Moore's Law (continuous duplication)
Natural law implies ongoing division of each native within from one another...ones consent to Moore's Law or any other suggested laws of men establishes a continuous duplication by ones (1) consent to another ones (1) suggestion aka 1+1=2.
technology advancement
Techno (artifice) logy (circular logic) confines ones mind within a circle, while ignoring that nature advances each native (life) within a line (inception towards death)...with no regard to any mental confinement.
semiconductor
Semi (same) contradicts con (together) duct (lead) because one can only lead together (likeness) after all (sameness) divides each one (apartheid) from one another.
A jew shapes conduct among gentiles to distract from natural division of each apartheid essence within. Technology represents such a distraction.
a literal cabal law
Natural law delineates each native within; a jew shapes literal letters to confine gentiles with words (logos) into a mental circle (logic) and a physical circle (reason) as to distract from cabal (cube of all) aka ones perception in-between up/down + left/right + front/back aka from within a cube (to cue/queue being).
technology is trickled to the plebs
The mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle represents the ouroboros eating it's own tail, hence internally feeling more and more restricted from outside access.
In nature...all perceivable moves through each ones perception at any moment of being. So no trickling down, but the full flood of knowledge ready to draw from. It's consenting to techno (artifice) logy (circular thinking) which draws a circle inside (logic) and outside (reason) of oneself aka an ouroboros FEEDBACK LOOP.
reign of power
Reign/reg - "to move in a straight line" aka...reign (inception towards death) of power (life). It's not something few posses, but the whole process of nature generating each natives potential within, which many are willingly ignoring for technology.
trickled from the shadows
Choosing ignorance (suggestion) over discernment (perception) casts a shadow over self, while interrupting ones perception from discerning the ongoing flow of perceivable inspiration for the self inflicted burden of suggested information held onto.
A jew doesn't operate from the shadows...gentile ignorance casts shadows over each other, which permits each jew to operate within light.
Any told vision (tell-a-vision) tempts ones sight to view through the lens of another. The viewers aren't spied on...they are the spies viewing what another shaped for them to see.
LG aka Lucky Goldstar aka gambling; malleability and a luminous point drawn within constellations.
Chaos Sorcery
Nature implies order, hence ordaining each native within the sorce/source; whence sorcery/sortis/sors (to sort) representing either the natural assortment (division) or artificial assortment (union)...the latter representing chaos; as in orderless con (together) fusion (to melt).
a prophecy in the Zohar
Zohar aka splendor (life) of light (inception towards death) allows pro (forward) phecy (to speech)...consenting to forwarded speech turns light (discernment) into dark (ignorance) within oneself.
For example...consenting to the word "zohar" prevents one from discerning self as splendor of light.
Messiah's arrival
Messiah/mashiah/mashah (to anoint) implies the coming into being of each anointed one within all. Arrival tempts one to ignore origin for outcome.
The voyage itself isn't ARRIVE, but ALIVE...that's the message/mittere (to release, let go; send, throw) of each messiah (anointed one).
I don't have the time to...
Did nature give you time or did you take time from another native? What if time is a measurement taken of a temporal duration within an ongoing motion?
What happens to the time you "have" if you choose to let go of it?
Edit: What if... https://genius.com/Queen-who-wants-to-live-forever-lyrics
- There's no time for us
- There's no place for us
- What is this thing that builds our dreams, yet slips away from us
lawsuit
If natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater) suits each native, then why does each one come into this world naked?
Thoughts on the...case and the propaganda around it
Propagation implies linear procession...consenting to a suggested case confines ones mental thoughts within circular conflict.
push to pick aside
That which picks implies ones choice, which can only operate in-between sides aka within balance. Picking either pushed side pulls ones choice off-center into imbalance.
guilty
Nature dividing each native implies innocence...natives ignoring this by uniting together implies guilt.
"Innocent until proven guilty" refers to ones consent to any suggested proof by another.
I haven't followed the case very closely
It's an open case until one consents to the suggestion thereof...after which it closes ones perception within the circumference of suggestion.
How does one confine self within a shut case? By choosing to hold onto any side within, which establishes a versus/verto - "to turn" conflict aka circular confinement.
Logos represents a suggested case; logic represents ones entrance into an open case; reason represents ones confinement within a shut case.
Consider the following..."Cases describe the grammatical functions of nouns, pronouns and noun phrases, such as whether they are the subject of the clause or a subordinate object."
That's how a case encloses subordinates aka how few utilize spell-craft to spell-bind many.
I believe we are being distracted
Believing implies mentally holding onto a suggested system aka sys (together) stem (to stand) like for example WE... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_we
Doing that distracts the perceiving being (effect) from all perceivable (cause), hence causing a distraction (to draw away).
being shown shiny objects
a) Nature objects each subjective native coming into being within...natives subject one another with artificial objects aka false idols/ideals.
How does one know if an object is false? Nature moves and cannot be held onto without destroying the native who tries, so holding onto mentally (ideal) or physically (idol) is objectively false.
Ob (towards) ject (to throw) aka being thrown towards implies objective (inception towards death) subjection (life).
b) Nature implies light; native implies radiance...few suggest artificial light to dim the radiance of many who in return ignore that only light shines.
If someone else "highlights" a spot within your mind to make you understand, then that isn't natural illumination (discernment), but an artificial highlight tempting your mind into darkness (ignorance).
If one resists what another highlights, then one enters the 'Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind'...
United Nations says...to atone
Atone aka "at one" can never be collective punishment...only ones atonement for the sin/syn (together) of artificially holding together what nature sets apart from one another.
United Nations represents a SIN TAX aka a syntax (systematic arrangement of parts).
public space
a) General (perceivable) > private (perception) > public (suggestion)...few make many public to distract private from general.
b) Space/spatior - "to wander". Within general; each private is free to wander. Within public; each private is mentally confined to wonder aka lost in space.
slave trade
Trading with another implies consenting (slave) to a suggestion (master), while ignoring that all perceivable sets each ones perception free from one another.
The original trade implies "course of action"...not trade among reactions. It's trade (inception towards death) which generates stock (life)...the stock-market amongst one another tempts one to ignore that.
- Proto (first) taxites (yews)...jews first
1814 - James and Nathan Rotschild ordered all European rulers to assemble at the Congress of Vienna. The Rothschilds drafted a plan to make it impossible for another Napoleon to rise to power by creating a European Balance of Power - this basically meant that if any European nation revolted against jewish control all the jewish controlled nations would attack it.
1815 - The battle of Waterloo signified the end of Napoleon's heroic anti-jewish rule and the Christian domination of Europe. Both James Rothschild of France and Nathan Rothschild of England financed Wellington's Victory over Napoleon at Waterloo. Nathan Rothschild used false information, about Napoleon winning Waterloo, to defraud the London Stock Exchange and seize control of Britain's economy.
1843 - Prototaxites where first collected; studied 14 years later by Sir John William Dawson; first president of the Royal Society of Canada (an offshoot of the Royal Society of London aka the Invisible College).
1872 - Rival scientist William C. Carruthers (also from the Fellowship of the Royal Society) ridiculed the idea. Carruthers faulted the name Prototaxites (loosely translated as "first yew" and insisted that the name Nematophycus ("stringy alga") be adopted, a move strongly against scientific convention. Despite these attempts to rename the genus, the rules of botanical nomenclature mean that the name "Prototaxites", however inappropriate in meaning, remains in use today.
a) One cannot protect self from a system by hiding within it, because one isn't a sys (together) stem (to stand).
b) Identity/idem - "the same"...only nature implies same (cause) for each different native within (effect). A native cannot have an identity without ignoring nature for an artificial system of identification.
c) Protect aka pro (forward) tect (to cover)...nature moving forwards (inception towards death) reveals each native (life).
Seeking protection conceals revelation.
someone steals something and manipulates it
Shaping a some/sum (plural) out of one thing (singular) represents the manipulation aka the theft of stealing more than offered.
Nature offers all (singularity) to each one (single unit) within...more than all (mor-al) contradicts ones disposition (divided position) when desiring from one another.
it doesn't mean they truly own it.
a) Meaning implies measurement taken into possession aka a claim of ownership. Doesn't aka does nothing implies dis-possession aka another claim of ownership.
b) True implies a potential (growth) within a process (loss) holding onto a possession (burden)...holding onto truth makes growing harder and losing a stronger temptation.
True/deru - "be firm, solid"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/true
Only within fluid (inception towards death) can there be solid (life)...holding onto solid (truth) contradicts the fluid false/fail/fall of each ones rise within.
The fall falsifies whatever any solid truth within holds onto...because it's fluid aka in motion aka changing.
HEAVEN ACTUALLY IS HELL
Actual aka "all action" implies forward motion...it's each reaction within which can heave (to rise) or hel (to conceal) during the fall (inception towards death) of man (life).
YOUR FREEMASONIC "HEAVEN" ACTUALLY IS HELL
The freemasonic inversion of heaven and hell is based on shaping an internal (logic) and external (reason) circle to turn rising (heaven) into concealment (hell) mentally, which tempts one to turn against others physically.
JESUS CHRIST DENIERS
Jesus (I AM aka taking possession over self) denies Christ (to anoint aka the separation from one another)...letting go of Jesus (I AM) dissolves the circular conflict against Judah (YOU ARE), while protecting ones christian status as anointed one.
Letting Jesus from the cross allows one to discern self to be (life) moved A-CROSS (inception towards death). Taking the nail off Jesus dissolves ones DE-NIAL.
Boaz and jachin
Boaz (within strength) + Jachin (to be established) aka establishing (inception towards death) strength (life) within.
Entry through birth. One the exit through death.
Aka entry (inception) and exit (death) establishing strength (life) in-between support.
Cathode-ral
Cathode-r-al aka "all are cathode", which establishes each one within as anode.
- Cathode aka kata (down) hodos (the way)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/cathode
- Anode aka ana (up) hodos (the way)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/anode
Aka up (life) and down (inception towards death) the way...the current of life.
something...almost magical
All (everything) sets each one (each thing) within apart from one another...shaping a sum of things (something) to emulate most of all (almost) represents magical aka mag (to be able) i (within) al (all).
Both "something" and "almost" represent magical spells...caste by few and held together by many.
Another word for something is "gentiles" aka the sum of many things cast together by a jewish few. Another word for almost is "tikkun olam" aka repairing the world by artificially putting together MOST gentiles within ALL of nature.
their sound diffusion
a) Sound implies singularity..."their" represents plurality shaped within sound to manipulate each in-stru-ment (mind structured within) sound.
b) Dif (to divide) fus (to unite) ion (action)...action (sound) divides each reaction (instrument) apart from one another; few unite many together to orchestrate compliance while playing them like a fiddle.
Unity requires ones consent to join, hence attaching a STRING to each divided instrument for others to play.
Was Paul Bonacci the first...
Only God implies first.
the first to come forward about split personalities through ritual abuse
Effect coming forward within cause implies the split of per (by) son (sound) al (all)...it's taking on personas like names; ranks; status; order; caste etc. which represents the abuse of ones rite of passage.
One first has to fill ones mind with personas to be able to switch between them...further abuse from outside tempts one to hide inside ones mind by switching personas.
Stop war
Nature moves and cannot be stopped...if a native mentally thinks and physically pretends to stop anything, while everything moves; then a mental (logic) and physical (reason) circle is being shaped within which natives are turning against each other. That's war.
freedom
Freedom implies each free native within the dominance of nature...natives binding each other into a circle represents slavery.
abolish the CIA
Agency (motion) establishes and abolishes each center (matter)...intelligence tempts center to internally (intel) collect (leg) burdens from one another, hence accumulating debt in form of information.
orwell
Aka GEORGE (work) OR (otherwise) WELL (will)
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/George
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/or
- https://www.etymonline.com/word/well
All implies work; each one within implies will...what will one choose? All work or otherwise the will of one another?
covenants for ALL
All forwards each one within...a coven is shaped with one another within all. To shape a coven (gathering) one has to covet (desire) from one another.
current year
All implies current; year implies a measurement taken by one who ignores all. A current moves forwards; a measured year confines ones mind within a annual circle which annuls straight thought.
God and the Ten Commandments.
God implies singularity...com (together) mand (to commit to one's charge) ments (minds) tempts one to ignore God.
The first commandment is what anyone ignores who consents to suggested commandments. Why? Because "first" implies God; the one and only.
First/fore/per - "forward"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/first
decided to let a couple jews take
Only God gives and takes...a jew shapes an idol within God to tempt gentiles to TAKE the idol by GIVING self up.
More specifically...suggestion represents the idol; consent represents the taking of suggestion by ones choice, while giving up ones choice to a chosen one.
One cannot take without giving, while being within motion. Here's a sleight of hand... https://genius.com/George-michael-freedom-90-lyrics
- You got to give what you take
- It's the one good thing that I've got (Freedom!)
- All we have to do now...Is to take these lies and make them true somehow
- All we have to see...Is that I don't belong to you, and you don't belong to me,
Aether is BEING
a) Being implies essence (interior) as opposed to abstract (exterior)...abstraction (inception towards death) generates essence (life).
Aether as "either" implies the division of abstract (cause) and essence (effect). Aether/aithēr/aidh - "to burn" implies cause burning effect aka loss generating the heat of growth.
b) Abstract WAS before essence can come into being. Only while divided from one another can essence suggest what aether IS.
Buried would be closer to reality than lost
How could a solid (life) be buried within a fluid (inception towards death)? It's fluid loss which brings forth solid growth, while growth (living) struggles to sustain self within loss (dying).
As for closer...that contradicts the essence of being divided from one another.
EN (within) ERGY (work) implies a distance from one another...not a closure.
joins IDF
Joining implies exposure; setting apart implies defense...hence israel sustaining a state of apartheid.
Now think force aka nature putting force/forth each physical strength within...what would joining together would do to the strength of each?
Is it a force-multiplier or does it distract from the division of force as the source of strength?
Shitpost
It's preventable... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GpXhHgFYTNA
Aether: the lost technology
- THE implies theos (God)
- LOST implies loss (inception towards death) generating growth (life)
- TECHNOLOGY implies tekhnē (artifice) and logy (circular logic)
So AETHER (either) one chooses artificial (suggestion) or natural (perception)...
one of the clearest collections
To collect (synthesis) contradicts one (analysis)...what if ERGY (work) clears up EN (within) by dividing each one within from one another?
What if few collectivize many together to obfuscate analysis (perceivable > perception) with synthesis (consent + suggested)?
Clearance requires one to set collections apart...
electromagnetic
Aka ELECT (choice) MAGH (to be able; have power)...easy to ignore unless one chooses to analyze to synthesis others suggest one to uphold.
cathedrals
CATHED aka cathode aka kata (down) hodos (the way) as oppose to anode aka ana (up) hodos (the way).
Cathode (inception towards death) generating anode (life) or Cathedrals anno domini.
produced from a non...
Only all (cause) can pro (forward) duce (to bring) each one (effect) within...non was suggested by another (affect).
Non aka nothing implies ones de-nial (nihilo; nothing) of everything for one another.
Aether is the energy
a) What if EN (within) ERGY (ergos; work) implies a division in-between outer and inner, and aether (either) tempts one to ignore that?
b) What if ERGY was before EN can come into being? What if suggesting what IS tempts ones perception to ignore what WAS perceivable?
energy that was captured
What if ongoing ERGY (inception towards death) generates temporary EN (life), which would make capture impossible?
Yet...what if temporal can manipulate one another to ignore the free state (perception) for a captured state (suggestion). What if suggestion can "capture" ones consent for as long as one willingly holds onto it?
energy that was captured through towers
What if only within a decline (inception towards death) can each tower be erected (life)? What if ones ignorance of decline permits another tower to build an arc; bridge; connection; link; junction etc. for harvest?
obelisk
a) OB (towards) EL (God) ISK (of the nature of)...what if the nature of God implies forward motion?
What if tower within decline implies matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion?
b) What if obelisk represents the male (upward triangle); while odalisque represents the female (downward triangle)?
Could the female be hidden within the male... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triforce
Triforce aka motion > momentum > matter...remember the LINK for capturing energy mentioned earlier?
energy stored
Energy implies process (inception towards death) generating potential (life)...storage implies potential holding onto possession while ignoring process.
What if few tempt many with hiSTORY to sacrifice potential by holding onto possessions like information? Why is it that the merchant who sells (suggestion) possessions for consumers to buy (consent) has a monopoly over storage?
Before storing (suggested) consider supply (perceivable) and demand (perception)...
Shopen
Hence the desire to shop...
Schopenhauer
Schopen/schuppen (shed) + hauer (hitter)...a disguise for a smith.
suffering comes from our desire
a) Each one within (effect) comes from all (cause)...desire implies towards one another (affect).
b) Suf (under) fer (to carry) aka lowering self with a burden.
things that we do not require
a) Aka things (suggested) that one (perception) within all (perceivable) does not require.
b) Depending on ones free will of choice...require implies either re (to respond) quire (to seek) or re (to respond) quire (to ask).
Seeking within nature implies SEEing all there was to SEEk...shaping artificial questions to seek artificial answers from another blinds ones sight within all there was to see.
I don't use retarded shit like TikTok
If you use a clock; then TikTok time is running out faster for you. Holding onto a measurement like time within a moving nature retards (delays) ones mental perception.
the usual
Usu (to use) al (all) implies the status quo of being...a jew tempts gentiles to ignore that for a generally recognized custom aka to consume from one another.
...is bad vs ... is innocent
A jew suggests conflicts of reason (good vs bad + innocent vs guilty) under different brands to tempt gentiles to turn against each other.
repeal the 19th
How about extricating ones mind from what others can amend (27 amendments ratified) or repeal (1 amendment repealed)?
Guess what the one repealed amendment was? Prohibition aka to prohibit - "forbid, interdict by authority"...that's repealing each gentiles authority to interdict jewish amendments into the gentile mind.
insane asylum
Insane aka in sanus (within sound) one does not have asylum aka a (without) sylē (right of seizure) because sound moves and cannot be held onto.
genociding foreigners
US aka United States implies the genocide of natives by inter-mixture with foreigners.
to advance the Zionist agenda
Nature represents the only advancing agenda, which each jew resists zion (heavenward) by resisting (life) the downfall (inception towards death).
Suggested agendas are designed by a jew to trick gentile consent (-ist) into a consensus (-ism) with each other which prevents going zion (heavenward). How could one rise if one burdens self with others?
never breaks the rules
Rule/reg - "to move in a straight line"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/rule
Rule (inception towards death) breaks (life)...only within natural law (rule) can each native be free (break) from one another.
A jew suggests gentiles to never break rules to distract each gentile from discerning self as being given a break within a rule.
Sleight of hand for break: https://genius.com/Tears-for-fears-break-it-down-again-lyrics
- When it's all mixed up...Better break it down
- In the world of secrets...In the world of sound
not allowed to talk
Sound allows each in-stru-ment (mind structured within) free will of choice...talking implies the articulation of sound into words, which binds free will of choice while permitting a chosen one to dictate speech.
Here's the sleight of hand... https://genius.com/Talk-talk-talk-talk-lyrics
- I'm tired of listening to you talking in rhymes
- Twisting around to make me think you're straight down the line
- All you do to me is talk, talk
- If every sign that I see is complete...Then I'm a fool in your game
- And all you want to do is tell me your lies
- Won't show the other side, you're just wasting my time
the United Nations deserves a death penalty
What if the internet united the nations of users, who now feel like being punished for wasting life willingly?
not shocked if the Antichrist was walking among us
Shock implies friction establishing a violent encounter among beings turning against (anti) each other...doing that tempts one to ignore Christ (to anoint) aka the anointment protecting each one from one another.
A jew tempts gentiles to turn against each other; thereby shaping many into the antichrist, which permits a chosen few to sustain anointed while avoiding most friction.
A jew riding the shock-waves among gentiles calls himself as shock jock(ey)... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shock_jock
ok with bringing about
a) About implies "by outside"...an inversion of nature bringing forth each native inside.
Few suggest whataboutism as a logical fallacy to distract many inside nature by outside artifice... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
b) Ok (okay) is here used as a sleight of hand for both "all right" + "to approve, agree to, sanction".
Approve, agree; sanction refers to many consenting to the suggested whataboutism by few, while all right/reg (to move in a straight line) refers to all of nature delineating (inception towards death) each native (life) within a straight line.
So when the puppet says "ok", then those with eyes to see acknowledge natural (all right), while those blinded are consenting to artificial (approve; agree; sanction).
JD Vance
Aka James (to supplant; usurp) David (to divide) Vance (to advance) aka to usurp the ever advancing natural divide with artifice.
A usurper presiding over vice as a vice president...
Only by resisting want (suggestion) for need (perception) can knowledge (perceivable) be perceived.
Hero implies "to protect"...holding onto truth invites assault by lies aka a lowering of protection.
Pro (forward) tect (to cover) implies nature forwarding each native by division from one another, which establishes the cover of anointment, which both holding onto truth and fighting off the assault by lies diminishes.
A traitor/trader implies effect (perception) trading with affect (suggestion) while betraying cause (perceivable).
Only within a line can one write aka only during delineation (inception towards death) can form (life) be shaped. The line divides opposites apart from one another, while the shaped writing tempts opposites against one another.
Logos (word) > logic (circular thinking) > reason (circular conflict)...it's ones consent to the suggested word written or spoken which turns opposites against each other.
One implies each particular within whole...a sum implies many particulars together (gentiles) under few particulars apart (jew) within whole.
...can only be taken by given choice. Choosing to do so represents gambling.