It's my preference to go back to being isolationist, but this just seems like neglect. - Conspiracies

It's my preference to go back to being isolationist, but this just seems like neglect. (www.dailymail.co.uk)

posted 2 years ago by Michalusmichalus 2 years ago by Michalusmichalus +6 / -0

China tightens grip on Latin America and Caribbean as Biden dithers

Commanders in the Pentagon are growing increasingly worried about Beijing's growing stronghold on Latin America and the Caribbean.

16 comments

16 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (16)

sorted by:

▲ 1 ▼

– free-will-of-choice 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

being isolationist

a) being an -IST (isolationist) implies ones consent to a suggested -ISM (isolationism); hence being willingly bound to another.

b) being partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable) implies a detached situation, hence center (life) insulated within surrounding (inception towards death)...the suggested spiel of -isms and -ists tempts one to ignore that.

my preference

PREFER', verb [Latin proefero; proe, before, and fero, to bear or carry.] - "to bear or carry in advance"...inception towards death represents forward motion, hence life representing being IN (within) ADVANCE (advanced by).

The few suggest preferences to distract from ones position as the reaction (temporary growth); carrying the burden of everything enacting upon self (ongoing loss). Each one carries that burden within perceivable; while the suggestions by others tempt one to burden self exponentially more.

permalink save report block reply