh precious"; while ignoring to reach out...
singlehandedly created
The single hand of a jew suggesting creationism has no control over another until the moment a gentile consents to it.
If a jew suggests that everything perceivable has a price; the gentile consent sells everything perceivable out the jew suggesting the price.
What am I missing here?
CONGRESS, noun - "to come together"...nature sets apart; so the longer things within nature are coming together; the quicker they degrade each other.
Slow-mo (shlomo aka solomon) has all the time in the world...it's those within who're running out.
why...defining anything...even matters?
Even (inception towards death) generates odds (life) aka motion evening odd matter. Matter holding onto a definition (definite; affixed) ignores motion...ignoring motion burdens matter, while draining resistance.
USA, Europe & India
Aka United States (bringing together what nature sets apart) + European (you are peon aka a debtor held in servitude by his creditor ) + India (within division)...must be hilarious to rule the world.
a) Amount of energy implies one...for all is one in energy.
b) Suggested amount (to rise) tempts one to ignore that only during fall (inception towards death) can one rise (life).
c) Fall (motion) and Rise (matter) of energy.
d) Motion generates momentum for the production of matter.
e) Product (life) cannot refute/drive back generation (inception towards death)...it can be tricked to spend resistance on refuting other products aka selling self out; when buying into others.
f) Suggestion (information) becomes the inversion of perception (inspiration)...if one consents to it.
g) Suggested information tempts one to miss perceivable inspiration by ignoring/denying it. Suggested "misinformation" tempts one to ignore perceivable..."information tempts one to miss inspiration".
Furthermore...ones consent to suggested information establishes a conflict of reason against another, hence DIS-information aka a division among form.
h) Information tempts one to hold onto it; inspiration cannot be held onto; since it moves. Inspiration cannot be refuted...only ignored.
i) Suggesting others to refute information is easy; choosing to let go of all the suggested information one holds onto, as to free oneself within perceivable inspiration...that becomes harder and harder; the more one burdens self with suggested information.
Example: "I need more information about why it is so hard to let go"...a burdening problem.
No, I literally meant the Shakers. The celibate Quaker-like group. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shakers
I quoted from that very wiki article (known as Shaking Quakers). The issue...shaking and quaking implies perceivable nature before it can be suggested artificially to describe anything within nature.
Few utilize suggestion to distract many from perception. Groups don't choose names; many follow suggested orders by few leaders; such as consenting to a brand. Nature doesn't group together; it sets units apart from one another.
I’m linguistically precise
PRECI'SE, adjective - "exact; definite; having determinate limitations; not loose"...few suggest definitions to trick many to ignore being set free ( will of choice) and spell-craft (linguistic) is how suggestions are being shaped and transferred to one another.
Definition implies "deaf phonetician" aka being deaf to phonics (perceivable sound); when consenting to suggested words.
Language implies "articulating sound" aka utilizing artificial (words) to distract from natural (sound). Nature doesn't shape words; it moves sound.
No...I don't...
Aka suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) tempting one to de-nial perceivable for suggested. Nothing isn't a natural state; but the artificial suggestion to ignore everything natural.
parsing...through ChatGPT
Artificial intelligence cannot adapt to natural knowledge (perceivable inspiration) without contradicting itself. This is all written by ones free will of choice...
not giving a straightforward answer.
a) Only nature gives straightforward (inception towards death) to each one (life) within.
b) Suggested questions tempt one to seek an outcome (suggested answers); while ignoring perceivable origin. If one's alive and being moved from inception towards death; then one needs to resist origin as to sustain self before outcome...others suggest outcomes as the inversion of perceivable origin.
Any question aims towards death; while any answer tempts life to wait for death. Nature doesn't question; nor give answers...it implies solution (inception towards death) generating problems (life); hence each ones struggle to sustain self.
c) Nature gives; those within tempt each other to take. Nature moves matter; matter cannot take motion...but it can be tricked to hold onto other matter, while burdening itself within motion.
d) What does nothing give? What gives nothing?
Do you fuck, yes or no?
a) Yes vs no implies a conflict of reason, shaped by ones consent to suggested determinism, hence your "precise linguistic". This conflict continues for as long as one holds onto any side. An answer cannot dissolve a conflict of reason; it simply tempts both sides to seek more answers by questioning each other....a self perpetuating conflict.
b) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fugger_family (the last name was originally spelled Fucker)...this implies freemasonry. If one puts bricks on mortar, then the weight squeezes the mortar outwards, which one has to smooth over at the joint...this is called a FUGE.
A mason of free (will of choice) utilizes suggested information as bricks and ones consent as mortar to build walls of ignorance within others...fuge/fuck is used to smooth the joints over, hence the many being tempted to use "fuck" within their endless conflicts of reason to maintain ignorance smooth aka "fuck this; fuck that; go fuck yourself; get the fuck out of here; holy fuck etc."
Free will of choice sets apart bricks and mortar, hence choice being uneven and rough, instead of a "smooth criminal"
For those with eyes to see...fuck/fuge/fugue aka "a fugue is a composition founded upon one subject, announced at first in one part alone, and subsequently imitated by all the other parts in turn".
Holy shit...insightful.
If whole is shit, then ones sight within...
microwave pulse
Macro-line (inception towards death) pulses/pushes micro-waves (life).
turned to ash
a) Few stoke so that many are consumed by flames.
b) Heat directs from/to aka from inception towards death...few stoke many to tempt a turn within direction aka life progressing with the process of dying instead of resisting it.
c) ASH from AS - "to burn; glow" implies life within motion (moved by) tempted with emotion (moving from); hence "turning to ash".
Sleight of hand: https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/glennfrey/theheatison.html
an aberration for anyone to claim
a) ABERRA'TION, noun (Latin aberratio) - "deviation from a strait line"...one (life) cannot deviate from a strait/straight line (inception towards death), yet ones mind can be turned aside, when consenting to reason over the suggestions of another.
b) Consent by many implies claim; suggestion by few implies tempting denial of perceivable for claiming suggested.
- Anything denied by many...few gain.
- Anything one (life) claims...all (inception towards death) takes.
If one hangs on strings attached; then one cannot erect or hold up; only being drawn by...ones consent to the suggestion of another attaches a mystical string.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2136925/jewish/The-Kabalah-of-String-Theory.htm
Deep State...who get high
a) Aren't many deeper than few high above them?
b) Form (life) or flow (inception towards death)...which one implies deep state?
egomaniacs
EGO (one's self)...what if ones choice selects chosen ones suggestions? As in...if a chosen one is selected; then how could one be egoistic?
As for mania aka mad..."I find it hard to tell you (suggested information), 'cause I find it hard to take (perceivable inspiration)...when people run in circles (reasoning over suggested information)...it's a very, very mad world".
to preserve humanity
PRE (before) SERVO (to keep) contradicts human aka hue (color) of man (species; similitude)...a species can only exist within a spectrum aka within momentum of ongoing motion, which a) exists before matter and b) cannot be kept by matter.
As for too many vs too few...there cannot be too many or too few partials within a whole. Furthermore...ongoing whole generates temporary partials no matter what, hence ongoing.
Matter (life) cannot stop motion (inception towards death)...only trick each other to ignore motion by holding onto matter.
tricked into believing
Aka suggesting to consent...is suggesting a trick if it requires ones consent to deceive?
based on a lie
a) Lies are based on truth; hence "untruth".
b) Truth implies ones choice to hold onto; while lie implies another ones suggestion to let go of what one holds onto.
c) Base for both holding onto and letting go implies "motion". Within motion (inception towards death) one (life) wants to hold onto, while needing to let go of.
chabad
Aka Chokhmah, Binah, Da'at (wisdom; understanding; knowledge)...knowledge implies perceivable; understanding implies suggested; wisdom implies wise (ones perception) within dominance (all perceivable)...which can be tempted by understanding to ignore knowledge.
neo
Suggested neo/new tempts one to ignore perceivable NOW.
nazi
Aka nation; native; natural; natus; nasci; gnasci...artificial (suggested) tempts one to ignore natural (perceivable).
are you fully
Full implies "containing all that can be received"; which implies ones possessiveness (to receive; to take into possession) over suggested information, contained within ones consenting mind/memory; hence "contain-ment".
Meanwhile in reality...perceivable inspiration flows (inception towards death) through each form (life) and cannot be held onto aka taken possession of aka contained within memory.
Ones denial of perceivable for suggested implies "emptiness", and ones possessiveness of suggested implies "fulfillment".
celibate
CELIBATE, noun - "a single life" aka being (bate) sole (celi) implies as one (partial) within oneness (whole).
Celibacy implies each ones status quo of being, which few corrupt by tempting many to "marry" aka to willingly consent to be united in wedlock aka binding together as the inversion of being set apart from one another.
like a shaker
a) "Christ's Second Appearing" implies anointed ones (christ) coming into light (appear) by division (Latin seco; to divide) of whole (oneness) into partials (ones).
The trick...suggesting one that "christ" is another, hence tempting one to count/enumerate/reckon together other ones as second; third; fourth etc.
b) "known as Shaking Quakers" implies shaking (inception towards death) + quaking (life) aka motion generating emotions.
Shaking implies setting apart; quacking implies convulsing together....hence one needing to "shake your booty" aka letting go of what one holds onto.
Another sleight of hand: "Shake, shake, shake, Señora, shake your body line...work, work, work, Señora, work your body line" aka senor (motion) + senora (momentum) for body (life) within line (inception towards death).
argument still holds
An arguing mind implies ones consent holding onto a suggestion by another, while ignoring that perceivable moves. Ignorance implies a fictitious "still-stand" within self, which others exploit by tempting one into a fictitious stand-off against others called reasoning aka arguing.
gay...pedophile...argument
While many argue pedophile vs gay; few gain the opportunity to exploit what many ignore while arguing against each other...like children for example.
what do you want gay dudes to do?
Needing to resist wanted temptation. Sodomy implies want vs not want; while ignoring need.
Pretend to be straight
Pretend (Latin proetendo; to stretch forward) tempts one to ignore being (life) within straight (inception towards death); hence needing to resist the wanted temptation to stretch forward.
sexless marriage
Sex (Latin seco; to divide) implies setting apart, while marriage (Latin maritatu; to wed; entering into a wedlock) implies putting together...latter contradicts former.
Needing to set apart implies ones choice to resist; while wanting to put together implies ones choice falling for the temptation to ignore resisting.
Example...intercourse for off-spring implies a setting apart, for which one needs to resist wanted temptation. The less one resists; the more one tempts self to try something else....entrance sodomy; prostitution; abortion; sex-changes etc.
Let...
LET, verb - "to suffer; to permit"....only nature (inception towards death) permits suffering (life). Resistance diminishes suffering; temptation diminishes resistance. Life needs to resist wanted temptation, while suffering within the process of dying.
There are two types of people.
a) Here and there implies center within circumference aka partial within whole aka perception within perceivable aka one within oneness.
Try this...say "here" while pointing at "there"; then go over "there" and notice you'll be "here".
b) There cannot be a "two" of energy, since all implies one in energy. Only within energy (whole) can one add; subtract; divide and multiply potential (partials) from one another.
In other words...only within sameness (motion) can differences (matter) be shaped.
c) Type implies Latin typus (figure, image, form; kind) and Greek typos (impression)...being implies formed expression (life) within impressing flow (inception towards death).
Holding onto form tempts one to ignore flow...this is called idolatry aka type-casting. Me writing this down implies type-writing and spell-casting etc.
Each form is different from one another, while others suggest counting aka Latin computare (to reckon together one by one). Notice also that a computer utilize a binary (Latin binarius; consisting of two) called "0/1"...so where's the 2 in 0 and 1? It's ones (1) consent to the suggested offer (0) by another one (1); which binds 1 + 1 together into 2 aka dualism.
d) People implies each consenting singular (person) within a suggested pluralism (people)...that's a combination of consent and suggestion. Before that...person implies per sonos (by sound) aka a setting apart of sound and each one by sound.
These are the ones meaning to combine.
a) Suggested the-ism combines ones consent with a suggested authority by another.
b) Meaning (having in mind) implies suggested information by another, held consensual within ones mind/memory, while ignoring that perceivable inspiration cannot be held onto.
Few utilize consent of many to combine suggested information within memory, as to establish indigestion of matter within the procession of motion.
The platonists(perceptionists) and the Aristotelians(conceptualists)
a) -ist implies ones consent to a suggested -ism by another aka a combination.
b) Combining one consent with suggested perception-ism contradicts that all perceivable sets itself apart into each ones perception.
c) Perceivable reveals; suggested conceals....if one consents to it.
d) Plato aka plat (to spread) implies from whole (perceivable) into partials (perception)...not from partial (suggestion) to partial (consent), while ignoring whole.
Motion spreads matter; matter is tempted to hold onto each other; which spreads dis-ease. Example...a mother holding onto a child implies smothering aka suffocation...so does holding onto any suggested information within self.
e) Aristo aka Greek aristos (ar; to fit together) tempts one to ignore being apart from one another, while partial within whole.
Plato (to spread apart) + Aristotle (to fit together) contradict each other to manipulate the ones who choose to hold onto a side. This is called talmudic reasoning (contradiction of both sides within reason) utilizing allegorical deceit.
Underneath that operates nature aka spreading apart (inception) and fitting together (death) aka the momentum (inception towards death) of motion for matter (life) within. In nature there's no conflict between plato (to spread apart aka inception) and aristotle (to fit together aka death)...only ones life (choice) in-between (balance).
In short...to conceal (suggestion) what nature reveals (perception) aka the "great work" of the enlightened few among the profane many.
f) Concept implies con (together; with) capere (to take)...an inversion of incept (inception) aka being (life) within that which gives and takes (inception towards death).
1of1...rare one
Aka partial (one) out of whole (oneness)...uncommon; as in apart from one another, not together.
meditating on white Light...closing one's eyes and meditating on Light...
a) Where did the "white" go?
b) Middle (mediate) of pure light (white) implies visible spectrum. How could one see pure light (white) or the absence of light (black), while being within the visible spectrum?
What if oneself implies impure ray of light (discernment) tempted by absence of light (ignorance)?
without purpose
Pur'pose implies before position, hence being within light as a ray; radius within circumference, hence having sight aka partial perception within perceivable whole.
Nothing is simple
a) What is nothing? Is nothing simple (sine plica; without folding) or complex (folded together)?
b) What if few suggest nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) to tempt ones consent to de-nial everything perceivable for it?
c) What if everything perceivable unfolds into each ones perception; while suggestions tempt ones consent to fold self by binding to another?
d) FOLD, noun - "a flock of sheep. Hence in a scriptural sense, the church, the flock of the shepherd of israel"
e) FOLD, verb (Hebrew; to fall)...what if fall (inception towards death) inspires rise (life)?
Agree vs disagree...a conflict of reason established by following (consenting) a lead (suggestion).
a) Can implies "to be able" and that which leads (inception towards death) enables (life)...those within cannot lead; only mislead followers.
b) Life being moved from inception towards death can be led towards what other outcome?
Copying perceivable inspiration implies suggested information...a copy (fiction) tempts one to ignore origin (reality).
Often implies frequency...ones consent to suggested creationism curtails ones frequency of choice.
Following reduces frequency...velocity (inception towards death) generates frequency (life).
Few suggest in the name of velocity to mislead followers... https://elisemitchell.com/site/images/user-files/1245-7-competencies-of-velocity-leadership-final-fillable-v2.pdf