I'm surprised no one yet mentioned the historical dustup between the Khazars on one side, and the Rus and Persians on the other. Okay, I suppose I just did.
To go further (and I'm just at a point of rank speculation with this, being too lazy to have done any research), but I suspect even that contretemps runs deeper. There's an obvious association between Tartaria and Russia. There's a less well-known association between the Persians (ie, Iran) and the Aryans. That's where the name "Iran" itself comes from.
My speculation is that the word "tartarian" derives ultimately from "aryan". Say the two out loud. If correct, that points towards a deeper, obscured connection between Russia and Persia, and why they worked together against the Khazars.
It would also go a long way to explain why the entire (Khazarian) Establishment wets it's pants every time Russia and Iran get on the phone together. "It's happening again!"
Suppose we frame the question this way, "The US Empire puts major bases all through Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but not no major bases in South America or Africa. Why is that?" (We're doing some rounding here because, yes, for example, the US has a big drone base in Africa but it sure ain't Incirlik.)
People could point to any number of reasons, but I would land on two. While they're interrelated, they're also quite distinct.
The first is that they're not contemplating a war where big bases in SA or Africa would be important. Big bases in Japan and arming up Taiwan with an eye towards China? Sure. Bases in Romania and turning all of Poland into an armed camp against Russia? You bet! Guns and planes and bombs all over the Middle East against everywhere else in the Middle East, particularly Iran? You know it!
There really aren't anything like the same sort of prospective campaigns in SA or Africa. There aren't really any significant opposing militaries. Venezuela and Cuba come to mind, but they're just across from Pensacola and Tampa. No problemo.
Which brings us to the second reason: the whole mindset is different. You can see from the original article that the entire underlying mindset is colonialism. Like, "Hey, ain't those Chinamen ever heard of the Monroe Doctrine? GTFO!"
Which brings us to what underlies the second reason: racial superiority. See how everything eventually is geared around, "All those greaseballs and darkies belong to us. We'll take their shit when we're good and goddamn ready. Oops, I mean, we'll take our shit." So the entire military approach involves taking our shit from these mud people who seem to have some objection to that.
(Sorry for the rough language, just trying to make a point. I'm certainly not in a warship off someone's coast with an eye towards taking anyone's stuff.)
Final note: it's not really even racial superiority, although "They" leverage any that is already existing. The people running the game will murder, rob and oppress white people just as enthusiastically as brown people (see Ukraine), but historically the more melanistic people ended up lower down on the totem pole, and therefore softer and higher priority targets.
in all seriousness, although suspicion of that is widespread (in certain circles), I really, really, really hope so.
When I look around and see how history is being annihilated just in our current time, I wonder how much was ever preserved when it's all so delicate to begin with. I try not to think about it too much so I don't weep and fall to despair.
The subject of the destruction and desecration of the record of human events is rarely talked about, but you know who mentioned years ago their alarm and regret that lies were being written down as history? Melania Trump. She's a quiet one but there's more going on with her than we know., huh?
You would have to say more about what you find odd about it.
I mean, the USG cares enough about the American population to hold guns to their heads to take their money in what they call "taxes", yet clearly care nothing at all about their civil liberties and Constitutional rights.
So if someone asked, "Don't you find the way the US government treats it's citizens a bit odd?" I think most of us would note a lack of clarity--if not a lack of insight--on the part of the questioner.
It strikes me that people read these articles, yet have no comprehension of what they're reading. Some examples:
China tightens stranglehold on Latin America and Caribbean
Shouldn't Latin America and Caribbean nations be the ones complaining? None of them rate a single quote. Apparently, the Globalist American Empire speaks for them.
As an aside, I wonder how liberals define colonialism? The imperial military speaking for brown people does not qualify, evidently.
Commanders in the Pentagon are worried ....
Hold on, we're already talking to the people with guns? Don't they just take orders from the people in suits any more? How about those, you know, diplomats? What do they have to say? The article never tells us. BTW, couldn't we save money by getting of the State Department?
'The PRC has expanded its ability to extract resources, establish port, manipulate governments through predatory investment practices....
No word in the article whether the US has ever contemplated doing such things. I mean, because what China is accused of doing is way out of bounds, right?
She has also criticized the fact many major players in the region, including Brazil, Panama and Chile, have spent years with no US ambassador in place.
Oh, okay, so there we have mention of diplomats. But no actual diplomats. Well again, who needs them when you have color revolutions and sanctions for "bad behavior", amirite?
'When countries see that we don’t have our senior diplomat there, it shows that we’re not serious,' [4-star General Laura Richardson] said.
Apparently, it takes four stars on your shoulder to realize this and point it out. Has she considered relating this insight to the State Department, as long as we still have it around? Or do they just get their foreign policy advice from a UK tabloid?
In a plot twist here at the end, I have reason to believe Gen. Richardson is one of the "good guys", doing what she can to bring attention to the precarious situation in USSOUTHCOM, even if it involves scare-mongering and blackwashing China to get some action. Interestingly, her wiki bio includes this:
Richardson was originally going to be recommended by then-Defense Secretary Mark Esper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley, but they delayed until after the 2020 United States presidential election over concern that then-President Donald Trump might react negatively to the nomination of a woman to a top command.
Does anyone really believe that reason? I'd guess she was a Trump holdover they didn't manage to flush out of the Swamp.
Just a fun note on a related subject no one thinks about: why are Europe and Asia considered different continents? What numbskull would even suggest them to be separate continents... uh, you know, just welded together by a low mountain range 1,600 miles long?
A solution to this disregarded question is that, at one time, there was so much enmity between the Tartarians in what we now call Asia and whoever exactly was in what we now call Europe that they refused to even acknowledge they shared the same continent.
Even in relatively recent history, the borders in Eastern Europe have shifted all around. They still are, in fact. As is often the case, the game is given away to the observant right on Wikipedia itself, and this time it's on this map.
With the Urals accepted as the demarcation between Europe and Asia, we see a huge chunk of Russia in Europe but--again--who would have drawn this line and why? If you read the nonsense written in the Ural Mountains wiki, they dance all around it but include this gem:
Nevertheless, around that time in the early 16th century, Polish geographer, Maciej of Miechów, in his influential Tractatus de duabus Sarmatiis (1517) argued that there were no mountains in Eastern Europe at all, challenging the point of view of some authors of Classical antiquity, popular during the Renaissance.
They were arguing as late as the 16th Century whether the mountains even existed! We have already mentioned the Tartarians, but for those with very adventurous minds, the next sentence from the article is quite tantalizing:
... there are mountains behind the Pechora and identified them with the Riphean Mountains and Hyperboreans of ancient authors....
Through geography, have we tripped across an intersection between Tartary and Hyperborea? Sometimes I wish I could just find the Indiana Jones warehouse and read the history books about all this.
These blasts were nuclear weapons detonations. For anyone that believes they would "already know" if that were so, please stop reading now.
I refer persons who like to talk about nuclear stuff to two of my other comments and one post. In a long comment to a post from last night, I analyze these nuclear blasts:
Bidens tax dollars up in flames in Ukraine
I add some analysis regarding depleted uranium in a comment to this post today:
Fear Mongering: Radioactive Panic from Russian Missiles impact on munitions
In my post from 8 days ago, we found that the strike in Pavlohrad was also a nuclear strike:
I say "we found out", but readers should take the time to skim the comments on that one, particularly the pushback, to understand and evaluate the expertise and insight of the company we find ourselves among on this forum.
The two big blasts were nuclear detonations and I wrote up an analysis of them yesterday evening in a long comment on this post:
Bidens tax dollars up in flames in Ukraine
I would add this in regard to depleted uranium. There may have been DU shells stored there, and that may have been why Russia obliterated this facility. And for anyone that thinks they would never do that because it would poison the land, note that it's in western Ukraine which will likely be left to a rump Ukrainian state or to Poland.
Note that DU and gamma radiation actually furthers the argument that these were nuclear weapon events. First, note that "depleted" means that this is the fraction of uranium that does not undergo fission and becomes a waste product in purifying the isotope that does. Second, DU is used as gamma radiation shielding. It does not produce gamma radiation, it blocks it.
Apparently this is shadowbanned on r/conspiracy.
I opened the browser to new posts but didn't look at it. Just now, a couple of hours later, when I clicked on the tab I reflexively hit refresh, but as the page was loading I happened to see a post at the top with the same thumbnail titled, "Why is there not a single post about this explosion?"
It has now been vaporized. There's only one post on Reddit with "Khmelnytskyi:" in the title, and it's from several months ago.
If memory serves, some years back a rich Israeli offered Iranian Jews who wished to make aliyah something like $25,000 a piece to defray moving costs and get them out from the grip of the Iranian regime. He shut the program down after less than a year. Why? Not a single taker.
One might say, "Yes, of course, it was one giant fake and ghey psyop, and now there are 25,000 kike fifth columnists ready to take down Iran!" Maybe, but I have always shied away from the unfalsifiable. As far as critical thinking and mental discipline are concerned, it's like lifting weights with no plates attached.
As far as the Golan Heights are concerned, my interest in the areas runs deeper than any military utility. I believe that ultimately, it's real importance is that it's the location of Mt. Hermon.
You had two chances at it now: the name of the town where it took place was the very first word in the link provided. Given that, I'm not sure what value anyone would ascribe to the acuity of any analysis you will provide, but if I were you, I'd be embarrassed and just let it drop.
But then again, not everyone is me, right?
These are more nukes they keep secret by not telling us they're nukes, cemented by near universal ignorance:
Khmelnytskyi: Two NATO Tactical Nukes in Western Ukraine Storage Hit by Cheap ‘Iranian’ Drone…Radiation Alert Over Europe (The Intel Drop 5/13/2023)
In the video available in the link, you can get a rough size comparison to the buildings in the foreground and see that both of these detonations are titanic. They are much larger than Pavlohrad, and I would guesstimate the yield at 10kt.
Although these installations may have been ammo depots, these are not the "cooking off" of ammo depots which happen munition by munition, just like a pack of firecrackers tossed in a campfire.
Although these installations may have been fuel depots, these are not the burning of fuel depots, which are simply large, smoky fires. If you toss a road flare in a pool of gasoline, it doesn't explode since it is not under compression, it just burns furiously. After it settles down a bit, there's not actually much of a fire at the site since all the flammable material has been vaporized or blown clear.
A key feature of the aftermath is the glowing column. This is not made up of burning mortar shells launched on ballistic trajectories. Rather, it clearly comes down out of the fireball. This is vaporized material, heated to incandescence and carried aloft by the fierce updrafts. It remains incandescent even as it falls back out of the sky.
An earlier article on the same site seemed to blame the Pavlohrad nuke on a Ukrainian black market nuke stored there accidentally detonated by the explosion of a Russian cruise missile. This strike, though, going two for two, to my way of thinking casts tremendous doubt on that.
Geopolitically, I would say that Russia knows the end is near and wants it over with sooner rather than later. They lost four aircraft today, and the terrorism is getting more blatant. On the flip side, everyone is beginning to realize the AFU spring counteroffensive is having trouble getting off the ground because it does not exist. Western wunderwaffen seem to be having little to no effect.
So can Russia increase resistance among participating NATO officers when their colleagues just down the road from Lvov are vaporized and reported as "training accidents"? I would say probably yes.
And if anyone is wondering why NATO doesn't just call it out for what it is, well, then what would they do? Declare war? Already done. That would just legitimize strikes on NATO assets wherever they are, without the inconvenience of having to track them until they arrive in Ukraine.
The situation in Iran is clearly complicated. For some balance, one might wish to spend a few minutes watching this:
Ahmadinejad: "Jesus WILL return" (When did you ever hear Western leaders talk with this conviction) (12/25/2008)
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad delivers a startling message to the people of Britain in an "Alternative" Christmas message.
One may make of it what they will, but I for one certainly wish that any Western political leader would make comments as uplifting and heartfelt on this subject.
A subject totally silenced outside Western media is that Iranian Jews do not support the Zionist entity in Israel. Here's one example:
MP Underlines Jewish Community’s Support for Iranian Athletes Abstaining Competition against Israeli Opponents (Fars News 11/14/2021)
One might say, "Well, he's controlled opposition, obviously!" The second paragraph in the article is this quote:
“Today, abstention from rivalry against Zionist athletes is not limited to Iranian athletes, and athletes from other countries are not either willing to face the sports representatives of the child-killing regime,” Sameh Yah told FNA on Sunday.
"Child-killing regime"? Everyone will have to make their own judgement, but that seems over-the-top rhetoric for controlled opposition. Try to find any Western politician saying anything similar.
Frankly, above and beyond their love of the material things of the world, I think people love their comforting lies about the world and what's in it. No one would admit to this, of course.
But it's not even that simple. In their own minds, they don't know these are lies and they don't know they have chosen them. All of them simply become the "truth" of the world. And who would question what is true?
Jesus referred to Satan as the father of lies, so you'd think people would be a lot more careful about what they believe. Really, you typically get just the opposite when you confront someone. They think it's the Devil trying to trick them. It's evidently too much for them to consider whether they'd already been tricked, or even just made an error, to which we are all prone.
I don't think the world would be anything at all like it is if people just loved the truth. The truth I wrestle with--and wish I could find a convincing and comforting lie for--is that the world is the way it is, and will be the way it will be, and that there's not much I can do about it.
You might want to think about not posting what every other lackwit on r/conspiracy is posting. I doubt this point will hit home.
Because actually, I think you're going to do what you're going to do. And I plainly see the problem with that but I suspect you won't because you can't. In any case, calling other people douchebags is a lot less effort, and far more comforting to one's worldview.
Final point, I have found that knowing when to agree and when to disagree with Wikipedia, or any other source, is reasoning of a higher level than most are capable. Thanks for the low-level insult disguised as a useless attempt at advice.
Shall we just leave it here or would you like more?
When I see everyone running in one direction, I always tend to pause and look in the other direction. Doesn't mean the lemmings are all wrong, but I do notice only a handful have enough presence of mind about them to do as I do. Or to get the point I made in the last post. Or to get the point I'm repeating in this one.
Seems to me this acute lack of wits is an even bigger problem than one "WEF member" on a service no one is making you or anyone else use. (<-- Well, there's another point the lackwits will not understand.)
But please do keep insisting, because it will hammer my points home for those who are alert.
George Carlin's greatest punchline is, "It's a big club, and you ain't in it." Maybe it's even the most popular quote of conspiracy theorists.
Every time I see something like this come by, I can tell that almost no conspiracy theorists actually put two and two together. As much as they love Carlin's hip, insightful quote, they've never really internalized it. Otherwise they'd note that, no, it's actually a pretty damn small club.
I took the time to study LindaYacc's wiki page, looking for all the usual red flags of a spook or one of "Them". Fifteen of the seventeen references are from today or yesterday. The two older ones are:
"Trump Names NBCU's Linda Yaccarino to the President's Council on Sports, Fitness and Nutrition"
"Penn State alum and NBCU President of Ad Sales Linda Yaccarino to speak at graduation"
Less than alarming, I would say.
But my point is this: every single person who considers themselves a "conspiracy theorist" simply sees some reference to the WEF and their dick gets as hard as diamond, as if they've discovered something vital. And like most times your dick gets hard, you stop thinking.
It is through this flaw that conspiracists can and are led around. They know such people love to think they're "in the know", so They just give you something to know.
Young people today just like to bitch and whine about everything. The lame, low-effort psyops we have now are perfectly effective. When I was a kid we had to psyop ourselves at home, reading long, boring history books full of bullshit.
Too long a story to go into, but there's evidence indicating an erased history that Christianity and Islam were a single religion at one time.
Even in the accepted (but suppressed) historical record and religious doctrine, there are incredibly strong links and associations between the two. A few examples:
Rather than study such things, from skimming the comments I see that people would rather give themselves over to ignorance, fear and hatred, rather than to the study of such things as I have mentioned. Sad.