technocapital
Aka techno/tekhnē (artifice) captial/kaput (head)...the natural head is heading from inception towards death; while the artificial head rolls mentally (logic) and physically (reason).
capital is the first AI
Capit (head) al (all) implies each secondary within all primary aka first nature; then native...artificial capital is shaped within the secondary (artificial intelligence) and distracts from the primary.
capitalism is the first AI
If capit (head) within al (all) consents to any suggested -ism; then what was first perceived is now being covered by artificial intelligence sustaining the suggested within ones head.
Artifice implies anything suggested to one by another; while intelligence implies ones understanding aka position "standing-under" another...both together tempts one to ignore that nature divides each native from one another.
capitalism
"Capitalism is an economic system based on the private ownership of the means of production and its use for the purpose of obtaining profit"...
Nature privatizes each native by division from one another, hence making each a product within all...positioned (pose) forwards (pur) aka thriving (life) while declining (inception towards death).
The suggestion of an -ism tempts ones private head (capital) into a common consensus with others aka an economic system shaped by few to contain many by obtaining profit/prophet aka pro (forth) bha (to speak).
Consenting to any suggested -ism tempts one to mentally hold onto the suggested as intend aka "mean", so whatever another suggests becomes the means to control ones productivity...if consented to.
The singularity
The aka theos aka God...the one and only for each one within. All implies singularity for each single unit within...it's ones consent to any suggestion of another which shapes plurality aka ones consent (singularity) shaping consensus with one another (plurality).
If one views self as part OF instead of part WITHIN; then one became part of many under few, while ignoring the singularity of all.
consciousness
Aka con (together) scious (to perceive)...any suggestion tempts ones singular perception together into a consensus with one another; thereby permitting few to manage the perception of many by means of suggestion.
One cannot perceive together...only apart from one another. Suggested consciousness represents the inversion of awareness from aware/wer - "to perceive"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/*wer-#etymonline_v_52646
Notice that avant-garde (awareness guard) requires one to guard advance from anything another puts before one. Ones perception represents the guard; all perceivable the advance, and any suggestion by another that which lowers ones guard from the advance.
the kabbalistic virus
The (theos; God) generates the kabbalah aka cube of allah aka each cued being (cu-be) of all law (al-lah)...that's how life becomes virile form during virus/poison/ueis (to melt away; flow) aka virile form (life) within poisonous flow (inception towards death).
Inside of all poison; each one prodigy (to draw forth) represents a remedy (responding medium). Sleight of hand... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/prodigy/poison.html
- I got the poison, I got the remedy
- I got the pressure, the pressure
The above description implies the natural kabbalistic virus.
As for the artificial kabbalistic virus...any esoteric mysticism suggested by another represents an exoteric injection into self if consented to. Ones free will of choice represents the only remedy to prevent such a poison.
declare offensive
Only nature offers...if a native consents to any declaration of another native; then only by ignoring the natural offer. Declare implies the division of clarity into a clear vs obscure conflict aka offensive versus defensive.
A native (living) cannot defend against natures offer (dying)...only adapt to being offered.
UK; university; minority
UNI (ted kingdom) + UNI(verse) implies one aka the minority within all...uniting together and turning (verse/verto) against one another represents a deception to distract each among many from being a minority within all of nature.
The majority isn't the collective of beings, but all of nature before dividing into each native minority within. It's joining the UK or any university which establishes a collective of minority within majority.
the term...is offensive
A term represents a boundary aka flow (inception towards death) as the boundary of each form (life) freed within aka the process of dying terminating each life within.
The corruption of the above described natural term represents artificial "terminology" aka a rhetorical trick to tempt ones mind to accept the suggested words of another as an artificial boundary, holding ones free will of choice confined to circular thinking (logic), while tempting ones body into circular conflict (reason) against others.
ethnic minority
Ethnic/ethnos - "band of people living together" aka artificially binding together what nature sets apart from one another; as in minority (native) set apart within majority (nature).
One does not live together...OFF-SPRING implies living apart from one another.
zionists and nazis worked together...
...for apartheid. Nature works by setting each native within apart from one another. A jew shapes artificial -isms like (NA)zism + (ZI)onism to tempt gentiles together.
worked with
Only within work (procession) can each partial (potential) be set together (possession)...joining any -ism implies ignoring procession; sacrificing potential given and taking possession.
south of russia
Yugo (south) slavia... https://www.etymonline.com/word/Yugoslav
the promised land
Pro (forth) mise (to send) aka God (the) sending forth (promised) natural L(and) A(ir) W(ater)...to be able to perceive the promised land one needs to yisra'el (he that striveth with God).
a) Being in synchronization ('N Sync) isn't real...chronos devours those who try.
b) Accord implies buying into; record implies selling self out...either sows discord.
c) Good looking (appeal to perception), yet bogus (shaped by suggestion)...
d) Liam from Uilliam/william (i am will) + Gallagher from Gallchobhair (descendant of the foreign helper). Now consider that will implies local; not foreign...unless willingly consenting to a suggestion.
should never be given any public honors or spotlight
a) God doesn't make public...only private. Ignoring ones given privacy by taking part in public shapes a spot within the light of God.
b) What if honor aka honest implies HONE (to sharpen) EST (to estimate) aka sharpening ones mental esteem?
The Word...Erased
Sound > instrument > word...sound moves; while word tempts in-stru-ment (mind structured within) to ignore being moved. The longer one holds onto words; the more (memory) erasure an instrument experiences.
Insertion (inception) > addition (life) > erasure (death)...one singular movement.
the words "mother" and "father"
"And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven" ~Matthew 23:9
Father (motion) > mother (momentum) > child (matter)...heaven refers to each child struggling to heave upwards, while being put down. The more one ignores to HEAVE (to raise); the more one falls into KEL (to cover).
Notice furthermore...PATH (motion delineating matter through momentum) and MOTH (momentum encapsulated within motion giving birth to the butterfly of matter).
not everyone is human
Every implies whole; one implies partial...human represents the division of whole (every) into partial (one).
The trick...everyone as a hybrid of "every" and "one" represents not/nihilo (nothing) aka ones denial of everything dividing each thing within from one another.
Hybrid therefore implies hubris aka wantonness; insolence; excess aka wanting more than needed.
concerning the threat
Con (together) cern (to perceive) represents a THREAT to ones perception and a THREAD to the suggestion of another aka bondage to oneself.
david jacobs
David (to divide) Jacob (to supplant)...God divides (david) each one from one another; each one within tempts one another with supplements (jacob) to sell ones birthright (esau) aka selling out ones perception by giving consent to any suggestion by another.
pandemic
Pan (all) demic (people)...all implies singularity; people implies plurality. Few shape many into a people to distract from all (nature) dividing each one within (native) from one another.
ONE has to choose in-between being one within all or one of a people...the former sustains life; the latter destroys life.
The next pandemic
There cannot be a next all (pan)...only a next people (demic). Next/nekh - "near" is established by one joining a people, while ignoring that all divides each one far from one another.
Far implies distance aka each ones "divided stance"...unless chosen to be near one another.
get attention
To attend implies being (life) stretched (inception towards death) aka a process (nature) generating potential (native)...get/ghend - "to seize; take" implies holding in possession, while ignoring being potential within procession.
PAN attends one; DEMIC tempts one to get from another...
will get
Only ones free WILL of choice can choose to GET...doing so binds ones free will of choice to a possession, hence becoming possessed by another.
university
Uni (one) verse (to turn)...as long as one is turning; so long does the circular conflict (most vs least; micro vs macro; top vs bottom etc.) continues.
qualified
A circle (uni-verse) is shaped by holding onto one side (most or least; micro or macro; top or bottom) during linear progression.
It's linear progression (inception towards death) which delineates "quality" of life...not whatever life chooses to hold onto.
job
Job implies each piece (life) of all work (inception towards death)...not working for one another. Hence the story of JOB in the bible describing him as wealthy (life) and righteous (inception towards death) who is taught the lesson that real wealth cannot be held onto.
help yourself first.
There was a first before self came into being...and only a secondary being can choose a side within a me vs you conflict.
most people of any group...
...have been artificially grouped together by few who naturally remain apart.
just want
Want implies versus not want...an injustice. Only need moving through want implies justice.
the very worst elements of those groups, and also making sweeping modern judgments
Worse implies a modern judgement made by you (singular) over groups (plural)...sweeping singularity under the rug of plurality.
I want to strongly push against categorizing entire groups of people as uniform blocs
Selecting "want" shapes a bloc (want vs not want), while blocking ones perception of need with conflict.
Team red; team blue...these people deserve to be respected and esteemed, not attacked.
Joining any team puts one into opposition to another team...a mutual attack. Nature sets each native apart from one another...few artificially team many together with for example slogans like "teamwork makes the dream work".
I have caused
Being implies effect within cause affecting one another.
the only move on the board after such an attack, is to raise up and promote the good in team Blue
Switching sides within a circular conflict perpetuates conflict...few trick many with team blue (left pedal) and team red (right pedal) to perpetuate conflict (bicycle) by switching sides.
If you take genetic editing, it changes you.
a) All given to each one within implies change...taking implies from one another, while ignoring all given change.
b) Change implies procession; taking implies possession...the latter tempts one to ignore the former.
c) Genetic implies generated (life) within generation (inception towards death) aka a potential within a process.
d) Edit/edere - "to give out" implies process giving out potential...taking anything published into possession selects another as ones editor.
e) Only nature gives (inception) and takes (death) from native (life)...if one ignores that; then one gives self up while permitting another to take from one.
f) A suggested genome (sum total of genes within a set) tempts one to ignore perceivable (total generation setting each gene within apart from one another).
As always...few are artificially mixing many together to distract many from nature dividing each native apart from one another.
Novum Organum by Francis Bacon which is basically about replacing inference based logic with induction based logic to refine mental confinement of many by few.
if God is still into dropping manna from heaven
Stillness represents ones ignorance of Gods motion; the momentum (inception towards death) of which drops each lifted matter (life) into the opportunity to heave(n) oneself up.
There ain't no extra drops for anyone within all already offered...manna aka the bread which the lord has given implies the break of all into each one aka the internal division from one another.
put gene into
Only nature puts gene (generation) into being at inception of life...what beings put into each other represents the dying particles of another being as ballast. Why? To distract each other from regeneration.
pig into lettuce
That's called gene-splicing...gene implies nature splitting each native from one another; splicing implies artificially joining the split back together.
Gene implies all moving through each one...splicing tempts one to ignore that with each joined burden from one another.
inserted a copy
There can be only one origin (nature) for each copy (native) inserted within...
next generation
There can be only one generator (inception towards death) for each reactor (life) within...next/nekh - "near; narrow" implies each beings narrow path as next in line.
definition of a "soul"
Soul/sole - "one and only" implying the one and only motion for each divided matter within. Any definition suggested by matter to one another contradicts soul. Why? Because ones consent to a suggested definition tempts one to hold onto artifice, while ignoring that nature moves and divides each native.
I don't get where you're coming from
Soul implies the same origin for anyone animated within it...what you don't get from another represents your lack of self discernment, which one cannot get from any other.
no animal actually elected you as their spokes person
Speech isn't actual; but factual aka a fiction (word) shaped within action (sound). An animal adapting to fiction (word) over action (sound) represents a domestic servant...like most of the human animals who elected a chosen one above ones choice.
How can you be sure
To be sure...a being seeks assurance from one another aka utilizing suggestion to bind consent together into a rational conflict called reason.
Nature doesn't require assurance from any native to move forwards...it's natives who require assurance from one another to keep artifice alive, while ignoring nature.
rational is an attribute of the soul and not of the structure of the human mind or brain
All attributing (bestowing) through each one within implies soul/sole (one and only)...which includes the structure of the human mind and brain AND any rational shaped within that too.
The issue...a rational tempts one (perception) to ignore all (perceivable) for one another (suggested). Ratio (a reckoning aka counting) represents a suggested tool to confine perception, yet only ones consent can operate the suggested rational of another within oneself.
Nature doesn't count (ratio)...it divides singularity (cause) into each single unit (effect).
Is human itself a soul attribute
Man (motion) > woman (momentum) > child (matter)...soul represents motion; human (hue of man) represents momentum; each attribute within represents matter.
Clarification about hue of man...motion represents light > momentum represents spectrum (color; hue) > matter represents ray.
a soul attribute, or an animal attribute?
Animal implies "all animation" for each one animated hue of man within. Soul implies animal; division of soul aka spiritual animation implies hue of man; the tribute of which implies matter coming into being.
do the two kinds cross reference each other?
There can be only one soul/sole (one and only)...two kinds represents the mental rationale "dualism and likeness" held together by your consent to the suggestion of another.
Soul moves attribute (life) across (inception towards death)...cross referencing tempts ones denial (the nail) of being moved across (a cross).
Being moved from inception towards death aka spiritual animation by soul divination (division of sole) implies the cross bearing one. To move across implies a transfer aka the transference of essence.
soul means some
Soul/sole implies one and only aka singularity...meaning tempts one to hold onto a suggested ratio by another; thereby establishing a some/sum aka an amount...as in the top of mount zion.
a framework
All implies work freeing each employed mind within from one another...it's ones consent to any suggestion by another which frames employment (ones perception) within work (all perceivable).
If one lets go of the frame; then one falls out of the picture others have painted...only then can one perceive that nature doesn't use paint to besmirch; but generates essence to draw within.
one life, rest eternity
All eternity; each ones life...no rest for the wicked (departed aka divided part).
many lives, soul evolution, one final destination
a) Each singular life can be distracted with manifold plurality.
b) Soul delineates within a straight line...only within which an evolution (circle) can be shaped.
c) Final implies "end of all"...one can only come into being (life) in-between beginning (inception) and end (death) of all, which represents ones destination (divided stance within action).
undeclared
Nature DE (to divide) CLARE (to clear) each native within...natives obscure each other with artificial unification.
So a plant has a soul, according to your Latin etymology, right?
Plant/plat - "to spread"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/plant
A plant implies the division of all (cause) into each (effect) plant aka the spreading of sameness (soul) by differentiation (spirit) into being (essence).
The plant you see represents a being (essence); the differentiation of each plant from one another represents breathing room (spirit/spiro - to breathe), and the unseen dividing animation represents the one and only (sole/soul).
According to it, it's hard to view the soul...
...because accordance with one another makes it harder to discern soul/sole (one and only) by oneself. Nature divides each native within from one another to allow each to discern self by analysis...others suggest accord to sow discord by synthesis.
Letting go of accord; prevents discord, which makes it easier for ONE to view the ONE and only sole/soul and what it does to each ONE within...which is division from ONE another aka making each essence diverse; unique; special; distinctive; notable; solitary (soul-itary) etc.
a plant as one that can never choose what to do
Only nature does (action); which allows each native within to redo (reaction)...each plant chooses how to react to being planted. Any gardener can tell you endless stories about plants choosing to be bitchy about growing as planted.
I do want the same from op on that one
That implies a difference (I) wanting sameness from another difference (op)...one can only find likeness this way. Sameness implies the nature each different native came into being within aka the soul/sole (one and only) for each solitary being within.
not supplying
Nature implies supply (need); native implies demand (want)...the struggle for life is about resisting the supplied temptation to demand more than offered by all from one another.
try to define
To define implies artificially "affixing" what nature "frees" from one another.
Anima is Latin for soul.
Soul implies animation (anima) forwarding (for) anything within it...Latin represents a label shaped within to distract one another from forwarding animation. A label has to be mentally (ideal) and physically (idol) held onto, which tempts one to ignore the ongoing forward animation.
Anything blessed with the gift of life has a soul.
A blessing is given; a gift is taken. Life has therefore a choice to make...adapting to all given or taking from one another. Those who offers gifts are tempting one to accept poison; those who offer blessing are tempting one to sacrifice blood.
But the question is what is a soul?
Soul/sole (one and only); hence not a quest (question) towards outcome; but also the animating origin, and each animated essence within given the free will of choice to accept quests from one another.
Soul WAS before one can suggest to one another what soul IS.
Is it the same as a spirit?
Sameness implies one and only (sole/soul) animating (spirit/spiro) each different one within.
You questioning "if it's the same as" represents a comparison of what soul differentiates aka a synthesis shaped within an analytical process.
If one draws comparisons with one another, then one ignores one and only aka sole/soul.
The same as a mind?
Mind implies differential (essence) within division (spirit) of sameness (soul)...holding onto likeness; like answers to questions, equalizes the diversity of mind.
rational souls
You using animals; souls; things; humans in the plural implies a rational; complex comparison shaped within your mind aka you counting together what was set apart from one another.
The process setting apart implies soul/sole (one and only) aka singularity.
All living things have
All dividing each living thing from one another implies process dividing potential..."having" represents a possession aka a living thing holding onto something, while ignoring the dividing process and diminishing ones potential.
All living things have souls, some more complex than others.
The division of all into each one, which divides one from one another...that's soul. The sum (some) of things entwined (plex) together (com)...that's you trying to shape more than all offers.
like comparing a fern to a cow
That which makes fern and cow distinct from one another...that's soul. Drawing a comparison to make fern and cow alike one another...that's you ignoring soul.
Notice the use of TO (towards)...that's the soul animating each body private from one another. Using "to" to describe a like-minded comparison...that's a contradiction. Why? Because motion divides any likeness held together...thereby establishing the whole soul to each one within.
How would anyone ever know if they got an actual vaccine...
a) Taking any vaccine makes one cattle (vacca; cow) as in a coward aka "one who lacks courage to meet danger or shrinks from the chance of being hurt".
If one takes it like a coward; then another will gonna give it to ya like a bully...notice the hidden COW + BULL allegory.
b) Nature implies actual; native implies reactual...exchanges among natives represents factual. A vaccine exchanged among natives cannot be actual, yet natives can be tricked to ignore actual for factual, hence getting FACT (fucked).
saline solution
Being implies problem (life) within solution (inception towards death) aka saline aka SAL (sole; whole) INE (within) aka the salt of the earth.
"Ye are the salt of the earth: but if the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted? it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men." ~Matthew 5:13
doesn't do anything about "problem"
PRO (forth) BLEM (to throw)... https://www.etymonline.com/word/problem
Only nature throws (life) forth (inception towards death)...few of the natives within tempt many to ignore that and instead seek to find a solution (dying) for each problem (living).
politics isn't corrupt everywhere. Why would you think that?
Every (cause) divides each (effect) from one another which allows each to be anywhere within every.
That being said...division from one another represents the body private; while unification with one another represents the body politic aka a corruption within the righteous way of nature.
wants to go back
Want vs not want implies versus/verto (to turn) aka a circle...that's why many are stuck wanting to go back.
Sleight of hand... https://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/cher/ificouldturnbacktime.html
- If I could turn back time (circular)
- If I could find a way (linear)
As long as one turns (back vs forth or want vs not want etc.) the way of linear procession remains hidden to one.
in the end it doesn't matter
Only in-between beginning (inception) and end (death) can matter come into being (life). The rhetorical trick used by Trump (or Tucker's hearsay) is that matter cannot be IN the end. It's progressivism tempting one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcome.
because we are
Because implies each effect coming into being within cause...the internal division of singularity. The rhetorical trick here is the conflagration of singularity (because) and plurality (we)...tempting one to ignore self by joining others.
all going to die anyway
All implies the way each one within goes to die. A correct statement, yet obfuscated by progressivism (in the end it doesn't matter) and pluralism (because we are).
tl; dr: using analysis to break apart any synthetic sentence allows one to see what another tries to hide from one.
There can be only sound/sanus (entire; whole; all) for each ones sight and mind within. Dimension implies the division of ones mind in-between all and one another.
An image represents a "piece of statuary; artificial representation; likeness"...imagination tempts one to hold onto a possession while ignoring to be (life) within the journey of procession (inception towards death), hence journey; noun - "one's path in life".
Being (life) moved ahead (inception towards death) inspires resistance...another suggests a signpost to tempt one to follow a standard while ignoring to resist.
Another word for sign is "omen"... https://genius.com/Magic-affair-omen-iii-lyrics + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=462AQfXOn1c
A jew becomes a mystic if a gentile follows any omen.
Patience/patientia - "the quality of suffering or enduring; submission"....consenting to any suggestion nullifies (0) ones (1) resistance into patience to another.
Nature (1) inspires resistance; artifice (0) tempts submission...there can be only one.