a) logic/reason (Latin logos; word aka suggested words over perceivable sound) implies ones consent to the choices of others, hence ignoring ones own free will of choice.
b) way (momentum of motion aka balance) always offers choice; but choice can choose to ignore itself for others.
domesticated animals
Viewing other lifeforms as AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul.) implies being domesticated to ignore self as being animated, hence within motion.
bi-sex
a) BI (two) SEX (Latin seco; to divide) contradicts being the divided one (partial) within dividing oneness (whole).
b) others suggest bi-theism (aka dualism) to tempt consenting ones to ignore self.
c) instead of male and female (two) consider motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-forrm (sex aka distinction between male and female) aka all within one. Notice that the perpetuation of oneself requires intercourse with another one for off-spring. It ain't "2 become 1"; it's being one among other ones within oneness.
preference through choice
If choice ignores self for suggested choices by others; then others wield ones consent to shape preferences for ones ignored choice, hence the many representing followers of suggested orders, while shirking response-ability (free will of choice).
Consider this...was it the child's preference to speak or was the child domesticated to comply with the spoken word suggested?
If one chooses to resist speaking to others; will others ostracize ones preferences? Why is that? If each one wields free will of choice; then why can mass consensus be wielded by a few to shape the preferred behavior of the many into compliance?
a) logic/reason (Latin logos; word aka suggested words over perceivable sound) implies ones consent to the choices of others, hence ignoring ones own free will of choice.
b) way (momentum of motion aka balance) always offers choice; but choice can choose to ignore itself for others.
Viewing other lifeforms as AN'IMAL, noun (Latin anima, air, breath, soul.) implies being domesticated to ignore self as being animated, hence within motion.
a) BI (two) SEX (Latin seco; to divide) contradicts being the divided one (partial) within dividing oneness (whole).
b) others suggest bi-theism (aka dualism) to tempt consenting ones to ignore self.
c) instead of male and female (two) consider motion (male) to momentum (female) to trans-forrm (sex aka distinction between male and female) aka all within one. Notice that the perpetuation of oneself requires intercourse with another one for off-spring. It ain't "2 become 1"; it's being one among other ones within oneness.
If choice ignores self for suggested choices by others; then others wield ones consent to shape preferences for ones ignored choice, hence the many representing followers of suggested orders, while shirking response-ability (free will of choice).
Consider this...was it the child's preference to speak or was the child domesticated to comply with the spoken word suggested?
If one chooses to resist speaking to others; will others ostracize ones preferences? Why is that? If each one wields free will of choice; then why can mass consensus be wielded by a few to shape the preferred behavior of the many into compliance?