Just a guess, but I would suspect it goes something like, "I'm just here to do my job, not to pass judgement for the protectee. That's above my pay grade. If I didn't do it, they'd just get someone else. Why should I give up my chosen profession just because someone else may or may not have done something wrong in the past?"
Writing it out like that, it almost makes sense. I'm surprised I have never yet gotten a mysterious job offer.
My working hypothesis is that the ancients were specifically prohibited by creating accurate depictions of the Anunnaki. The reasons behind that rule would be pure speculation.
The most complete information we have about the Anunnaki comes from the Sumerian culture, and I recently learned that there are specific anthropological clues that the Ubaid culture was the predecessor of the Sumerian culture.
They produced very strange and unique reptilian/mammalian figurines. I believe that, if any accurate depictions of the Anunnaki are to be found, these would be closer than any of the much later and more metaphorical representations.
It's a reference to the "Roots" mini-series (which was fictional but everyone believes it was a documentary).
In it, Kunta Kinte is captured in Africa and transported to colonial America as a slave, where he was assigned the name Toby. He never accepted being a slave and eventually ran away from the plantation. To punish him and physically hinder him from escaping again, they chopped off half his foot:
Kunta kente gets his foot cut off
This is how we were all programmed and traumatized back in the 70's. Looking back, I think it was also a warning to all of us.
I predict that, no matter what happens, no one who ever thought (Country X) was winning will ever admit that (Country X) lost.
In this time of universal deceit, an unconditional surrender on the part of (Country X) after suffering half a million KIA can simply be sold by politicians, their lackeys, and all the shills as "giving (Country Z) the opportunity for a graceful exit from their brutal and unprovoked war of aggression":
If that sounds ridiculous, after all this time look how many morons insist that the conflict began February 24, 2022 for no reason at all, because nothing ever happened before that.
(I didn't fill in he country names to save the shills and retards the effort of typing up all their loud and lame refutations.)
The phrasing you use is interesting, because looking back over the increasingly apocalyptic Biden era and what they themselves say about it, I'm now see that have been pushed so far that they no longer feel they need to correlate what they say with any semblance of reality.
"Post-truth" has evolved into "post-communication". We have entered a time where they use language not to communicate information, but only to manipulate the intended audience. Any people not in the audience that see how far they are from the truth are in no position to hold them accountable and are thus irrelevant.
So they can and will deny any and all realities, no matter how cold and hard. Indeed, they will just utter "abracadabra" and the hypnotized masses will see the dawning of a new paradise on Earth. Well, they would if it weren't for the Enemies of the State.
Get out of the way of you doing what, exactly? Typing more of your outrage on a tiny social media site? Have you convinced yourself that's helping anyone?
If I were you and knew other people were seeing me getting called out like this, I'd be embarrassed. I suspect you don't feel the same way. Say what you will about it being everyone's else's fault, but I cannot imagine anyone being interested in following you anywhere to do anything. thanx.
I too wish that more action was being taken. But on the flip side, you may have missed my point: neither Trump nor Q nor X22 nor Alex Jones nor David Icke has told you or anyone else not to do whatever it may be in your mind to do. Everyone is free to lead whatever type of revolution they desire.
But with that in mind we come full circle to what I believe Trump and Q and the forces behind them know much better than you or I: that leading a revolution of any kind is a difficult and dangerous thing indeed.
As a practical matter, I don't see myself as leading any such revolution. Rather, I feel that my duty is to know for a fact that if and when (metaphorically) the mob comes streaming by my front door whether the proper action is to join them, or begin firing from cover and concealment, or just watch them walk by.
From my study, the AZ audits were themselves part of the fraud and psychodrama. I believe few people understand just how well dug in the Cabal has become after many decades and centuries. Rather than study, almost everyone just points fingers and shouts at straw men the Cabal has set up all along the way.
Well, I see what you're driving at, but I think the positive evidence for it is weak.
If I was pressed as to the strongest statement Trump has made to restrain anyone from taking any action they might have otherwise, it would be a few hours into the J6 "event" when he told people it was time to go home. That was after two people (Boyland and Babbitt) had been murdered by the "authorities". Pretty barbaric, and I don't think there was any more point to be made. We see with hindsight that, given what he is (and we are all) up against, there was not much benefit to any of it in the first place.
The same point could be made about Q, which so many believe to be a honeypot of some type. I don't recall Q ever telling anyone not to do something. If their own fear and/or better judgement got hold of them, why pin it on Q?
Your point stands as stated, but I believe something deeper was/is work.
After the election, Trump was fighting the rig strongly and never conceded. Then something happened on or about the 12th of January 2021. After that, he pretty much stopped fighting, clammed up, and left quietly (on Air Force One).
Interestingly, to this date he still says it was rigged and has never conceded that he was defeated.
Every time you hear a liberal talking head screeching about "political violence" regarding the Paul Pelosi underwear hammering, listen closely and you'll hear a howling silence about this event. Maybe they just never heard about this, right?
Is anyone aware of and can link to any documented instances of normies saying something like, "Jeez, I said they were full of it but with all these people dropping dead maybe these anti-vaxxers were on to something."?
Even without documentation, has anyone just heard this casually? I fear that normies have not thought this because they are incapable of thinking this.
This is not on point and also outrageously juvenile and insulting, but don't you take one look and think that, just like Pinocchio, it wishes that someday it can be a real boy? Like it writes "Dr. Ken Starbird" over and over in it's journal?
Most will differ sharply from this, but IMHO Xi has finally turned China from it's path to the NWO, which featured China as the inheritor of the American Empire just as America took over from the British. The Cabal's reversal of fortune in Ukraine has made it all very real and they're having a harsh reaction to these turns of events.
The mental dynamics of Sanders (and many others similarly situated) are, in my view, quite unexpected. You will see that this is an inversion of what is assumed to be the normal process of rational faculties:
- Sanders thinks of himself as a "good" person. Although really, he doesn't think about it at all, just as no one considers whether the color red might be another color. It isn't and never can be, and thus it bears no consideration.
- Good people are moral. This is what entitled him to shame others.
- Moral people are smart. They cannot and have not been fooled into error by immoral or untruthful people. Has he admitted even the possibility of error?
- Smart people are well-informed. One could not possibly praise the shots if one were ignorant of any potential harm, right?
- Well-informed people cannot be harmed by unforeseen risks. There are none, otherwise he would be aware of them.
So here he is struck by a bolt from the blue, in a state of mental paradox. He's silent because his mind is stuck in an infinite loop. How do we know that?
He could break out of it by stating either, "Just a freak occurrence, I guess," or "Well, maybe those shots can mess up some people after all." Whether correct or incorrect, both are simple enough but both are totally unacceptable.
We all must internalize that we are dealing with people who operate far differently than we do.
Interestingly, the karate reference isn't really all in jest. I was recently listening to an old podcast (which I believe was this one: The Conspiracy Farm Ep. 151 Rich Graham which had some bearing.
Graham is a former special forces operator with an interest in MMA-type fighting and who now does training, including for LEOs. He mentioned that most get just 4-5 hours of hand-to-hand training per year.
That being the case, they don't know to handle themselves and have no confidence to go "hands on", so they just resort to shooting or tasering people.
Everyone can come to their own conclusions as to whether this was part of the cause, and also what the solution may be.
Looks like Bolsonaro will not go quietly. Just how not quietly is still evolving:
I've concluded that the entire "Dulce base" story is disinformation. I don't rule out that there may be an underground base there, but in addition to rock and dirt it's overlaid with a mountain of bullshit.
I say that to make the point that if you validate the original story and more closely examine it for veracity, you may come to the same conclusion as I did. If so, you may save yourself the effort of evaluating the far more esoteric issue you raised, or at least doing so based on a narrative from the creative writing department at Langley.
The difference I see with the Great Awakening--or awakening of any sort for that matter--is that you begin to notice things on your own without any authority needing to tell you.
In fact, I noticed that on my own without Qanon needing to tell me.
This is a pretty wild guess, but then again turning on the CCP like this is a pretty wild move:
The Cabal has judged that they have now lost control of China. They expect that Xi will begin to move against them both domestically and internationally. Why not throw some of the baggage off the back of the train if it can drum up any kind of anti-Xi sentiment? Easy enough to replace later.
The telling sign to look for is that when politicians and the mainstream media comment on this and similar situations, it will be based on the unstated premise that Xi personally ordered it or something. The same technique was used in the US against Donald Trump, when any wrongdoing by the United States came to light.
It's all on the up-and-up. They just announced the winner as a gentleman named V. Zoloftsky. He opted to take the payment in multiple launch rocket systems, cocaine, and a Lockheed-Martin gift card.