"They" didn't give a rat's ass about Trump until he announced he was running for President. Then he was the Worst Person in the World(tm), although none of Them ever noticed it before. Everything is weaponized against Trump for the sole reason that he's standing between those weapons and everyone They really want to use them on.
Which is everyone.
Thanks very much for the post and the summary.
Meta-comment: Software always just does what it does, nothing mysterious about it even if the programmers themselves lose track. Programmers always lose track to some extent, which is why there are bugs in every piece of software. So the key is to understand what the software is doing, and Hinton here tries to explain that.
The key observations at this point are that very few wish to and are capable of understanding what Hinton is explaining, and very, very few think with the framework I just wrote in the last paragraph. This state of affairs is purely to the advantage of the Elite.
Rather than understand what "AI" is doing, it's a lot easier for everyone to make it up themselves. Even easier is to be told, and that's where the Elites come in. So we're told things like, "the AI is hallucinating", which is, of course, nonsensical anthropomorphism.
But that's all the Elite need to control "reality". They just need a shim in between actual reality and what people perceive as reality. They save incalculable effort in controlling reality by simply being able to tell people what it is.
So when you get fired from your job, or all your bank accounts are zeroed out, or you're arrested on Domestic Terrorism(tm) charges, the reason will be simple: "bcz AI, brah". See how easy it is?
You can add the wrinkled flag on his casket to the pile:
What's up with the wrinkly flags on the coffins of Bush and McCain? (12/11/2018)
The confirmation in that post is a meta-analysis of it. Zero upvotes? What normal conspiracy theorist would bother downvoting that? Even more damning is the unusual number of Redditors with an unusually high-interest in carefully explaining all their unusually elaborate knowledge and reasoning concerning flag wrinkling.
It's the oldest trick in the book: problem-reaction-solution.
First we must understand that the Globalist American Empire seeks total hegemony. No rival concentrations of power may exist outside of that system. All must be integrated or destroyed; they may not even exist separately and independently. Thus, Russia will not be tolerated to exist. They admit this openly, and the Russians recognize it also:
Washington's Plan to Break Up Russia (Unz Review 10/27/2022)
The destruction of Russia being the desired "solution", the "reaction" that would bring about that solution is World War 3, more specifically NATO (and whoever else they can drag into the conflict like South Korea, for example) against Russia and her allies. Those allies, whether formal or informal, are continuously increasing. Sides are being chosen as we speak, and you can count with Russia the nations of China, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and North Korea. Most of Africa is also real tired of getting kicked around. Everyone knows now that they are just lower down on the menu than Russia.
To bring about the desired "solution", the "problem" is thus created along the lines of, "Putin is an evil dictator threatening to overrun the entire world, and if we don't stop him your surviving children will be speaking Russian". Of course, they just make it up as they go along.
How do we know they just make it up? Think of the most dire threat you've heard from Putin. Can't think of any, right? That's because he hasn't made any, or you know for a fact you would have heard it over and over.
In fact, do you notice that you can't think of anything he's said? That's because the Empire simply cannot allow the public to hear a word he might have to say in justification of Russia's position and actions. That's how immoral the cause is against them.
Finally, Ukraine was just a tool the GAE used against Russia, and that was because it's run by the most corrupt people in Europe (which is really saying something). Besides the corrupt leadership, the Nazi Terror Army that the CIA has built over the years was told Ukraine would be a hammer against the hated Russians. We see that Ukraine became the anvil and little will be left of it. Poland is heading rapidly towards the same scenario.
For reference, the corrupt US War Machine has plenty of space under the rug to hide dead bodies. Just from training accidents alone, the normal rate is over 400 per year. How much could they multiply that before a flag gets raised anywhere outside the Pentagram?
There are many other categories under which it might be even easier to hide pre-WW3 combat deaths. Here's a breakdown of active duty deaths from 2006-2020:
How many troops are dying in training accidents – and why? (Audacy 9/14/2020)
On Netfix, try watching content from other countries. I watch a lot of stuff out of Asia (Korea, China, Japan). It's surreal because about halfway in you'll get a very strange feeling and ask yourself, "Where's all the globohomo and social engineering?"
I watched "Mosul" recently, about the last days of ISIS in that city, and found it to be completely up to Western standards of production values. The messaging was, "ISIS sucked hard and they all deserved to die". USA#1 was nowhere to be seen and hardly mentioned. The odd messaging was with an Iranian colonel commanding an Iraqi PMF unit, and depicted as a shady a-hole. But he was just there to kill ISIS too.
I recall a study once that people were happiest living in small towns of a few tens of thousands, as opposed to big cities, suburbs, or rural areas. Maybe with the shifts some people will find better lives. Not that these global social engineering initiatives/genocides are anything but evil, but we've got to look for silver linings wherever we can find them.
On the flip side, I can't see myself trusting any population numbers in the foreseeable future. They make up voters, so why not just make up the population doing the "voting"?
I think probably no one anywhere knows the depths of the infiltration and subversion, both in tech and everywhere else. In tech it's everything from Spamhaus and Cloudflare to boot microcode in factory-fresh hard drives.
Just a few days ago, Jim Stone mentioned he got hacked so hard once he heard the hard drive spinning after the power was off. He had to yank the cord from the wall.
The reason I say it's unknown is that, from the inside, it's so widespread no one could keep track. Plus, compartmentalization demands that everyone only know what they need to know.
From the outside, it's unknowable in principle. That is, they keep everything on the up-and-up until such time as action is deemed necessary. Until then, you can't detect that which has no manifestation.
While it's not in tech, the recent departure of James O'Keefe provided a glimpse into the depths. I followed the story as reported by the No Agenda Show podcast. What I will say next is predicated on O'Keefe being legitimate, so read no further if you disagree because it will gain you no insight.
One of the listeners contacted host Adam Curry about the story. He is the CEO of one of the foundations, and said that the board of directors was totally legit, yada yada. Remember that this is going out to an audience probably approaching a million.
My read is that no, the board was not legit and O'Keefe was corralled. When he finally went over the line they drove him out and discredited him. But as part of the coverup of that action, this CEO pumps out disinfo through No Agenda. Adam seems to suspect none of this, rather he buys in because he's getting it from an "inside source". Which is true, but he doesn't suspect that the inside is contaminated.
I also recall when a couple of listeners to the podcast wrote in with notes on their donations about their friends or relatives that had been killed in the LV "massacre". I think few suspect the rot goes so deep as to monitor and use podcasts in this way, even with legitimate hosts.
You know, that really reminds me of the two most disturbing things I've ever heard:
-
What was the greatest trick the Devil ever played? Convincing people he doesn't exist.
-
What does the Devil look like? Like everything you ever wanted.
So the "Internet of Things", how convenient is that? Yes please!
Right, and it's sort of the insidious yet obvious aspect.
People develop their favorite broadcasters or outlets, and then something comes along that indicates they may be disinfo. They'll say, "No way, So-and-so is funny / entertaining / charming / educated / informative / whatever. There's no way they're disinfo!"
But just think of it from the other side of the equation: would you use someone as your disinfo agent that was an ignorant dummy that rubbed everyone the wrong way and said a lot of stuff people didn't like to hear? Probably not the best choice, right?
For that very reason I gave up trying to carefully mold what I wrote to please the maximum number of people. (Or is that my dastardly disnfo plan, the old revers-o? Bwahahahaha!)
I don't know anything at all about this guy, other than the catchy name of his show. But just from this little incident, I think we can draw two conclusions. First, that this was some sort of ritual humiliation, which impiies that Crowder is a disinfo outlet. If anyone suspected that, this is your confirmation.
We need only think closely about one sentence:
The video, obtained by journalist Yashar Ali and posted on his Substack....
You can pose as many questions as you like about this assertion: Isn't Ali worried about getting sued? Or Ring? How precisely did Ali get hold of it? Isn't Ring worried Crowder will just go around saying Ring secures your data like mints at the restaurant counter? Not one of these will yield a sensible answer.
One such question is this: Is "Yasher Ali" even a real journalist? No, he is not. I checked his Substack and it is a thin and lame veneer, which is trademark of an Intelligence legend.
Why do they think they can get away with such low effort? Because they know for a fact no one will look, and any that do will not recognize what they see. Just keep your radar on for the next few days to see if anyone else has a word to say about that substack. No one will, and Intelligence knows this for a fact.
Is "Yasher" even a real human being? With a certain level of sophistication in thought, there comes a sort of "inception" point in analyzing the synthetic reality of Intel operations where such issues cease to be relevant. And exactly what Crowder did to incur this is similarly irrelevant.
Will Crowder raise any of the issues I have raised here? Of course not, because he's an asset. He will take his beating and move on with his tasking.
So Eglin AFB has been talked about for a while, but I looked up the 2nd "most addicted" city, the innocuous sounding Oak Brook, IL.
In the Government section of it's wiki page, I found the following curious trend:
2012 30% Democrat 69% Republican
2020 46% Democrat 52% Republican
That is quite a dramatic shift. Really makes me wonder if the Establishment is consolidating some sort of operations in little old Oak Brook. With a population of 8,163, it certainly would not be difficult to take it over outright,
I agree. I think that's the correct description.
Many would fault me for it, but I'm still a believer in Trump partly due to that. Dig down far enough and you'll find a few researchers saying that he's legit, but his big mistake was that he did not know how deep The Swamp really is.
Which sounds like a convenient excuse, to be sure, but then I think about how I, though I consider myself very knowledgeable, just had no idea about a wide variety of things that have come to reality over the last few years.
Did I think they would front a body double as President or re-elect a dead man as Governor of CA, and be successful? No. Did I imagine they could set off a nuke and convince everyone it was a pile of old fertilizer? No way. Did I think They would try to start WW3 in Europe, and even blow up their big pipeline, and those faggots wouldn't even say a word in their own defense? No, never thought it would be possible. Point is, my imagination is good enough to know that I can't imagine what he or anyone like him is really up against.
In the end, it's like Pascal's Wager. If he's for real, then maybe just maybe he can pull our fat out of the fire. If he's phony and this was all a mind-blowingly elaborate setup, we were already done for long ago. So no downside, as I see it.
This is all well and good, but why not take the next step? If certain people should be prosecuted, should he not name those whose responsibility it is but who are failing to do so? If he's not going to at least call them out now, would we have any reason to expect he would as President, let alone take action?
"Naming the Jew" seems to be a big deal around here, so it would seem "naming the prosecutor" would be absolutely required.
Whether Abraham existed or not is irrelevant.
I would disagree with this. And it's not just pedantic trivia or Biblical inerrancy, but because it seriously affects pretty much everyone's approach to the Bible.
You see, I learned that Abraham has a very odd backstory, and I also learned about the historical context he was born into. While the details are important and fascinating, what I also learned is that that backstory is virtually entirely ignored.
I came to realize that people did not want to wrestle with such a thing because it affected how they treated the Bible. One the one hand, some wanted to dismiss it as fairy tales. On the other, it was just a series or morality tales, even if they made noise about how "true" the Bible was. With a morality tale, they could pretty much read into it whatever morality they cared to.
I took the narrower path, and entered in at the strait gate. My approach was, "Hey, I think these things really happened. Now, the stories may be distorted, corrupted over time, and even edited, and we have to do the difficult and uncertain work of undoing that. But we should be very reluctant to take anything from these stories until that work is done."
I suppose this all comes ultimately from self-interest, and my point is to invite others to go in at the strait gate. That way I won't be alone. I do feel like I will not get many takers.
Before getting too wrapped up in details of the shadowy doing of bankers, one may want to take a look at Miles Mathis' analysis of Lincoln's Assassination (42-page PDF) showing that it was a hoax. Intelligence agents were running around all over the place. (Bonus: Booth was a gay Jewish actor! But then you already knew that last part.)
The point is to save some time, because you can really get caught up in a lot of details that ultimately lead nowhere. The reason for that is that if your historical framework is wrong, you'll never, ever be able to properly interpret and fit in the details.
Even in a very long paper, Mathis doesn't find time to mention that Harriet Tubman was an Intellligence agent, and that the Underground Railroad was some kind of op. Who knows what it's true nature was, or even the extent to which it existed. See how far down the hole we are?
Even before his 2024 campaign has begun, enough evidence has stacked up against Ronny to certify him as phony. Who he really works for and exactly what his tasking is are irrelevant, because it certainly isn't the American people and their benefit. It will all play out as it will.
What to study is exactly how many normies are taken in by this guy, and exactly how it is accomplished. This sort of study is for those who wish to understand how the world really works, and how human minds are manipulated to cause it to be that way.
Which brings us to your average "conspiracy theorist". Studying their approach, it all ends at bashing poor old RDS. They love to prove to everyone around them, and especially to themselves, just how "right" they were all along.
I point this out because it's both rampant on conspiracy forums and also entirely unnoted. The huge pit which they fall into is that advancing one's knowledge most commonly involves discovering what you are wrong about. You'll see they have no interest in such discoveries. In fact, they detest, abhor, and avoid them.
The closer you study the world, the more clearly you see why it is the way it is. Unavoidably so, in fact.
I was going to say, "Everyone plainly recognizes it as ad hominem, which instantly discredits any argument anyone reduced to such fallacy might make. It;s a clear demonstration that person has no other evidence or argumentation."
As I say, I was going to say that before I recognized that out of six original comments, not a single one mentioned ad hominem. So I guess, critical thinking-wise, we're a lot farther up shit creek than I really knew.