a) does being imply "complete" or partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
b) what if suggested questions seeking suggested answers tempts one to ignore perceivable solution?
c) to be implies "towards being", while being (life) implies within towards (inception towards death)...can you discern the difference?
just a reception on...entrance.
What among all perceivable (whole) did the perceiving one (partial) not receive on entrance (inception)? What's missing within what's already available?
who is behind
a) does BE (being) imply HIND (backward; pertaining to the part which follows) or does being (living) imply resisting being progressed (process of dying)?
b) what if questioning "who is be..." implies lacking self discernment about "being"? Why would a being put "who" before "be"? Who could be more important than being oneself?
Sleight of hand: WHO runs the world? The WHO! Another sleight of hand: Horton hears a WHO, from HORTON (Latin hortatio, from hortor, to exhort) - "giving advice; to encourage; to embolden, to cheer).
stopped humanity progress
Can life being moved from inception towards death be stopped? How can any suggested progressivism be considered over perceptibly being processed?
What is the real source
All that "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is"...
The more we know, the more question arise
a) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); questions and answers represent suggested (information).
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being problem (living) within solution (process of dying)...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.
a) does being imply "complete" or partial (perceiving) within whole (perceivable)?
b) what if suggested questions seeking suggested answers tempts one to ignore perceivable solution?
c) to be implies "towards being", while being (life) implies within towards (inception towards death)...can you discern the difference?
What among all perceivable (whole) did the perceiving one (partial) not receive on entrance (inception)? What's missing within what's already available?
a) does BE (being) imply HIND (backward; pertaining to the part which follows) or does being (living) imply resisting being progressed (process of dying)?
b) what if questioning "who is be..." implies lacking self discernment about "being"? Why would a being put "who" before "be"? Who could be more important than being oneself?
Sleight of hand: WHO runs the world? The WHO! Another sleight of hand: Horton hears a WHO, from HORTON (Latin hortatio, from hortor, to exhort) - "giving advice; to encourage; to embolden, to cheer).
Can life being moved from inception towards death be stopped? How can any suggested progressivism be considered over perceptibly being processed?
All that "was" perceivable before one can shape a suggestion about what it "is"...
a) knowledge implies perceivable (inspiration); questions and answers represent suggested (information).
b) being able to perceive perceivable implies being problem (living) within solution (process of dying)...questions and answers tempt one to ignore that.