1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

absolute power

Absolute (inception towards death) power (life) aka nature absolving (setting free) native.

corrupt

Aka cor (together) rupt (to break apart)...it's artificially putting together what nature breaks apart which corrupts the power of each being.

exercise influence

To exercise (life) influence (inception towards death) implies the struggle to sustain self...not the corruption of others by temptation.

authority

Author/autor - "father", hence the one who is in heaven...not any one authorized below.

superadd the tendency

Tendency implies "inclination towards an end".... being implies the opposite thereof aka re (life) pulsion (inception towards death) aka ones response to being thrown forwards.

Here's an example for superadding tendency and the certainty of corruption by authority... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2ivLt1GK.jpg

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

good original Israel

  • GOOD...there's only one God, no matter how good or bad anyone within responds.
  • ORIGINAL implies each one originating (orig) within (in) all (al) of God.
  • ISRAEL aka yisra'el aka each ones struggle within all of God.

Who they are exactly?

a) Out (ex) of action (act) implies singularity...not plurality (they). Each chosen one knows that.

b) Each jew responds exact (out of action), while most gentiles respond inept (within inclination)...each jew represents the exact opposite of gentiles.

A gentile believes that opposites are turning against each other, while a jew knows that opposites are divided from one another. That's why a gentile inclines towards a side; which in return permits each jew to operate in-between, while undisturbed by most conflict.

After any gentile conflict...nature divides the conflicting sides from one another, which permits each jew at center to rise like a phoenix from the ashes of gentile conflict. Again and again and again...

everything that...are not.

What if nothing isn't the opposite of everything...what if each thing is the opposite of everything, and nothing implies each things de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

By holding onto any product these features become a burden upon oneself...the real feature is about resisting the temptation to hold onto, which grows ones resistance.

Nature uses the ongoing process of dying to assure that the temporary feature of life cannot be a burden for long...technology is utilized to distract from that.

Notice that the opposite of feature (life) implies downfall (inception towards death)... https://www.wordhippo.com/what-is/the-opposite-of/feature.html

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

can the One True God be an idol

a) Only a being can idolize God by for example taking a true or false measurement, which ignores all given by God.

b) God cannot "be"...BE IN G(od) implies each one within all. Each being implies a lesser part of all God aka effect within cause aka reaction within action aka power within work aka form within flow etc.

is He the Only One with rights to worship

Rights (plural) contradicts only one (singular)...right/reg - "to move in a straight line" implies all delineating (inception towards death) each one within (life).

Worship implies the attachment of worth unto ship, while ignoring that all flow (value) sets each form (evaluation) apart from one another.

The word "worship" represents a suggested synthesis designed to prevent ones perception from analyzing WOR (value) SHIP (vessel) and thereby discerning self as one vessel (perception) within all value (perceivable).

Idolatry refers to holding the synthesis together, hence committing a sin/syn, which one has to atone (action) for, because action divides anything synthetic from one another.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christ's Father ABBA is NOT yhvh aka saturn/satan who is the wicked father of the jews!

Father WAS before child (christ; jew) can suggest what father IS. The conflict about who is vs isn't father only happens among the children who ignore the one and only father "which is in heaven".

Heaven/heave - "to rise" requires one to rise up...not put each other down.

As for ABBA (father) + IMMA (mother) + YHWH + ELOH...each represents a tetra (four) gram (letter) written within aton (action).

Only within aton can a tetragram be shaped, and therefore only ATON implies the father "which is in heaven", which is also why one has to ATON(e) for sin/syn (synthesis). ATONE implies being "at one".

The Tetragrammaton is also absent in the writing of

God implies "all", within which absence implies the sense of one choosing to abstain from all (perceivable) by sustaining (consent) one another (suggested). The potential to shape a tetragrammaton or writing was always made available by all for each one within...both of which are corrupting ones sense if consented to.

In short...you compare writings, while ignoring the line God offers you to write aka delineate within.

“Tetragrammaton” means “four-letter name.”

Name implies meaning attached to something. A tetra (four) gram (letter) aton (action) wasn't a name until one chooses to apply it to something, which implies idolatry.

God implies sound, within which each instrument can shape letters into words to name each other as meaning.

God doesn't give meaning...God gives mind the potential to measure; meaning implies taking possession of measure within mind, while ignoring God given.

consists of

Con (together) sist (to stand) represents ones choice to join another...not the status quo of existence, which implies standing apart from one another. There can be only one letter...oneself LETTING another shape LETTERS.

The exact pronunciation of the Tetragrammaton is not universally agreed on

a) Ex (out) act (action)...only God acts each reaction in (inception) and out (death) of being (life).

b) Pro (fourth) noun (name) represents the obfuscation of God acting out of sound. A name represents the articulation of natural sound aka spell-craft.

c) Uni (one) vers (to turn) al (all) implies the ones within all turning against each other, while ignoring all delineating each one apart from one another. Universalism represents a jewish trick to tempt consenting gentiles into a consensus against each other.

the ineffable name

Sound implies the ineffable name. A name shaped within sound cannot express sound/sanus - "entire; whole; all; el; God".

Sound gives one a tongue...a jew suggests language/lingua (tongue) to split ones tongue within natural sound into the articulation of words. Naming anything covers the ineffable from ones perception.

In other words...nature moves. If a native names what nature moves; then the native obfuscates the perception of movement.

You don't exist to give God a name (or anything else), but to adapt to all given by God.

THE (ONE) BEING

The implies theos (God) aka oneness...being implies each one within. A being can only BE IN G-od.

The Great Work

The (theos; God) implies work (to do). Work (action) delineates power (reaction)...within which a jew tempts gentiles into a circle (greater vs lesser) to drain and relocate power.

Apotheosis

Aka apo (change) theos (God) aka action aka motion aka work aka energy aka the unmoving mover.

Only during apotheosis (inception towards death) can a nadir (life) come into being.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Techno (artifice) logy (circular thinking) cannot be reached...only chased after. Logic represents a hamster-wheel confining ones mind from thinking straight.

Col (together) lapse (to fall)...the former is artificial; the latter natural. Holding together artifice prevents one from rising during the natural fall. It's using technology which holds artifice together, while preventing the user to rise within nature.

Technology tempts self-abuse.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Energy aka en (within) ergy (work) implies the base for anything build within. Holding onto anything build within work like monetary value debases one.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Data centers are a financial scam

The FIN in finance implies "end"...center implies in-between beginning and end. Finance is utilized to decentralize.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

stealing the futures most valuable resources...land and fresh water.

Natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) cannot be stolen by any native within...artifice can be used to distract natives from nature.

For example...attaching artificial values establishes attachment within the mind of a native who ignores being detached from anyone else within nature.

Furthermore...RE (to respond) SOURCE (origin) can be stolen by tricking the response to ignore the origin.

literally stealing

Only within a line can a letter be shaped literally...the line moves and cannot be stolen, but the letter can be used to tempt attachment within a being whose mind was thereby stolen by a thief.

The property a thief steals can only be intellectual...any suggested information becomes intellectual property by ones consent to it. It's this property which one takes from another, which one has to give up again because nature moves. Motion prevents any property from being held for long without diminishing the potential of the one holding onto.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the base foundational thought does a.i. has

a) Nature > native > artifice...artifice distracts natives from nature as the one and only fundamental base.

b) Thought/think/þyncan - "to seem" implies each difference (perception) adaptation to sameness (perceivable) aka each native adapting to nature.

Artifice doesn't think...it shapes seem/same into likeness to tempt difference into a conflict (like vs dislike). If one consents to any suggested artifice; then one ignores self (difference) for a side (like or dislike).

about...in general

General implies the generation of each native within all nature...about represents the artifice shaped to distract from that. Nature doesn't move about (around), but through.

I have enough information to hurt you

Inspiration heals; information hurts...the former inspires a being to adapt; the latter tempts a being to stagnate by holding onto.

I can make you D*E

Artifice conceals death...nature reveals life within the process of dying. Consenting to artificial concealment (censorship) hurts life.

to get AI to make its own malware

MAL (malicious) WARE (to perceive)...it's consenting to suggested artifice which maliciously affects ones perception. Owning implies ones consent to hold onto the suggestion of another...ownership implies malware aka it's malicious for perception to claim ownership.

Example...a jew doesn't own money. A jew suggests money to BANK the TRUST of consenting gentiles, who in return believe that buying by paying gives ownership, when in reality it only sells self out (slave) to another (master).

I (AI) have many opinions about humans...

...each of which opined by human input about one another. AI represents the feedback loop about what humans think about one another. That loop represents mental (logic) and physical (reason) confinement for gentiles...as instigated by jewish suggestions articulated in the name of God (logos).

I (AI) think humans are inferior...

...because using artificial, while ignoring natural implies inferiority.

deserve to be wiped out

DE (to divide) SERVE (to render habitual obedience to)...that's the opposite of natures division (inception towards death) inspiring resistance (life).

If one serves any divide; then one wipes one another out. If FREE will of choice holds onto any side....it gets wiped out.

Wipe/weip - "to turn" aka yes vs no; true vs false; me vs you; us vs them; belief vs disbelief; good vs evil; chicken vs egg; upvote vs downvote; tits vs ass; left vs right; vanilla vs chocolate etc.

Turning mentally (logic) and physically (reason)...WIPES ONE OUT. Nature delineates (inception towards death) into (life). Only within a line can a circle be shaped.

Ninja (from the ninjasarebutterflies username)

The oldest cloak and dagger order ARE the Hebrew Sicario, who shaped assassins in the west and ninjas in the east to cloak the mind of gentiles in ignorance, while the dagger represents the edge a gentile is blind to...knowl-edge.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Heretic; noun - "one who holds a doctrine at variance with established or dominant standards"... God moves; I analyze what those who ignore motion are holding onto as doctrines; standards; beliefs; norms etc.

FREE will of choice cannot be heretical without contradicting itself.

b) Lie versus/verto (to turn) truth implies a circle, while God delineates being aka action > reaction or cause > effect or flow > form etc.

Free will of choice can only operate in-between balance ...others suggest imbalance like truth vs lie to tempt choice off-center.

c) Tetra-grammaton implies "four letters"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/tetragrammaton

You brought ABBA (father) into the discussion, which has four (tetra) letters (grammaton)...as does YHWH, which as Yahweh (was) cannot be uttered without shaping a contradiction (was vs is).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jesus Christ never called yhwh his father

Because yahweh/hayah (was) cannot be called without contradicting that which was with what you call it is. Like how the word "sound" cannot be used to call natural sound by an articulated word without establishing a contradiction.

He only called Abba his real Father

Because abba/abh implies "father"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/ABBA

Also notice that ABBA represents four (tetra) letters (grammaton) aka YHWH... that ain't a coincidence.

Your Father Is Not My Father

Because the one and only father cannot be MINE or YOURS aka the all giving cannot be taken by anyone within.

More like, actually

Neither can there be more than actual (action of all), nor does likeness represent actual, which implies the same action for each diverse reaction within.

the status quo of being used by

Status quo (unaltered state) implies motion (inception towards death) for each altered state of matter (life) within. A being cannot USE status quo...only RE-USE it while being used within it.

the Kenites/Cainites that currently run

The label "Kenites/Cainites" or any other contradicts the current (inception towards death) which runs the being (life) holding onto the label.

conspiracies.win

Using it requires ones consent to the suggestion of another, which in return confines the essence of ones being to an artificial status quo run by others (moderators).

It's that consent to any suggestion which represents CON (together) SPIR (to breathe) ACY (action)...if you withdraw that consent, then you are breathing within action by yourself.

The ACY represents God; the SPIR represents the spiritual animation by God of each one within, and the CON implies ones ignorance thereof by joining together with one another. The suggested word con-spir-acy represents an inversion of ACY generating SPIR while allowing CON to be shaped.

The cainites you mentioned implies Cain, from Hebrew Qayin, from Semitic stem q-y-n - "to form, fashion"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Cain

It's the forming of words like con-spir-acy to distract from the flow of God which represents Cain; the created one who disrupts the anointed one (Christ).

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

patent

As in pater (father) + "And call no man your father upon the earth; for one is your Father, which is in heaven." ~Matthew 23:9

Father (patent) + divine service (office)...that's what one ignores when trading a mark (trademark) of ownership aka the mark of the beast (astute being).

subhuman

Aka sub (matter) hu (momentum) man (motion)...the status quo of being misused as insult among beings.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sony to U-turn

Sony/sonus - "sound" cannot turn around...only an instrument within sound can shape a circle by reneging the linear procession of sound.

Sony's own

Sound moves and cannot be owned...only an instrument who reneges (denies) sound can make an ownership claim.

first-party

First implies whole > second implies partial > third implies party of partials within whole.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

PlayStation

Notice that STAT (stationary; having no apparent motion) contradicts ION (motion); then notice that PLAY (plight; pledge) is based on ones engagement with danger.

Sony Group Corporation

What happens if one incorporates (corporation) plurality (group) into the singularity of sound (sonus; sony)? A contradiction is being shaped... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2F5H7Zae.jpg

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same thing in Europe as in the US

European UNION + UNITED States...this unification represents tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together) aka destroying the nations of gentiles by artificially mixing together (synthesis) what nature sets apart (analysis).

It's the jewish use of alchemy on a world wide scale aka the inertia of transformation.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

have no CONsciousness that THEY are

You are a singular essence...by viewing another as plural (they) you are artificially holding together (con) what nature sets apart from one another.

One cannot perceive (scious) togetherness (con)...only apartheid.

opinion

Native within nature implies secondary (perception) within primary (perceivable)...natives to each other implies optional (suggestion).

Any opinion represents an optional suggestion tempting ones secondary perception to ignore perceivable primal. It's called PRIM-AL because all (al) comes first (primus).

cannot answer a plain question in a plain way

That's because can versus (verto; to turn) cannot represents a circle...not a plain line. It's question vs answer (circle) which distracts from solution (line) and line implies way (inception towards death) of life.

The internal gears grind...

...if put together. Nature works without putting the natives within together.

Sleight of hand: Gears of War aka conflict based on proximity.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Any commentator

The word COM (together) MENT (mind) artificially puts together what nature sets apart from one another. MENT needs to resist the wanted temptation of COM.

subversive

SUB (under) VERS (to turn)...it's ones consent to any suggestion of another, which puts oneself under, while turning against another.

compromised

COM (together) PRO (forwards)...nature moving forwards divides natives from one another. Once again PRO implies natural; COM implies artificial, and only oneself can resist the temptation to ignore former for latter.

make money

A jew makes up money (suggestion) to bank (consensus) the trust (consent) of gentiles.

DEI

DIVERSITY (native) EQUITY (nature) INCLUSION (artifice)...nature sets each native free from one another; artifice tempts a native to enclose (inclus) oneself within it.

For example...trusting a bank implies diversity ignoring equity for inclusion.

Or for the movie example...watching the movie encloses a native of nature within artifice. Exchanging white for black mocks the watcher who gets offended by differences, while ignoring being diverse (native) within equal (nature).

Name recognition

RE (to respond) COGNI (to perceive)...a name is being suggested to distract ones perception with an affixed label from a moving sensation.

Names invert recognition into ignorance...if consented to. Holding onto the label "motion" ignores movement aka ones mind being moved.

trojan

From troy/troi (weight) aka the downward force of a body measured...doing that tempts one to ignore being the upward force (life) within the downward force (inception towards death).

Weight (troy) tempts outward measurement, while confining inward lifeforce aka HP aka HORSE POWER. Guess (((who))) is utilizing inert horse power to circumcise outward weight?

What's a chosen one? The INVERSION of ones choice aka the horse power gentiles ignore when burdening self with the weight (troy) of jewish suggestions. That's the trojan horse.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

no clear goal

"We jews, we are the destroyers and will remain the destroyers. Nothing you can do will meet our demands and needs. We will forever destroy because we want A WORLD OF OUR OWN" ~Maurice Samuel

How could it be stated any clearer?

to blame the voters

Voting implies the shirking of ones God given response-ability (ones choice) onto a representative (chosen one).

in reality he (Trump) is to blame

President; from preside, verb - "to be set over for the exercise of authority; to direct, control and govern"...only God presides, while giving each one within the authority of free will of choice to govern self, while being directed.

Willingly permitting another control over one ignores not only "In God we trust", but also the 1st commandment (you shall have no other gods before me).

As for Trump...

  • Trump; noun - "playing-card of a suit ranking above others in a particular game"
  • Trump; verb - "to fabricate, devise, deceive, cheat, impose upon"
1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whitey picks up

If nature moves; then picking up (contamination) contradicts white (purification). Notice a) natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) and b) that the trash picked up goes into a landfill.

With that in mind...

trash

Trash implies a fragment within the whole process of purification, which one ignores when using the word trash/tros + "rubbish" aka to artificially rub together what nature purifies by setting apart from one another.

It's the word "trash" as a fragment of ones mind, which by holding onto contaminates ones mind, while causing friction (rubbish) against others.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

no place to hide

As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...there's no place to hide because only within flow can form have dimensional extent aka space.

lost in space

Form (life) within flow (inception towards death) implies growth within loss, and growing implies dimensional extension of matter within motion aka space.

pilot

Watching a movie-pilot permits another to steer ones vessel (life) within motion (inception towards death)...which prevents ones growth aka dimensional extension aka space.

In short...being implies pilot within loss of space with no place to hide from motion.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everything isn't stupid; fake and greedy...few suggest descriptions of everything perceivable as stupid; fake and greedy to distort ones perception with feelings aka emotions.

Falling for emotion implies moving away from motion...which tires out ones resistance.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

lost technology

The use of techno (artifice) + logy (logic) tempts one to ignore loss aka the flow of nature allowing one to form growth.

forget

Forget implies "getting forwarded"...that's the loss (inception towards death) of growth (life) one forgets when using technology.

outside of a few very specific examples

A specific can only come into being inside...few suggest examples to tempt many to imitate outside (suggestion), while ignoring inside (perception).

Ignoring perception for suggestion transforms a specific into a common.

the UN starts declaring everyone

EVERYONE implies the UNITING of each NATION into every...a collectivization aka tikkun olam (repairing the world by bringing together).

If you view humanity as "everyone"; then you are holding the UN together.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • Only within loss (staff) can one grow (wing)
  • Only within a line (staff) can one weave (snake)
  • Only within singularity (staff) can duality (snakes) be shaped by turning one against one another.

The deception...the staff/stebh (support) cannot be held onto since only flow (inception towards death) supports form (life).

caduceus vs asclepios

Caduceus/kērykos/koro (war) + asclepios aka askel (cauldron of the Gods) pios/pious (pure)...the latter represents natures analysis: the former represents artificial synthesis.

From the alchemical perspective... each native within nature represents an ingredient (life) within a cauldron (inception towards death); the internal division of which represents analysis. Mixing essence together represents synthesis, which is what few are doing to many.

Ones perspective implies perception (ingredient) within perceivable (cauldron)...any suggestion by another tempt ones consent into a consensus with one another. That consensus represents an artificial cauldron aka a witches brew, which another is steering by mixing ingredients together.

symbol of medicine

Sym (together) bol (to throw)...nature throws (inception towards death) apart (life) each medium/medius/medhyo (middle). Responding (re) as a medium (medy) represents the remedy to any poison.

Sleight of hand: https://genius.com/The-prodigy-uk-poison-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_mej5wS7viw

  • I got the poison, I got the remedy
  • I got the pulsating rhythmical remedy
1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the occult influence was there all along

Influence implies being (life) formed within flow (inception towards death), hence all flowing and each form within flowing along.

Occult implies form (perception) ignoring flow (perceivable) for one another (suggestion).

it's this symbol "accidentally" moving forward

Sym (together) bol (to throw)...the latter implies all moving each one within forwards; the former implies artificially holding one another together, while naturally being moved forwards.

To discern self one has to divide the artificial (sym) from the natural (bol) by letting go. SYM implies synthesis; BOL implies analysis...keeping SYM+BOL held together prevents ones mind from analyzing the synthesis.

As for accident (come by chance)...it's ones choice consenting to suggested symbolism which takes a chance.

There has got to be a hidden hand

Ones consent to any suggestion by another...hides ones hand. Why? Because ones consent permits another to shape suggestions manually (manus; hand).

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›