She's a horrible person and I quietly laugh at any progressive dimwit who still supports her.
Years ago, when Wells Fargo systematically defrauded millions of their customers, Congress held hearings on the scandal. Warren was outraged and said, "I'm just shocked that no one has resigned yet!" Then she got up and left.
What a warrior for the people, eh? With squaws like that, who needs enemies?
Regarding your experience with your client, I will say that to this day, many years after falling into that first rabbit hole, I'm still shocked at some of the things They do. Not shocked enough to disbelieve the evidence before me and it's implications, but I'm saying it might have been something I previously thought They would not do.
After long contemplation on the matter, I came to the realization that the limiting factor was actually** imagination**. If you cannot imagine something might be true, you'll overlook or misinterpret or reject evidence for it, or fail to notice it in the first place. You will fail to give ideas consideration, since imagination is used as a heuristic to immediately reject ideas that are "not possible".
I would suggest that your client never associated the shingles vaxx with the negative health effects because he thinks it's impossible that every vaxx might be a form of bioweapon. And he thinks that because he literally cannot imagine that it is true.
And all of this takes place at a subconscious level, so he couldn't even walk you through the thought process as I just did, since it is not a process of conscious thought at all.
You've hit on the primary shill detection mechanism, which applies to this subject and many others.
You see proponents of both narratives everywhere, but you never see proponents of one of the narratives using it to argue against proponents of the other. This tells us that both are false narratives, and their proponents are shills. Oh, or dumbasses that bought into one or the other shill narrative.
If the shills start arguing with each other to simulate an organic discourse, cognitive warfare costs would skyrocket, and they won't be able to keep their own narratives straight. They will never bother. Plus, they know the rest of us would have too much fun watching.
The heat, huh? Guess it's never been hot in Kansas before.
Maybe it would have been too obvious an attack on the food supply if thousands of cattle caught fire or mysteriously exploded like those dozens of food production facilities.
Browsers of this .win should recognize the heavy shilling on this post and RRN as a metric of the merit of the post and the linked site, and an indication of whether it would be fruitful to investigate further, should they be interested
Are we not living in inverted times?
You're 100% right, the whole stock market is just one giant rigged casino. It is so far from the idea of fractional ownership in profits of a company and providing a mechanism for raising capital that I doubt 1 in 100 "investors" could even write this very sentence.
And I very much like your sentiments regarding patents. We have so little regard for sharing as a virtue in Western cultures. I recall hearing about cultures (from the South Pacific, I think) where sharing was most highly regarded. The most highly respected people were the poorest, because they would use all their resources to throw lavish feasts for the community. What a world it would be were that to go global, huh?
I'm not much of an expert on these matters, but I'll take my best shot.
Three items on insider trading. First, I recall it being said that companies, counterintuitively, now tend to give out less information about their operations. They fear that any disclosure to anyone in other than formalistic public statements may be seen as "insider" information.
Second, on enforcement, we get "arch-criminal" Martha Stewart strung up over $40K by arch-scumbag James Comey. Meanwhile, you can see price movements before news every single trading day, but no one says a word about it.
Third, water can and will seek it's own level. Companies with an insider trading problem will simply perform less well than investments over time. Dirty players carry away value that does not go to average investors. No way around it, but the market is so distorted there's probably no telling that at this point in time.
As for patent infringement and related "intellectual property" matters, I'm sure you can find any number of analyses showing that these long ago became destructive to the general welfare. And recall that they only exist as a creation of the government.
As a concrete example, someone estimated that a modern smartphone had within it about 250,000 items of "intellectual property". So do the big phone manufacturers license each of these? Of course not. They have amassed huge portfolios of IP, like loaded cannons they point at each other. They compromise by signing "blanket licenses". which are something like truces.
So does "patent infringement" protect the tinkerer in his basement? Maybe. But good luck busting the de facto cartels that "patent infringement" has undeniably created.
Imagine if you gave high school students the choice to either attend classes as usual, or to scroll through r/conspiracy looking at whatever they pleased.
Even browsing a shill-infested hell-hole such as that, a lot of parents would end up getting a real earful that night
This bust does not at all seem planned, so I'm quite sure some or all of these feds were thinking, "Son of a bitch, someone narced on us! What kind of low-life scumbag would do such a thing?"
The mix of schadenfreude and irony is delicious, is it not?
Respectfully, and I hope this doesn't come off the wrong way, but you may be looking at the issue upside-down. I would suggest that the heart of the idea behind capitalism or the free market or libertarianism or whatever you'd like to call it is that decisions made on how to interact with another another are to be made by individuals for themselves.
The point here is that this is markedly distinct in spirit and practice than a small number of people, even smart and well-intentioned people such as yourself, dreaming up rules for the rest of us to live by then using violence to assure compliance. That's pretty much what we have now and only the rich and powerful like it and wish for more of the same.
Theft and murder, even of small amounts or of unimportant people, are forbidden by natural law, regardless of the economic system and what we name it.
This is not a direct answer to the question, but I have long thought that for just about everything a Leftist points to that is wrong with capitalism, you can trace the effect back to some government intervention. That is to say, almost nothing that we identify as a problem with capitalism is a problem with capitalism.
I also remember a wise man relating to me the saying, "If you have a problem with a capitalist, send another capitalist after him." In the decades since, I have not a single time heard of that being done.
This is hard evidence that the supply chain is openly sexist and must be canceled. The Overlords should immediately invoke the Defense Production Act for all genitalia-related goods, regardless of how they identify.
The work of Jerry Marzinsky is closely aligned, associating schizophrenia with demonic possession. In short, people that hear voices in their heads may not simply be "mentally ill". Here's a sample podcast:
JERRY MARZINSKY – SCHIZOPHRENIA, ENTITIES & MENTAL ILLNESS | TCM PODCAST #16 (PART 1)
I agree that monkeypox is a hoax and a coverup, but I think they've already hit solid bedrock in lack of accountability with the mysterious and I suspect eternally opaque "Sudden Adult Death Syndrome". But then again, there could be one more level:
Science has today determined that the single greatest danger to human health and safety, one that is very often fatal, is asking fucking questions. So mind your business.
I recall a video where a former Special Forces soldier was speaking on how he became disillusioned when he personally found out what the US military was doing in the world. He said something like, "You grow up wanting to be Luke Skywalker, and then you come to find out you're a Stormtrooper for the Empire."
Well, now you don't even want to be Luke Skywalker.
One should intellectually and spiritually compare this to one of the most iconic images from the Vietnam War: an officer summarily executing a Viet Cong prisoner by shooting him in the head. Even half a century later, from a war that killed over a million people, that stands out as symbolic of the brutality and inhumanity of that time and place.
And now this. Not on some faraway battlefield but in the very Capitol. Not an execution for crimes committed, but a murder (or more likely an assassination, as there is much more to the story). And not the happenstance of a war photographer, but in full view of cameras. The murderer is hailed as a hero and the victim denounced as a terrorist.
You have to ask yourself: if they would do that to her, what more care would they have for me, for my life, for anything I have and anything I am? If you believe it's one iota more than for Ashli Babbitt, you are living in a dream world. We see plainly all around how many are.
We are living through times far more barbarous and infernal than even that little slice of Hell known as the Vietnam War.
I think there's a simple calculus that explains the Democrats' speech and actions, no matter how ludicrous and corrupt and criminal they become: "If I don't go along with this and do whatever it takes to get out of it, they can only hang me once."
The commander of the DCNG Gen. William Walker is in it up to his eyebrows and was trying to cover his ass a year ago: Pentagon prevented immediate response to mob, says Guard chief (3/3/21)
He probably gets nervous around lampposts these days.
I used to listen to the "Campfire Stories" podcast by Jim Harold, where people call in with their "paranormal" type personal stories. One of the recurring types is guardian angels.
One of the stories I recall was a young pregnant woman who was carrying laundry, and she tripped at the top of a staircase. As she began to fall, she thought, "My baby or both of us are going to die." The next instant she was upright at the bottom of the stairs, no idea how she got there.
After I heard dozens and dozens of such stories, and not one of them sounded like they were lying, I thought, "Well, by far the simplest, most straightforward explanation is that guardian angels exist." So that's my tentative conclusion.
I just bought the cheapest thing I found, did zero research on either what kind of iodine or even what it was supposed to do. The substantial positive effect on my sleep was a complete and total surprise.
Personally, I'd just go cheap and work up from there. The stuff I use says 3 drops per day. I started at 1 drop/day and I'm up to 4 now just by playing around and watching the effects.
Flat Earth.
What should be examined is nothing about the theory itself, but how people deal with it. If you think just a little about what the shape might be, you can easily come up with 3 different tests to make the determination, and if you put your mind to it you can think up 3 more. Just like the ancients did it, none of them need special instruments or the watching of YouTube videos.
But in the 10 years the psyop has been running, I have yet to hear a single person say they have thought up such tests and described them, let alone performed them. I'm sure some have, but it's incredibly rare.
The point here is that the simple, most basic idea of science to use observation and experiment to prove or disprove basic theories about the world has been nearly completely lost.