Consider, black people, asian people, white people, hispanic people and jews.
Why is it that the jews have the lead in all crime over history? Why are all criminal words of jewish origin?
Why when we consider financial crimes, the only significant numbers are jewish?
Is it because they are smart? or because the religion teaches them to be criminals from day one?
I think we know the answer, there is a reason why they continue to be scrutinized. Numbers don't lie, like the jews do.
Because the many are consenting to follow their leading suggestions (progressivism).
Because the many consent to ignore perceivable sound for suggested words.
a) if the many ignore to evaluate (perceiving) value (perceivable) for suggested values by the few, then the few gain the power to put a price on reality; make compound interest out of the ignorant many, while drowning them with mental and physical debt and continue to devalue their choice of evaluation.
b) the few suggest numbers (plural) to tempt each "one" of the many to ignore perceivable NUM'BER, noun - "the designation of a unit", from U'NIT, noun [Latin unus, unitas, unity.] - "one" (singular).
Those who consent to suggested counting of others, ignore expressing "one" self, while the suggesting few call themselves "counts"... https://pic8.co/sh/1rIGYa.jpg
If the many consent to suggested INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand), then that implies them willingly "standing under" the suggesting few. If the many would adapt to KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists", each one of them could grow comprehension of perceivable, yet putting themselves underneath others seems to be more tempting than the effort of growing oneself...
Reasoning represents ones consent to want versus not want suggested information aka a conflict among the many about the suggestions of the few. A self imposed mental hamster wheel that gives the suggesting few the power to control both sides of every conflict of reason by first defining (idolatry); then redefining (revisionism) and finally contradicting (talmudic reasoning) the suggested information for both sides within every conflict of reason.
a) what if all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "Internal or inherent power" alas partial ones (living) within whole oneness (process of dying)?
b) what if perceiving differences (living) within perceivable sameness (process of dying) can be tempted by suggested likeness, under disguise of sameness, to ignore differences? Hence equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)....
c) what if ones consent to suggested truth (want) tempts one into a conflict against suggested lies (not want), while both sides ignore perceivable change (need)? Why need? Because being (life) within change (inception towards death) implies the need to resist being changed from alive to dead.
What if HE BREW HIS STORY to tempt you to ignore yours? What if your story within nature doesn't require narration?
Precisely the point, we do not need some bobble head to attempt to tell us anything at all, you either present with cold hard data, implementations or beat it.
a) suggested "we" (plural) contradicts perceivable "one" (singular). Your consent to the suggested "we" gives the suggesting few the power to suggest "in the name of" (in nomine) of others. Those suggesting in the name of others are distancing themselves from the suggested, which is why the consenting many fail to comprehend who's making the suggestions. Instead the many are reasoning among each other over the suggested.
b) suggested "do" tempts one to ignore being (living) done by (process of dying), hence only able to "redo" aka RE (respond to) DO (being done by).
c) suggested "not" (nothing) represents the inversion of perceivable everything. A "thing" implies something, while suggested "no" represents ones denial of something perceivable.
d) tell me how one needs "we", how one being done needs to "do", and how one thing within everything needs "nothing"? How are any of those representing a perceivable need, a necessity for the sustenance of ones existence?
a) look at my profile....Post Score 0 (no offering); neither upvotes; nor downvotes (no judgement). I adapt to what inspires for the sustenance of oneself....others represent both inspiration (need) and temptation (want) for my struggle to sustain self through free will of choice.
b) a telling implies suggested information; I adapt to perceivable inspiration, while taking apart the suggested information by others, hence reverse engineering the fictitious narratives shaped within ignored reality.
a) nature sets itself apart, from whole (process of dying) into each partial (living), which implies from everything into each one thing given.
b) known aka KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists" implies perceivable inspiration, hence "hot flowing data"...not the "cold hard data" of suggested information.
The process of dying represents the ongoing flow of inspiration for those living within to adapt to, to draw from, to grow resistance within (need) or to be tempted into ignorance by (want).
c) PRES'ENT, adjective [Latin proesens; proe and sum, esse, to be.]...to be implies temporary living within the essence of the ongoing process of dying. What others suggest you about it tempts one to ignore it, hence becoming "absent".
IMPLEO (to fill) MENT (mind/memory) -ATION (through action)...comprehending this requires self discernment about being reaction (living) within enacting (process of dying), and therefore with the need of life to resist the incoming movement towards death. Filling ones mind drowns one faster, which is why the few suggest endless information to tempt the consenting many to accumulate as much fictitious ballast as possible into their minds clouded with ignorance.
A memory needs to be used for temporary adaptation to ongoing input (like a ram), while resisting the temptation to want to be misused for accumulation of suggested information (like a hard-drive).
Reasoning with others about suggested information represents beating oneself. Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see: "No one wants to be defeated...It doesn't matter who's wrong or right...just beat it"