5
pizzakek 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hi cuck, could you please donate to my millionaire party?

I'm really poor and don't have enough money for a 6k bottle of vodka.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody human is going to get it, at any rate or %.

We are going to benefit from this, we are going to know who's who.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

This depends on how big the donger of the canuck to fuck the cuck.

5
pizzakek 5 points ago +5 / -0

Scraping data is incompatible with facebook policies and ethics. They'd never do it. Not once in a lifetime. Totally.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, sadly we are the Cassandras.

What i mean is that we are few, and if we were more (ok a little more would be good, but a lot more?) we'd suffer the same fate as old T_D.

When T_D started it was thouroughly a redpilled spinoff of 4chan. Conspiracy veterans, JQ pilled. Then it gained traction, was infiltrated heavily, and never was the same again.

Memes are still good, but the discussion has gotten dumb for the most.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Believing things because they agree with things you already believe

Does it make more sense to you to agree with things because they disagree with things you already believe? Btw, that isn't dunning kruger (check wiki, you may be confused). That is simple logic. And it's not about belief, it's about odds. Take your point and reverse it, find if what you "believe" make sense to be discarded when judging new thoughts.

If what you already believe isn't a basis for judgement, why would new beliefs be? If you weren't capable of thinking until today, what makes you believe now you started for real?

I think therefore i am; i believe, and i judge according to my beliefs. The belief not to have to judge info based on old beliefs? that's an old belief you got, dude. Circular logic. Word salad.

Examples would be abound, but frankly i think the logic itself you stated is quite evidently not sound on a minimal reasoning.

As for intuition and instinct, i suppose it depends on your own experience with it. If . you are never right you will refuse it, if you often hit you will tend to go with it unless something seems off. As long as you are able to challenge/modify your results based on new evidence, there is no problem in having a working hypothesis by those sources.

Literally most scientific discovery is made by people who had a thought by intuition and went on to test it.

The catapult inventor is said to have dreamed of it a night and then reverse engineered his dream.

Disregarding our natural sense of "getting it" is stupid imo. Has always been the best starter for discovery.

6
pizzakek 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's the same tranny agenda rethoric.

You don't invite black to country, you racist.

You don't import black women to mix with, you racist.

Basically if you mind your own biz, you racist. Checkmate. It doesn't matter if it doesn't make sense, the point is not to convince you (which they can). The point is to convince other you are a racist, for future agenda reference.

3
pizzakek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good spirit,

The belief a sky man created our world because it is written in a book is equally bad to the belief a sky man can't have created the world because it is written in a book.

This reasoning can apply to most divided issues around, and it is easy to spot people who are biased one way or the other.

Most can recognize the first part, but few understand the second.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is an interview from which many quotes got out.

I cannot attest the veridicity as its obviously not the original, but a reading of the transcript. I couldn't find the original video, it likely doesn't exist, perhaps it was just audiotaped but idk.

Anyway, taking it face value, it's pretty rad.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Euthanization requires informed and voluntary consent, that is just homicide.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

From simulacra and simulation, Jean Baudrillard.

It's difficult to find the actual pdf rn, here is a short version which includes the above paragraph

http://www.kareneliot.de/downloads/JeanBaudrillard_Simulations_and_Simulacra.pdf

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hyperreal and Imaginary

Disneyland is a perfect model of all the entangled orders of simulation. To begin with it is a play of illusions and phantasms: Pirates, the Frontier, Future World, etc. This imaginary world is supposed to be what makes the operation successful.

But what draws the crowds is undoubtedly much more the social microcosm, the miniaturised and religious revelling in real America, in its delights and drawbacks.

You park outside, queue up inside, and are totally abandoned at the exit. In this imaginary world the only phantasmagoria is in the inherent warmth and affection of the crowd, and in that sufficiently excessive number of gadgets used there to specifically maintain the multitudinous affect. The contrast with the absolute solitude of the parking lot - a veritable concentration camp - is total. Or rather: inside, a whole range of gadgets magnetise the crowd into direct flows outside, solitude is directed onto a single gadget: the automobile.

By an extraordinary coincidence (one that undoubtedly belongs to the peculiar enchantment of this universe), this deep-frozen infantile world happens to have been conceived and realised by a man who is himself now cryogenised: Walt Disney, who awaits his resurrection at minus 180 degrees centigrade.

The objective profile of America, then, may be traced throughout Disneyland, even down to the morphology of individuals and the crowd. All its values are exalted here, in miniature and comic strip form. Embalmed and pacified. Whence the possibility of an ideological analysis of Disneyland (L. Marin does it well in Utopies, jeux d'espaces): digest of the American way of life, panegyric to American values, idealised transposition of a contradictory reality. To be sure. ** But this conceals something else, and that "ideological" blanket exactly serves to cover over a third-order simulation: Disneyland is there to conceal the fact that it is the "real" country, all of "real" America, which is Disneyland (just as prisons are there to conceal the fact that it is the social in its entirety, in its banal omnipresence, which is carceral). Disneyland is presented as imaginary in order to make us believe that the rest is real, when in fact all of Los Angeles and the America surrounding it are no longer real, but of the order of the hyperreal and of simulation. It is no longer a question of a false representation of reality (ideology), but of concealing the fact that the real is no longer real, and thus of saving the reality principle. The Disneyland imaginary is neither true nor false; it is a deterrence machine set up in order to rejuvenate in reverse the fiction of the real. Whence the debility, the infantile degeneration of this imaginary. It is meant to be an infantile world, in order to make us believe that the adults are elsewhere, in the "real" world, and to conceal the fact that real childishness is everywhere, particularly amongst those adults who go there to act the child in order to foster illusions as to their real childishness.** Moreover, Disneyland is not the only one. Enchanted Village, Magic Mountain, Marine World: Los Angeles is encircled by these "imaginary stations" which feed reality, reality-energy, to a town whose mystery is precisely that it is nothing more than a network of endless, unreal circulation - a town of fabulous proportions, but without space or dimensions. As much as electrical and nuclear power stations, as much as film studios, this town, which is nothing more than an immense script and a perpetual motion picture, needs this old imaginary made up of childhood signals and faked phantasms for its sympathetic nervous system.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny that the video he uploaded on BNT about this is incomplete and quite messy and on YT you find the whole thing.

A refreshing talk, we all know the contents i guess, but is still nice to hear it spelled out clearly by someone in face of a crowd.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm always backhanded, friends know i will never lose an occasion to mix it up a lil bit x)

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but it want less to when targets are low risk and high effort.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +3 / -1

Bestest of the best of luck, fren.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Italy? it's fucked too, but i have property on the mountains where nobody come buckbreak me.

9
pizzakek 9 points ago +11 / -2

My american frens, go to montana or some federally ignored state.

Nah, just kidding. there is no escape inside the USA or there won't be soon (although i bet the aforementioned can buy some extra time, which as little as may be, it is still precious)

You guys need to really make yourself heard TOGETHER or run to south america mountain villages in my opinion.

Mountains are rarely subject to politically motivated action, and are easier to defend as a terrain (above hill advantage).

This last 2 years really brought all we discussed for the last 10-20 years out of the shadows and showed it's all real and confirmed. They won't stop now. If they stop, they die, and they don't like that. They can't back off anymore. They will come for you.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

Although u/pkvi is sometimes cheap in my opinion he keeps the place dynamism going and that's a good thing. He also has great posts, too. One who tries often is allowed to miss some.

I don't really think he's likely a shill.

When you talk of other users is good behaviour to put u/ before, so as to not "talk behind shoulders". Netiquette.

2
pizzakek 2 points ago +2 / -0

4chan veterans are the web elites.

They know perfectly how to spot shills, and their highly edgy lingo is made exactly to polarize user behaviour into in/out groups.

A shill will either back off or go overboard trying to merge, and will likewise be identified from the first post.

When T_D was created as a 4chan offspring it was the shit in 2016. Then apes joined the party. I remember in 2016 you could call out the JQ and be upvoted, now it would get you banned because Trump touched the wrong wall.

Much like in china you had the bloodiest political logic, and it created some of the most amazing individual beings and techniques, which you don't hear about because they don't really care about fame. Warlike zones/situations create the strongest warrios by definition. and 4chan is the vietnam of the internet.

1
pizzakek 1 point ago +1 / -0

You wouldn't fit the pattern as you would no longer post, though.

view more: Next ›