Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
Those cameras tend to record when motion happens. Since they keep moving, I assume the camera is smart enough to keep recording until the motion is finished.
100% believe wife captured the footage from the camera app and is using it for the divorce. Candace Owens said the video originally came from the wife.
So what, it is constitutionally illegal. Who's camera is it? Under what rights was it recording? Instead it has hit the press by nefarious constructs, and it proves nothing apart from taking us all for fools.
It thinks it can go around recording us all, then excuse it as a justification into divorce proceedings?
No I am not that guy. He's a bully and idiot. I question the fabric of society and the invasion into our fundamental rights.
On what planet is this legal?