Hang on. Why is a camera recording them? Not that I defend that guy. He looks like a bully. But that shit is private. Who knows what caused it?
Maybe he treats all his shit that way. Or what ever. It's another bullshit take down.
Because at what point is there that bullshit being recorded? At what point has it gone too, a third party? The press making it up. Where is that tape. How is it legal unless she complained?
Instead it's bullshit. Unless she complained. Who accessed that legally. Where is the actual footage, and under what law has it been released?
There are serious questions here. Not what that press says. The press is compromised today. We live in surveillance state. How was that shit accessed? Who cares what that shit is. Unless she complained it's hearsay propagating public opinion on what grounds?
This is serious for everybody installing those devices.
Nobody should have these devices. If they constitute an invasion of privacy. How was it accessed? It like anything else, illegal, should have been treated as such.
Where is the rest of that footage. The years of intolerance. Instead it has acted as executioner off of hearsay. Who knows the rest of it. It looks staged. What does it even prove. A bad day at the office?
Seriously it is criminal that the footage was released. There was laws on it. It is an invasion. Prior too today, but these devices are creeping on everybody. She didn't record him either. It wasn't her own footage, and her personal device. It was accessed how, and under what pretense? A divorce, spare us all that bullshit gossip. It should be subjected to the full extent of the law. Suing that device into censorship, so it doesn't invade our rights.
I do not condone his behaviour. I condemn that access being put out publicly.
Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
It doesn't categorically mean an invasion of privacy.
Did the court pursue the pee tapes?
No.
At what point is a third party acting as vigilantes, hastening any other marital problems. Acting as an inquisition, and prior to any judgement.
Sorry this whatever this is, it is an invasion of all our privacy.
I hate that guy because the press has said so. It is hiding the fact of gross illegality on all our security. At no point should this have been released in this manner.
Hang on. Why is a camera recording them? Not that I defend that guy. He looks like a bully. But that shit is private. Who knows what caused it?
Maybe he treats all his shit that way. Or what ever. It's another bullshit take down.
Because at what point is there that bullshit being recorded? At what point has it gone too, a third party? The press making it up. Where is that tape. How is it legal unless she complained?
Instead it's bullshit. Unless she complained. Who accessed that legally. Where is the actual footage, and under what law has it been released?
There are serious questions here. Not what that press says. The press is compromised today. We live in surveillance state. How was that shit accessed? Who cares what that shit is. Unless she complained it's hearsay propagating public opinion on what grounds?
This is serious for everybody installing those devices.
Nobody should have these devices. If they constitute an invasion of privacy. How was it accessed? It like anything else, illegal, should have been treated as such.
Where is the rest of that footage. The years of intolerance. Instead it has acted as executioner off of hearsay. Who knows the rest of it. It looks staged. What does it even prove. A bad day at the office?
Seriously it is criminal that the footage was released. There was laws on it. It is an invasion. Prior too today, but these devices are creeping on everybody. She didn't record him either. It wasn't her own footage, and her personal device. It was accessed how, and under what pretense? A divorce, spare us all that bullshit gossip. It should be subjected to the full extent of the law. Suing that device into censorship, so it doesn't invade our rights.
I do not condone his behaviour. I condemn that access being put out publicly.
Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
On what planet is this legal?
His wife filed for divorce in 2021. It's mentioned in the article.
It doesn't categorically mean an invasion of privacy.
Did the court pursue the pee tapes?
No.
At what point is a third party acting as vigilantes, hastening any other marital problems. Acting as an inquisition, and prior to any judgement.
Sorry this whatever this is, it is an invasion of all our privacy.
I hate that guy because the press has said so. It is hiding the fact of gross illegality on all our security. At no point should this have been released in this manner.
Agree with the privacy issue