Bro go do anything patrarchic in the west you'll either have to slaughter armies or most likely will be eaten up and spit back in shit by the system's ass.
But anyway i agree the feminine masculine desc there is quite low tier.
Women are as aggressive as men if not more IF it comes to personal space and kids. They are defensive. Men are aggressive in the sense they are proactively so as they kill to eat. It's the same aggression, just two different tendencies of it.
Women are entire unto themselves, whereas men always need women.
This instead is a greater bs than the one in OP.
Women are an useless purposeless gate to life without a man. A man atleast would get to experience the world without reproduction with just an extra appendix rather than a whole tunnel inside. None gets anything in this sense without the other, one is simply way more impaired and inconvenienced by the absence of sex, the woman.
As a ethnos jews are a lame excuse.
But they hide well the topmost echelons where elder blood reign. Or so i think honestly.
It would be simply impossible for them to have given it up, provided it existed, and i think it did.
Most jews are puppets for the elite jews. Better quality cattle, but still cattle.
The elite jews might well be nephilim and likely then Yahweh own bloodline. After all blood is essential to them and as Jacob R. once said 'we like to keep it in the family'
Notice how their mythical characters represent, indeed, bloods and lineages.
Much like 'the sons of abraham' ended up as quite the thousands.
One could inquire about who 'yahweh' is nowadays given the original one most probably died or went away. Elohim used to fuck and impregnate humans. Legacies...
Didn't know that of Makow, but i can see why even a honest boomer could still think that.
About Corbett, i never even cared about getting deep into him. His videos are just dull, and as you say, he only says stuff i can easily find myself. No depth at all. His soyboy persona also match the dullness of his content.
I only know of Henry Makow who is quite clearly -our- guy in the 'open'. All the rest are hard to read through.
Perhaps Chris Langan is also quite decent, although he monetizes his audience so there's that and i wouldn't name him -our- just because of that.
Even people like Corbett are mostly lightweights who refuses a full analysis for safety.
Very interesting.
Yes, i find hard to believe with this volume and depth that he has no team behind him, if he's someone at all.
But sometimes those individuals do exist, and they can fall off their own slope in time.
So i'm willing to lend him some credit, he did point out deep details even in stuff i'm accustomed to, on both the rhetorical and logical spectrum of analysis, and knowledge-base-wise
I'm also open to judge him a crook anyday i start seeing what you saw, myself. Thanks for the perspective.
That's some lame association