language convoluted
- CONVOLUTE, adjective -"rolled together, or one part on another"
a) perceivable sound represents the ongoing whole, each ones responding resonance (need) or dissonance (want) represents the partial, and one choosing dissonance with others (want vs not want) represents the convolution.
b) shaping a temporary word out of perceivable ongoing sound represents a tool of choice like any other. Suggesting words towards the consent of others represents a temptation to ignore perceivable for suggested for both. Why for both? Because consent gives power to the word, which tempts the one suggesting to exploit it over others. On the other side...consenting to a suggested word shirks ones response-ability (free will of choice) to discern self within perceivable sound.
c) try humming to notice an ongoing sound, then try speaking words while continue humming to notice temporary words within ongoing sound. This btw represents chanting (melodious uttering). If you then suggest the words to others, those others require a moment (um) to make a choice of consenting or denying it. This represents staccato aka a detachment; disconnecting from the humming foundation. This represents how the suggested word tempts one to ignore the ongoing sound.
unnecessary
The process of dying represents the perceivable need; living within represents ones perceiving choice to adapt to (need) or ignore (want) it. Reaction couldn't exist within action without choice, because the separation/differentiation of whole action into partial reaction implies momentum (balance of motion) and balance implies a choice at the center.
The issue here represents the suggested "UN-" aka a suggested negation of ongoing action. The living cannot negate the process of dying; only choose to resist (need) or ignore (want) it. Therefore...suggest UN- tempts one to ignore perceivable NECESSITY.
ambiguity
- AMBIGU'ITY, noun [Latin ambiguitas, ambigo.] - "doubtfulness or uncertainty of signification".
a) consent to suggested symbolism shapes doubt and ones uncertainty within perceivable symmetry. The foundation of symmetry implies ongoing motion, doubt (to waver or fluctuate in opinion) represents ones hesitation within motion, hence ignorance about the need to adapt to being moved.
Furthermore; FLUCUTATE (Latin fluctuo, from fluctus, a wave, from fluo, to flow) ignores that temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death) needs to adapt by "frequency" of resistance, which represents the formed growth potential within the flowing loss of potentiality.
In short...fluctuation implies going with the flow; while frequency implies being the formed resistance within flow.
b) suggested AM (to be) BI (two) tempts "one" to ignore being the perceiving one (partial) within perceivable oneness (whole) for counting others as "two". Also...consenting (want or not want) to suggested shapes want vs not want conflicts of reason aka "dualism" (one vs another one together within conflict).
hidden meaning
a) predefined meaning is available everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving) at any moment (um) as perceivable inspiration, which implies IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe aka adaptation of perceiving to perceivable) -ATION (through action hence as reaction).
Nature setting itself apart from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving) implies "revelation" for "illumination".
b) ignoring perceivable inspiration by consenting to suggested information, gives those suggesting the power to not just define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the suggested meaning at will, but also to conceal it from all those who consent to want it. It's a simple as exploiting supply & demand by the "happy merchant" of temptation.
Furthermore; hidden implies CONCEAL (to withhold from sight) MENT (Latin mens; mind; Greek; memory). Perception represents ones sight, while ones choice to hold onto suggested information within ones mind/memory keeps one out of sight of perceivable inspiration. It's hard to notice the perceivable outside if one is busy with suggested information inside.
major tool in brainwashing
a) perceivable sound represents the major; perceiving choice represents the minor instrument within. Everything the "weapon of choice" utilizes represents a tool to express (growth) or repress (loss).
b) a brain represents temporary form (life) within ongoing flow (inception towards death), hence in need to resist being washed away, while being tempted to want to ignore resistance. Why does ignorance represents a temptation? Because resistance implies struggle, and struggle tempts the "path of least resistance" which is ignoring to struggle against being moved and letting oneself be washed away.
Brain-washing represents the utilization of choice (suggestion) towards choice (consent) contract law to tempt form to ignore resisting flow, while accumulating suggested information aka further burdening the formed vessel within flow with ballast, hence loading information onto a vessel to incapacitate its steering capabilities, which allows the pirates (maritime admiralty law) to take over the vessel.
Does Latin offer a more concise manor of expression?
a) perceivable towards perceiving implies "impression", perceiving adapting to perceivable for comprehension implies "compression", growing comprehension within perceivable implies "expression", ignoring perceivable for suggested implies "repression".
Sleight of hand: "express yourself, don't repress yourself...and I'm not sorry...it's human nature"..."I'm not your bitch, don't hang your shit on me"..."it's human nature".
b) Latin helped me to further comprehend English (aka Pig-Latin)...a slave language robbed of all natural connotations; filled to the brim with rhetorical traps; numerical and phonetical encoded numerous times to allow communication (among the few) underneath miscommunication (among the many), pushed as the one world language through the world wide web; constantly and being defined; redefined and contradicted without corrupting its foundation.
As to reverse engineer ongoing revisionism between English and Latin this can be helpful, but I learned that the more I comprehend about the perceivable foundation (sound) underneath suggested distraction (words); the less the used languages matter, since they all represent different distractions from the same source.
To utter words shapes BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] - "confusion; disorder" and building such a tower of confusion; disorder (babel) out of suggested information, will always collapse upon itself, while leaving the foundation (perceivable inspiration) untouched. This is why the few use the symbolism of the broken tower of babel (Brussels headquarter of the EU) as the reveal of method for those with eyes to see. Also; BABYLON aka to "babble on" aka BAB'BLE, verb - "to utter words indistinctly".
c) without ones self discernment as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); temporary growth within ongoing loss, resistance within velocity; ingredient within base; reaction within action; potential within potentiality; trans (form) within the feminine (momentum) of male (flow), magnetic within electric; internal within external; partial within whole etc....no language can help much with comprehending ignored communication. Instead one needs to struggle with the temptation to want to hold onto suggested information, like all the words used as brands upon the moving system one ignores for them.
Pardon my ignorance
Ignorance represents ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable). Wanting a suggested pardon by the choices of others continues ones choice of ignoring need.
It's not about the right vs wrong usage of need/want, but about choice discerning self to be in-between balance (need/want), which requires resisting the temptation of suggested choices by others, who when consented to, lure one into imbalance (want vs not want).
Grow your comprehension about need (struggle) and want (temptation to ignore struggling). Suggested Cola vs Pepsi represents want vs not want from whatever side one chooses to consent...only perceivable "thirst" represents ones need to adapt. Hunger represents need; appetite represents want. Appetite leads to being exploited by suggested convenience (stores); while hunger implies inconvenience, which if resisted frequently would grow ones temporary resistance within the ongoing velocity of hunger.
In short...suggested always tempts want or not want, only perceivable represents everyone's need to adapt. Hold your breath and wait until necessity forces adaptation....that represents the quickest reminder of what one ignores. Death is only ever a moment (um) separated from those alive within, and it's extremely tempting to ignore that.
wish to understand
Aka ones choice to want to "stand under" suggested information; while ignoring the need to adapt to KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" aka perceivable inspiration, which would represent ones growth of comprehension.
Take anything next to you, open a text-file and write "things I can do with..." and use only this thing to draw inspiration from. Do this 20 minutes a day for as long as it takes for you to comprehend that you can choose to draw out of infinite inspiration by adapting to any finite thing around you. This comprehension needs to be grown by frequent adaptation through free will of choice....not by reading words from others and agreeing or disagreeing with them.
Understanding doesn't grow you; it willingly represses you under others, who then are tempted to exploit your ignorance for their growth.
as you do
a) AS, adverb - "like; even; similar"...every partial (living) within whole (process of dying) represents a difference within sameness. "like" implies ones choice to respond like others, while ignoring to sustain apartheid within wholeness. Ones choice represents the "uneven" reaction within the ongoing momentum of motion aka the "even" balance.
b) suggested "do" tempts one to ignore being (living) done by (process of dying)....others suggest one to do (monkey see, monkey do) to distract one from only being able to RE (respond to) DO (being done by).
I can only write 11000+ words on the fly by adapting to what inspires me, not by trying to understand what others are suggesting. Utilize anything that inspires you and notice that further adapting to it will keep increasing your comprehension about it...the only limit is yourself, hence your temporary life. If you instead want to understand others, then the suggesting others represent the consented to limit for your growth, which those others will exploit to keep you from growing, hence misdirecting you alongside ongoing loss.
I can write this down, but only you can choose to resist standing under others....agreeing with me doesn't change your position underneath, you just allowed yet another above you.
we do not need
a) suggested "we" (plural) contradicts perceivable "one" (singular). Your consent to the suggested "we" gives the suggesting few the power to suggest "in the name of" (in nomine) of others. Those suggesting in the name of others are distancing themselves from the suggested, which is why the consenting many fail to comprehend who's making the suggestions. Instead the many are reasoning among each other over the suggested.
b) suggested "do" tempts one to ignore being (living) done by (process of dying), hence only able to "redo" aka RE (respond to) DO (being done by).
c) suggested "not" (nothing) represents the inversion of perceivable everything. A "thing" implies something, while suggested "no" represents ones denial of something perceivable.
d) tell me how one needs "we", how one being done needs to "do", and how one thing within everything needs "nothing"? How are any of those representing a perceivable need, a necessity for the sustenance of ones existence?
attempt to tell us
a) look at my profile....Post Score 0 (no offering); neither upvotes; nor downvotes (no judgement). I adapt to what inspires for the sustenance of oneself....others represent both inspiration (need) and temptation (want) for my struggle to sustain self through free will of choice.
b) a telling implies suggested information; I adapt to perceivable inspiration, while taking apart the suggested information by others, hence reverse engineering the fictitious narratives shaped within ignored reality.
present with cold hard data
- DA'TA, noun - "things given, known"
a) nature sets itself apart, from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living), which implies from everything into each one thing given.
b) known aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" implies perceivable inspiration, hence "hot flowing data"...not the "cold hard data" of suggested information.
The process of dying represents the ongoing flow of inspiration for those living within to adapt to, to draw from, to grow resistance within (need) or to be tempted into ignorance by (want).
c) PRES'ENT, adjective [Latin proesens; proe and sum, esse, to be.]...to be implies temporary living within the essence of the ongoing process of dying. What others suggest you about it tempts one to ignore it, hence becoming "absent".
implementations
IMPLEO (to fill) MENT (mind/memory) -ATION (through action)...comprehending this requires self discernment about being reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying), and therefore with the need of life to resist the incoming movement towards death. Filling ones mind drowns one faster, which is why the few suggest endless information to tempt the consenting many to accumulate as much fictitious ballast as possible into their minds clouded with ignorance.
A memory needs to be used for temporary adaptation to ongoing input (like a ram), while resisting the temptation to want to be misused for accumulation of suggested information (like a hard-drive).
beat it
- BEAT, verb (Latin batuo; abate) - "to destroy in any manner; to lessen; to diminish".
Reasoning with others about suggested information represents beating oneself. Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "No one wants to be defeated...It doesn't matter who's wrong or right...just beat it"
a) take the faces out and notice that the many wanted to hear the tales of the few before and are still wanting to hear the tales of the few afterwards. The faces are irrelevant, and so is what they're suggesting...only the consent of the many runs the show.
b) turn the pic sideways (nine pictures in-between two pillars aka 9/11)...strange.
Why is it that the jews have the lead in all crime over history?
Because the many are consenting to follow their leading suggestions (progressivism).
Why are all criminal words of jewish origin?
Because the many consent to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words.
Why when we consider financial crimes, the only significant numbers are jewish?
a) if the many ignore to evaluate (perceiving) value (perceivable) for suggested values by the few, then the few gain the power to put a price on reality; make compound interest out of the ignorant many, while drowning them with mental and physical debt and continue to devalue their choice of evaluation.
b) the few suggest numbers (plural) to tempt each "one" of the many to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit", from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one" (singular).
Those who consent to suggested counting of others, ignore expressing "one" self, while the suggesting few call themselves "counts"... https://pic8.co/sh/1rIGYa.jpg
Is it because they are smart?
If the many consent to suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand), then that implies them willingly "standing under" the suggesting few. If the many would adapt to KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists", each one of them could grow comprehension of perceivable, yet putting themselves underneath others seems to be more tempting than the effort of growing oneself...
there is a reason
Reasoning represents ones consent to want versus not want suggested information aka a conflict among the many about the suggestions of the few. A self imposed mental hamster wheel that gives the suggesting few the power to control both sides of every conflict of reason by first defining (idolatry); then redefining (revisionism) and finally contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information for both sides within every conflict of reason.
numbers don't lie; like the jews do.
a) what if all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power" alas partial ones (living) within whole oneness (process of dying)?
b) what if perceiving differences (living) within perceivable sameness (process of dying) can be tempted by suggested likeness, under disguise of sameness, to ignore differences? Hence equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)....
c) what if ones consent to suggested truth (want) tempts one into a conflict against suggested lies (not want), while both sides ignore perceivable change (need)? Why need? Because being (life) within change (inception towards death) implies the need to resist being changed from alive to dead.
history
What if HE BREW HIS STORY to tempt you to ignore yours? What if your story within nature doesn't require narration?
Where can I learn to think properly?
Where? Momentum (balance), hence being the choice at the center thereof. Why does one lack self discernment about this "where"? Because one consents to "stand under" (understanding) the suggesting choices of others.
Try to choose need over want; perceivable inspiration over suggested information and implication (if/then) over reason (want vs not want; true vs false; agree vs disagree, belief vs disbelief etc).
In short...resist holding onto suggested and learn to let go of it, until you comprehend that everything perceivable is still available to you.
From a different perspective...conscious memory needs to be used like a ram (adaptation to ongoing inspiration), yet wants to be misused like a hard-drive (accumulation of temporary information)...the more you hold onto the temporary, the less you comprehend about the ongoing.
As for learning...to learn for self represents to teach self and vice versa. Others can be used to draw inspiration (need) from, but simultaneously tempt one to bury self under suggested information (want)...it's ones response-ability (choice) to discern self within balance (need/want).
PROP'ER, adjective [Latin proprius, prope, near.] aka being PROPER (living) within COMMON (process of dying). What is nearer; ready; willing to aid, than ones free will of choice to sustain self?
I do not believe claims that he is completely controlled fake opposition.
a) information warfare (info-wars) implies the main means of the few to steer the many through mass suggestion. It doesn't matter if one consents to agree or disagree with suggested information...only that one consents to suggested (information) over perceivable (inspiration), which lures one into "info-wars".
The video freezed up for me. And then the audio cut out.
I have this on the regular on jewtube. Same PC; different IP and what do you know...now it works.
Consenting to suggested "copy & paste"...a) allowed others to accumulate and distribute information that is easy to copy & paste and b) domesticated oneself to be content with "stale pasta".
The result of that...automated cattle feeding.
a) noice rhetoric.
b) DICTATE, verb [Latin, to speak.] + DOCTOR, noun [Latin, to teach.]...consider if nature teaches without speaking?
c) if one represents a vessel (life) within flow (inception towards death), then a DOCKED ORE (phonetic doctor) implies ones ignorance to steer self, which allows others to dictate directions.
a) all suggested information represents misinformation if one resists consenting to it, hence it "missing" the aimed at consent.
b) all suggested information represents disinformation if consented to, because consenting to suggested information implies ones parting away (dis-) from perceivable inspiration.
c) reasoning over information (want) vs dis/mis- information (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (need).
unelected
The choice of the many to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) shapes the suggesting few into the ELITE; noun (from French élite) - "selection, choice", hence the few becoming the elected consequence of the many ignoring to select need (responsibility) over want (temptation).
If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of "choice" within perceivable, then the suggesting few become the "chosen ones"...
a) what people believed is being suggested to you by those who tempt you to consent to believe them.
b) suggested "before" tempts the perceiving one to ignore "being within" perceivable.
- BE; verb - "being; existing within" + FORE, adjective - "advanced, or being in advance of something in motion or progression" aka to BE (living within) FORE (advanced by the process of dying).
explain
"plain" implies loss (inception towards death)..."ex" implies growth (life).
an even more retarded version of Creationists.
If you would comprehend the difference between suggested creationism (out of nothing) and perceivable transmutation (out of everything), you wouldn't label others RETARD (to diminish the velocity of motion)...ongoing velocity (process of dying) represents the base of temporary resistance (living).
No matter how slow one lives, one cannot diminish the velocity of dying.
are just an even more
"just" implies balanced, hence in-between less/more...suggesting "even more" tempts one to ignore that.
can demonstrably prove
Any suggested proving (to deduce certain conclusion) tempts one to ignore the perceivable conclusion demonstrated. If one demonstrates being alive one ignores being within the process of dying, hence still in the process of being concluded (moved from inception towards death).
How can you deduce a conclusion while still being concluded?
demonstrably
DEMON aka DAI (divider) MON (provider)...it's the process of dying (whole) which divides into living (partial), while providing base (inception towards death) for ingredient (life).
to make the people believe...
...is about tempting others to consent to suggested over perceivable. Those who believe ignore what is for what others tell them it means...a meaning shaped by others at will.
the root of all our problems
The temporary problem (living aka seed); the ongoing solution (process of dying aka soil)...the roots of problems (comprehension or ignorance). Adaptation to perceivable grows the roots of comprehension, while ignoring it for suggested grows the roots of ignorance.
deception
Those who ignore perceivable for suggested are tempted to blame the suggested as the deception, while ignoring that ones choice to consent to suggested deceives oneself into ignoring perceivable. Others don't wield the power of ignorance...only oneself does.
flat or ball
a) whatever others are suggesting represents a different partial of the perceivable whole, yet their suggestions tempt oneself to ignore being the partial center of the perceivable whole, hence tempting one to consent to imbalance self off center.
b) notice the OR; termination of noun - "denotes an agent, as in actor, creditor" + OR; conjunction - "connective that marks an alternative"...aka altering reaction (living) within terminating action (process of dying).
Reasoning about suggested (flat versus ball) tempts one to alternate within a controlled environment by others, while ignoring implication (if/then) within terminating perceivable.
The perceiving partial needs to alternate with the perceivable whole, while resisting the temptation of taking turns in bashing each other over suggestions.
Mythos defines logos
Mythos (suggested information) defines Logos (wanting vs not wanting suggested information aka the conflict of reason)...if consented to.
in a similar manner
Suggested similar (likeness) tempts one to ignore perceivable difference. To be "one" (partial within whole) implies being different from each other one, otherwise one couldn't discern self, nor perceive others.
an attempt to convolute individual viewpoints
Perceivable implies moving differences (need), suggested represents the temptation of collecting them (want), hence ones choice of want (suggested) over need (perceivable) convoluting ones individual viewpoint (perceiving perceivable through the lens of suggested).
are not
ARE, noun - "a measure"...the perceiving one (partial) can only measure within perceivable everything (whole)...others suggest "nothing" to tempt one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
Chaos is the result
Temporary chaos (life) represents the resistance within ongoing order (inception towards death); hence cause (process of dying) resulting in effect (living).
Ive heard people say, and tend to agree, that the future has not yet been created.
a) aka I consented (agree) to suggested (say), hence ignoring that which perceptibly is (momentum) for suggestions about what isn't (created future).
b) from the "moment" of inception to the "moment" of death...one can only exist "now" aka within the perceivable; ever changing moment (um).
That our minds create
Then try it...CREATE (out of nothing) without TRANSMUTING (out of everything already perceivable). Show that your mind can create anything without utilizing everything already in existence...
we go along
Does life go along from inception towards death or does life resist being moved from inception towards death? If breathing, drinking; eating and sheltering represents resistance, then is that a "we" (plural) or a "one" (singular) reaction?
both individual and collective
If consciousness represents awareness by perceiving (partial) of perceivable (whole) input, then receiving implies individual consciousness, while being dissolved back into inputting represents the collective consciousness, hence the process of dying (ongoing) "collecting" the consciousness of the "individual" living (temporary).
As for shared consciousness...consider the collective input (perceivable) being shared by each individual part (perceiving) within, while potential of access to it (comprehension of perceivable) has to be shaped by each individual for self.
As a man thinketh, so is he
What a man thinketh about, already was available for him to shape within.
received all the...ordinances.
All (whole) represents the only order (inception towards death) for each one (partial) within (life).
building a temple
TEM (to cut) aka CUT, verb - "to separate the parts of any body by an edged instrument"....whole (process of dying) separating itself into partial (living) represents the "cut", while the momentum of motion (balance) represents the "edge" for ones "instrumental" choice at the center.
magic: măj′ĭk (noun) -The art or practice of using charms, spells, or rituals to attempt to produce supernatural effects or control events in nature.
a) "art" aka ARTIFI'CIAL, adjective - "in opposition to natural" implies ones ignorance of natural (perceivable) for artificial (suggested).
b) "to produce" ignores that nature (perceivable) represents the sole producer, while those within (perceiving) are re-producing, hence respond to being produced by.
b) "supernatural" aka SUPER (beyond) NATURAL (produced by) ignores being the product (partial) within nature (whole).
c) CHARM (suggested over perceivable); SPELLS (words over sound); RITUALS (sacrifice of will by consenting to suggested will of others).
I use the free version
You always represent the product of anything suggested, and payment implies PAY (to discharge a debt) MENT (mind; memory).
a bot as often accused
Like by that one account? https://pic8.co/sh/hkZW3G.png It's called dehumanization and it isn't aimed at me, but everyone else, hence domesticating others to ignore any human growth potential by associating it with suggested "bot" repeatedly...until the shit sticks.
what is coming
Implies ones consent to suggested progressivism (outcome orientation), while ignoring perceivable (resistance within origin), hence...
need the next fix
...wanting more suggested over the need to resist perceivable.
what is the hardest social-drug to now come by? Independence.
Who could've thought...consenting to suggested society (togetherness) increases ones craving for independence (apartheid).
Meanwhile...IN (being within) DEPENDENT (dependent to) implies apartheid (living) within dependency to wholeness (process of dying).
cut lines of freedom
"free" will of choice at the center of "dom" inanting balance implies the ongoing line (inception towards death) which causes the balance (momentum) for the temporary choice (life)....one cannot cut that line, the line (whole) cuts each one within (partial).
isolationism
An -ism implies ones consent to the suggestion of another, hence being bound to them by choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law.
In short...isolationism implies dependency to others, hence those others suggesting it, while promoting it with increase of suggested togetherness.
Keep an eye on the link and delete "via bitslide" and you'll get the vid... https://www.bitchute.com/video/UtJx9f6IH6jF/
"The beautiful people, the beautiful people...It's all relative to the size of your steeple"
STEEPLE, noun - "a spire" + SPIRE, noun (Latin spira; spiro, spirit) - "to breathe"...
the shift from free-range to walled garden...outdated philosophy of "pervasive wild mindset"...feel obligated to uphold the philosophy of “free expression at all costs"
That's the alleged issue...a free mind.
places like Stormfront or 4chan’s /pol/, where bashing an "arbitrary" set of people, based on religious or racial traits was the norm.
ARBITRARY, adjective - "depending on will or discretion; not governed by any fixed rules"...isn't it amazing that a so called jew (jett goldsmith) describes his own kin as depending on free "will" of choice and not governed by any fix rules, while suggesting the entire rest of humanity that their "free minds" are the issue?
On hand hand...eight months without farting
On the other...eating year old meat, raw out of a jar, with a spoon.
a) consenting to suggested satellites implies one to represent a SAT'ELLITE, noun [Latin satelles.] - "a follower; an obsequious attendant or dependant"
b) something; something...why is NASA the #1 consumer of helium in the world?
c) side note...adding a T to NASA allows the spelling of S A T A N, so where did NASA lost the T...minus 9,8,7,6,5,4,3,2,1...