This video from smirky pop science guru Brian Cox explains time dilation with a "stationary" and "moving" light clock. https://www.youtube.com/shorts/b2Vd9HGB5XQ
However since the foundation of Special Relativity is that all motion is relative, it is impossible to say one frame is "moving" and therefore impossible to say that only one frame is "slowed down". Both would have to be "slowed down" relative to the other. In other words the slowing in this thought experiment is just from the perspective of a frame of reference, but not real.
So why then does academia and the media insist Einstein's theory explains true and LASTING clock slowing? Is it an intentional conspiracy? I'm not so sure. Although perhaps those at the very top know better and pursue real science without relativity, it wouldn't be the first time science went astray organically.
It may be divine judgement on an immoral relativist world. And to that end I say good and "thy will be done". But for those of us who seek real truth in science, Einstein's work must be overturned. Herein lies an advantage for the decentralized over the well funded & centralized.
Or maybe I'm wrong and just a kook. Perhaps my tiny theistic brain can't grasp the complexity of Einstein's theories and should leave the thinking to those genius physicists. But until those genius physicists start doing anything truly ground breaking with relativity instead of chasing after black holes, "dark matter" and "gravitational waves", I'll stand by my reasoning.
a) The one consenting to the suggested saying of another makes it possible.
b) The one looking at suggested frames is being tricked to focus ones sight within a suggested frame by another.
c) Impossible implies each one within all possibility/potential/power.
d) Being one aka unit aka partial implies, while being moved within whole aka as temporary (life) within ongoing (inception towards death).
e) Nature (all perceivable) doesn't slow down; those within (ones perception) can choose to increase or diminish their temporary resistance within ongoing velocity.
Ignoring natural (perception) for artificial (suggestion) permits others to increase or decrease ones "lack of" resistance.
a) A clock tempts one to believe in oscillation to sustain motion, which inverts reality, where motion (inception towards death) generates oscillation/vibration into matter (life).
b) It's called a clock-face and clock-hands; because the one consenting to a suggested clock is holding it in his hands, while facing it, hence defacing self, while handing manual control over to others.
c) Ones consent implies a gear; the suggestions by others implies the weight imposes upon self, and the mainspring of information by others; and the many consenting to the few imply the gear train of interlocked consent.
Putting these parts together establishes an "escapement" aka ones "fleeing mind" aka a mind avoiding; shunning; and shirking self onto others.
d) Clock aka Chronology aka Horologe ties to Cronos (time); Horus (distant one; eye of horus), and logic/logos (reasoning about suggested words) etc.