First, I would make the scholarly argument that "Amalek" originally referred to adherents to Satan It's an interesting and illuminating (haha) case, but quite long.
Of course, since Satan rules this world, the original meaning has been inverted, so that "Amalek" eventually gets used when pointing to someone or something that stands in the way of Satan's goals. See how neatly that holds together?
The Khazarians, generally being both intelligent and violent supremacists, gladly fill in all the connecting "logic" and "facts" of the inversion, and congratulate themselves on their moral superiority for thus saving the world.
I recall first hearing about this story a decade ago, and what I've learned in that time is one of the most fundamental, most important techniques of the Ministry of Truth.
You see, in all that time NASA has never tried to cover it up, or argue against it, or hide the survivors, or "deboonk" the conspiracy theory. All they've done is keep telling the same story of the tragic deaths of the astro-nots.
And that's it. The technique is simplicity itself: just keep telling the lie longer than anyone else can keep telling the truth. If they persist long enough, the lie will undoubtedly prevail as bedrock reality.
People really need to focus on the phrase "no health authority in the world".
There's a world-wide genocide going on and none of these people anywhere have the balls and/or brains to say one word about it. Take note that this is what the entirety of the World Health Establishment is worth to you: (checking my math here) something less than zero.
One might even be tempted to say they're part of the problem.
Mathematicians say they can prove anything at all, if you just spot them one miracle. For the Medical-Industrial Complex, "standard of care" is that miracle.
"Standard of care" is, essentially, declaring some medical treatment as safe, healthful, beneficial and even mandatory solely by fiat. Even if it drops you right in your tracks (see Tiffany Dover), then that's on you because probably you just suck at being alive. For proof, see the first sentence of this paragraph.
I consider the existence of NPCs as a substantial fraction of the population one of the biggest secrets of the Elite. They want you to continue believing that these are people you just somehow differ with because of culture or values or intelligence or any other reason. This is not the case.
When you finally accept the reality of NPCs, you begin to see the world with new eyes. You think and feel and act very differently. If you go back and watch "The Matrix", you'll notice that all the "awakened" people barely interact with the others who are still in the Matrix. Now you know why.
Russia is going to do what they're going to do, and i think that was decided long ago. They are past negotiating, or even caring what the West thinks. Would you trust any Western government to keep their promises?
That said, it's not really even a provocation, but more a psyop. Any counter-measure will be characterized as an aggression. Even if they do nothing and the residents of Kaliningrad suffer in any way, then "tHeY dOn'T eVeN cArE aBoUt ThEiR oWn PeOpLe!"
The key question is how many Westerners will buy into the narrative. Support seems to be crumbling. Even the (Anti-)Pope now says openly that Russia was provoked into military action. Who saw that coming?
I suspect the Puppet Masters no longer care about popular support or even the pretense of it. They will keep commanding their "troops" to do their bidding. And what happens when that persists for long?
Anyone ever heard of fragging? Rumor has it that's essentially what happened to those 50 or so Ukrainian officers in a recent Kalibr missile strike.
I believe the world will be very different in the near future, but the process of birthing it is proving very painful.
The news itself is like a spear thrust at the heart of the Medical-Industrial Complex, but it cannot be underestimated that it comes out of the University of Oxford.
If you've ever wondered where the "official narrative" comes from in any area of what was once called a "liberal education", it's Oxford. Specifically, Oxford University Press (OUP) is the black hole at the center of the galaxy of what passes for modern culture, and the dark rays emanating from it "enlighten" all corners of our world. Want to pollute your mind? Get a book from OUP.
That it's the home of the Rhodes Scholarship should surprise no one reading this, and ties us into so many misadventures. Oxford probably has more spooks than Langley, since they got started centuries before.
Two aliens in a power struggle, long-running like a soap opera, humans caught in the middle. Each is known by many names, so the pieces of the story are dispersed among many sources. The problem is, researchers either do not make the proper identifications or make incorrect ones so they never put the pieces together.
The real big problem, which you can see all around, is that everyone either does not care or already "knows" what the story is.Either way, they stand no chance of ever running into the truth.
Yes, the evidence has been rewritten, distorted, scattered, but I put it together and I'm no one special. When I look around, though, no one is close to the truth and they don't really desire it anyway. What they already have they find sufficient.
We've entered into such a surreal time. Biden (or whoever puppeteers him) and the other Liberals are taking actions that I don't believe anyone who writes laws and constitutions and sets up government structures ever even considered.
Like, it's explicitly illegal to shoplift from a store, but what if someone bulldozed the entire store and crushed all the goods beneath the treads?
And oh yeah, I guess it's not really illegal to shoplift from a store anymore.
I didn't know too much about Masonry when a few years ago I came across the fact that Masons take the "Oath of Nimrod". That told me all I needed to know that it was, at heart, a Satanic organization.
"Well," you might be saying, "Nimrod did challenge Yahweh with the whole Tower of Babel thing, but c'mon, Satanic?"
All I can say is that there is a much, much longer story behind that incident, who Nimrod and Yahweh really were, and the relationship between the two.
For reference, here's the matching r/conspiracy post: What is an American chemical weapons specialist doing in Ukraine?
Browse through it and tt's hard to believe the sheer repetition of shills troubling themselves to post variations of "Nothing to see here. If you don't move on, yOuR dUm!"
I read it as confirmation that this guy was sheep-dipped and acting on orders of the Pentagon or more likely the CIA.
As cynical as I am, once again I was not cynical enough. I had little suspicion when I read this article on him yesterday: American fighters who surrendered in Donbass speak to RT
Why, he really just sort of wandered into the whole thing:
Drueke, who left the US military in 2014, initially set out for Ukraine without a clear plan. Flying to Poland with the intention of doing humanitarian work, he nevertheless brought military gear and said that he was prepared to fight....
Ah, just a drifter, with time and money enough to fly to Eastern Europe on an indefinite trip. Like so many of our ex-servicemen, eh?
Then this caught my eye, but I chalked it up to lax reporting:
The two veterans – Drueke served two tours with the US Army in Iraq while Huynh worked in logistics for the Marine Corps in Okinawa, Japan....
No mention of what Drueke did. Did the reporter not ask? Did Drueke decline to specify? Truck repair or clerk/typist perhaps? Now looks like probably something else, huh?
This also caught my eye but, again, I was not sufficiently suspicious:
Under the command of Ukraine’s secret police, the SBU, Huynh said that the pair were sent to cover a Ukrainian retreat.
The SBU is now commanding troops in the field? Or was it perhaps a mission of a more sensitive nature?
My suspicions are now aroused, and I very much suspect all this will not go over well at Drueke's trial.
I'll save you the reply and write it myself: "Ohhhh, you know what I meant!"
Without directly addressing how we got here, I think the first insight is to realize that the world is not how we always very reasonably assumed that it was.
To illustrate, take the example of language skills. Just in everyday interactions (and assuming you're in an English-speaking country), virtually everyone is conversant on a similar level in English. You have to encounter a foreigner who is a beginner speaker or a retarded person before you take note of the difficulties they have.
But if you're old enough to remember the advent of email, we all got a peek for the first time into everyone's written skills. Good Lord, it turned out many people are literally barely literate! They have difficulty structuring a sentence, let alone a paragraph or a full argument. And now with the advent of texting and tweeting it has managed to degrade significantly further.
This is all a long route to saying that to figure out what the hell is going on with anything in the world, we have to closely examine where we might have gone wrong in our own thinking. (And what's funny in the current context is that this is something I have yet to witness a Flat Earther doing.)
Just my $0.02, but I'm of the belief that Assange was black-bagged in October 2016 and is now in either a physical or metaphorical hole. This latest news, then, would be just part of the continuous phony spectacle that they put in front of us.
Flat Earth.
What should be examined is nothing about the theory itself, but how people deal with it. If you think just a little about what the shape might be, you can easily come up with 3 different tests to make the determination, and if you put your mind to it you can think up 3 more. Just like the ancients did it, none of them need special instruments or the watching of YouTube videos.
But in the 10 years the psyop has been running, I have yet to hear a single person say they have thought up such tests and described them, let alone performed them. I'm sure some have, but it's incredibly rare.
The point here is that the simple, most basic idea of science to use observation and experiment to prove or disprove basic theories about the world has been nearly completely lost.
She's a horrible person and I quietly laugh at any progressive dimwit who still supports her.
Years ago, when Wells Fargo systematically defrauded millions of their customers, Congress held hearings on the scandal. Warren was outraged and said, "I'm just shocked that no one has resigned yet!" Then she got up and left.
What a warrior for the people, eh? With squaws like that, who needs enemies?
Regarding your experience with your client, I will say that to this day, many years after falling into that first rabbit hole, I'm still shocked at some of the things They do. Not shocked enough to disbelieve the evidence before me and it's implications, but I'm saying it might have been something I previously thought They would not do.
After long contemplation on the matter, I came to the realization that the limiting factor was actually** imagination**. If you cannot imagine something might be true, you'll overlook or misinterpret or reject evidence for it, or fail to notice it in the first place. You will fail to give ideas consideration, since imagination is used as a heuristic to immediately reject ideas that are "not possible".
I would suggest that your client never associated the shingles vaxx with the negative health effects because he thinks it's impossible that every vaxx might be a form of bioweapon. And he thinks that because he literally cannot imagine that it is true.
And all of this takes place at a subconscious level, so he couldn't even walk you through the thought process as I just did, since it is not a process of conscious thought at all.
You've hit on the primary shill detection mechanism, which applies to this subject and many others.
You see proponents of both narratives everywhere, but you never see proponents of one of the narratives using it to argue against proponents of the other. This tells us that both are false narratives, and their proponents are shills. Oh, or dumbasses that bought into one or the other shill narrative.
If the shills start arguing with each other to simulate an organic discourse, cognitive warfare costs would skyrocket, and they won't be able to keep their own narratives straight. They will never bother. Plus, they know the rest of us would have too much fun watching.
The heat, huh? Guess it's never been hot in Kansas before.
Maybe it would have been too obvious an attack on the food supply if thousands of cattle caught fire or mysteriously exploded like those dozens of food production facilities.
Browsers of this .win should recognize the heavy shilling on this post and RRN as a metric of the merit of the post and the linked site, and an indication of whether it would be fruitful to investigate further, should they be interested
Are we not living in inverted times?
You're 100% right, the whole stock market is just one giant rigged casino. It is so far from the idea of fractional ownership in profits of a company and providing a mechanism for raising capital that I doubt 1 in 100 "investors" could even write this very sentence.
And I very much like your sentiments regarding patents. We have so little regard for sharing as a virtue in Western cultures. I recall hearing about cultures (from the South Pacific, I think) where sharing was most highly regarded. The most highly respected people were the poorest, because they would use all their resources to throw lavish feasts for the community. What a world it would be were that to go global, huh?
I agree, and it is very depressing. But there is some light in the darkness.
In that dank hellhole of disinformation that is Wikipedia, I constantly come across stuff that I'm stunned they just left laying around in plain sight. I mean, even if it was a lie, they're still--in practice--admitting to it.
The flip side to that flip side is that they don't need to hide it all, because few are reading, fewer still are understanding, and almost no one realizes the true meaning. (Perfect example is the first line of the Georgia Guidestones.)