a) all suggested information represents misinformation if one resists consenting to it, hence it "missing" the aimed at consent.
b) all suggested information represents disinformation if consented to, because consenting to suggested information implies ones parting away (dis-) from perceivable inspiration.
c) reasoning over information (want) vs dis/mis- information (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (need).
unelected
The choice of the many to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) shapes the suggesting few into the ELITE; noun (from French élite) - "selection, choice", hence the few becoming the elected consequence of the many ignoring to select need (responsibility) over want (temptation).
If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of "choice" within perceivable, then the suggesting few become the "chosen ones"...
a) all suggested information represents misinformation if one resists consenting to it, hence it "missing" the aimed at consent.
b) all suggested information represents disinformation if consented to, because consenting to suggested information implies ones parting away (dis-) from perceivable inspiration.
c) reasoning over information (want) vs dis/mis- information (not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable inspiration (need).
The choice of the many to ignore perceivable (need) for suggested (want) shapes the suggesting few into the ELITE; noun (from French élite) - "selection, choice", hence the few becoming the elected consequence of the many ignoring to select need (responsibility) over want (temptation).
If each "one" of the many ignores to represent free will of "choice" within perceivable, then the suggesting few become the "chosen ones"...