It's a massive city
City implies center; mass implies circumference of center. Gentiles represent the amassed circumference of a jewish center.
Think like being a prisoner (gentile) inside a yard (massive city) with a watchtower (jew) at the center. You may think that among all those prisoners across the whole yard, your behavior can be concealed, but doing anything by oneself among goyim stands out to jews immediately.
for various reasons
For tempting other to reason over suggested information against one another, while ignoring those suggesting it.
feeds the party line that "suboxone is not injectible"...
...which tempts consenting followers to choose a side within a conflict of reason (is injectible vs isn't injectible); a conflict controlled by those outside making the suggestion, not by anyone inside fighting about it.
A better example...pro-life vs pro-choice implies consent to suggested "abortion". Both sides fight each other, which sustains the abortion racket indefinitely.
most of the people responsible for the subreddit are corrupt
To respond to SUB implies submission of self to another. A bribe to corrupt only works if one willingly consents to take it.
its actually a brilliant plan to control the internet and speech and prevent information from spreading by centralizing all independent forums into one place.
Being implies center (perception) of surrounding (perceivable). Few tempt many to ignore perceivable for suggested, which permits few to erect self at center, while cutting of many from circumference. Consenting to a suggestion implies ones submission (ones choice) to another (chosen one). Suggestion inverts perception...if one chooses one over the other.
As for "verboten" topics...dig into the structure of jewish "kehilla" worldwide.
Ayh was not committed to unplugging society
"not" implies still being plugged into what others are suggesting to socialize/domesticate one together with others. There are more believers in suggested "nothing", then ones adapting to everything perceivable.
Notice the upvote vs downvote options attached to each post; these tempt one to choose yes or NO. The majority is being domesticated to believe that "no means no", while ignoring that ones free will of choice doesn't require permission or denial from others.
What does "no; don't rape me" mean to the choice of the rapist?
- TRUMP; verb - "to fabricate, devise; deceive, cheat"... https://www.etymonline.com/word/trump#etymonline_v_17893
a) Perception implies unit; suggestion implies fabric...if one ignores former for latter; then others are permitted to clothe one with fabric.
b) CHEAT, verb - "to deceive and defraud in a bargain; to deceive for the purpose of gain in selling. Its proper application is to commerce"
Aka buying (ones consent) and selling (suggestion by another)...those who sell are merchants; while those who buy into, are the product selling itself out for an assumed bargain.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested implies cheating. Perceivable natural order implies support; aid for ones perception...ignoring this for suggestions by another cheats self out of support/aid.
COSMOS (Latin kosmein) - "to dispose; order"...natural order (inception towards death) disposes beings (life) within.
Others suggest cosmology (order + logic) to tempt one into conflicts of reason like ancient vs recent or jew vs gentile. Why? To tempt one to ignore natural order for artificial disorder.
Furthermore...suggested pythagoreanism corrupted cosmos into "universe" aka UNI (one) VERSE/VERSUS (to turn) which when consented to, turns one on self.
into the west
a) To be implies in-between north/east/west/south aka center of circumference...others suggest N.E.W.S to tempt one off-center.
b) Into (inception) within (life) out of (death)...that implies foundation of ones position within procession.
c) Few delineate maps to tempt many to ignore that line (inception towards death) designates units (ones life) at center of surrounding.
The suggested maps drawn are drawing ones consent out, which tempts one to ignore that natural order presses itself into each one.
law abiding
ABI'DE, verb (abada) - "to be, or exist, to continue; to dwell, rest, continue, stand firm, or be stationary for anytime indefinitely"...being implies temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death); hence needing to resist natural law; not abide artifical laws by one another.
mostly peaceful
Peaceful within a war (most vs least)?
financially driven
What drives FINANCE, noun - "revenue" aka RE (response to) VENIO (coming to be)?
In other words...before suggested currency can drive those consenting to it; does current (inception towards death) drive being (life) to come?
of jewish mysticism...not science.
MYS'TICAL, adjective (Latin mysticus) - "obscure; hid; secret"...are jews obscuring science (perceivable) with scientism (suggested); or does one obscures ones perception when consenting to any suggestion by another?
theoretical physics
Physic implies as produced by nature...theory implies as theorized by those within nature to each other.
Perceivable (nature) or suggested (artifice)...implies each ones free will of choice.
Shilling implies suggested sales-pitch tempting ones consent to buy into it...doing so establishes conflicts of reason aka LOGIC/LOGI/LOKI.
republican
Can a republic (state in which supreme or executive power rests in the people) have democratic electives without giving power of many into hands of few?
a) for distribution of...not content on...
b) Gentiles distribute to divide; jews distribute to bring together.
c) SAM aka Samuel aka Hebrew Shemiel aka Shem + El - "name of god".
We should do the same
a) That's the issue with gentiles...suggested pluralism (we) tempts each singular (one) to react in the name of each other; instead of as self. That implies mass ignorance of ones choice; which in return secures chosen ones.
b) Suggested same (we) tempts perceiving difference (one) to ignore self for others.
have followers
Who are jews following? What happens if matter (life) follows motion (inception towards death)? Why are gentiles always looking to follow leaders? Do jews gain followers and the position as leaders by gentiles consenting to be led, while following others?
If jews suggest internet, and gentiles follow along, then could they be distracted by seeking followers on the internet?
Different perspective...if cattle within a stampeding herd suggest other cattle to follow; then what is being ignored?
Does anyone know this is real or fake?
Knowledge implies perceivable change; real vs fake implies a conflict of reason over suggested information one holds onto.
Perception cannot be faked; only ignored for suggestion. Fiction implies ones ignorance/denial of reality...not anything outside of self.
see beyond sight
Being YOND, adjective - "mad; furious, or alienated in mind; that is, gone, wandering, and allied to the preceding"... about suggested; tempts one to ignore sight (perception) within see/sea (perceivable).
unlock
a) UN (negative signification) implies Latin negare - "to deny" aka ones free will of choice to ignore/deny perceivable inspiration for suggested information. Others suggest nihil-ism to tempt ones consent to de-nial perceivable.
b) Lock is suggested as an enclosure for one to open...nature generates an enclosure (inception towards death) to open/close those within (life). As long as one is alive; so long all is open to one.
Ignoring perceivable for suggested...closes oneself from ones surrounding, while permitting others to suggest keys to unlock "hidden knowledge".
Sleight of hand for those with eyes to see...the stone which binds (consent to suggested) an arch (growth within loss) is called a "key-stone".
intuition
Intuition implies as perceived by self; not as suggested by another; hence inspiration coming in before reasoning or deducting over information held within.
Example...being exists before name. Consenting to suggested name diminishes intuition as perceiving being.
invented modern sexual blackmail
a) It goes back to confession aka "to acknowledge"...knowledge (perceivable inspiration) cannot be held onto; to acknowledge implies suggesting to another information held within self.
Holding onto suggested information implies ones admission (Latin admissio) - "to let in" by consent to suggested debt (Latin debitum, contracted) - "that which is due from one person to another".
b) SEX (Latin seco) - "to divide" is being ignored when falling for the temptation of lust (coming together).
c) Blackmail refers to ignoring (black) ones armor (mail) of discernment, when consenting to the suggestions of another.
d) Sexual blackmail implies others suggesting AMORE to tempt one to lower ARMOR.
Notice the merchant...a list (sold suggestion) to tempt enlisting (buying by consent). Once the contract is made; those who buy into are selling themselves out.
LIST; noun - (lysta) - "desire, wish, have a fancy"...list implies lust.
money
"Commodities are movables, valuable by money, the common measure."...that implies suggested commonism/communism. Natural order (inception towards death) moves units (life) apart from one another, and being temporary growth within ongoing loss requires the evaluation (resistance) of value (velocity).
Holding onto suggested currency feeds one into perceivable current.
most powerful
Most vs least implies ones choice to evaluate another ones suggested value. This not only tempts those evaluating into a conflict of reason against one another; it also exponentially increases suggested value through self devaluation, and permits chosen ones to rebrand both sides of the conflict from most vs least into for example rich vs poor; have vs have not; 1st world vs 3rd world; success vs failure; useful vs useless; crucial vs expendable etc.
In short: being implies evaluation (perception) within value (perceivable)...suggested values tempt devaluation of being.
humanity...illusion
The color (hue) of man aka spectrum of visible light implies a dissolution of motion into matter, which allows matter to sense the differentiation of motion as a partial within a moving spectrum.
Ignoring this dissolution of whole into partials by holding onto suggested aka by "fusion" of matter, make the dissolution illusive for ones sight.
Shine implies the emission of all light going through each one; which ignorance clouds in shadows. He talks about wearing magic glasses that can't be taken off; but that's the Hollywood inversion (They Live) of ones real sight within perceivable without ignoring it for suggested.
Others suggest information to tempt one to hold onto it within ones mind/memory...if one read it/reddit, then that implies one consumed suggested information by another, which is then establishing indigestion within ones mind/memory.
Ever heard of things involuntarily repeated in one's mind (earworm)? Well; others can utilize suggested information to tempt ones voluntary consent to trigger repetition within ones mind aka remembrance/recollection/capacity to recall.
What if there's a difference in-between TOTAL (all perceivable) + RECALL (suggested by another)?
Edit: The tracking device (suggested information by others) is stuck within ones mind/memory and only oneself can get it out. The whole ordeal is called a (((NOSE))) job... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJx-Wb1zETc
Pageants are private...nobody in Germany gives a shit
a) PAGEANT, noun (Latin pegma; Gr. something showy carried in triumph)...it's being used as a victory of conquest over Germans. By whom? By those showing pride or haughtiness manifested in contemptuous and overbearing treatment of others; petulant contempt; impudence aka chutzpah.
b) PRI'VATE, adjective (Latin privo) - "peculiar to one's self"...which implies the status quo of being ONE among others. Imagine the chutzpah to privatize the showcase of ones insolence against others, while doing it in the name of others "Miss Germany"...
c) Suggested "nobody" implies INCORPO'REAL, adjective (Latin incorporalis, incorporeus) - "not consisting of matter; not having a material body; immaterial"...that's rhetoric used within spiritual warfare.
it is impossible to say one frame is "moving" and therefore impossible to say that only one frame is "slowed down"
a) The one consenting to the suggested saying of another makes it possible.
b) The one looking at suggested frames is being tricked to focus ones sight within a suggested frame by another.
c) Impossible implies each one within all possibility/potential/power.
d) Being one aka unit aka partial implies, while being moved within whole aka as temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death).
e) Nature (all perceivable) doesn't slow down; those within (ones perception) can choose to increase or diminish their temporary resistance within ongoing velocity.
Ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) permits others to increase or decrease ones "lack of" resistance.
clock
a) A clock tempts one to believe in oscillation to sustain motion, which inverts reality, where motion (inception towards death) generates oscillation/vibration into matter (life).
b) It's called a clock-face and clock-hands; because the one consenting to a suggested clock is holding it in his hands, while facing it, hence defacing self, while handing manual control over to others.
c) Ones consent implies a gear; the suggestions by others implies the weight imposes upon self, and the mainspring of information by others; and the many consenting to the few imply the gear train of interlocked consent.
Putting these parts together establishes an "escapement" aka ones "fleeing mind" aka a mind avoiding; shunning; and shirking self onto others.
d) Clock aka Chronology aka Horologe ties to Cronos (time); Horus (distant one; eye of horus), and logic/logos (reasoning about suggested words) etc.
everything does change, i wasnt using it in that context
Context implies the suggested words mankind weaves together...perceivable sound implies the ever changing system underneath. Affixed words are being used to label a moving nature...and ones consent to suggested words affixes them.
language is tricky
The trick is that few utilize affixed language (words; information) to distract many from moving language (sound; inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter can't be held onto.
when words with definitions are used to infer ideas
Definite implies affixed, and ones consent to suggested ideal-ism affixes them within ones mind/memory. This consent is being sold as belief; faith; creed; ideal; dogma; laws etc. while tricking one to sell self out to those suggesting it.
From a different angle...adapting to perceivable sound implies being a PHONETICIAN (from phonics; sound); while consenting to a suggested word aka definition implies being a DEAF PHONETICIAN.
Only nature infers perceivable sound...those within suggest words to trick one to abstain willingly from what nature infers. Why? So that those suggesting gain ones permission to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the words; labels; brands; idols etc.
original yet depended on similar structures
Origin (inception towards death) differentiates (life)...others suggest similar structures to tempt consenting ones to react alike. Hence all the order followers...
I hate the term elite, wasn't my choice
a) Ones choice establishes chosen one...consenting to suggested implies ignoring ones choice for another ones choice. The label "chosen one" is used to distract from "ones choice"...hence tempting one to ask "chosen by whom"?
b) Elite (from French élite) - "selection, choice" puts both ones choice and the selected choice by another one into one word. Why? So that one views others as elite; while ignoring to be the selecting choice establishing others.
c) To vote for any representatives makes oneself disposable. Within nature there's no disposition of self for others; only ignoring self, while being exploited by others.
overlords
It's the consent of the underling to a suggestion, which puts another into the position of overlord. Many seek to understand; which tempts them to "stand-under" what few are suggesting them.
i hate calling them "elite"
Few suggest a label to tempt many to consent by either loving or hating it...either side tempts many in conflicts of reason (love vs hate) against one another.
If one resists giving consent to another, then one can discern self as the "lite within el" aka one within all aka partial within whole.
i dont know because its been deceiptfully hidden from me
Knowledge implies perceivable, and all perceivable is offered to each ones perception. As in...nature doesn't hide anything; it offers everything to each one within.
It's ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction); which a) hides self from it, and b) permits others to wield "hidden knowledge".
The deceit by others only works because one gives willing consent to their suggestions...starting with words. Teach a dog to respond to words and it's called domestication; do it to a child and it's called civilization...guess what?
mutilated when i was a baby, like most men
Where was your father? Will you be the man choosing otherwise, when others suggest your child to be mutilated? This is all it takes. Don't blame your father either; learn your lesson from it and as soon as you hold your "intact" child it was worth it.
brainwashed to support our slavery
Ones consent (slave) to another ones suggestion (master) permits another to wash ones brain. The master sells suggestion; the slave buying into it, sells self out.
wherever gave people hope is gone
Hope implies suggested outcome; being implies within (life) perceivable origin (inception towards death). Others suggest hope/fear to distract one from foundation.
Nature isn't gone...it keeps everyone within going; no matter how ignorant their choices made them.
great tree
Each one implies seed (temporary growth) within soil (ongoing loss)...others suggest a great tree to distract ones seed from growing pains. Few suggest greatness; then break it down to discourage many from trying to grow.
a slave world
By choice of those within who shirk response-ability (choice) onto others.
it won't change.
That implies your choice to hold onto suggested "it" aka a slave world. Nature implies freedom aka free will of choice within dom-inance of balance aka FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).
Only within loss can there be growth, and loss implies the ongoing change for anything temporary grown within. You holding onto suggested "it" implies holding onto the temporary growth; while ignoring the ongoing loss.
nothing will change
What if everything changes, and each thing implies a will within?
against the elite
Elite implies "selection; choice"...what if selecting from another turns one against ones free will of choice?
What benefits ones sustenance of self...one's choice or chosen ones?
hope for
What if hoping for an outcome tempts one to ignore origin?
as one steers a ship
Aka a solid (life) within a fluid (inception towards death).
humans must become parts of that ship...inanimate part
Coming to be implies as partial (life) within animating whole (inception towards death).
So we got from a department store closing to The System of the World.
Department store aka mind/memory departed by storage (of suggested information).
dare I say “occult" meaning
Knowledge (perceivable inspiration) isn't hidden/occult; ones consent to understand/stand-under (suggested information) tempts one to "hide" from perceivable.
Holding onto suggested tempts one to ignore that perceivable moves.
a) Could it be that the majority of the human species can be domesticated to behave alike; so that a few behaving differently can both stand out and hide among them?
b) Dehumanizing others by suggesting the brand "bot"...does that make it easier for oneself to be human, or easier for others to dehumanize each other?
c) Take a circle and point at the center...can the center be bigger than the circle? If not; then why call center (city) massive, when circumference is bigger?
d) It interests one how fast others work; yet implying how slow one thinks is met with disinterest towards others. Why is that?