everything does change, i wasnt using it in that context

Context implies the suggested words mankind weaves together...perceivable sound implies the ever changing system underneath. Affixed words are being used to label a moving nature...and ones consent to suggested words affixes them.

language is tricky

The trick is that few utilize affixed language (words; information) to distract many from moving language (sound; inspiration)...the former tempts one to hold onto; while the latter can't be held onto.

when words with definitions are used to infer ideas

Definite implies affixed, and ones consent to suggested ideal-ism affixes them within ones mind/memory. This consent is being sold as belief; faith; creed; ideal; dogma; laws etc. while tricking one to sell self out to those suggesting it.

From a different angle...adapting to perceivable sound implies being a PHONETICIAN (from phonics; sound); while consenting to a suggested word aka definition implies being a DEAF PHONETICIAN.

Only nature infers perceivable sound...those within suggest words to trick one to abstain willingly from what nature infers. Why? So that those suggesting gain ones permission to define (idolatry); redefine (revisionism) and contradict (talmudic reasoning) the words; labels; brands; idols etc.

original yet depended on similar structures

Origin (inception towards death) differentiates (life)...others suggest similar structures to tempt consenting ones to react alike. Hence all the order followers...

I hate the term elite, wasn't my choice

a) Ones choice establishes chosen one...consenting to suggested implies ignoring ones choice for another ones choice. The label "chosen one" is used to distract from "ones choice"...hence tempting one to ask "chosen by whom"?

b) Elite (from French élite) - "selection, choice" puts both ones choice and the selected choice by another one into one word. Why? So that one views others as elite; while ignoring to be the selecting choice establishing others.

c) To vote for any representatives makes oneself disposable. Within nature there's no disposition of self for others; only ignoring self, while being exploited by others.

overlords

It's the consent of the underling to a suggestion, which puts another into the position of overlord. Many seek to understand; which tempts them to "stand-under" what few are suggesting them.

i hate calling them "elite"

Few suggest a label to tempt many to consent by either loving or hating it...either side tempts many in conflicts of reason (love vs hate) against one another.

If one resists giving consent to another, then one can discern self as the "lite within el" aka one within all aka partial within whole.

i dont know because its been deceiptfully hidden from me

Knowledge implies perceivable, and all perceivable is offered to each ones perception. As in...nature doesn't hide anything; it offers everything to each one within.

It's ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction); which a) hides self from it, and b) permits others to wield "hidden knowledge".

The deceit by others only works because one gives willing consent to their suggestions...starting with words. Teach a dog to respond to words and it's called domestication; do it to a child and it's called civilization...guess what?

mutilated when i was a baby, like most men

Where was your father? Will you be the man choosing otherwise, when others suggest your child to be mutilated? This is all it takes. Don't blame your father either; learn your lesson from it and as soon as you hold your "intact" child it was worth it.

brainwashed to support our slavery

Ones consent (slave) to another ones suggestion (master) permits another to wash ones brain. The master sells suggestion; the slave buying into it, sells self out.

wherever gave people hope is gone

Hope implies suggested outcome; being implies within (life) perceivable origin (inception towards death). Others suggest hope/fear to distract one from foundation.

Nature isn't gone...it keeps everyone within going; no matter how ignorant their choices made them.

great tree

Each one implies seed (temporary growth) within soil (ongoing loss)...others suggest a great tree to distract ones seed from growing pains. Few suggest greatness; then break it down to discourage many from trying to grow.

a slave world

By choice of those within who shirk response-ability (choice) onto others.

it won't change.

That implies your choice to hold onto suggested "it" aka a slave world. Nature implies freedom aka free will of choice within dom-inance of balance aka FREE (life) within DOM (inception towards death).

Only within loss can there be growth, and loss implies the ongoing change for anything temporary grown within. You holding onto suggested "it" implies holding onto the temporary growth; while ignoring the ongoing loss.