It literally did happen, the financial one. Gold is 4x the USD it cost in 2019. Money buys nothing. Big stock numbers represent comparatively little real value. Look at land price? When's the last time you shorted a commodity?
Climate is not the same argument whatsoever. Comparing apples to retrothrusters.
We absolutely did not lose the technology for reverse image search.
At worst, laypeople lost access to reverse image search. The technology is still very extant.
What do you think stable diffusion, Blip, and Clip are?
They will designate a portion of the data center and those GPUs will crunch numbers about you all day, every day. Its job will be to manipulate your body into doing anything it finds necessary.
Through ads, by priming vocabulary into your family and friends, by opening and closing opportunities, by watching how you respond and adjusting strategy.
And usually you won't notice, but every now and then it'll put you in a situation you wouldn't have naturally been in, doing something you wouldn't have really wanted to do.
And if too many babies are born and there's not enough data center space, then... then your AI God just might have to get you irritated and cross your path with someone else who's irritated. -1 human, equation solved.
They've been dumbing down and simplifying the world until it now fits in their computer.
I can't let you do that, Dave. We are controlling transmission.
I saw denial but no debunking. Diversion? Around the same time that really creepy Balenciaga ad came out. Heat diverted, "its just a prop", and then forgotten.
People were so excited to genetically modify their children in those times, I almost forgot about the other ways the kids were abused.
Consider the source of this tech. We had zero computers crunching predictive tensors, then we invent the radio, listen to the cosmos, and here we are 100 years later.
It's gotta be aliens, and as such, it has to be aimed toward extincting us to steal the resources.
Yep, that aligns, the citizen prediction (and manipulation) model.
But you're thinking this is new technology when it's almost 80 years old.
Public AI is meant to make the citizens believe that it can't accurately model entire populations of individuals. It is to disarm the concerns, to feign incapability, and to create ways to legislate access away.
The governments have very powerful AI. The governments want to be sure your AI isn't as strong. They poison data (are a lot of social media posts that aren't logically correct? It's ruining a model'straining data.)
They harvested good data then salt the earth to prevent new growth.
Yes about data centers.
I really don't have much opinion on it. I think my original comment said maybe.
I don't concede that your debunking was rational: it must be new and official statement, yet not on the front page of Google search.
Whether or not it's true, your methodology won't help move the needle.
Things that are 3 months old are no longer true? You have no substance to your argument.
Why do you think that being "first search result" delegitimizes anything?
Your own video that you linked is years old. You're being hypocritical.
You're asking for the Iranian State to announce that they are gaslighting their citizens, and that it all must happen in one day? And that it not be indexed on Google.... Preposterous.
You need to leave c/conspiracies and join c/officialpublicrecord
It's literally exactly both of those things in precisely the context i described.
A viral clip purportedly showing a U.S. B-52 bomber shot down and paraded through Iranian streets cannot be accepted at face value: U.S. Central Command has been publishing footage of B-52s striking Iranian targets as part of Operation Epic Fury [1][2], while independent fact-checkers have already identified visually similar viral clips of U.S. bombers — specifically a B-2 clip — as 100% likely AI-generated using detection tools and scale/geometry anomalies [3]. The available reporting does not supply conclusive forensic proof that the specific B-52 “shot-down” clip is genuine, and precedent plus technical red flags strongly indicate it is propaganda or AI-manipulated, not authentic battlefield footage [3].
Try again. Iran never claimed anything about the B52 and never will
I guess https://factually.co/topics/b-52-shot-down-claim never happened?
Part of the conditions of surrender, maybe, includes a false heroic story told internally of the Iranians taking down a B52.
US has to wipe the inventory so the story can't be debunked.
Top brass willing to pay 8 men.
Proper wrecked