It's off topic, but I thought by far the most important scene was one that no one ever talks about, near the end where the protagonist meets that Elite occultist/oligarch or whoever he's supposed to be.
That guy mentioned something about men like himself having ambitions that men like the protagonist could not understand, which is why he never knew what was really going on. I thought that was a key insight to understanding how the world really works. As I carried it forward from the time I saw the movie, I also noticed that virtually no one understands this and why the point is completely glossed over in discussion about the film.
So everyone has ambitions, which we could restate as things which are important to them. Maybe it's "get money" or "fuck bitches" or "protect my tribe" or "have health insurance" or "be powerful" or whatever. You could probably rank these according to some logical scale, but the particularities of that are not the problem.
The real problem is this: everyone subconsciously assumes that the world is driven by people with ambitions of a no higher "level" than their own. Another way of saying it is, no one believes ambitions of a higher level exist, and so no one else could be driven by them. That flawed premise skews all analysis of events. And that's exactly what the guy in the movie was talking about.
Take the analysis on the "No Agenda Show" podcast. John Dvorak is a smart and worldly guy, but he's driven by money. You hear him bitching and moaning abut donation levels all the time, but that's not the real tip-off. All of his analysis is driven by trying to figure out who is trying to make money, and that's because he literally can't imagine anyone being driven by goals on a higher level. He drags poor Adam Curry down to this level, even though Adam would eventually recognize a higher plane (witness his recent conversion).
You know, I was going to write up some other things, outlining how NPCs are not really in control of their own behavior and that that has to do with a detachment from external reality, but on balance I suspect there's no one with any consciousness still reading at this point and it's fruitless to try telling an NPC any of this.
So you "won" buddy! What an ego boost! Maybe you can just let it slide at this point. Otherwise, let me know if you insist on everyone seeing the NPC writeup.
Frankly, you keep insisting on demonstrating just what I'm talking about. Your egotism just won't let it go and is not thinly veiled but is on full display.
And if anyone is somehow still reading this thinking it's just two jagoffs pointlessly arguing on the Internet, note that I wish to highlight how only one of us was so controlled by their own subconscious they were "triggered" and could not just let it slide.
This is how we all get to observe how the human mind really works, and what sort of a problem we're really up against. This is what dark occultists study, by the way, and you can see why.
And in your mind that somehow affects what I said? I guess you're just one of those people that "likes to be right".
I also guess you didn't notice what I mentioned about people failing to raise their consciousness, so thanks for reinforcing my point.
Three notes:
-
He was probably injured in a brave battle to save his chef from testifying.
-
In the DailyMail article pics, is that actually Obama? It doesn't really look like him, does it?
-
Also in the same pics, Mike looks more like a dude than ever.
If the choice is between rolling around the pig sty of a bullshit rigged legal system looking for a buck or the punishment of my enemies, and the elevation of personal consciousness, I know which choice I would make.
Maybe many of the world's problems can be attributed to the choices too many people make.
They are definitely not the same.
The Bible flatly states that the Nephilim were born when "the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men". Here, we're clearly talking about sexual union, and the phrase "daughters of men" is used to indicate what we would phrase as "human women" in more modern parlance.
As to the translated "sons of God", the original Hebrew says "bene ha elohim". The first part is simply "sons of". While that word could be used to indicate literal male offspring, the understanding here should be parallel to the "daughters of". That is, it's used to indicates a "type", as in the phrase "sons of the South". So the phrase means something like "male persons of the Elohim (type)".
It's a much longer story, but the "Elohim" can essentially be considered one and the same as the "Anunnaki". There is actually a finer point to this but I am unaware of any evidence that could be used to make the distinction.
The "Anunnaki" were an expedition from the planet Nibiru, the word itself meaning "those who from heaven came to Earth". Thus, we would probably technically refer to their species as Nibiruans. Complicating this is that the Sumerians did not use the word Anunnaki themselves and always referred to the "Anuna gods", or "the gods from heaven". Here they probably were referring to "Nibiruans", at least as well as they could understand it.
The Sumerians also used the word "I.GI.GI". This word can be translated as "watchers", but I suspect this is not the sense in which they meant it. The same word has a numerical value, which is 600. There is strong evidence this was the size of the expedition, and so it seems clear that "I.GI.GI" was used to refer to the expedition members specifically.
The Bible is regrettably less specific. When writers used the Hebrew word "elohim", were they referring to the race or only to the members of the expedition? There is at present no way of distinguishing.
You know, I'd like to see that debate too, but I don't think They will let it come to that,
If Bobby goes after it, there's basically no way to separate it from the vax itself and all the damage it's done. He's supposed to be well-versed in such things and he would be splashing around the boiling hot acid of impressive sounding info on everyone and everything that promoted it.
Trump's fallback can be just, "Well, if you say so. WTF do I know about it? I'm just a real estate developer and TV star. You should have told me all this at the time. All I knew was what the experts told me. Should we write down a list of names of people that fucked over America? I've got my pencil right here and I'll take care of business when I'm Prezzy again."
At least that's how I would wargame it. Dangerous path, but then again They have been doing a lot of crazy stupid shit lately.
I would say yes, definitely an op. Many will be fooled because the evidence is subtle, but it's there. One of the latest examples were his comments on election rigging:
RFK Jr. Slams DNC for ‘Rigged’ Primary System
Ho ho, yes!!! That's what we all think! They're rigged all right! Except that's not what he says:
2024 Democrat presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. blasted his party’s governing body, the Democratic National Committee (DNC), for stifling debate and changing its primary schedule to President Joe Biden’s advantage.
Stifling debate and changing primary schedules? Yes, those are clearly among the most outrageous crimes of the Democrats concerning elections. Finally, someone calling them out on it.
Anyway, the idea that he's a psyop is consistent with the overall thesis that the Elites are becoming quite desperate, so They activate this bloodline sleeper in a last-ditch effort to draw attention and support away from Trump. It all sounds great until you stop to examine it (which you are never supposed to do, of course).
Unexpected from Rand Paul, which should very much draw our attention. I decline to deal myself with wild card of, "hE's BeEn DeEp StAtE aLl AlOnG!" as the explanation. Serious researchers ask more of themselves.
Given the very recent unfortunate problem of lightning strike/electrical short/spontaneous combustion/no explanation at his office, I count as possible that he was gently informed (by friend or foe) of the elevated fire danger closer to home. You know, with him and his family in it.
I've often wondered about this and the numerous similar situations. No one at NASA has good reason to think the Moon landings were faked? Can't some people in the CIA figure out the USG was involved in 911? How many other big giant mysteries are there that no one on the inside seems to crack open and revolt at what they find?
To square these many circles I went back to the symbol They never tire of showing us: the pyramid. I suspect that at every level, insiders are given a different set of lies. The dumb ones believe them. The smart ones, well... they "believe" them.
Say what you will about the Elite, but I think they choose who they work with very carefully.
Whether you think it's for good or ill, statements like this help you get past the crisis of wondering whether these people can be reasoned with, bargained with, and some sort of agreement struck.
In a similar situation on a much larger stage, I always laugh with a sort of black humor every time someone in the Neo-Liberal Establishment even mentions the possibility of peace talks with Russia (you know, given that they're losing and all). I actually think they're so far out of it they really don't know how far past that they've gone.
Similar to what Bill Cooper said, Alan Watt made the claim that in ancient Greece, attendance was made mandatory at theatrical performances for the purposes of indoctrination. I was never able to substantiate it, but then again They've had a couple of millennia to suppress that info.
Funny if true, though, because in "Lysistrata", the women go on a "sex strike" to end the Peloponnesian War. How far we've come.
0% of myself thought that any of this was reflected in any movie about WW2 that I have ever seen.
100% of me agreed that: "I love war movies and I have seen a ton."
0% of normies want to hear about how "The Jews run the movie business"
Some years ago, when I first thought deeply about the "narrow gate", I wondered, "How you would detect someone actually trying to follow this path?"
I thought that, in our mundane world, you'd hear someone say something like, "Well, that's just the best I'm able to figure out so far, and so that's what I'm trying to do." That reflects an imperfection in knowledge, morality and will, and an awareness of it, and the struggle to perfect them all. In addition, an acknowledgement of possible error reflects the humility that Jesus always encouraged.
Fast-forward and I observed you virtually never hear anything like that. It's a sad realization to come to. Anyway, all this is just the best I'm able to figure out so far.
A few years ago, I was surprised to find that this psyop goes back literally a century:
Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose.
A few years ago, I happened to be chatting with a couple of people that had graduated with bachelor's degrees in psychology a few years previously. They had both attended one of the larger state universities where I live, with about 20k undergraduates and 5k grads on campus.
Neither one had heard of either the Milgram Obedience Experiment or the Stanford Prison Experiment. Never covered them in school or had run into them outside of school. Neither rang the faintest bell.
So I think that also explains the modern world.
I am reminded of Lincoln's Lyceum Address, and a flip side to the words he said there:
Most everyone expected the end of the Zionist Entity would come in some sort Gog v. Magog showdown or some such thing, but if it comes--and I think it will--it'll be more along the lines laid out by Abe.
The difference and the fatal problem with Israel, of course, is that they were never freemen, but rather human shields.