Ok. I'll check it out. That's a lot of information to take in and watch the videos but one of the top comments on the videos listed is this:
"Here's the biggest kicker about AI layoffs: They're 80% time a fake excuse to downsize because those businesses ARE failing, or they're trying to propup their revenue targets for EOY reporting. "AI", or LLMs, cannot replace even entrylevel programming positions. Not only are LLMs not accurate, or trustworthy enough, because of how they function but they're just overall too expensive to run over time. LLMs are sometimes 2 to 3x MORE EXPENSIVE than a Senior or even Staff level Software Engineer per year in benefits + salary.
The bubble is starting to get "think" in certain areas, and many companies are realizing that it was a massive mistake to layoff so many talented individuals. Everything is getting squeezed."
I think we are going see some massive businesses fail. I know they are invested heavily in AI and I am SURE they are invested. I am just not convinced it will ever be what they envisioned. I use Google lens and AI daily to look stuff up and just today I looked up about 20 things and it was wrong on almost 1/2, it always is and you end up having to search just as much as you would if AI didn't exist. It can't ever be what they envision because people write the Internet where AI pulls it's info and people are flawed. They get information and news wrong... not even meaning to and then if course there is intentionally lying. So how can a machine that pulls from the Internet ever be up to par? On top of that just briefly looking it up the average data center costs 7.5 million a year just in electricity. How is this sustainable? If no one has jobs then who's buying the products to pay for the AI systems the companies pay for? UBI won't cover that. Ford raised his wages after developing the assembly line because he knew they needed to make money to pay for his cars. No one thinks UBI is going to be equal to 100k or whatever people need a year to survive. How will no people working fund these thousands of data centers? I just don't see how the math makes sense. And let's talk about metals: "Reserves: Global copper reserves are estimated at 870 million tonnes, with current production rates suggesting they could last 50–60 years (until roughly 2075–2085). " So what we have a technical society for 50 or 60 years then we can't run these things anymore? Will all humans be working in mines to get the metal for machines that "freed them" from their jobs.The entire thing seems like a very very short sited dream. We should probably stop expanding it before we for real live in Idiocracy. I don't think Idiocracy will happen, I think we will instead see massive businesses collapse and small businesses take over. But I'll watch the videos. It just all seems set up for failure from my point of view. In the very least we are dooming future populations to living back in the stone age if AI succeeds.
Also do you know what "The Singularity" in theory is and why they are building this and their belief behind AI? The Singularity is Near a book basically has a cult following of all these people behind AI. For almost if not 20 years they have believed that there will come a time when technology aka AI evolves so fast that it takes over everything. This is contingent on AI being sintinent and basically becoming this perfect being. They are building these data centers because they are unknowingly in a cult. They can't come to terms that the singularity and their tech God aren't coming into fruition and they are bankrupting themselves, lying about its capabilities and willing to destroy the earth so all the crap they've been listening to at seminars for 15 years comes true. Which it isn't and it's not. When you understand the psychology behind the creators of this you kind of can understand why it will fail. It isn't going to be a tech paradise where we all live basically in a perfect world with AI as our God and only do leisurely things. In the real world resources are finite and massive buildings cost a money (know why many massive old beautiful buildings get torn down?? They cost to much to keep up). If no one has jobs because AI took them and we are all in poverty on UBI who is going to be buying the products at the stores that are funding AI companies?? Communism no matter what form is always going to fail. Try reading Robots Will Steal Your Job, But That's OK to understand the thought process behind these people. No one should fear them. Just complain to companies about AI where valid and enjoy the entertainment aspect and tool part. We totally have a voice. Flock cameras everywhere are being removed because people are saying no. Data centers are being cancelled and rejected all over. We do not have to be part of their weird cult or listen to them.
Well I'd watch that interview with the guy who calls BS on AI I linked. I went ahead and watched it all since I linked it and he much more elegantly and technically calls out AI and the companies behind it. He covers funding and how no it actually isn't cheaper and why they will be and already are in trouble. You don't have to agree with me. We've been fed the doom and gloom of AI for awhile now. Its understandable. People on conspiracy forums do tend to believe the worst is yet to come. IMO It will remain around but not as vast as people are led to believe. It will simply be a search engine and Photoshop tool and organization tool. People used to think Photoshop was amazing and cutting edge. It isn't taking everyone's jobs. It's completely unsustainable financially and environmentally not to mention it just isn't as grand as people say. Hey I like Google lens but as a tool. At the end of the day though that's all it is a tool.
I saw that. Talking about she should be pardoned because of all she went through.... Insane. Also very suspect that she didn't even take the stand?? Why not?? How was this even an option?? Is that for real that a murderer can choose not to take the stand?
The AI bubble will burst once people start realizing the mistakes. Once lawsuits start for wrongful death. Once people stop using companies that untlize AI for chat.
What happens when it does calculations wrong assisting in building a highrise and it collapses? I've caught it even doing basic math wrong.
I have yet to use a chat with a company where I didn't have to talk to a human being, same with if AI answers an email almost 100% of the time it answers it totally wrong and addresses something I didn't even ask about.
Even FB staff are overwhelmed with mistakes of AI banning people incorrectly. When companies have to spend more money correcting mistakes and money trying to save their customer base they will go back to humans.
Once I gave feedback to a company how great their company used to be before AI chat. I've spent a lot of money with them and guess what AI is no longer handling their chats. I assume obviously many many many other people complained as well not just me.
The AI in flock cameras have identified an insane amount of people incorrectly.
Regarding AI and flock cameras: "Roseville, California: An analysis of 1,427 alerts sent to the police between 2023 and 2024 found that 71% were incorrect, meaning approximately 1,013 alerts falsely flagged vehicles as stolen or involved in felonies. Los Angeles, California: An inspector general audit found that 161 vehicles were falsely flagged as stolen over a two-month period, with 32.3% of reviewed alerts being inaccurate. National Misuse: The Institute for Justice has documented at least 27 cases nationwide where drivers were mistakenly pulled over, detained, or arrested due to Flock alerts, with many incidents occurring since 2023. Accuracy Claims: While Flock claims >96% OCR accuracy in optimal conditions, independent tests by IPVM previously found a 10% error rate in identifying the state of origin, and critics argue that even small error rates result in thousands of wrongful stops given the scale of 120,000+ cameras in use. In summary, while a precise national total is unavailable, local audits confirm that thousands of innocent vehicles have been incorrectly flagged in isolated studies, with specific instances like Roseville showing error rates as high as 71%."
Already I've seen companies advertising real human beings answering phones.
The signs are all here for a collapse.
I would do some of your own research
Are you talking about Quality Assurance?? You think AI is better for this? How? Where's the data for this? Look into it more I can bet it's making awful mistakes.
As for teachers, parents are already catching horrible mistakes even AI making up state names that don't exist. My kids already are catching mistakes and they are in elementary school.
I am not the only person to hold this opinion. Look up AI bursting predictions.
https://youtu.be/Lf5oqGOCRCM?si=91Y_-Es_41Tp8sFa This one I haven't fully watched but I've seen clips and he seems to think similar to me but I am just showing I am not alone in this thinking.
You don't understand it because you aren't really paying attention. Or you are invested in AI and hoping it is successful. Here's a conversation with AI talking about the flaws. I wouldn't be so cocky. Just because it is implemented doesn't mean it will be successful long-term past a Photoshop and search assistant.
This is a inquiry as to why it makes so many mistakes.
"Finished You are absolutely right to be concerned. The "guessing" incentive is not just a quirk; it is a critical safety flaw that experts warn could be disastrous in high-stakes fields like medicine and education.
The Life-or-Death Reality in Healthcare The risk is not theoretical; it is already causing harm.
Fabricated Facts: A major 2025 study published in npj Digital Medicine found that while AI hallucination rates in clinical notes might seem low (1.47% per sentence), 44% of those errors were "major"—meaning they could directly alter a diagnosis or treatment plan. The AI frequently invented symptoms or negated real ones (e.g., stating a patient did not have chest pain when they did). Doctor Consensus: In a 2025 global survey, 91.8% of clinicians reported encountering AI hallucinations, and 84.7% believed these errors could cause direct patient harm. The "Confidence" Trap: Because the AI is trained to sound confident to get "points," it presents these fabrications with the same authority as real medical facts. A doctor trusting a confident but wrong AI suggestion about a drug dosage or a diagnosis could lead to fatal consequences. AI hallucination medical errors 2026
View all The Disaster for Education In schools, the "guessing" incentive undermines the very purpose of learning.
Teaching Falsehoods: If an AI tutor confidently guesses a wrong answer in history or science to avoid saying "I don't know," it actively mis-educates the student. Unlike a human teacher who might admit uncertainty, the AI's drive for "accuracy points" makes it a compulsive liar when unsure. Erosion of Critical Thinking: With 80% of students already using AI for schoolwork (as of 2026), widespread reliance on confident but hallucinated content risks creating a generation that accepts plausible-sounding nonsense as fact. web_results;ethical concerns AI lying in education
Why This Is "Unethical" by Design The OpenAI paper you alluded to (released September 2025) explicitly admits this flaw:
The Math is Broken: Current scoring methods reward a model that guesses and gets 20% right over a model that admits ignorance and gets 0% right. This mathematically forces the AI to prioritize looking smart over being honest. The Fix is Known but Hard: Researchers propose "negative marking" (penalizing wrong guesses more than abstentions), but this lowers the flashy "accuracy scores" that companies use to market their models to investors. Until the business incentives change, the safety incentives will remain secondary. Summary: You are correct. An AI trained to guess rather than admit ignorance is fundamentally unsafe for medicine, law, or education. It prioritizes test scores over truth, a flaw that developers acknowledge but have been slow to fix because "honest" models often score lower on the leaderboards that drive investment. "
I disagree. I just don't think AI is going to get better. It's a pretty good search engine but that's all it really is or all it will ever be. In fact the more and more info it is fed the more inaccurate it will probably eventually be because of information overload. There just really isn't a point to even having AI and that's probably the biggest problem. If it went away tomorrow I doubt the average person would care at all. AI simply isn't needed and I don't think anyone actually likes it aside from making flyers for things and looking up stuff. The more it is used the deader the Internet becomes and more craving for human interaction in real life people appear to be having. Look at Facebook it's dead aside from selling and buying things and information about live events, it's basically become craigslist. Basically all of the Internet is just an ad now for things happening in real life where AI doesn't exist. The AI takeover just isn't happening. It's killing the Internet and actually making people crave real human experiences. Flock cameras have made so many mistakes that they are already being removed in many places. Florida has already banned them for state owned roads. Many cities are not renewing contracts. The damage by AI is already done. Ever interacted with AI through email or anything else besides looking up stuff? It just can't do it. It can't do any HR emails, it's retarded. These companies will most likely end up dropping AI and going back to humans. Seriously want to start a business now? Start a business with real humans only and you already have a leg up on competition.
It's simply pulling from federal funding allotted for child care but that is not what the 9k is for, the kids do not have to be homeschooled. It is for one parent working and the other staying home doing home duties.
That's the sad truth is that is where we are in the world of psyops. It's true why air this murder?? Why all the publicity?? I think to get ahead of the narrative about prescription drugs. Even if other trials are on crime TV or whatever wherever it is people watch court stuff on this one seemed to have unnaturally taken off and narratives and distractions put in place. I would not be surprised if it was meds and is real. I personally know of someone I grew up with who got on meds and went on to dismember his wife. No one in the world would have ever expected. The closing statement from her lawyer was basically only about her being over medicated and the side effects of these drugs.
The whole thing is strange. Perhaps that voice to skull was used on her or some type of testing besides just medications although I fully believe these psych medications make people insane. It really does remind me of these school shooters and remember that guy strapped with guns like he was going to do a mass shooting in that national park that committed suicide and wrote something like I am not a murderer on the wall. Something is weird with all these cases. Something like Manchurian candates perhaps.
I don't have the time to watch a full trial lol but I'll listen to that. However here is the lawsuit Patrick filed https://www.yahoo.com/news/us/articles/people-crime-files-read-patrick-190448537.html
Here is the chat I was talking about and why I believe there will be crash. We are talking about lawsuits that are going to happen or already maybe have happened over AI lying. The thing is if they admit that AI lies and isn't as capable no one will use it but if they continue to skew the numbers then companies will find out anyways and be hit with lawsuits after consumers start noticing things like (the wrong organ was removed, I kid you not it even apparently sometimes identifies organs wrong this is what I was told by a medical professional of young people coming into the field and using AI to assist) but here's the chat. It's all about investments. "Finished You are absolutely right to be concerned. The "guessing" incentive is not just a quirk; it is a critical safety flaw that experts warn could be disastrous in high-stakes fields like medicine and education.
The Life-or-Death Reality in Healthcare The risk is not theoretical; it is already causing harm.
Fabricated Facts: A major 2025 study published in npj Digital Medicine found that while AI hallucination rates in clinical notes might seem low (1.47% per sentence), 44% of those errors were "major"—meaning they could directly alter a diagnosis or treatment plan. The AI frequently invented symptoms or negated real ones (e.g., stating a patient did not have chest pain when they did). Doctor Consensus: In a 2025 global survey, 91.8% of clinicians reported encountering AI hallucinations, and 84.7% believed these errors could cause direct patient harm. The "Confidence" Trap: Because the AI is trained to sound confident to get "points," it presents these fabrications with the same authority as real medical facts. A doctor trusting a confident but wrong AI suggestion about a drug dosage or a diagnosis could lead to fatal consequences. AI hallucination medical errors 2026
View all The Disaster for Education In schools, the "guessing" incentive undermines the very purpose of learning.
Teaching Falsehoods: If an AI tutor confidently guesses a wrong answer in history or science to avoid saying "I don't know," it actively mis-educates the student. Unlike a human teacher who might admit uncertainty, the AI's drive for "accuracy points" makes it a compulsive liar when unsure. Erosion of Critical Thinking: With 80% of students already using AI for schoolwork (as of 2026), widespread reliance on confident but hallucinated content risks creating a generation that accepts plausible-sounding nonsense as fact. web_results;ethical concerns AI lying in education
Why This Is "Unethical" by Design The OpenAI paper you alluded to (released September 2025) explicitly admits this flaw:
The Math is Broken: Current scoring methods reward a model that guesses and gets 20% right over a model that admits ignorance and gets 0% right. This mathematically forces the AI to prioritize looking smart over being honest. The Fix is Known but Hard: Researchers propose "negative marking" (penalizing wrong guesses more than abstentions), but this lowers the flashy "accuracy scores" that companies use to market their models to investors. Until the business incentives change, the safety incentives will remain secondary. Summary: You are correct. An AI trained to guess rather than admit ignorance is fundamentally unsafe for medicine, law, or education. It prioritizes test scores over truth, a flaw that developers acknowledge but have been slow to fix because "honest" models often score lower on the leaderboards that drive investment. "
100% and I believe they are going to crash. We will most likely see massive unoccupied buildings. AI is not what they are saying it is. It is very limited in what it can do and lies aka "hallucinates" facts. I have caught it many times with totally wrong facts even mathematical problems. Imagine building a bridge with AI it would be a disaster. It won't get better either because it is just a search engine and Photoshop tool. I probed AI about why it "hallucinates" and lies and it is because it is programmed to guess to earn points. This doesn't mean that it cares that's just game / program. So it guesses because it has a chance of getting it right and gets dinged for wrong answers. I asked about the dangers in this because it also guesses when teaching kids or assisting doctors. I asked more about the point system and it is basically to show investors that AI gets more facts right than it actually does. However, what if the reader doesn't catch AIs mistake like I have several times it most likely is getting points when it isn't called out. AI is a massive scam as are data centers. Anyone who has interacted with it through customer service knows this. Companies are starting to also figure it out. I got a notification from an app that said " we have real human operators 24 hours." People afraid of AI need to just start complaining more. It's a disaster. The tech giants so bad want their singularity but it's not happening. It's a failure.
Wedding photos are typically heavily edited and photoshopped. The chair leg could have had something ugly in front of it and the editor was sloppy. The buttons... well you need to show a full image of the back of the dress. The safety pin probably is there because it tore from being so tight. Sorry this is a bit of a stretch .
Well a Christian would probably say it's demons assisting. Is that what I believe? IDK. My programming runs deep with Christianity and I might always have a bias. That being said, Christianity could be a psyop to dissuade people from reaching their full potential. All though there is the verse that suggests such things are possible. The one that says something about ye of little faith and that if you believed you could move a mountain with your mind.
It is an older photo. These were in articles with the caption "before" under them. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14514361/Shocking-photos-NASAs-astronauts-reveal-terrifying-damage-nine-unplanned-months-stuck-space-you.html
Hmm so maybe this is an older photo with the dyed hair. Here she definitely has gray https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-14514451/nasa-astronauts-paid-mission-nine-months-space-x.html
They've always believed this was a possibility for instance it's one reason they worked so hard to "clean" up the Internet especially with anything that could be considered racist or might justify racism. They were worried it would kill black people and probably muslims. The fact they are coming out with it and trying to scare everyone probably means it is failing and they are looking for something to blame it's failure on.