You're going to have to do your own research and decide for yourself what is convincing. Personally, I've found in many instances that evidence I consider compelling is metaphorically invisible to others.
As for nukes, I've found that Trinity, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Bikini Atoll tests were fake, but have no reason to believe that all other purported nuclear detonations were not real. Also, there many been many dozens of tactical nukes used in hostilities that were are told were other things (WTC, Beirut, ammo dumps, etc) or simply not told about.
My point is not that you should take my word for that, or even that you will come to the same conclusions, but just that you have waded into deep waters full of shills and self-assured ignoramuses. What I told you in the last paragraph is not a simple answer, and I suggest you beware anyone trying to hand you one.
You're going to have to do your own research and decide for yourself what is convincing. Personally, I've found in many instances that evidence I consider compelling is metaphorically invisible to others.
As for nukes, I've found that Trinity, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the Bikini Atoll tests were fake, but have no reason to believe that all other purported nuclear detonations were not real. Also, there many been many dozens of tactical nukes used in hostilities that were are told were other things (WTC, Beirut, ammo dumps, etc) or simply not told about.
My point is not that you should take my word for that, or even that you will come to the same conclusions, but just that you have waded into deep waters full of shills and self-assured ignoramuses. What I told you in the last paragraph is not a simple answer, and I suggest you beware anyone trying to hand you one.
Argument from ignorance
You may want to quit while you're only this far behind.