I don't know anything at all about this guy, other than the catchy name of his show. But just from this little incident, I think we can draw two conclusions. First, that this was some sort of ritual humiliation, which impiies that Crowder is a disinfo outlet. If anyone suspected that, this is your confirmation.
We need only think closely about one sentence:
The video, obtained by journalist Yashar Ali and posted on his Substack....
You can pose as many questions as you like about this assertion: Isn't Ali worried about getting sued? Or Ring? How precisely did Ali get hold of it? Isn't Ring worried Crowder will just go around saying Ring secures your data like mints at the restaurant counter? Not one of these will yield a sensible answer.
One such question is this: Is "Yasher Ali" even a real journalist? No, he is not. I checked his Substack and it is a thin and lame veneer, which is trademark of an Intelligence legend.
Why do they think they can get away with such low effort? Because they know for a fact no one will look, and any that do will not recognize what they see. Just keep your radar on for the next few days to see if anyone else has a word to say about that substack. No one will, and Intelligence knows this for a fact.
Is "Yasher" even a real human being? With a certain level of sophistication in thought, there comes a sort of "inception" point in analyzing the synthetic reality of Intel operations where such issues cease to be relevant. And exactly what Crowder did to incur this is similarly irrelevant.
Will Crowder raise any of the issues I have raised here? Of course not, because he's an asset. He will take his beating and move on with his tasking.
I notice that more than half the houses i go to have these spy device door bells or alexa devices listening in.
It's difficult to avoid these these.
Government didn't have to force you to carry around spy devices or install spy devices in your home. People voluntarily did it and PAID MONEY to get them. People are so dumb. Even the Republicans install this shit in their cars, doors, homes.
I won't even give the smart thermostat access to my wan. I have to setup a completely isolated network for a potential spy device and i'm too lazy to even deal with it right now.
Right, and it's sort of the insidious yet obvious aspect.
People develop their favorite broadcasters or outlets, and then something comes along that indicates they may be disinfo. They'll say, "No way, So-and-so is funny / entertaining / charming / educated / informative / whatever. There's no way they're disinfo!"
But just think of it from the other side of the equation: would you use someone as your disinfo agent that was an ignorant dummy that rubbed everyone the wrong way and said a lot of stuff people didn't like to hear? Probably not the best choice, right?
For that very reason I gave up trying to carefully mold what I wrote to please the maximum number of people. (Or is that my dastardly disnfo plan, the old revers-o? Bwahahahaha!)
Hang on. Why is a camera recording them? Not that I defend that guy. He looks like a bully. But that shit is private. Who knows what caused it?
Maybe he treats all his shit that way. Or what ever. It's another bullshit take down.
Because at what point is there that bullshit being recorded? At what point has it gone too, a third party? The press making it up. Where is that tape. How is it legal unless she complained?
Instead it's bullshit. Unless she complained. Who accessed that legally. Where is the actual footage, and under what law has it been released?
There are serious questions here. Not what that press says. The press is compromised today. We live in surveillance state. How was that shit accessed? Who cares what that shit is. Unless she complained it's hearsay propagating public opinion on what grounds?
This is serious for everybody installing those devices.
Nobody should have these devices. If they constitute an invasion of privacy. How was it accessed? It like anything else, illegal, should have been treated as such.
Where is the rest of that footage. The years of intolerance. Instead it has acted as executioner off of hearsay. Who knows the rest of it. It looks staged. What does it even prove. A bad day at the office?
Seriously it is criminal that the footage was released. There was laws on it. It is an invasion. Prior too today, but these devices are creeping on everybody. She didn't record him either. It wasn't her own footage, and her personal device. It was accessed how, and under what pretense? A divorce, spare us all that bullshit gossip. It should be subjected to the full extent of the law. Suing that device into censorship, so it doesn't invade our rights.
I do not condone his behaviour. I condemn that access being put out publicly.
Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
It doesn't categorically mean an invasion of privacy.
Did the court pursue the pee tapes?
No.
At what point is a third party acting as vigilantes, hastening any other marital problems. Acting as an inquisition, and prior to any judgement.
Sorry this whatever this is, it is an invasion of all our privacy.
I hate that guy because the press has said so. It is hiding the fact of gross illegality on all our security. At no point should this have been released in this manner.
Ring sells their data to LEO. There are entire neighborhoods that have removed ring. You are paying Amazon, but it's not yours. There was a case of police brutality where the police tried deleted the video, but a backup had been made already. You don't own ring video. If you ever did, you don't anymore. Read the terms and conditions.
I was under the impression that he had a pectus excavatum that was significant enough to put pressure on his heart. It’s possible that was his cover story but either way it can look pretty fucked up.
So five years ago Crowder appears on the ((daily wire)) with ((ben shapiro)), wearing cowboy boots and no pants, and talking about trad man duties of taking care of your wife.
then this almost absurd ring footage with her 8 month twin filled belly sticking out, and him saying obviously monstrous shit which is basically enough to understandably fuel toxic feminism for the next 5 years.
rhetorical question: why are all the promoted people on the 'right' deeply closeted homosexuals who crossdress and treat their family or colleagues like shit.
is it that they are deeply aligned with the archons and inner demons of the psyche, or are their puppet-masters also deeply aligned archonic and demonic archetypes who also help nudge these people to the top. or some mix of those factors.
rhetorical question: why are all the promoted people on the 'right' deeply closeted homosexuals who crossdress and treat their family or colleagues like shit.
For the same reason red states are the biggest consumers of Trans porn: rightoids love cock. They just try to hide it whereas leftwing cocksuckers have parades celebrating it.
If you have as much money as Crowder you should at least roll your own security system. That being said, I'm fine if this gets exposed. He went out of his way to say he was so committed and loving and didn't chose to divorce. Then this comes to light, lol.
You guys realize she is being manipulative too. In a softer way. Less noticeable. You can't think you know everything from a small clip. Given she is very pregnant, and hormones can be a bitch...but still. The way she says I love you over and over seems off...Seems like the video was released on purpose. But really he should be doing things for a super pregnant wife regardless. His reasoning makes no sense.
any dumbass installing a Ring system deserves whatever invasion of privacy happens. just like those who chose to get the vaccine mrna gene therapy deserve what they get.
The latest deal with these things is they initiated a subscription fee on top of the price, for functionality that was previously covered by the price of the device. They've even been retroactively "updating" devices people already own, to disable functionality and require them to pay the subscription fee to get it working again.
Didn't black rifle coffee catch a bunch of shit for being hypocrites before? I think they turned against Kyle Rittenhouse who obviously acted in self defense.
I don't know anything at all about this guy, other than the catchy name of his show. But just from this little incident, I think we can draw two conclusions. First, that this was some sort of ritual humiliation, which impiies that Crowder is a disinfo outlet. If anyone suspected that, this is your confirmation.
We need only think closely about one sentence:
You can pose as many questions as you like about this assertion: Isn't Ali worried about getting sued? Or Ring? How precisely did Ali get hold of it? Isn't Ring worried Crowder will just go around saying Ring secures your data like mints at the restaurant counter? Not one of these will yield a sensible answer.
One such question is this: Is "Yasher Ali" even a real journalist? No, he is not. I checked his Substack and it is a thin and lame veneer, which is trademark of an Intelligence legend.
Why do they think they can get away with such low effort? Because they know for a fact no one will look, and any that do will not recognize what they see. Just keep your radar on for the next few days to see if anyone else has a word to say about that substack. No one will, and Intelligence knows this for a fact.
Is "Yasher" even a real human being? With a certain level of sophistication in thought, there comes a sort of "inception" point in analyzing the synthetic reality of Intel operations where such issues cease to be relevant. And exactly what Crowder did to incur this is similarly irrelevant.
Will Crowder raise any of the issues I have raised here? Of course not, because he's an asset. He will take his beating and move on with his tasking.
Thanks very much! I just hope people get something out of it so we can all move the ball forward.
I notice that more than half the houses i go to have these spy device door bells or alexa devices listening in.
It's difficult to avoid these these.
Government didn't have to force you to carry around spy devices or install spy devices in your home. People voluntarily did it and PAID MONEY to get them. People are so dumb. Even the Republicans install this shit in their cars, doors, homes.
I won't even give the smart thermostat access to my wan. I have to setup a completely isolated network for a potential spy device and i'm too lazy to even deal with it right now.
He said with his smartphone within hearing distance.
You know, that really reminds me of the two most disturbing things I've ever heard:
What was the greatest trick the Devil ever played? Convincing people he doesn't exist.
What does the Devil look like? Like everything you ever wanted.
So the "Internet of Things", how convenient is that? Yes please!
Don't believe it!
Right, and it's sort of the insidious yet obvious aspect.
People develop their favorite broadcasters or outlets, and then something comes along that indicates they may be disinfo. They'll say, "No way, So-and-so is funny / entertaining / charming / educated / informative / whatever. There's no way they're disinfo!"
But just think of it from the other side of the equation: would you use someone as your disinfo agent that was an ignorant dummy that rubbed everyone the wrong way and said a lot of stuff people didn't like to hear? Probably not the best choice, right?
For that very reason I gave up trying to carefully mold what I wrote to please the maximum number of people. (Or is that my dastardly disnfo plan, the old revers-o? Bwahahahaha!)
Did he try,
sudo make me a sandwich
xkcd
https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/sandwich.png
Hang on. Why is a camera recording them? Not that I defend that guy. He looks like a bully. But that shit is private. Who knows what caused it?
Maybe he treats all his shit that way. Or what ever. It's another bullshit take down.
Because at what point is there that bullshit being recorded? At what point has it gone too, a third party? The press making it up. Where is that tape. How is it legal unless she complained?
Instead it's bullshit. Unless she complained. Who accessed that legally. Where is the actual footage, and under what law has it been released?
There are serious questions here. Not what that press says. The press is compromised today. We live in surveillance state. How was that shit accessed? Who cares what that shit is. Unless she complained it's hearsay propagating public opinion on what grounds?
This is serious for everybody installing those devices.
Nobody should have these devices. If they constitute an invasion of privacy. How was it accessed? It like anything else, illegal, should have been treated as such.
Where is the rest of that footage. The years of intolerance. Instead it has acted as executioner off of hearsay. Who knows the rest of it. It looks staged. What does it even prove. A bad day at the office?
Seriously it is criminal that the footage was released. There was laws on it. It is an invasion. Prior too today, but these devices are creeping on everybody. She didn't record him either. It wasn't her own footage, and her personal device. It was accessed how, and under what pretense? A divorce, spare us all that bullshit gossip. It should be subjected to the full extent of the law. Suing that device into censorship, so it doesn't invade our rights.
I do not condone his behaviour. I condemn that access being put out publicly.
Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
On what planet is this legal?
His wife filed for divorce in 2021. It's mentioned in the article.
It doesn't categorically mean an invasion of privacy.
Did the court pursue the pee tapes?
No.
At what point is a third party acting as vigilantes, hastening any other marital problems. Acting as an inquisition, and prior to any judgement.
Sorry this whatever this is, it is an invasion of all our privacy.
I hate that guy because the press has said so. It is hiding the fact of gross illegality on all our security. At no point should this have been released in this manner.
Agree with the privacy issue
Ring sells their data to LEO. There are entire neighborhoods that have removed ring. You are paying Amazon, but it's not yours. There was a case of police brutality where the police tried deleted the video, but a backup had been made already. You don't own ring video. If you ever did, you don't anymore. Read the terms and conditions.
Owen Benjamin said this guy got some sort of pectoral surgery to give him fake chest muscles?
LOL i can't believe guys do this.
Crowder's own wife confirmed that it was elective cosmetic surgery because he didn't like the way his chest looked.
Literally gender affirming surgery.
Not surprised if true.
He went in on him pretty hard couple days ago. Near the beginning of the show.
OWEN BENJAMIN | #1676 JUDGEMENT DAY MUSLIM SHARIA & CHRISTIAN SHAME https://www.bitchute.com/video/upwDAHeh7GrP/
I was under the impression that he had a pectus excavatum that was significant enough to put pressure on his heart. It’s possible that was his cover story but either way it can look pretty fucked up.
The video was leaked by the wife.
source?
So five years ago Crowder appears on the ((daily wire)) with ((ben shapiro)), wearing cowboy boots and no pants, and talking about trad man duties of taking care of your wife.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eelGot8nkTU
then this almost absurd ring footage with her 8 month twin filled belly sticking out, and him saying obviously monstrous shit which is basically enough to understandably fuel toxic feminism for the next 5 years.
rhetorical question: why are all the promoted people on the 'right' deeply closeted homosexuals who crossdress and treat their family or colleagues like shit.
is it that they are deeply aligned with the archons and inner demons of the psyche, or are their puppet-masters also deeply aligned archonic and demonic archetypes who also help nudge these people to the top. or some mix of those factors.
She filed for divorce in 2021
For the same reason red states are the biggest consumers of Trans porn: rightoids love cock. They just try to hide it whereas leftwing cocksuckers have parades celebrating it.
Wait, how did the ring autodox him? Did he upload the footage, or do people at ring watch all your footage?
Ring sells your data to LEO. That's not your data.
Both, of course.
Would believe it initially came from the spouse in a divorce than a vindictive company.
If you have as much money as Crowder you should at least roll your own security system. That being said, I'm fine if this gets exposed. He went out of his way to say he was so committed and loving and didn't chose to divorce. Then this comes to light, lol.
watch it = domestic abuse
lol
You guys realize she is being manipulative too. In a softer way. Less noticeable. You can't think you know everything from a small clip. Given she is very pregnant, and hormones can be a bitch...but still. The way she says I love you over and over seems off...Seems like the video was released on purpose. But really he should be doing things for a super pregnant wife regardless. His reasoning makes no sense.
any dumbass installing a Ring system deserves whatever invasion of privacy happens. just like those who chose to get the
vaccinemrna gene therapy deserve what they get.The latest deal with these things is they initiated a subscription fee on top of the price, for functionality that was previously covered by the price of the device. They've even been retroactively "updating" devices people already own, to disable functionality and require them to pay the subscription fee to get it working again.
Aka a visible sign of an invisible bond; no beginning and no end; a circle...a kike.
CAMERATE, verb - "to vault; to ceil" aka vault (to confine within) + ceil (to overlay or cover the inside).
kek
Too much Black Rifle coffee?
Paytriot paying the piper.
Didn't black rifle coffee catch a bunch of shit for being hypocrites before? I think they turned against Kyle Rittenhouse who obviously acted in self defense.
Vlad is a shill account who got exposed hate larping between his own alts.
I agree a distraction, and also further driving the wedge between men and women.
Sounds like you're an incel psychopath. Good for women that they steer clear of you.