full reinstatement
Responding (re) to be within (in) an affixed (state) mind (ment) tempts one to ignore "full" perceivable offer for "empty" suggestions by others.
back pay
a) PAY, verb - "to discharge a debt; to deliver to a creditor the value of the debt"...consenting to suggested implies putting creed (credit; belief; faith) in suggested, hence putting self into debt to those suggesting.
Sleight of hand: "payback's a bitch"
b) nature charges (inception towards death), which allows those within (life) to re-charge aka respond (as choice) to being charged (by balance aka momentum of motion).
replaced by a diversity
a) RE-sponding (as choice) to PLACE (balance) implies diverse (difference).
b) notice how replacement migration forces ones mind (ment) to respond (re) to place of CLIMATE, verb - "to dwell; to reside in a particular region"
All the suggested definitions represent distractions for those lacking discernment.
Instead of being afraid of being replaced; one needs to "re-spond to being placed" and instead of fearing diversity one needs to adapt to perceivable differences (inspiration). Only among differences can one sustain self as apartheid (perceiving partial) within wholeness (perceivable whole).
Let us be in peace. Who is the Puppet Master? For all love and life.
a) wanting (peace) or not wanting (war) tempts one to ignore the need to adapt as temporary (chaos) within ongoing (order).
b) consent to suggested implies ones submission to others, hence establishing a master (suggestion) slave (consent) bond.
c) asking for suggested who implies lack discernment of one-self...who else but one could be?
d) wanting (love) vs not wanting (hate) suggested, tempts one to ignore adapting to perceivable for sustenance of life.
e) all for (forward) aka inception towards death needs to be resisted as life within.
a) natural order (inception towards death) needs to be resisted by each one (life) within...others suggest one to follow orders instead.
b) consenting to suggested orders shapes one into an order follower, hence putting oneself into a chain of command by giving the suggesting few the consent of the many as the chain.
c) UNI (one) FORM (differentiated by flow)...others suggest uniformity as the inversion thereof, hence dressing and moving in same fashion.
d) nature sets itself apart (from perceivable whole into each perceiving partial)...those within nature HERD (collecting or assembling) those who ignore nature back together like cattle (goyim).
e) consent (by choice) to suggestion (by choice) tempts one into a regimented state aka REG (to move in a straight line) MENT (mind/memory)...in reality ones mind/memory represents the momentum (balance) for ones different choices within the same motion.
Notice the mercantile contract aka bond of self imposed slavery to others aka religion (Latin religio; to bind anew) underneath....suggestion (by choice) towards consent (by choice). Without consent the suggested remains a temptation...
There is no correct news
a) perceivable NEWS (north; east; west; south) implies the perceiving ones at the center.
b) CORRECT, verb (Latin regere) - "to lead straight, rule"...inception towards death leads life straight.
c) wanting (correct) vs not wanting (incorrect) suggested, tempts one to ignore perceivable...
the same technique the mainstream often uses when they wish to mislead
a) the main stream (inception towards death) doesn't mislead, it directs those within (life)...other suggest the word "mainstream" to distract one from that.
b) same (inception towards death) generates differences (life)
c) TECHNOL'OGY, noun [Gr. art, and word or discourse.] aka artificial suggestion over natural perception.
the ends justify the means underlies the vast majority of what the Elite do
a) what if the consenting many represent the means of the suggesting few to gain control?
b) what if the few trick the many to apply justification to suggested ends, while tempting them to ignore perceivable origin aka that which "just is" (justice)?
Inception towards death represents that which just is, hence delivering justice to those living within...a life sentence with a death penalty.
being isolationist
a) being an -IST (isolationist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (isolationism); hence being willingly bound to another.
b) being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies a detached situation, hence center (life) insulated within surrounding (inception towards death)...the suggested spiel of -isms and -ists tempts one to ignore that.
my preference
PREFER', verb [Latin proefero; proe, before, and fero, to bear or carry.] - "to bear or carry in advance"...inception towards death represents forward motion, hence life representing being IN (within) ADVANCE (advanced by).
The few suggest preferences to distract from ones position as the reaction (temporary growth); carrying the burden of everything enacting upon self (ongoing loss). Each one carries that burden within perceivable; while the suggestions by others tempt one to burden self exponentially more.
Evidence is what I require.
Everything perceivable is open to be seen (evident) by each perceiving one within...unless ignored for wanting to seek (quero) suggested.
album covers
AL'BUM, noun [Latin albus, white.]...why cover "white" underneath a different definition? Why would tavistock label their Beatles propaganda as the "white album" aka the "white white"...which also represents the only "double" album released?
until it was pointed out.
Each ones "point" of view exits within everything perceivable...consenting to others pointing out suggested tempts one to ignore that.
a good code
One-self implies partial within...a suggested CODE (a collection of aka suggested collectivism) tempts one to ignore self, while giving others consent to collect, to amass; to gain control over partials.
Ignore them
Suggested "them" (a collective) tempts perceiving "one" (a partial) to ignore self.
Ayh want them as uncomfortable as ayh am.
COMFORT, verb - "to strengthen; to invigorate" aka being (life) within invigorating force (inception towards death).
Wanting (comfort) or not wanting (discomfort) from others tempts one to ignore the need to strengthen self.
Logically...but there's always choice, isn't there?
a) logic/reason (Latin logos; word aka suggested words over perceivable sound) implies ones consent to the choices of others, hence ignoring ones own free will of choice.
b) way (momentum of motion aka balance) always offers choice; but choice can choose to ignore itself for others.
domesticated animals
Viewing other lifeforms as AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul.) implies being domesticated to ignore self as being animated, hence within motion.
bi-sex
a) BI (two) SEX (Latin seco; to divide) contradicts being the divided one (partial) within dividing oneness (whole).
b) others suggest bi-theism (aka dualism) to tempt consenting ones to ignore self.
c) instead of male and female (two) consider motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-forrm (sex aka distinction between male and female) aka all within one. Notice that the perpetuation of oneself requires intercourse with another one for off-spring. It ain't "2 become 1"; it's being one among other ones within oneness.
preference through choice
If choice ignores self for suggested choices by others; then others wield ones consent to shape preferences for ones ignored choice, hence the many representing followers of suggested orders, while shirking response-ability (free will of choice).
Consider this...was it the child's preference to speak or was the child domesticated to comply with the spoken word suggested?
If one chooses to resist speaking to others; will others ostracize ones preferences? Why is that? If each one wields free will of choice; then why can mass consensus be wielded by a few to shape the preferred behavior of the many into compliance?
exposed to television...or if they were abused
Being exposed to others suggesting tell-a-vision represents abuse. Others suggest visions to corrupt ones view.
- VACCINE (vacca; cow) + SKEPTIC (to look about, to consider, to speculate)
this one would be a decent choice
a) decent (want) or indecent (not want) still represents ones free will of choice...alas in ignorance of need.
b) does being choice require passing judgements upon choices? What comes first...being choice or choosing among other choices?
never get answered
Ones quest to want answers from others...what if that tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to solution (inception towards death) as problem (life)?
Before one can suggest questions towards others, and while waiting for answers suggested by others...does one need to adapt to perceivable? By breathing for example?
He's not (he is nothing)
Who suggested "nothing" and who consented to contradict perceivable IS (everything) with suggested NOT (nothing)?
time, as stated
STATE, noun [Latin , to stand, to be fixed.]...does tick; tick; tick...imply a fixed state or an ongoing state?
White Rabbit: "Oh dear! Oh dear! I shall be too late!"...so many out there chasing rabbits.
a) consenting to suggestions by others vacates self.
b) within everything perceivable; each ones ignorance represents a void.
c) perceiving instrument (choice) within perceivable sound (balance) can be chartered by the suggested words of others.
why any movement always have some name?
a) every suggestion is made in the name of (in nomine) the suggested, hence tricking those who consent to ignore who's suggesting.
b) life being moved from inception towards death implies a mind/memory (ment) within constant motion...tempting ones mind to hold onto suggested information tempts one to ignore being moved.
c) all suggested movements tempt one to follow along (want) or opposed against (not want)...both sides tempt one to ignore the need to resist (life) being moved (inception towards death).
If I have to organize a movement for whatever reason, the name will be the lastest thing I will think about
To organize implies collecting troops together under a suggested banner, that's the idol; brand; name; word; leader; spearhead; carrot on a stick; justification for shirking response-ability onto; suggested information to reason (conflict) over etc.
Suggested Patriot Front lures patriots (those loyal to their fatherland) away from center and towards a front against turncoats (traitors). The uniformity used advertises tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one). All suggested movements tempt different followers into the same conflict against each other, which is where they will spend most of their resistance until depleted.
I'll avoid and prohibit any naming at all
- "Hey you; march with me!
- "Me? Are you talking to me?
The few already domesticated each one among the many to brand each other with names.
- "YOU and ME together; WE have to do something..."
That represents a brand for oneself; a brand for another one and a collective brand for both. This represents individualism (you+me) and collectivism (we) utilized to corrupt each designated UNIT (Latin unitas; unus; one).
"me" represents one who claims self; "you" represents one who claimed self and now designates other ones, and "we" represents suggesting in the name of others.
much more complex
Suggested we (complex) tempts perceiving one (simple) to ignore self. Notice that the military industrial "complex" utilizes suggested uniformity for chain of command order following...
repetitive moments
Oneself represents repetitive (choice) within momentum (balance).
w/o destroying both sides
a) try stepping away from the fictitious center by discerning to be center (choice) of surrounding (balance).
b) all the conflicts of reason tempt aka invite one into a center; into an arena; into a controlled environment; into a collective; into a stadium; into a congregation; into a pit etc....consenting to such tempts one to ignore ones discernible position.
the cull that is happening all around us
Suggested "us" (plural) tempts the perceiving "one" (singular unit) to ignore self, which in return allows the suggesting few to cull the consenting many, based on their cattle-like behavior aka goyim (cattle) aka VAC'CINE, adjective [Latin vaccinus, from vacca, a cow.]
- SHILLING (skiljaną) - "to separate, split, divide"...
a) whole (perceivable) separates; splits; divides into each partial (perceiving)...the suggestions of others tempt each divided unit (unitas; unus one) back together when consenting to anything suggested.
b) SOCIAL (togetherness) MEDIA (mediate; middle) implies the suggestions of others as the middlemen, tempting those who consent to socialize within controlled cattle-pens.
c) ones consent allows suggestions of others to infiltrate ones mind/memory.
stick with these briefer one liners
a) line (inception towards death) generates each one (life)...one needs to resist line.
b) suggested one-liners tempt brief expressions, while being one within line represents ones struggle for a lengthy expression.
c) suggested "stick with" tempts one to want to hold onto...perceivable represents the need for each one within to let go. Ones struggle represents need to resist want.
Those longer format ones ayh skip
Does nature omit what those within choose to skip?
question what is true
a) QUEST (the act of seeking) -TION (action)...a rhetorical distraction...to seek implies reaction to what can be sought within action.
b) true vs false reasoning represents a reaction to what another suggested about "what is" perceivable.
c) action (motion) sets reaction (life) on a quest (inception towards death)...discerning this implies ones need to resist that quest. Others suggest quests (questions) to tempt one to seek (answers) while ignoring to resist motion.
d) holding onto suggested (truth) while repelling suggested (lies) tempts one to spend resistance onto suggested, while ignoring to be the resistance (life) within perceivable (inception towards death).
e) self discernment teaches one to learn to let go. Example...grief tempts one to hold onto; relief represents letting go...in-between operates ones resistance aka ones struggle between wanting to hold onto and needing to let go. This struggle represents compression between input (impressing) and output (expressing). The more one compresses (resists), the more effective compression (resistance) grows.
they don't know these are lies and they don't know they have chosen them
Consenting to suggested (truth or lies) tempts one to ignore perceivable (knowledge). Holding onto suggested implies ignoring to know what goes on within perceivable.
an error, to which we are all prone
a) ER'ROR, noun [Latin error from erro, to wander.]...no mistakes within reality; all parts within JOURNEY, noun [Latin diurnus, dies.]
b) suggested we (plural) tempts perceiving one (singular) to ignore self, hence lack of self discernment about being partial within whole.
c) consenting to stand under (understanding) the suggestions of others represents PRONE, adjective [Latin pronus.] - "bending forward; inclined; not erect; lying with the face downward; contrary to supine".
consent/dissent; faith/doubt; belief/disbelief; agreement/denial; submission/defiance etc...both sides represent ignorance of perceivable for suggested.
The truth I wrestle with
a) those who suggested wrestling openly declared it to be fake, to be show; to be lies etc.
b) to wrestle tempts one into contention against others about wanted vs not wanted outcomes...ones struggle to sustain self implies ones reaction (perceiving) to enacting origin (perceivable)...not towards suggested outcomes.
c) one (partial) needs to struggle within whole...not trying to fight other ones. One fighting another one implies ignorance of one-self for contention with others, hence putting others over self, hence putting self under others willingly, hence submitting to others instead of struggling for self.
Fighting ones reduces the resistance of the one that needs to be sustained...one-self. The perpetuation of one-self implies intercourse with another one for off-spring, hence once again the need to learn to let go OFF-spring, hence struggling with the want to hold onto.
will be the way
Being (life) implies will (free will of choice) within way (inception towards death)...others suggest THE-ism to trick ones choice to submit to suggested choices of others, hence to a supreme being distracting from being supreme (highest in authority aka free will of choice).
Notice that all suggested -isms require ones consent by free will of choice, hence representing an offer towards ones supreme being and a temptation for one to ignore self when consenting to others...
They took my favorite subject (science)
What if you consented to subject yourself to suggested scientism; which in return tempts you to ignore SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka perceivable?
Each partial is subjected to whole...not to other partials.
humor
Comedy (life) can only exist within drama (inception towards self)...anything can be funny if one resists all the drama-queens.
film/tv
The suggested information with which others tell-a-vision represents the film over ones eyes within perceivable inspiration. Why watch moving pictures (captured moments), when one can adapt freely (choice) within momentum (balance)?
they took nomadism
How can one lead a wandering life (nomad) when one consents to suggested -isms by others, hence following their rules?
they took every place for me to turn
Try adapting to what comes in (perceivable) instead turning in response to suggested. Balance represents the only place to be choice.
ahy have nothing left
Suggested within everything offered...
Impressing (perceivable) into oneself; compressing within oneself (comprehension); expressing through oneself (growth)...most refuse to see it.