A caveat for researchers of this subject: I have regrettably concluded that both LaCroix and Wallis are disinformation agent, albeit of two different sorts.

LaCroix is, let's say, excitable and undisciplined, and that leads him (and you) right off a cliff into some multidimensional speculative nonsense. Billy Carson falls into this same category.

As for Wallis, if his academic background is anything like he says it is, he should have the scholarship to steer clear of all that, if not call it out. Yet he doesn't. There's no way he is just accidentally became so undisciplined.

With that being said, in my opinion the Anunnaki is one of the most important subjects anyone could study, as they lie at the heart of our current troubles. It's one of "Their" biggest secrets.

So why are LaCroix, Wallis, Carson, and a number of others allowed to speak about the Anunnaki and related subjects? Because they are meant to lead you around and around the forest, never arriving anywhere, most certainly not at the truth. "They" know this.

So by all means listen to the evidence presented by these researchers, but--and this cannot be overstated--it is crucial that you know when to break with them. If all you're ever going to do is decide which "expert" to follow, the Elite have an endless supply from which you can choose.

You have to develop and exercise your judgment, and become entirely comfortable with recognizing when any and all "experts" have it wrong.