I don't know anything at all about this guy, other than the catchy name of his show. But just from this little incident, I think we can draw two conclusions. First, that this was some sort of ritual humiliation, which impiies that Crowder is a disinfo outlet. If anyone suspected that, this is your confirmation.
We need only think closely about one sentence:
The video, obtained by journalist Yashar Ali and posted on his Substack....
You can pose as many questions as you like about this assertion: Isn't Ali worried about getting sued? Or Ring? How precisely did Ali get hold of it? Isn't Ring worried Crowder will just go around saying Ring secures your data like mints at the restaurant counter? Not one of these will yield a sensible answer.
One such question is this: Is "Yasher Ali" even a real journalist? No, he is not. I checked his Substack and it is a thin and lame veneer, which is trademark of an Intelligence legend.
Why do they think they can get away with such low effort? Because they know for a fact no one will look, and any that do will not recognize what they see. Just keep your radar on for the next few days to see if anyone else has a word to say about that substack. No one will, and Intelligence knows this for a fact.
Is "Yasher" even a real human being? With a certain level of sophistication in thought, there comes a sort of "inception" point in analyzing the synthetic reality of Intel operations where such issues cease to be relevant. And exactly what Crowder did to incur this is similarly irrelevant.
Will Crowder raise any of the issues I have raised here? Of course not, because he's an asset. He will take his beating and move on with his tasking.
I notice that more than half the houses i go to have these spy device door bells or alexa devices listening in.
It's difficult to avoid these these.
Government didn't have to force you to carry around spy devices or install spy devices in your home. People voluntarily did it and PAID MONEY to get them. People are so dumb. Even the Republicans install this shit in their cars, doors, homes.
I won't even give the smart thermostat access to my wan. I have to setup a completely isolated network for a potential spy device and i'm too lazy to even deal with it right now.
Right, and it's sort of the insidious yet obvious aspect.
People develop their favorite broadcasters or outlets, and then something comes along that indicates they may be disinfo. They'll say, "No way, So-and-so is funny / entertaining / charming / educated / informative / whatever. There's no way they're disinfo!"
But just think of it from the other side of the equation: would you use someone as your disinfo agent that was an ignorant dummy that rubbed everyone the wrong way and said a lot of stuff people didn't like to hear? Probably not the best choice, right?
For that very reason I gave up trying to carefully mold what I wrote to please the maximum number of people. (Or is that my dastardly disnfo plan, the old revers-o? Bwahahahaha!)
I don't know anything at all about this guy, other than the catchy name of his show. But just from this little incident, I think we can draw two conclusions. First, that this was some sort of ritual humiliation, which impiies that Crowder is a disinfo outlet. If anyone suspected that, this is your confirmation.
We need only think closely about one sentence:
You can pose as many questions as you like about this assertion: Isn't Ali worried about getting sued? Or Ring? How precisely did Ali get hold of it? Isn't Ring worried Crowder will just go around saying Ring secures your data like mints at the restaurant counter? Not one of these will yield a sensible answer.
One such question is this: Is "Yasher Ali" even a real journalist? No, he is not. I checked his Substack and it is a thin and lame veneer, which is trademark of an Intelligence legend.
Why do they think they can get away with such low effort? Because they know for a fact no one will look, and any that do will not recognize what they see. Just keep your radar on for the next few days to see if anyone else has a word to say about that substack. No one will, and Intelligence knows this for a fact.
Is "Yasher" even a real human being? With a certain level of sophistication in thought, there comes a sort of "inception" point in analyzing the synthetic reality of Intel operations where such issues cease to be relevant. And exactly what Crowder did to incur this is similarly irrelevant.
Will Crowder raise any of the issues I have raised here? Of course not, because he's an asset. He will take his beating and move on with his tasking.
Thanks very much! I just hope people get something out of it so we can all move the ball forward.
I notice that more than half the houses i go to have these spy device door bells or alexa devices listening in.
It's difficult to avoid these these.
Government didn't have to force you to carry around spy devices or install spy devices in your home. People voluntarily did it and PAID MONEY to get them. People are so dumb. Even the Republicans install this shit in their cars, doors, homes.
I won't even give the smart thermostat access to my wan. I have to setup a completely isolated network for a potential spy device and i'm too lazy to even deal with it right now.
He said with his smartphone within hearing distance.
You know, that really reminds me of the two most disturbing things I've ever heard:
What was the greatest trick the Devil ever played? Convincing people he doesn't exist.
What does the Devil look like? Like everything you ever wanted.
So the "Internet of Things", how convenient is that? Yes please!
Don't believe it!
Right, and it's sort of the insidious yet obvious aspect.
People develop their favorite broadcasters or outlets, and then something comes along that indicates they may be disinfo. They'll say, "No way, So-and-so is funny / entertaining / charming / educated / informative / whatever. There's no way they're disinfo!"
But just think of it from the other side of the equation: would you use someone as your disinfo agent that was an ignorant dummy that rubbed everyone the wrong way and said a lot of stuff people didn't like to hear? Probably not the best choice, right?
For that very reason I gave up trying to carefully mold what I wrote to please the maximum number of people. (Or is that my dastardly disnfo plan, the old revers-o? Bwahahahaha!)