To me, you can just smell the BS in the first headline you read on these "events" and dismiss it instantly as yet another psyop.
But for those that hope to benefit from the study of them, the mindset I suggest is that as you review the evidence, you always ask, "How hard would it be to fake this? Am I being shown actual evidence, or is someone just telling me what to believe? Who would have to be compromised and in what way?"
I think with that kind of scrutiny, you'll find that there's actually significantly less to these events than you ever thought.
To me, you can just smell the BS in the first headline you read on these "events" and dismiss it instantly as yet another psyop.
But for those that hope to benefit from the study of them, the mindset I suggest is that as you review the evidence, you always ask, "How hard would it be to fake this? Am I being shown actual evidence, or is someone just telling me what to believe? Who would have to be compromised and in what way?"
I think with that kind of scrutiny, you'll find that there's actually significantly less to these events than you ever thought.