1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

ABCs of Kabbalah

ABC (Latin abecedary) implies suggested ABraCaDabra...Kabbalah (Hebrew qibbel; to receive, admit, accept) implies ones consent to suggested (word), while ignoring perceivable (sound).

non-being

Aka being (perception) denying (Latin nihilo; nothing) everything (perceivable) for the suggestions by another.

ein soph

a) FAL'LACY, noun (Latin fallacia) - "that (suggestion) which misleads the eye (perception).

b) Ones consent to suggested soph-ism shapes one into a soph-ist.

c) SOPH (wise; to know) implies to perceive (as partial) perceivable (whole)...consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore that.

d) THEO (suggested the-ism) contradicts SOPH (to perceive)...if one chooses to ignore latter for former.

to introduce a concept

  • INTRO (within) DUCO (to lead) implies being (life) within lead (inception towards death).
  • CON (together; with) CAPERE (to take) implies taking from another while joining together.

Any suggested concept tempts one to ignore being led within perceivable, and ones consent implies holding onto conceptual (suggested information) while ignoring natural (perceivable inspiration).

Inspiration cannot be held onto; only adapted to, while letting it pass through one; hence IN (being within) SPIRIT (spiro; to breath) ATION (action)...breathing while being enacted upon implies being reaction within.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0
  • All truly dogmatic religions have issued from the Kabalah and return to it
  • Everything scientific and grand in the religious dreams of all the illuminati...is borrowed from the Kabalah; all the Masonic associations owe to it their Secrets and their Symbols
  • The Kabalah alone consecrates the alliance of the Universal Reason and the Divine Word; it establishes, by the counterpoises of two forces apparently opposite, the eternal balance of being; it alone reconciles Reason with Faith, Power with Liberty, Science with Mystery...
  • The Bible, with all the allegories it contains, expresses, in an incomplete and veiled manner only, the religious science of the Hebrews.
  • The Hebrew books were written only to recall to memory the traditions; and they were written in Symbols unintelligible to the Profane.
  • The Pentateuch and the prophetic poems were merely elementary books of doctrine, morals, or liturgy; and the true secret and traditional philosophy was only written afterward, under veils still less transparent.
  • Thus was a second Bible born, unknown to, or rather uncomprehended by, the Christians; a collection, they say, of monstrous absurdities; a monument, the adept says, wherein is everything that the genius of philosophy and that of religion have ever formed or imagined of the sublime; a treasure surrounded by thorns; a diamond concealed in a rough dark stone.
  • the consecration of the most fundamental realities by the primitive characters; the Trinity of Words, Letters, and Numbers; a philosophy simple as the alphabet, profound and infinite as the Word; theorems more complete and luminous than those of Pythagoras; a theology summed up by counting on one's fingers; an Infinite which can be held in the hollow of an infant's hand; ten ciphers, and twenty-two letters, a triangle, a square, and a circle,—these are all the elements of the Kabalah. These are the elementary principles of the written Word, reflection of that spoken Word that created the world!

~Albert Pike - Morals & Dogma"

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

based on vanity

VANE/WANE/WANT...which is based on need and wielded by ones free will of choice.

industry

Notice that industrious (steady attention to business) opposes sloth and idleness, while those who embrace the Hollywood industry are falling for sloth and idleness.

HollyWeirdos have so many mental problems

Which mind has more problems...the one making the wall flicker; or the one sitting in darkness while watching the flickering wall?

Consider CINE-ma aka cineration (reducing of any thing to ashes by combustion) and of course MA-CINE (mason)...

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

all of

If ALL could be OF, then that would imply more than ALL, adjective (Shemitic from calah, to be ended or completed to perfect).

Adding to all implies blaspheming.

all of them

The whole number of particulars implies each ONE of them within ONENESS of all. Others tempt one to ignore self for a suggested aggregate called "all".

In this example...there's more than "all" the jews of Hollywood within ALL of existence.

yep

Yep implies vs nope...a conflict of reason aka a controlled enviro-ment by a suggesting jew within the mind of a consenting gentile.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +2 / -2

Before there can be state or character, there was DE of GEN aka division (life) of generation (inception towards death). Others suggest state (affixed) and charact (mark made) to distract from the motion underneath.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Impale Jews

a) How about curtailing jew before putting up...

b) Ones consent permits jewish suggestions to penetrate. Consent puts ones life at stake.

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

starting point

Point implies end of sentence. Also; "minute amount" implies as partial within whole, and whole implies start and finish for each partial within.

Others suggest progressivism (points) to distract from ones life sentence, and suggested start to finish tempts one to ignore the moving foundation underneath those points.

genealogy

a) Logy contradicts gen aka reason contradicts generation. The latter moves; while the former tempts one to hold onto.

b) Suggested line of descend (genealogy) tempts one to ignore being ascend (life) within line of descend (inception towards death). How? Instead of growing self one is being tempted to uproot self, while digging into that which was.

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

a) Consenting to suggested information establishes a conflict of reason (love vs hate); such a conflict doesn't exist within perceivable inspiration...unless ignored for suggested information by ones free will of choice.

b) Seeking to employ ones mind (employment) under another diminishes ones potential.

c) IN'CIDENT, adjective - "falling; casual; fortuitous; coming or happening occasionally, or not in the usual course of things, or not according to expectation or in connection with the main design".

In short...consenting to incident (suggestion) tempts one to ignore adapting to main design (perceivable).

b) Blacklist implies boundary (list) of ignorance (black); being implies free to acknowledge...consenting to suggested tempts one to ignore knowledge (perceivable), hence establishing a self imposed boundary of ignorance, while permitting others to bind one with spell-craft.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) PROTEST', verb (Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it) - "to affirm with solemnity"...hence not against, but for...PRO/PRE implies FORWARDS.

b) TEST implies "to weave together". Protestors are weaving their consent into the suggested -isms by others, hence making what they're protesting stronger, while weakening themselves with the burden thereof.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who created

Few suggest creationism; consent by many establishes it.

If God is all knowing

Only within all (perceivable) can one know (perceive)...others suggest what all is (god), and ones consent permits others to invert "one knowing" into "all knowing".

Knowledge can only exist for partials within whole...otherwise a partial couldn't grow self discernment. Whole cannot grow, since it already implies maximum; omnipotence; all; entire etc.

It's the partials who trick each other to ADD onto whole. Why? Because whatever suggested information one believes to ADD to perceivable inspiration only adds a burden to oneself. Gentiles are burdening themselves with whatever a jew suggests them to hold onto; believe in; have faith in.

knows the future

One cannot know (perceive) past or future...only now aka perceivable moment (um) of motion. Where is before and after right NOW?

Also; present tempts one to consent to what another presents, which in return tempts one to ignore self aka one's presence.

enemy

Aka adversary; adverse; to turn. If wave (life) ignores line (inception towards death) it turns on itself. Ever seen a wave become unstable and break?

In different words...if ONES CHOICE consents to CHOSEN ONES suggestion, then it implies turning on self aka "the enemy within"... https://genius.com/Rush-the-enemy-within-lyrics

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

sparring...fail to win

a) Succeed vs fail and win vs loose implies fighting, not SPA'RING - "using frugally; forbearing; omitting to punish or destroy".

b) Suggested progressivism (to; towards) tempts gentiles into conflicts of reason (succeed vs fail; win vs loose)...a jew shaping -isms utilizes sparing (implication) before the fights (reason) among gentiles.

partner

P'ARTNER, noun - "one who partakes or shares with another; a partaker"...being implies partial (perception) within whole (perceivable), while sharing (suggestion) tempts others to partake (take by consent the suggested part of another).

One is PART; one needs to resist the wanted temptation to TAKE from another. Taking from another implies giving self away.

catholic

  • KATA (down) HODOS (a way, path, track, road)
  • ANA (up) HODOS (a way, path, track, road)

a) Rising up (life) while falling down (inception towards death) aka the rise and fall of men.

b) A jew suggests catholicism (kata; down) and anabaptism (ana; up) to gain permission to control both sides of reason from consenting gentiles.

two pair of scales

a) Suggested dualism by jew to tempt each gentile to choose a side.

b) Being implies ONE (choice) within ONENESS (balance).

c) Balance exists before choice; in-between choices exists only imbalance. What one perceives implies balance; what another suggests implies imbalance IF one consents to it.

If you want to train a good boxer

a) Want vs not want and good vs bad...a conflict of reason established faster than a boxer can put his gloves on.

b) BOX implies SQUARE; reason implies CIRCLE...winning vs loosing implies the circle a boxer ignores when entering a ring.

What a jew does here is "circling the square" by tempting square (perception) into circle (suggestion). To be implies in-between left/right + up/down + front/back aka within a cube, which center (perception) of circumference (perceivable) can only discern for self, not sharing (suggestion) with another.

Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...https://www.lyrics.com/lyric-lf/1176001/Freundeskreis/Quadratur+des+Kreises (check out the whole album).

-2
free-will-of-choice -2 points ago +1 / -3

LSD

Psychedelic aka PSYKHE (animating power) DELOUN (make visible; reveal) implies being revealed (life) through animation (inception towards death)...consenting to suggested PHARMAKON - "a drug, a poison, philter, charm, spell, enchantment" tempts one to ignore that.

reality might come into focus.

Being implies as living sentence within moving reality...ones choice to focus establishes a point of convergence, which diminishes ones life sentence. It's resistance spend by bending light.

Each suggestion by another tempts ones consent to focus on and hold onto it; while all perceivable inspires one to adapt and let go off. Choosing the latter increases ones resistance to the temptation of former.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

a) One (Jesus) cannot debase all (God); for it's all (whole) which debases into each one (partials).

b) Only during loss (inception towards death) can one rise (life).

c) Suggested (words) cannot debase perceivable (sound)...BUT suggested can tempt one to ignore perceivable, hence debasing self, while submitting to another.

c) All perceivable implies value; each ones perception implies evaluation...whatever another suggests tempts ones consent to devalue self.

d) Condition implies "set together into order"...an inversion of ongoing natural order (inception towards death) setting temporary chaos (life) apart from one another, hence each ones struggle to sustain self within natural order.

e) Judge (suggestion) not others lest ye (perception) be judged (perceivable)...

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

a) "And then the lawless one will be revealed, whom the Lord Jesus will kill with the breath of his mouth and bring to nothing by the appearance of his coming." ~2 Thessalonians 2:8

b) Would implies "if could"...a distraction from being free WILL of choice.

c) B'ASTARD, noun - "a natural child; a child begotten and born out of wedlock"... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/bastard

Natural child implies male (motion) through fe-male (momentum) for off-spring (matter)...others suggest wedlock (to join in marriage) as the inversion of perceivable divorce (Latin divortium; separation).

Intercourse for off-spring...not joining together in "wedlock". Why do you think intercourse (need) and lust (want) force ones choice to adapt?

Jesus would not...

A suggestion in the name of another; while ignoring "anointed one" aka each off-spring coming to be through a mother.

his words

Who suggested you to vocalize sound into articulated words? What can you tell me about "ineffable" aka that which is beyond expression? Could it be that there's perceivable sound beyond the expression of suggestible words?

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

we are of...evil one

Ones (partials) are of one (whole)...both pluralism (we) and reason (good vs evil) are suggested by other ones.

Ask yourself this...are you and me "we" or does each one has to consent to the label "we" to be a part of it? Can you show me a "we" within nature?

to see...demonic

Demon aka dai-mon (divider-provider)...reasoning about a provided suggestion implies a division of ones sight/perspective/optics.

appear distorted

Perceivable (inspiration) appears distorted if one consents to suggested (information).

-2
free-will-of-choice -2 points ago +1 / -3

I think they don't know what they're doing anymore and it's driving people together instead of dividing them...

E pluribus unum (out of many; one) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka united states.

Few collectivize many, while nature (whole) sets itself apart (partials). Many ignoring perceivable nature for suggestions by few are trying to hold together what nature sets apart from one another.

tl;dr...nature drives (inception towards death) apart (life)...artifice (suggestions by few) tempt together (consent by many).

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

why would one side be attempting to imprison the other side

"Lock her up" vs "Lock him up"...both sides where suggested to tempt ones consenting choice into a conflict of reason (versus)..which implies mind (ment) within (in) confine (prison) aka im-prison-ment.

6
free-will-of-choice 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Permit me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws" ~Mayer Amschel Rothschild

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +1 / -0

a) Value (inception towards death) generates evaluation (life)...evaluating the suggested values by another devalues oneself.

b) Nothing implies suggested nihil-ism (Latin nihilo; nothing) and ones consenting de-nial of everything perceivable for it.

c) Contribute and discussion implies CON (together; with) DIS (apart, asunder, in a different direction) aka a contradiction, hence all contributing partials within any discussion finding themselves within a conflict of reason against one another.

Notice the option (up-vote or down-vote) next to each "contribution" to any "discussion"...it doesn't matter what is written, only that those reading it consent to conflicts of reason about it.

d) Honor implies versus dishonor...yet another conflict of reason, and no matter how much honor or dishonor one has; the conflict continues.

e) Notice that contribute implies TRIBUTE; noun - "stated sum of money or other valuable consideration paid by one ruler or country to another in acknowledgment of submission or as the price of peace or protection"

Next notice that free-will-of-choice doesn't con-tribute (Post Score - 0)...why?...because choice implies reaction within enacting balance.

Motion offers balance (inception/death)...matter reacts as choice (life). Ignoring this for each others suggested choices implies imbalance.

f) How about this...can nature contribute nothing of value to those within?

g) The topic here is about revolt...so how does discussing contributions revolt against anything?

If I'm the one standing out with my behavior from the norm of contributing to discussions, then what if I'm the one breaking apart from established authority aka revolting?

Do jews contribute to discussions or do jewish suggestions set the foundation for consenting gentiles to contribute their opinions within discussions?

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

The ONLY option IS anarchy.

a) Suggested AN (without) ARKHON (ruler) inverts perceivable aka being (life) within rule (inception towards death).

b) Suggested option (choice) tempts one to ignore perceivable essence (balance)...only within essence can there be options.

c) If only (one), then why consent to or suggest options to other ones?

Do you see?!

How could one see if one looks at what another shows?

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2
  • GIB'BERISH, noun - "rapid and inarticulate talk"

What if I write about natural (perceivable sound), while you choose to ignore it for artificial (suggested words), hence making it inarticulate for your view?

What if perceived as self implies natural; while suggested by another implies artificial?

Does nature articulate anything? Do those within nature have the free will of choice to articulate to each other, while ignoring nature?

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

a) Being alive implies FO'CUS, noun - "a fire, hearth"...focusing burns one out.

b) LOT, noun - "that which, in human speech, is called chance; hazard, fortune; fate; the determination of Providence" aka the effect of an unknown cause.

Being implies as effect (life) within known cause (inception towards death). Few are "casting a lot" to aggregate many, which nature scatters apart.

c) As matter (life) within momentum (inception towards death) of motion, one needs to balance as choice, hence resisting to incline to either suggested side, as to remain at center of perceivable.

d) Being alive implies withIN process of dying...other suggest ON death to tempt life onwards towards death. It's being called progressivism.

One needs to resist wanted progression...not follow along suggested progressivism.

1
free-will-of-choice 1 point ago +2 / -1

that's the beginning of that sentence

When I wrote it? When you wrote it? When Julius Evola wrote "Rivolta contro il mondo moderno"? When few suggested information (words) over inspiration (sound) towards many? When inception sets ones life-sentence towards death? When energy generated (motion) beginning towards end (momentum) for the matter within?

view more: Next ›