We may outnumber them, but they have all the money, control the laws, technology and corporations. Its the benjamins that make otherwise good people be bad. All they have to do is keep paying their henchmen to jail us, cancel us, bankrupt us and kill us directly or indirectly, through whatever means works. You know, like they've been doing and will continue to do.
Tech = I'll give them that, they probably have access to stuff generations in front of us
Corporations = a collection of people heavily under the spell of the mind trick
We outnumber them but because of the hold most of those mind tricks have over most of us, we've misplaced what are the threats with non-threats. If more of us collectively saw through the mind tricks and decided to live in a way that make us a slave to those tricks we'd be doing great
Christianity pacified everyone to be gay cuckolds, worship "muh chosens people", turn the cheek, pray for their enemies, drink the grape juice and eat the cracker.
Libertarianism is as aspirational and utopic—in doctrine—as communism. It would be nice if we could “live and let live.” It would be nice if people had perfect information of the entirety of “the market” and its conditions at any given moment so as to make the most informed decision possible. It would be nice if everyone perfectly obeyed the mechanics of voluntarism and the non-aggression principle.
But that’s not how the world works. So in terms of ‘needed responsibility,’ in order to bring society to a state where we can more closely fit those principles, there are actions we need to take to cleanse society of the elements that prevent us from doing so.
Libertarianism is as aspirational and utopic—in doctrine—as communism.
a) -ISM implies ones consent to the suggestions of another, which tempts one to ignore LIBER (free), hence being free will of choice, and then allows the suggesting few to collect the consenting many, hence building communes of order followers.
b) aspiration aka aspirating to be implies suggested progressivism (towards outcomes). Life, while being progressed from inception towards death needs to resist the temptation to follow.
c) utopia is based on suggested idealism, once again tempting one to seek outcomes form others, while ignoring to adapt to origin.
d) as for doctrine (from doctor)...one doesn't represent a docked (doct) ore (or), but a vessel (life) with free will of choice to row within flow (inception towards death).
tl; dr...all the suggested words used by the many to communicate are corrupt, are defined, redefined and contradicted by the few, and represent the inversion of perceivable sound and its behavior.
You use -isms to describe something, while ignoring that all the -isms are defined by the few, while the many are busy reasoning about the meaning thereof. This represents division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
I don't try to tell others how to behave, I rip apart what restricts ones free will of choice behavior, hence the suggestions by others.
live and let live
LET, verb - "to permit; to allow; to suffer"...the ongoing process of dying permits and allows temporary living to suffer ones struggle as resistance within temptation.
It ain't other life that allows living, it's the process of dying....loss (inception towards death) lets one grow (life). "live and let live" represents a suggested inversion thereof, a rhetorical suggestion tempting one to fight against others, instead of struggling for the sustenance of self within origin.
It would be nice
You represent the "being"; tempted by suggested "it" to ignore self for "nice" things...
Sleight of hand: "You know it seems the more we talk about it...It only makes it worse to live without it"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfhaA65aM-0 This isn't a pop song, it's ideological warfare, spell-craft, mass deception etc...yet it can be just a pop song if one so chooses...
It would be nice if people had perfect information of the entirety
a) each one of the people represents a partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), while struggling to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Perfection and entirety is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being imperfect and partial.
b) information implies IN FORM...form (life) implies within flow (inception towards death). One represents form within flow, hence the need to adapt to IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe).
The few suggest information to tempt one to ignore perceivable inspiration. You are tempted to want to accumulate the entirety of information, while ignoring to exists within the entirety of inspiration.
Information represents that which you uphold within your mind/memory, while inspiration represents the perceivable flowstate you need to adapt to aka the moving differences surrounding you.
the market
a) M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass), hence the mark (life) of the beast (inception towards death) aka the Passover of life from inception towards death. The mark aka the visible effect (living) of force or agency (process of dying).
b) ignoring the perceivable mark for the suggested "market", tempts one to buy (suggested information) and sell (consent to suggested information) under contract law.
c) merchant implies MER (sea) CHANT (to utter a melodious voice) aka MER (perceivable inspiration) CHANT (suggested information). The happy merchant of temptation is gonna sell you as much information as you want, but you don't need any...a Faustian deal.
at any given moment so as to make the most informed decision
a) motion gives momentum, momentum gives form (living) into flow (process of dying)...form (life) perceives flow (inception towards death) as the ever changing moment (um).
b) does one need to decide to breathe or is one forced to adapt by breathing?
It would be nice if everyone perfectly obeyed the mechanics of voluntarism
Suggested voluntarism represents "acting by choice", which represents the inversion of reaction as choice to being within an enacting balance (need/want) based system.
One cannot choose to have a choice, one represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within balance, with the choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) it.
non-aggression principle.
Defense (living) within offense (process of dying), hence aggression (Latin gradior; gressus, Hebrew; to descend) aka to descend as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
PRIN'CIPLE, noun [Latin principium, beginning.] aka inception towards death...a descend of life.
Why do the many lack to comprehend this? Because each one consents to suggested "non" (nothing). How could one comprehend how everything works if one willingly believes in the existence of nothing?
not how the world works
Again with the suggested nothing, tempting one ignore perceivable everything, which just works...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". It's not hard to comprehend work, it's hard to resist ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
needed responsibility,’ in order to bring...
One represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within the natural order (balance), hence struggling as choice to balance in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested).
One cannot BRING, verb - "to produce; to procure as a cause", one represents the effect of NATURE, noun -"born, produced" as the cause.
actions we need to take...
...ignores reaction each one represents. Life can only react to being directed from inception towards death, hence reacting within an enacting system.
Others suggest "actors" under "directors" as the inversion thereof...
to cleanse society
Society represents suggested collectivism, which represents the inversion of nature setting itself apart from whole (process of dying) into partial (living). The many keep dying because they willingly want to be "part of" collective society, instead of struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Coincidentally; the so called jews survive apart, while not just suggesting the collectivism of societies, but as APART WITHIN them, hence mimicking partial within whole.
Consider if the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) cleanses every chaos (living) within...not matter what those within are up to?
prevent us from doing so
If everyone else suggests one "thou shall not kill", then does that prevent one from utilizing free will of choice to "try" to kill another? You are alive...how are you prevented from living?
The Allure of Forbidden Knowledge: The Temptation of Sabbatean Literature for Mainstream Rabbis in the Frankist Moment, 1756-1761 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41681764
It's much simpler-- the proper term is Christ deniers. They were the original deniers of Christ. The reason so much evil seems to be associated with them is because Christ deniers reject God and serve worldly desires.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
Ephesians 6:12
Precisely. The Bible is pretty clear on this topic. And if anyone tries to convince you otherwise, or that there is such a thing as "judeo-Christian" anything, you know they're already denying the Christ and are therefore apostates. And a Christian should only argue with a blasphemer by running his sword through his bowels as far as it will go.
"Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust."
Matthew 5:43-45
Strike them with the Word, not the sword. A dead man has no opportunity to repent, to be saved.
Yeah, I'm aware that that last sentence isn't in the Bible, it's a quote from King Louis IX. But I think you'll find that if you take Jesus by his word and try to argue with or convince these people, you'll quickly find that an awful lot of them are long past being able to be saved. They've sold their souls to the devil a long time ago and have little to no humanity left. They're demons and ghouls, and they'd be better off dead, because at least then that would end their suffering.
a) is the ongoing process of dying stronger that those temporary living within? Can any partial be stronger than the whole?
b) is living good or evil? Is dying good or evil? Can life exist without being moved from inception towards death? Is living without inception/death good or evil? Is dying without living good or evil?
the jews will always win
a) ALWAYS (without variation) represents the inversion of being the variant (life) within the way (inception towards death), hence "ONESWAY".
Sleight of hand: "One way or another I'm gonna get ya"
b) YOUS (phonetic jews) will always win, because each growing ME (life) exists within loss (inception towards death)...one dies; another lives.
c) WIN (to gain) implies being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception toward death)...
d) it took your free "will" of choice to suggest what "will" happen to the jews...
A ripe apple hanging in a tree; a hungry child needing it; a greedy child wanting it...is the tree good or evil?
we're aware
a) how can one be watchful (aware) if there's always more to watch?
b) how could a plural (we) be watchful for each singular (one) within?
to choose one or the other...
...or to be one representing free will of choice among all others?
{their} goal is
a) why do the many keep reasoning about goals, while the few keep taking down goalposts after goalposts within the ongoing game?
b) what if perceivable "was" before any suggestion can be shaped about what it "is"?
influence
IN (life) FLUENT (inception towards death)...how could life be "outfluent"?
lead us
Only followers can be led, while each life implies resisting while being processed from inception towards death.
to choose...en masse
"chosen ones" implies each one with choice. Groups don't choose, each individual chose to consent to a suggested group, which allows the suggesting individual to keep suggesting in the name of the group, hence becoming the suggesting leader for the consenting followers.
goal should be to do the opposite
a) being (life) implies being done in-between opposites (inception/death), hence representing the opportunity to RE (respond to) DO (being done by) self.
b) origin (inception) drives being (life) towards goal (death), hence the want to reach goals tempting one to ignore the need to sustain self.
Take them out and more will fill their place... and the cycle continues. It is not so much that a few evil people that are the problem, but the capacity for evil that is within all of us. The Satanists you speak of, have you thought that maybe there might be some truth to their name?
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Ephesians 6:12
agree'd.. but it would certainly diminish their evil resolve.. i choose the side of good and i will speak out against inhumane injustices ...
"But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea." - matthew 18:6
Obviously, to kill is to sin. Jesus is not encouraging us here to take revenge on those who wronged us, but saying that "to have a great millstone fastened around his neck" is preferable to the pain that awaits them in hell. "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her." John 8:7
I think we don't even start with rabbit holes, really. Just enter them and find out something. All things you mentioned could easily be just a reception on the rabbit hole entrance.
Things that seems to be completely unanswered - who is really behind all that cults/elites/whatever? Who stopped humanity progress in 1970 and why? What is the real source of all that agendas and other shit?
The more we know, the more question arise. And they are not so easy to answer.
Perhaps there are beings that know this is going to happen soon and order society accordingly
Perhaps. But who exactly that beings? Where they come from? How exactly they contact with Earth elites? What language they speak? How they look like? And so on.
It is easy to make wide assumptions about reptiloids, aliens, daemons, whatever. We have a lot of them around for a long time. More complex thing is to find details, dots that could be connected.
Its like with elites - first you find out there is somebody behind politicians, then you began to collect the dots - all that corporations, clubs, families and so on. Then you connect the dots - this is corporation that owns half of world assets, here is their accounts, here they have a contracts with those institution, here they pay MSM to hide something, this man is a head of something, and that man is in charge of that and so on. That is how you get a whole picture about thing you guessed at the beginning.
Same should be done again, but with upper level. Everything from previous dots that looks unnecessary on previous level should be collected, systematised and studied. This will be the next group of dots for next level. And so on.
It is hard to prove evil supernatural beings exist if they don't want to be caught. However, though that challenge is great, I ultimately agree with you. We need to try to prove they exist or do not, once and for all.
It is hard to prove evil supernatural beings exist if they don't want to be caught.
There are a lot of things that invisible and unsensible that actually not hard to proof at all. Electricity, radiation, atoms, whatever. It is just a question of willing to find and detect them. Another option is to continue to tell fortunes about "supernatural beings".
There is no magic or supernatural. Only technology we are not aware of yet. And "supernatural beings" are not supernatural, just unstudied and unresearched.
We need to try to prove they exist or do not, once and for all.
There could be a lot of things that could help.
Technologies appeared from nowhere, without preceeding techs
things that elites routinely do that looks completely senseless
elites reactions to some things or events that looks totally unimportant
chains of relations between elite members that goes into nowhere
and so on.
I think 1 and 4 are very promising approaches. If we are alone with elites, then that things will be totally in closed loop, there could not be gaps or loose ends. all circles will be closed and everything will be sequential. If there is gaps, loose ends and all that stuff, then it is a basic proof of third-party presence.
a) does being imply "complete" or partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
b) what if suggested questions seeking suggested answers tempts one to ignore perceivable solution?
c) to be implies "towards being", while being (life) implies within towards (inception towards death)...can you discern the difference?
just a reception on...entrance.
What among all perceivable (whole) did the perceiving one (partial) not receive on entrance (inception)? What's missing within what's already available?
who is behind
a) does BE (being) imply HIND (backward; pertaining to the part which follows) or does being (living) imply resisting being progressed (process of dying)?
b) what if questioning "who is be..." implies lacking self discernment about "being"? Why would a being put "who" before "be"? Who could be more important than being oneself?
Sleight of hand: WHO runs the world? The WHO! Another sleight of hand: Horton hears a WHO, from HORTON (Latin hortatio, from hortor, to exhort) - "giving advice; to encourage; to embolden, to cheer).
stopped humanity progress
Can life being moved from inception towards death be stopped? How can any suggested progressivism be considered over perceptibly being processed?
What is the real source
All that "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is"...
The more we know, the more question arise
a) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); questions and answers represent suggested (information).
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being problem (living) within solution (process of dying)...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
It feels like we've reached the bottom of the rabbit holes. The grand conspiracy, the one encompasses all the others, is that there is a 6000 year (give/take) old death cult that rules the planet, worship some kind of demonic, negative entity, and are now in the process of culling the planet for loosh production and setting the planet up for a technocratic dictatorship one world government that worships said being.
It won't even last 4 years if it happens. It will not be God's Millennium Kingdom but God's 4-year reign of terror, I don't think they can control everyone and everything for 1000 years anymore. The worst however, happens AFTER that reign collapses. You see Cambodia 1975 and you have the big picture.
Yeah, but the Khmer Rouge is simply the most effective of all four of these.
Some of the techniques even go to the Covid World Revolution and the damage is permanent (China and Russia do recover economically, Cambodia is essentially crippled once Kissinger and Mao did with it), so it must be a successful model.
fwiw, the Book of Enoch and Sumeria predate jews and their bullshit. jews or wahatever controls jews/khazars is more-or-less in charge and making a mess right now, but if jews/khazars/their controller up and died right now we've still got various ancient civilizations, Agartha, the Annunnaki, reptillians, and assorted non-earth bound entities to look into.
converting Enki's age to current human scale, even jews are just a bad 7-10 years.
edit: kinda' makes me wonder what qualifies as conspiracy to Annunnaki who are on Annunnaki society's fringe. or reptilians. like, what does the reptilian version of David Icke spend all it's time trying to wake reptillian society up to?
I think we're still waiting on widespread self awareness, which I mean, good luck I guess. If 10 kids are brutalized or killed to make a fancy accessory for the killers and abusers to sell, is it ethical to buy the fancy accessory? Does buying the fancy accessory make someone guilty of supporting the killing and abuse? Is ignorance an excuse in this modern world with such readily available information? Truth is TPTB love it when we blame them for everything and act like helpless innocent victims ourselves. We're still functional little cogs in their death and suffering machine. The next step in enlightenment is reeeeeally uncomfortable and collectively we're not ready. We probably won't see it in our lifetimes.
6000 year (give/take) old death cult that rules the planet, worship some kind of demonic, negative entity
When presented with the idea of a conspiracy theory, the average person tends to react in disbelief, saying "But how could such a conspiracy exist? Think of how many people would have to be in on it!" And he has a point. Such a vast conspiracy, spanning many millennia and every nation, simply could not be sustained, moving in the same uniform direction, using a purely material/physical explanation. No, there is someone at the top of the pyramid, directing it all. It is much simpler than we think. No need for a complex web of secret societies and tactics to explain how it functions. The true force behind this global movement of evil is that "negative entity", the prince of this world.
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.
Ephesians 6:12
what comes after this?
There is true Evil in this world. It's time to align yourself with the side of Good.
There are probably far grander conspiracies orders of magnitude larger and more complex throughout our galaxy and universe, they're just so disconnected from the human experience and human reality that we'll never know of their true scope or existence, perhaps forever. Think about the simple world of a gnat or a squirrel, and how much more complicated the world is, completely beyond their understanding. Why can't the same be true for us? Despite the explosion of progress in the last 800-1000 years for humanity, we still essentially know nothing.
Gnats, squirrels and other animals dont seek what is outside of their boundaries. Taoist believe the world would be simplier if we lived and died in the village we were born in and never sought after the noises we heard outside of our village. Now that is not the world we live in but we are probably behavioral conditioned to interfere with things outside ourselves when all we merely have to do is go about our business probably how the aliens do.
You'd have to take my word for it, but you've definitely got father to go down basically the same rabbit holes. There's more evidence to collate. One sign that you've arrived is that all conspiracies begin to coalesce into one conspiracy.
As for myself, after many years I still don't feel like I'm at the bottom, but I do feel like I'm running out of evidence that can be sensibly processed. Like, if I start reading up on channelers, I'll know I've gone too far.
Funny you say this now. I just remarked how the board seems to be slowed to a trickle of ideas and few seem able to see over the edge. it's understandable, it's part of the end-game and waits for decisions to be made.
We will always be in for another cycle until the cause of the cycle itself is discovered.
'some kind of demonic negative entity' needs more rabbit-holing until all the different 'kinds' can be distinguished if one were to know one's enemy completely.
It's necessary in fact. They vary, but it's what they share in it that counts.
There are positive and negative 'rabbit holes'. At the moment, the obsession is with the negative with good reason. But as to 'what comes after this'....it's about the positive 'rabbit holes'.
All truths have a shadow. Currently, we see only the shadows until we achieve that Great Awakening to the light. But as always, it's 'One Mind At A Time' and there, as here, 'the end won't be for everyone'.
Finally: 'How they did it' - is a discussion of all subjects throughout all time, we call history. Some of it is even true.
b) whole represents the foundation (bottom) for each partial (top) within.
what comes after this?
a) what comes after this moment(um)? What was there before this moment(um)?
b) THIS, definitive adjective...does adjective (to throw) define (limit) aka does adjective (inception towards death) define (life)?
the jews
What started the jewish behavior of exploiting others? What represents the origin of exploitation? What represents the foundation (bottom) for the so called jews to rise to the top?
give/take
What if given (inception) and taken (death) implies being (life)? What could life give/take from this process?
Either we kill them all or they kill us all. There aren’t any other options.
We may outnumber them, but they have all the money, control the laws, technology and corporations. Its the benjamins that make otherwise good people be bad. All they have to do is keep paying their henchmen to jail us, cancel us, bankrupt us and kill us directly or indirectly, through whatever means works. You know, like they've been doing and will continue to do.
Money = mind trick
Laws = mind trick
Tech = I'll give them that, they probably have access to stuff generations in front of us
Corporations = a collection of people heavily under the spell of the mind trick
We outnumber them but because of the hold most of those mind tricks have over most of us, we've misplaced what are the threats with non-threats. If more of us collectively saw through the mind tricks and decided to live in a way that make us a slave to those tricks we'd be doing great
They got 80% of people to do that. As long as people blindly comply, they win.
this right here...
and its actually.. 10 million to 1...
Christianity pacified everyone to be gay cuckolds, worship "muh chosens people", turn the cheek, pray for their enemies, drink the grape juice and eat the cracker.
kek eat the cracker
a) among all the us vs them killings, why are there crocuses "springing" up once again?
b) what if suggested OP'TION, noun [Latin optio, from opto, to wish or desire.] tempts one to ignore needed response-ability?
Libertarianism is as aspirational and utopic—in doctrine—as communism. It would be nice if we could “live and let live.” It would be nice if people had perfect information of the entirety of “the market” and its conditions at any given moment so as to make the most informed decision possible. It would be nice if everyone perfectly obeyed the mechanics of voluntarism and the non-aggression principle.
But that’s not how the world works. So in terms of ‘needed responsibility,’ in order to bring society to a state where we can more closely fit those principles, there are actions we need to take to cleanse society of the elements that prevent us from doing so.
a) -ISM implies ones consent to the suggestions of another, which tempts one to ignore LIBER (free), hence being free will of choice, and then allows the suggesting few to collect the consenting many, hence building communes of order followers.
b) aspiration aka aspirating to be implies suggested progressivism (towards outcomes). Life, while being progressed from inception towards death needs to resist the temptation to follow.
c) utopia is based on suggested idealism, once again tempting one to seek outcomes form others, while ignoring to adapt to origin.
d) as for doctrine (from doctor)...one doesn't represent a docked (doct) ore (or), but a vessel (life) with free will of choice to row within flow (inception towards death).
tl; dr...all the suggested words used by the many to communicate are corrupt, are defined, redefined and contradicted by the few, and represent the inversion of perceivable sound and its behavior.
You use -isms to describe something, while ignoring that all the -isms are defined by the few, while the many are busy reasoning about the meaning thereof. This represents division (reason) by suggestion (-isms).
I don't try to tell others how to behave, I rip apart what restricts ones free will of choice behavior, hence the suggestions by others.
LET, verb - "to permit; to allow; to suffer"...the ongoing process of dying permits and allows temporary living to suffer ones struggle as resistance within temptation.
It ain't other life that allows living, it's the process of dying....loss (inception towards death) lets one grow (life). "live and let live" represents a suggested inversion thereof, a rhetorical suggestion tempting one to fight against others, instead of struggling for the sustenance of self within origin.
You represent the "being"; tempted by suggested "it" to ignore self for "nice" things...
Sleight of hand: "You know it seems the more we talk about it...It only makes it worse to live without it"... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hfhaA65aM-0 This isn't a pop song, it's ideological warfare, spell-craft, mass deception etc...yet it can be just a pop song if one so chooses...
a) each one of the people represents a partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable), while struggling to sustain apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Perfection and entirety is being suggested to tempt one to ignore being imperfect and partial.
b) information implies IN FORM...form (life) implies within flow (inception towards death). One represents form within flow, hence the need to adapt to IN (being within) SPIRIT (Latin spiro; to breathe).
The few suggest information to tempt one to ignore perceivable inspiration. You are tempted to want to accumulate the entirety of information, while ignoring to exists within the entirety of inspiration.
Information represents that which you uphold within your mind/memory, while inspiration represents the perceivable flowstate you need to adapt to aka the moving differences surrounding you.
a) M'ARK, noun (Latin mercor, to pass), hence the mark (life) of the beast (inception towards death) aka the Passover of life from inception towards death. The mark aka the visible effect (living) of force or agency (process of dying).
b) ignoring the perceivable mark for the suggested "market", tempts one to buy (suggested information) and sell (consent to suggested information) under contract law.
c) merchant implies MER (sea) CHANT (to utter a melodious voice) aka MER (perceivable inspiration) CHANT (suggested information). The happy merchant of temptation is gonna sell you as much information as you want, but you don't need any...a Faustian deal.
a) motion gives momentum, momentum gives form (living) into flow (process of dying)...form (life) perceives flow (inception towards death) as the ever changing moment (um).
b) does one need to decide to breathe or is one forced to adapt by breathing?
Suggested voluntarism represents "acting by choice", which represents the inversion of reaction as choice to being within an enacting balance (need/want) based system.
One cannot choose to have a choice, one represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within balance, with the choice to adapt (need) or ignore (want) it.
Defense (living) within offense (process of dying), hence aggression (Latin gradior; gressus, Hebrew; to descend) aka to descend as temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception towards death).
PRIN'CIPLE, noun [Latin principium, beginning.] aka inception towards death...a descend of life.
Why do the many lack to comprehend this? Because each one consents to suggested "non" (nothing). How could one comprehend how everything works if one willingly believes in the existence of nothing?
Again with the suggested nothing, tempting one ignore perceivable everything, which just works...EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power". It's not hard to comprehend work, it's hard to resist ignoring perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction).
One represents the response-ability (free will of choice) within the natural order (balance), hence struggling as choice to balance in-between need (perceivable) and want (suggested).
One cannot BRING, verb - "to produce; to procure as a cause", one represents the effect of NATURE, noun -"born, produced" as the cause.
...ignores reaction each one represents. Life can only react to being directed from inception towards death, hence reacting within an enacting system.
Others suggest "actors" under "directors" as the inversion thereof...
Society represents suggested collectivism, which represents the inversion of nature setting itself apart from whole (process of dying) into partial (living). The many keep dying because they willingly want to be "part of" collective society, instead of struggling for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying).
Coincidentally; the so called jews survive apart, while not just suggesting the collectivism of societies, but as APART WITHIN them, hence mimicking partial within whole.
Consider if the ongoing natural order (inception towards death) cleanses every chaos (living) within...not matter what those within are up to?
If everyone else suggests one "thou shall not kill", then does that prevent one from utilizing free will of choice to "try" to kill another? You are alive...how are you prevented from living?
You will do no such thing because it would require you to crawl out of your basement
Even Doomer Slayer is dooming.
Do what, subhuman illiterate? There were two diametrical options there.
Do anything except shitposting
Cry. You still failed.
Nah, he figured you out instantly. It's not difficult.
Sorry, admitted sockpuppet account. You revoked your right to be taken seriously by anyone.
Yawn, you're like a little toy. Pull the string and listen to him repeat his catchphrases.
It's da joos
Always has been. Always will be.
At the bottom of every rabbit hole, there's a jewish merchant rubbing his filthy hands.
Sabbatean Frankist's to be exact ☝️🤓
The Allure of Forbidden Knowledge: The Temptation of Sabbatean Literature for Mainstream Rabbis in the Frankist Moment, 1756-1761 https://www.jstor.org/stable/41681764
1666 and the Dark Messiah - ROBERT SEPEHR https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXsnLskb7pA
Sepehr's a legend
It's much simpler-- the proper term is Christ deniers. They were the original deniers of Christ. The reason so much evil seems to be associated with them is because Christ deniers reject God and serve worldly desires.
"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." Ephesians 6:12
Precisely. The Bible is pretty clear on this topic. And if anyone tries to convince you otherwise, or that there is such a thing as "judeo-Christian" anything, you know they're already denying the Christ and are therefore apostates. And a Christian should only argue with a blasphemer by running his sword through his bowels as far as it will go.
"Ye have heard that it hath been said, Thou shalt love thy neighbour, and hate thine enemy.
But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;
That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven: for he maketh his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sendeth rain on the just and on the unjust."
Strike them with the Word, not the sword. A dead man has no opportunity to repent, to be saved.
Yeah, I'm aware that that last sentence isn't in the Bible, it's a quote from King Louis IX. But I think you'll find that if you take Jesus by his word and try to argue with or convince these people, you'll quickly find that an awful lot of them are long past being able to be saved. They've sold their souls to the devil a long time ago and have little to no humanity left. They're demons and ghouls, and they'd be better off dead, because at least then that would end their suffering.
I think - it’s like the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil
Now that we’re aware, it’s up to us to choose one or the other in our lives.
{their} goal is to influence/lead us to choose evil over good, en masse
Our goal should be / is (imo) to do the opposite
a) is the ongoing process of dying stronger that those temporary living within? Can any partial be stronger than the whole?
b) is living good or evil? Is dying good or evil? Can life exist without being moved from inception towards death? Is living without inception/death good or evil? Is dying without living good or evil?
a) ALWAYS (without variation) represents the inversion of being the variant (life) within the way (inception towards death), hence "ONESWAY".
Sleight of hand: "One way or another I'm gonna get ya"
b) YOUS (phonetic jews) will always win, because each growing ME (life) exists within loss (inception towards death)...one dies; another lives.
c) WIN (to gain) implies being temporary growth (life) within ongoing loss (inception toward death)...
d) it took your free "will" of choice to suggest what "will" happen to the jews...
A ripe apple hanging in a tree; a hungry child needing it; a greedy child wanting it...is the tree good or evil?
a) how can one be watchful (aware) if there's always more to watch?
b) how could a plural (we) be watchful for each singular (one) within?
...or to be one representing free will of choice among all others?
a) why do the many keep reasoning about goals, while the few keep taking down goalposts after goalposts within the ongoing game?
b) what if perceivable "was" before any suggestion can be shaped about what it "is"?
IN (life) FLUENT (inception towards death)...how could life be "outfluent"?
Only followers can be led, while each life implies resisting while being processed from inception towards death.
"chosen ones" implies each one with choice. Groups don't choose, each individual chose to consent to a suggested group, which allows the suggesting individual to keep suggesting in the name of the group, hence becoming the suggesting leader for the consenting followers.
a) being (life) implies being done in-between opposites (inception/death), hence representing the opportunity to RE (respond to) DO (being done by) self.
b) origin (inception) drives being (life) towards goal (death), hence the want to reach goals tempting one to ignore the need to sustain self.
until you start seeing satanists swinging from the gallows.. we've gotten to the bottom of NOTHING
Take them out and more will fill their place... and the cycle continues. It is not so much that a few evil people that are the problem, but the capacity for evil that is within all of us. The Satanists you speak of, have you thought that maybe there might be some truth to their name?
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:12
agree'd.. but it would certainly diminish their evil resolve.. i choose the side of good and i will speak out against inhumane injustices ...
"But whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone fastened around his neck and to be drowned in the depth of the sea." - matthew 18:6
Obviously, to kill is to sin. Jesus is not encouraging us here to take revenge on those who wronged us, but saying that "to have a great millstone fastened around his neck" is preferable to the pain that awaits them in hell. "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her." John 8:7
theres a difference to those who repent and accept jesus and those who continue to commit evil..
I think we don't even start with rabbit holes, really. Just enter them and find out something. All things you mentioned could easily be just a reception on the rabbit hole entrance.
Things that seems to be completely unanswered - who is really behind all that cults/elites/whatever? Who stopped humanity progress in 1970 and why? What is the real source of all that agendas and other shit?
The more we know, the more question arise. And they are not so easy to answer.
Perhaps. But who exactly that beings? Where they come from? How exactly they contact with Earth elites? What language they speak? How they look like? And so on.
It is easy to make wide assumptions about reptiloids, aliens, daemons, whatever. We have a lot of them around for a long time. More complex thing is to find details, dots that could be connected.
Its like with elites - first you find out there is somebody behind politicians, then you began to collect the dots - all that corporations, clubs, families and so on. Then you connect the dots - this is corporation that owns half of world assets, here is their accounts, here they have a contracts with those institution, here they pay MSM to hide something, this man is a head of something, and that man is in charge of that and so on. That is how you get a whole picture about thing you guessed at the beginning.
Same should be done again, but with upper level. Everything from previous dots that looks unnecessary on previous level should be collected, systematised and studied. This will be the next group of dots for next level. And so on.
It is hard to prove evil supernatural beings exist if they don't want to be caught. However, though that challenge is great, I ultimately agree with you. We need to try to prove they exist or do not, once and for all.
There are a lot of things that invisible and unsensible that actually not hard to proof at all. Electricity, radiation, atoms, whatever. It is just a question of willing to find and detect them. Another option is to continue to tell fortunes about "supernatural beings".
There is no magic or supernatural. Only technology we are not aware of yet. And "supernatural beings" are not supernatural, just unstudied and unresearched.
There could be a lot of things that could help.
and so on.
I think 1 and 4 are very promising approaches. If we are alone with elites, then that things will be totally in closed loop, there could not be gaps or loose ends. all circles will be closed and everything will be sequential. If there is gaps, loose ends and all that stuff, then it is a basic proof of third-party presence.
a) does being imply "complete" or partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
b) what if suggested questions seeking suggested answers tempts one to ignore perceivable solution?
c) to be implies "towards being", while being (life) implies within towards (inception towards death)...can you discern the difference?
What among all perceivable (whole) did the perceiving one (partial) not receive on entrance (inception)? What's missing within what's already available?
a) does BE (being) imply HIND (backward; pertaining to the part which follows) or does being (living) imply resisting being progressed (process of dying)?
b) what if questioning "who is be..." implies lacking self discernment about "being"? Why would a being put "who" before "be"? Who could be more important than being oneself?
Sleight of hand: WHO runs the world? The WHO! Another sleight of hand: Horton hears a WHO, from HORTON (Latin hortatio, from hortor, to exhort) - "giving advice; to encourage; to embolden, to cheer).
Can life being moved from inception towards death be stopped? How can any suggested progressivism be considered over perceptibly being processed?
All that "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is"...
a) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); questions and answers represent suggested (information).
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being problem (living) within solution (process of dying)...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
It won't even last 4 years if it happens. It will not be God's Millennium Kingdom but God's 4-year reign of terror, I don't think they can control everyone and everything for 1000 years anymore. The worst however, happens AFTER that reign collapses. You see Cambodia 1975 and you have the big picture.
Yeah, but the Khmer Rouge is simply the most effective of all four of these.
Some of the techniques even go to the Covid World Revolution and the damage is permanent (China and Russia do recover economically, Cambodia is essentially crippled once Kissinger and Mao did with it), so it must be a successful model.
fwiw, the Book of Enoch and Sumeria predate jews and their bullshit. jews or wahatever controls jews/khazars is more-or-less in charge and making a mess right now, but if jews/khazars/their controller up and died right now we've still got various ancient civilizations, Agartha, the Annunnaki, reptillians, and assorted non-earth bound entities to look into.
converting Enki's age to current human scale, even jews are just a bad 7-10 years.
edit: kinda' makes me wonder what qualifies as conspiracy to Annunnaki who are on Annunnaki society's fringe. or reptilians. like, what does the reptilian version of David Icke spend all it's time trying to wake reptillian society up to?
I think these discussions are important because we have to plan our best life- death plans, how to escape the matrix/archon grid of reincarnation.
And for those who have kids, we have to plan generational legacies/winning strategies.
I think we're still waiting on widespread self awareness, which I mean, good luck I guess. If 10 kids are brutalized or killed to make a fancy accessory for the killers and abusers to sell, is it ethical to buy the fancy accessory? Does buying the fancy accessory make someone guilty of supporting the killing and abuse? Is ignorance an excuse in this modern world with such readily available information? Truth is TPTB love it when we blame them for everything and act like helpless innocent victims ourselves. We're still functional little cogs in their death and suffering machine. The next step in enlightenment is reeeeeally uncomfortable and collectively we're not ready. We probably won't see it in our lifetimes.
The return of Jesus Christ and the final judgment.
7 year tribulation comes first. Mark of the Beast and AI empowered by Satan and his chosen. Get ready for Rapture or stay and don’t take the Mark.
This could be year three.
Year 3.5 starts with the asteroid. May 2029. We aren’t quite there yet, but the Rapture is before that - any moment now.
There are differences of opinion on whether the rapture will be before the tribulation.
Name names
When presented with the idea of a conspiracy theory, the average person tends to react in disbelief, saying "But how could such a conspiracy exist? Think of how many people would have to be in on it!" And he has a point. Such a vast conspiracy, spanning many millennia and every nation, simply could not be sustained, moving in the same uniform direction, using a purely material/physical explanation. No, there is someone at the top of the pyramid, directing it all. It is much simpler than we think. No need for a complex web of secret societies and tactics to explain how it functions. The true force behind this global movement of evil is that "negative entity", the prince of this world.
For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Ephesians 6:12
There is true Evil in this world. It's time to align yourself with the side of Good.
There are probably far grander conspiracies orders of magnitude larger and more complex throughout our galaxy and universe, they're just so disconnected from the human experience and human reality that we'll never know of their true scope or existence, perhaps forever. Think about the simple world of a gnat or a squirrel, and how much more complicated the world is, completely beyond their understanding. Why can't the same be true for us? Despite the explosion of progress in the last 800-1000 years for humanity, we still essentially know nothing.
Gnats, squirrels and other animals dont seek what is outside of their boundaries. Taoist believe the world would be simplier if we lived and died in the village we were born in and never sought after the noises we heard outside of our village. Now that is not the world we live in but we are probably behavioral conditioned to interfere with things outside ourselves when all we merely have to do is go about our business probably how the aliens do.
not so sure about squirrels
You'd have to take my word for it, but you've definitely got father to go down basically the same rabbit holes. There's more evidence to collate. One sign that you've arrived is that all conspiracies begin to coalesce into one conspiracy.
As for myself, after many years I still don't feel like I'm at the bottom, but I do feel like I'm running out of evidence that can be sensibly processed. Like, if I start reading up on channelers, I'll know I've gone too far.
Funny you say this now. I just remarked how the board seems to be slowed to a trickle of ideas and few seem able to see over the edge. it's understandable, it's part of the end-game and waits for decisions to be made.
We will always be in for another cycle until the cause of the cycle itself is discovered.
'some kind of demonic negative entity' needs more rabbit-holing until all the different 'kinds' can be distinguished if one were to know one's enemy completely. It's necessary in fact. They vary, but it's what they share in it that counts.
There are positive and negative 'rabbit holes'. At the moment, the obsession is with the negative with good reason. But as to 'what comes after this'....it's about the positive 'rabbit holes'.
All truths have a shadow. Currently, we see only the shadows until we achieve that Great Awakening to the light. But as always, it's 'One Mind At A Time' and there, as here, 'the end won't be for everyone'.
Finally: 'How they did it' - is a discussion of all subjects throughout all time, we call history. Some of it is even true.
Even deeper question then.. have human souls always existed or is a soul created at sex/conception/birth?
Hard to see "over" when standing "under"...
WAIT, verb -"to stop or to continue"...does that represent an option for life, while being moved from inception towards death?
Surrounding of center...
Reality shifting. No. Do a google search.
a) RAPID (speedy in progression) WHOLE (entire)
b) whole represents the foundation (bottom) for each partial (top) within.
a) what comes after this moment(um)? What was there before this moment(um)?
b) THIS, definitive adjective...does adjective (to throw) define (limit) aka does adjective (inception towards death) define (life)?
What started the jewish behavior of exploiting others? What represents the origin of exploitation? What represents the foundation (bottom) for the so called jews to rise to the top?
What if given (inception) and taken (death) implies being (life)? What could life give/take from this process?
Im afraid you are still quite near the top of the rabbit hole.
What comes next is the fake alien invasion as a cover for the prophets in revelation
Bro, you totally missed the annunaki
Pretty much. I did find this interesting. Rather than just saying it’s the Jews and lumping all Jews into the same basket, this seemed a bit better.
https://conspiracies.win/p/16aA98Xjdu/history-of-the-illuminati-sabbat/